Ched Evans to Oldham Athletic 12:17 - Jan 4 with 55768 views | exiledclaseboy | Apparently. Cue a few days of outraged reaction until Oldham change their mind. | |
| | |
Ched Evans to Oldham Athletic on 20:32 - Jan 8 with 1412 views | Shaky |
Ched Evans to Oldham Athletic on 20:14 - Jan 8 by Shaky | Well I care you have just deleted the Modou Barrow thread. Or are you denying that? |
You know what, Phil? You are not only unfit to be the chairman of the supporters trust and to own this forum, you are also unfit to be a man at a very basic level. Know what I'm saying? | |
| |
Ched Evans to Oldham Athletic on 20:33 - Jan 8 with 1407 views | trampie |
Ched Evans to Oldham Athletic on 20:25 - Jan 8 by jackonicko | Hi Trampie. In short, no, I don't agree. As I said in my post, based on what I've seen and read, the verdict is entirely plausible and reasonable. The adversarial trial system has its drawbacks, but in the main it delivers good outcomes and is better than anything else I've seen. By good, in the main more guilty people go free than innocent people get punished. Money often talks of course, and usually money is thrown at the best defence teams. I think it's safe to assume that Ched with his financial history wasn't struggling by on legal aid. Most of the examples on here are to say I got drunk at uni and never asked for consent from a drunken girl staggered home with, and think that is a good parallel for this case. They forget its a good parallel for the defendant who was found NOT guilty. The defendant who was found guilty slipped into a hotel room on false pretences, had sex with a barely conscious female he did not know, before slipping out of the fire escape afterwards. That's not usual conduct after a night out at the Students Union - or maybe my Uni days were less exciting than those on here. |
You don't agree that to some people its a questionable verdict ?, yet you set out reasons why it could be seen as a questionable verdict. You might think the verdict is sound but not all people agree, if the level of proof that sent Evans to jail is the norm then little wonder there seems to be more and more convictions for sex crimes which would be a good thing if they are all guilty but a bad thing if its the other way around. | |
| |
Ched Evans to Oldham Athletic on 20:33 - Jan 8 with 1401 views | Parlay |
Ched Evans to Oldham Athletic on 20:32 - Jan 8 by FieryJack | I'm very happy with it. Millions of people are sentenced without 100% clear proof. Why can't you see that? That's what juries are there for - to convict on the evidence provided - whether it's 100% proof or not. A good local example would be the bloke who was locked up for the murder of a family of four women in Clydach in the 80's. As far as I recall there was no clear, incontrovertible proof, no DNA evidence, no witnesses etc. And I don't recall there being an outcry in that case. |
Then he was wrongfully convicted. There doesnt have to be 100% proof but proof beyond reasonable doubt. Which is close to 100%. Balance of probability is reserved for civil cases not criminal. Can you tell me what that proof beyond reasonable doubt is please? [Post edited 8 Jan 2015 20:35]
| |
| |
Ched Evans to Oldham Athletic on 20:36 - Jan 8 with 1380 views | Parlay |
Ched Evans to Oldham Athletic on 20:32 - Jan 8 by Shaky | You know what, Phil? You are not only unfit to be the chairman of the supporters trust and to own this forum, you are also unfit to be a man at a very basic level. Know what I'm saying? |
You will be banned for that. | |
| |
Ched Evans to Oldham Athletic on 20:37 - Jan 8 with 1367 views | Starsky |
Ched Evans to Oldham Athletic on 20:32 - Jan 8 by Shaky | You know what, Phil? You are not only unfit to be the chairman of the supporters trust and to own this forum, you are also unfit to be a man at a very basic level. Know what I'm saying? |
Quite simply... You and Parlay need banning because you're both dragging this site down to its knees with your endless crap. Have the last word and feck off. | |
| It's just the internet, init. |
| |
Ched Evans to Oldham Athletic on 20:38 - Jan 8 with 1363 views | Darran |
Ched Evans to Oldham Athletic on 20:36 - Jan 8 by Parlay | You will be banned for that. |
Hopefully. | |
| |
Ched Evans to Oldham Athletic on 20:39 - Jan 8 with 1357 views | VetchitBack |
Ched Evans to Oldham Athletic on 20:27 - Jan 8 by Parlay | Be careful you will now be accused of boasting about your drinking exploits regardless of its relevance to this case. The amount of things I've consented to that I cant remember doing is truly frightening. Eating a cake laced with copious amounts of cannabis for one, doesn't mean i was force fed it. Its a crazy case which is why it is so controversial. I am amazed at the extent of the pitchfork crew who now dont even believe you need evidence to convict a man. Truly truly terrifying and a sad indictment of modern society and media, social or mainstream. |
It's frightening that many would prefer to have blind faith in our judicial system and mainstream media rather than study the facts. And on an unrelated note why was the Mo Barrow thread taken down which included an actual conviction yet heaps of unsubstantiated dirt were thrown at Leigh Dineen by some very unpleasant people yet thread after thread remained? | |
| The orthodox are always orthodox, regardless of the orthodoxy.
