| MOM 23:04 - Dec 4 with 10957 views | Swanseajill |
in my view was the referee. He kept the game flowing with an unbiased view. No strutting or giving the players verbal earbashing. Both sets of players had plenty of respect for him
How refreshing. ....Can we have him every week?  |  | | |  |
| MOM on 15:00 - Dec 5 with 1881 views | Uxbridge |
I can confirm you did PM me. I'm lost for words. |  |
| |
| MOM on 15:25 - Dec 5 with 1855 views | jackonicko |
| MOM on 13:06 - Dec 5 by Shaky |
Don't worry Uxbridge, as I said I'm not an accountant but in my professional experience I've never come across one who is better than me, because my expertise in finance gives me such a big edge.
That said I did on one occasion learn a few arcane tricks from a specialist New York based brand/intangible asset accounting and valuation team from KPMG. |
It's efforts like this that just cry out for the ability to edit quotes. |  | | |
| MOM on 16:09 - Dec 5 with 1842 views | Shaky |
| MOM on 15:00 - Dec 5 by Uxbridge |
I can confirm you did PM me. I'm lost for words. |
Well that's an effect I frequently have on my professional opposition, which is one reason I am still in demand from my old clients more than 10 years after I left the city.
BTW, where did you get your £100m for the club? ?It wouldn't happen to be my number from the summer you argued bitterly was totally outlandish, would it?
 |  |
| |
| MOM on 16:10 - Dec 5 with 1840 views | Shaky |
| MOM on 15:25 - Dec 5 by jackonicko |
It's efforts like this that just cry out for the ability to edit quotes. |
Jog my memory will you please, are you the guy who couldn't operate a calculator? | |
| |
| MOM on 16:13 - Dec 5 with 1837 views | Uxbridge |
| MOM on 16:09 - Dec 5 by Shaky |
Well that's an effect I frequently have on my professional opposition, which is one reason I am still in demand from my old clients more than 10 years after I left the city.
BTW, where did you get your £100m for the club? ?It wouldn't happen to be my number from the summer you argued bitterly was totally outlandish, would it?
|
Hey, it's your figure. I'm glad you also find it laughable now! | |
| |
| MOM on 16:15 - Dec 5 with 1834 views | Shaky |
| MOM on 16:13 - Dec 5 by Uxbridge |
Hey, it's your figure. I'm glad you also find it laughable now! |
That you have appropriated:
"I certainly could never begrudge Huw Jenkins earning what is a relatively small salary for being in charge of what is approaching a £100m company. "
Recognise that quote?
Here is your blog post where you wrote it:
http://planetswans.fansnetwork.co.uk/blogs/6/whose-money-is-it-anyway | |
| |
| MOM on 16:17 - Dec 5 with 1825 views | Shaky |
Honesty is always the best policy Uxbridge, especially in the personal evaluation of what you don't know. | |
| |
| MOM on 16:27 - Dec 5 with 1806 views | Uxbridge |
| MOM on 16:17 - Dec 5 by Shaky |
Honesty is always the best policy Uxbridge, especially in the personal evaluation of what you don't know. |
There's plenty I don't know. The trick is to understand you don't know everything. On the flip side I don't have multiple personas on the interweb depending on whatever the topic is either.
Regarding the £100m, my article related to turnover however concede it isn't explicitly stated. I'm surprised you can be so confident on your valuation when in the previous thread you didn't have the first clue about how much a 5% shareholding had been realised for about 12 months ago and then attempted to put a cringeworthy basic interpretation of translating that into the full value of the company. | |
| |
Login to get fewer ads
| MOM on 16:29 - Dec 5 with 1800 views | Shaky |
| MOM on 16:27 - Dec 5 by Uxbridge |
There's plenty I don't know. The trick is to understand you don't know everything. On the flip side I don't have multiple personas on the interweb depending on whatever the topic is either.
Regarding the £100m, my article related to turnover however concede it isn't explicitly stated. I'm surprised you can be so confident on your valuation when in the previous thread you didn't have the first clue about how much a 5% shareholding had been realised for about 12 months ago and then attempted to put a cringeworthy basic interpretation of translating that into the full value of the company. |
I am not going to go over this again, but the fact is that historical cost is IRRELEVANT.
Ask any expert ;-) | |
| |
| MOM on 16:34 - Dec 5 with 1789 views | Dull1Thomas |
the ball flicked Ash's finger and hardly deviated from its path - really only seen in slomo replays. |  |
| |
| MOM on 16:34 - Dec 5 with 1788 views | Uxbridge |
| MOM on 16:29 - Dec 5 by Shaky |
I am not going to go over this again, but the fact is that historical cost is IRRELEVANT.
Ask any expert ;-) |
Luckily we had an expert on the original thread .... and no, it wasn't either of us. | |
| |
| MOM on 16:38 - Dec 5 with 1781 views | Shaky |
| MOM on 16:34 - Dec 5 by Uxbridge |
Luckily we had an expert on the original thread .... and no, it wasn't either of us. |
Was he the one who couldn't use a calculator?
| |
| |
| MOM on 18:02 - Dec 5 with 1751 views | jackonicko |
| MOM on 16:38 - Dec 5 by Shaky |
Was he the one who couldn't use a calculator?
|
I have people to use calculators. And, thankfully, some super intelligent people who understand this thing called Excel. | | | |
| MOM on 18:16 - Dec 5 with 1737 views | swancity |
This is what happens when a couple of know it alls have a difference of opinion.
 | |
| Only an idiot would eat a turkey curry on Christmas day |
| |
| MOM on 18:51 - Dec 5 with 1711 views | VetchitBack |
Always considered Webb to be one of the few decent refs about. Not a drama queen and seemingly fair.