|
| |
Ched Evans to Oldham Athletic on 20:39 - Jan 8 with 1357 views | Shaky |
Ched Evans to Oldham Athletic on 20:36 - Jan 8 by Parlay | You will be banned for that. |
And miss out on the stimulating debate? I couldn't bear the thought. | |
| | Login to get fewer ads
Ched Evans to Oldham Athletic on 20:39 - Jan 8 with 1354 views | Parlay |
Ched Evans to Oldham Athletic on 20:37 - Jan 8 by Starsky | Quite simply... You and Parlay need banning because you're both dragging this site down to its knees with your endless crap. Have the last word and feck off. |
Diddums. Im still waiting for a sensible reply. You should be banned for your offences against debate. Bye. | |
| |
Ched Evans to Oldham Athletic on 20:41 - Jan 8 with 1332 views | reddythered |
Ched Evans to Oldham Athletic on 20:39 - Jan 8 by Shaky | And miss out on the stimulating debate? I couldn't bear the thought. |
I agree, don't ban them. Both are good on forums, have excellent mass debating skills. | |
| |
Ched Evans to Oldham Athletic on 20:44 - Jan 8 with 1324 views | FieryJack |
Ched Evans to Oldham Athletic on 20:33 - Jan 8 by Parlay | Then he was wrongfully convicted. There doesnt have to be 100% proof but proof beyond reasonable doubt. Which is close to 100%. Balance of probability is reserved for civil cases not criminal. Can you tell me what that proof beyond reasonable doubt is please? [Post edited 8 Jan 2015 20:35]
|
"The defendant who was found guilty slipped into a hotel room on false pretences, had sex with a barely conscious female he did not know, before slipping out of the fire escape afterwards." That sounds pretty bad to me - but, I will concede that it cannot be described as "beyond reasonable doubt", though. However, I trust the jury on this one - possibly, if I'm honest, because I'm predisposed to after years of reading about how the justice system has been stacked against rape victims for years. It's this latter fact that makes my blood boil - not the very faint possibility that Evans may be innocent. Too many arrogant, misogynistic, predatory young men - a lot of them footballers, I'd wager - purposely seek to take advantage of drunk women. And that can hardly be doubted. | | | |
Ched Evans to Oldham Athletic on 20:44 - Jan 8 with 1321 views | Starsky |
Ched Evans to Oldham Athletic on 20:39 - Jan 8 by Parlay | Diddums. Im still waiting for a sensible reply. You should be banned for your offences against debate. Bye. |
Listen up you idiot. You had a perfect answer off Jackonicko. So take your endless drivel and feck off somewhere else. Ban him please or witness an exodus of posters that can't be arsed anymore with this endless drivel | |
| It's just the internet, init. |
| |
Ched Evans to Oldham Athletic on 20:47 - Jan 8 with 1313 views | Darran |
Ched Evans to Oldham Athletic on 20:44 - Jan 8 by Starsky | Listen up you idiot. You had a perfect answer off Jackonicko. So take your endless drivel and feck off somewhere else. Ban him please or witness an exodus of posters that can't be arsed anymore with this endless drivel |
I completely agree with this post. | |
| |
Ched Evans to Oldham Athletic on 20:48 - Jan 8 with 1310 views | Parlay |
Ched Evans to Oldham Athletic on 20:44 - Jan 8 by Starsky | Listen up you idiot. You had a perfect answer off Jackonicko. So take your endless drivel and feck off somewhere else. Ban him please or witness an exodus of posters that can't be arsed anymore with this endless drivel |
How about listening to this one "idiot", jackonicko probably covered the other side of the debate perfectly - however it is the side of the debate i disagree with wholeheartedly. Now suck it up or deal with it you pillock. | |
| |
Ched Evans to Oldham Athletic on 20:50 - Jan 8 with 1300 views | Phil_S |
Ched Evans to Oldham Athletic on 20:32 - Jan 8 by Shaky | You know what, Phil? You are not only unfit to be the chairman of the supporters trust and to own this forum, you are also unfit to be a man at a very basic level. Know what I'm saying? |
I have no idea what you are talking about, I have just been out of the room talking to my children about their day and upcoming cub and scout camps So wind your neck in and learn some decency | | | |
Ched Evans to Oldham Athletic on 20:51 - Jan 8 with 1286 views | trampie |
Ched Evans to Oldham Athletic on 20:32 - Jan 8 by FieryJack | I'm very happy with it. Millions of people are sentenced without 100% clear proof. Why can't you see that? That's what juries are there for - to convict on the evidence provided - whether it's 100% proof or not. A good local example would be the bloke who was locked up for the murder of a family of four women in Clydach in the 80's. As far as I recall there was no clear, incontrovertible proof, no DNA evidence, no witnesses etc. And I don't recall there being an outcry in that case. |
Yes but sentenced within the bounds of beyond reasonable doubt. I had to tell an English board about the Suarez/Terry cases, a highbrow board with apparently politicians, professionals, educated people etc etc but they had no concept of different laws and the balance of probabilities. Suarez should not have been charged by the English FA and was [Evra incident] and they would find him guilty when they should not have - it happened as I told that board. Terry taken on by the law, not guilty.........hmm, but would have to be found guilty by the English FA who found a Uruguayan guilty [for less many would say], people could not understand that Terry having got off in a court of law would have to be charged by the FA and found guilty [when the law did not find him guilty] and given at least as stiff a sentence as Suarez was - it happen just as I told that board that it must happen. I was called everything but I was correct all the way down the line, people just didn't know the different tests and how different bodies work. Now should Evans have been found guilty ? [after all I would have thought that a crown court would have a very high level test to attain a guilty verdict], I would say it was a big call by the jury, they may have got it right who knows, but it seems like a big call to quite a few observers. PS Clydach 80's [family of 4] ????, you a way out with your dates, also there has been lots of controversy over the outcome which is still being talked about today. [Post edited 8 Jan 2015 21:07]
| |
| |
Ched Evans to Oldham Athletic on 20:52 - Jan 8 with 1282 views | Parlay |
Ched Evans to Oldham Athletic on 20:44 - Jan 8 by FieryJack | "The defendant who was found guilty slipped into a hotel room on false pretences, had sex with a barely conscious female he did not know, before slipping out of the fire escape afterwards." That sounds pretty bad to me - but, I will concede that it cannot be described as "beyond reasonable doubt", though. However, I trust the jury on this one - possibly, if I'm honest, because I'm predisposed to after years of reading about how the justice system has been stacked against rape victims for years. It's this latter fact that makes my blood boil - not the very faint possibility that Evans may be innocent. Too many arrogant, misogynistic, predatory young men - a lot of them footballers, I'd wager - purposely seek to take advantage of drunk women. And that can hardly be doubted. |
Whose words are they? And how did the person who said those words come to that conclusion. If I said "the defendant won the lottery and spent it all on wine gums" does that mean he did? That sounds like someones view who was not present basing their opinion on very sketchy evidence, so sketchy not one single person dare cite it as evidence on here, nobody. What you have done there is admitted that your opinion is not based on the case at all but indeed your view of footballers in general and how the justice system is stacked against rape. Thats is not a sound base for an opinion. | |