It is an impossible job nowadays since we allowed cheating and with Sky with their million camera-angles waiting to pounce. |  |
| The orthodox are always orthodox, regardless of the orthodoxy.
|
| |
| MOM on 18:51 - Dec 5 with 1545 views | SwansNZ |
| MOM on 16:34 - Dec 5 by Dull1Thomas |
the ball flicked Ash's finger and hardly deviated from its path - really only seen in slomo replays. |
Nice try to get this thread back on track. |  |
| |
| MOM on 18:53 - Dec 5 with 1539 views | Shaky |
| MOM on 18:02 - Dec 5 by jackonicko |
I have people to use calculators. And, thankfully, some super intelligent people who understand this thing called Excel. |
I'm impressed. Honest.
Edit: But disappointed you failed to answer my direct question. And in case of confusion, the geezer I have in mind also had some pretentious latin twaddle about Anfield in his signature on the old board. Ring a bell? [Post edited 5 Dec 2013 19:06]
| |
| |
| MOM on 23:43 - Dec 5 with 1477 views | jackonicko |
| MOM on 18:53 - Dec 5 by Shaky |
I'm impressed. Honest.
Edit: But disappointed you failed to answer my direct question. And in case of confusion, the geezer I have in mind also had some pretentious latin twaddle about Anfield in his signature on the old board. Ring a bell? [Post edited 5 Dec 2013 19:06]
|
I did answer your direct question. I don't use calculators.
Back on thread. Never a sending off. it comes to something when the commentators have to praise a player for not feigning injury. He didnt touch him and at best was handbags. well done Webb.
for the two penalty shouts that Pardew, Ginola and Shearer whined on about, we have been denied waaaay more blatant ones than them. And equally had much softer ones given against us. So, pretty even.
Ironically, the most likely shout was Ash's handball on the edge of the box in the lead up to the Davies handball. Ash had his hands above his head and to be honest we would have little argument had that one been given against us.
Who gives a f**k? We are not even close to having terrible ref decisions evened out yet. That's just a very small entry in the credit column. | | | |
| MOM on 23:51 - Dec 5 with 1472 views | WarwickHunt |
Pardew's reasoning that the shot that hit Ben was on target and therefore a penalty made me laugh out loud.
Chewing gum during the press conference was a nice touch too.
Stay classy, Al.
Be thankful we have a bullsh1t-free, class act like Laudrup as our manager. [Post edited 5 Dec 2013 23:52]
|  | | |
| MOM on 23:53 - Dec 5 with 1468 views | jackonicko |
| MOM on 23:51 - Dec 5 by WarwickHunt |
Pardew's reasoning that the shot that hit Ben was on target and therefore a penalty made me laugh out loud.
Chewing gum during the press conference was a nice touch too.
Stay classy, Al.
Be thankful we have a bullsh1t-free, class act like Laudrup as our manager. [Post edited 5 Dec 2013 23:52]
|
I am thankful. Just wish he would wave his arms a bit more. | | | |
| MOM on 00:11 - Dec 6 with 1460 views | SwansNZ |
| MOM on 23:51 - Dec 5 by WarwickHunt |
Pardew's reasoning that the shot that hit Ben was on target and therefore a penalty made me laugh out loud.
Chewing gum during the press conference was a nice touch too.
Stay classy, Al.
Be thankful we have a bullsh1t-free, class act like Laudrup as our manager. [Post edited 5 Dec 2013 23:52]
|
"Pardew's reasoning that the shot that hit Ben was on target and therefore a penalty made me laugh out loud"
... and it must have been a penalty because his players appealed for it | |
| |
| MOM on 09:03 - Dec 6 with 1426 views | Uxbridge |
| MOM on 23:53 - Dec 5 by jackonicko |
I am thankful. Just wish he would wave his arms a bit more. |
OOF. Leave the poor lad alone mun, it's getting cruel now! | |
| |
| MOM on 09:05 - Dec 6 with 1422 views | WarwickHunt |
| MOM on 23:53 - Dec 5 by jackonicko |
I am thankful. Just wish he would wave his arms a bit more. |
You can't have everything. | | | |
| MOM on 11:19 - Dec 6 with 1364 views | Shaky |
OT jackonicko,
My last post on this, but you really aren't endearing yourself to me with you evasiveness.
If as seems likely from your comments you are indeed the guy in question, we both know it wasn't that you were a few decimals out in your calculations, but rather the fact to was something in the order of a 100x factor.
Even Darran spotted the error it was such a whopper, and there is no way you can not only make the initial miscalculation but then go on to write a post on that basis, if you are used to working with these types of numbers in any kind of professional capacity in the city. Natural law of selection says you get eaten alive at the first hurdle.
You you may work in the city somewhere say in compliance or bookkeeping or sales of some sort, but you sure as as shit aren't facing clients in anything remotely related to valuation; there's no way standards have slipped that far. | |
| |
| MOM on 11:51 - Dec 6 with 1335 views | Uxbridge |
Well, far be it from me to point out to a Global M&A titan like yourself that being out by a factor of 10 or 100 would indeed be a matter of a decimal place in the wrong place.
The internet truly is a strange place sometimes. I can understand why somebody would seek to pass themselves off as something interesting, but this? Weird. | |
| |
| |
By continuing to use the site, you agree to our use of cookies and to abide by our Terms and Conditions.