| |
Ched Evans to Oldham Athletic on 20:52 - Jan 8 with 1278 views | ItchySphincter |
Ched Evans to Oldham Athletic on 20:37 - Jan 8 by Starsky | Quite simply... You and Parlay need banning because you're both dragging this site down to its knees with your endless crap. Have the last word and feck off. |
Amazing how offensive they are isn't it? Of course they put it down to they're intellectual superiority. | |
| |
Ched Evans to Oldham Athletic on 20:56 - Jan 8 with 1259 views | Parlay |
Ched Evans to Oldham Athletic on 20:52 - Jan 8 by ItchySphincter | Amazing how offensive they are isn't it? Of course they put it down to they're intellectual superiority. |
Offensive by asking what was the conclusive proof that sent a man to prison? Oh god, i think the internet may not be for you if you are offended by that lad. | |
| |
Ched Evans to Oldham Athletic on 20:58 - Jan 8 with 1251 views | Shaky |
Ched Evans to Oldham Athletic on 20:50 - Jan 8 by Phil_S | I have no idea what you are talking about, I have just been out of the room talking to my children about their day and upcoming cub and scout camps So wind your neck in and learn some decency |
Well a random string of characters didn't materialise out of the ether, creating a perfectly formed SQL statement deleting the thread I started a few hours ago that several people found deeply disconcerting for all the wrong reasons. If somebody is deleting threads without your knowledge, perhaps you should make it your business to investigate thoroughly. | |
| |
Ched Evans to Oldham Athletic on 20:59 - Jan 8 with 1241 views | Oldjack | She don't look very drunk to me http://chedevans.com/judge-for-yourself | |
| Prosser the Tosser dwells on Phil's bum hole like a rusty old hemorrhoid ,fact
You Greedy Bastards Get Out Of OUR Club!
|
| |
Ched Evans to Oldham Athletic on 21:00 - Jan 8 with 1228 views | Phil_S |
Ched Evans to Oldham Athletic on 20:58 - Jan 8 by Shaky | Well a random string of characters didn't materialise out of the ether, creating a perfectly formed SQL statement deleting the thread I started a few hours ago that several people found deeply disconcerting for all the wrong reasons. If somebody is deleting threads without your knowledge, perhaps you should make it your business to investigate thoroughly. |
That's OK I accept your apology I have no desire to communicate with you any more, you showed in three posts the level of your debating power and you clearly have no ability to have a discussion with anyone nor right to have that discussion for that matter. you showed yourself up tonight to be the lowlife you clearly are | | | |
Ched Evans to Oldham Athletic on 21:03 - Jan 8 with 1213 views | Parlay |
Dont be silly that Ched Evans' family website. Everything on there is made up, even the obtained CCTV footage of her in the hotel is somehow fabricated to make her look capable of decisions. I mean she wasn't the one to tell police, and i quote.... "i felt tipsy but not out of control" after all was she...... Silly us. | |
| |
Ched Evans to Oldham Athletic on 21:03 - Jan 8 with 1213 views | Shaky |
Ched Evans to Oldham Athletic on 21:00 - Jan 8 by Phil_S | That's OK I accept your apology I have no desire to communicate with you any more, you showed in three posts the level of your debating power and you clearly have no ability to have a discussion with anyone nor right to have that discussion for that matter. you showed yourself up tonight to be the lowlife you clearly are |
And you are unable to take responsibility for anything. An irresponsible giggling schoolboy. | |
| |
Ched Evans to Oldham Athletic on 21:03 - Jan 8 with 1212 views | FearOfAJackPlanet |
Maybe I have different standards, but she looks f*cking mullered to me. | |
| |
| |