| The Resurrections Agenda 09:02 - Oct 30 with 10573 views | Darran |
Well it's quite obvious that he's oblivious to what was in The Trust statement from last week anyway,surely if he had read it he'd be 10 times more vociferous about the sellouts than the Trust considering what they've done to the club and Trust.
Summin not right here it's as if he's in cohorts with one of them simply to bring the Trust down.
As I said a couple of days ago anyone that doesn't see the Trust/Huw Cooze business as the lesser of two evils by a country mile must be the as thick as f*ck.
Not to be mentioning the other business considering he's been so critical of Dineen and Jenkins in the past.
Very strange,very strange indeed. |  |
| |  |
| The Resurrections Agenda on 18:53 - Oct 30 with 1214 views | Loyal |
| The Resurrections Agenda on 18:45 - Oct 30 by Pacemaker |
You need to learn the law.
Conspiracy under common law is to conspire ( i.e. all together) to commit a criminal offence at some time in the future. If there is no criminal offence alleged then you cannot be guilty of conspiracy to commit.
Common Law just means that no act of Parliament was passed to make it law.
What you and others have stated on here are conspiracy theories which is something you read about on the internet all the time on forums such as this. |
Wrong,
I've already stated the offence. The conspiracy element I've explained as well. And not all of them need to be involved it can be committed in part or by two or more people. Fck me there's some likely lads on here. [Post edited 30 Oct 2016 18:55]
|  |
| Nolan sympathiser, clout expert, personal friend of Leigh Dineen, advocate and enforcer of porridge swallows.
The official inventor of the tit w@nk. | | Poll: | Who should be Swansea number 1 |
| |
| The Resurrections Agenda on 18:55 - Oct 30 with 1203 views | exiledclaseboy |
| The Resurrections Agenda on 18:53 - Oct 30 by Loyal |
Wrong,
I've already stated the offence. The conspiracy element I've explained as well. And not all of them need to be involved it can be committed in part or by two or more people. Fck me there's some likely lads on here. [Post edited 30 Oct 2016 18:55]
|
Mate. He's a lawyer. An actual proper lawyer. This I know for a fact. |  |
| |
| The Resurrections Agenda on 18:55 - Oct 30 with 1198 views | Murph75 |
| The Resurrections Agenda on 18:55 - Oct 30 by exiledclaseboy |
Mate. He's a lawyer. An actual proper lawyer. This I know for a fact. |
Awkward |  | | |
| The Resurrections Agenda on 18:56 - Oct 30 with 1189 views | Nookiejack |
| The Resurrections Agenda on 16:30 - Oct 30 by TheResurrection |
I think it's important to make it clear. And I thank you for your well balanced post because I know you find it really difficult to post anything sensible, normally.
But it was never about him being on the make as you put it.
It was always more about the going into battle and bringing up thorny issues whilst being dependent on his overall income streams.
He should never have been put in a position to even worry about these things yet the Trust Board deemed them satisfactory.
They are the real problems here, not Cooze. He just got on with things and was put in a terrible position by both the Trust and the Board of Directors.
I understand he will keep the SLO role and I think he's the right man for the job
He just should never have been Trust Director and the real problems are still here today.
It's their fault and from what I'm hearing it's them who are going to get another chance to make more mistakes.
. |
Do we understand if the Club is going to pay Huw Cooze for SLO role? |  | | |
| The Resurrections Agenda on 18:58 - Oct 30 with 1178 views | Loyal |
| The Resurrections Agenda on 18:55 - Oct 30 by exiledclaseboy |
Mate. He's a lawyer. An actual proper lawyer. This I know for a fact. |
Then he needs to get a proper job 😂ðŸ‘
My work is done here, a topic posted since I have started these discussions on here has been made which should have been done a week ago. As I said my work is done, just a shame it took this long.
Enjoy the evening planet swans, now I really do have to mix with proper people. | |
| Nolan sympathiser, clout expert, personal friend of Leigh Dineen, advocate and enforcer of porridge swallows.
The official inventor of the tit w@nk. | | Poll: | Who should be Swansea number 1 |
| |
| The Resurrections Agenda on 19:01 - Oct 30 with 1146 views | exiledclaseboy |
| The Resurrections Agenda on 18:58 - Oct 30 by Loyal |
Then he needs to get a proper job 😂ðŸ‘
My work is done here, a topic posted since I have started these discussions on here has been made which should have been done a week ago. As I said my work is done, just a shame it took this long.
Enjoy the evening planet swans, now I really do have to mix with proper people. |
See ya, Rumpole. | |
| |
| The Resurrections Agenda on 19:03 - Oct 30 with 1116 views | monmouth |
| The Resurrections Agenda on 19:01 - Oct 30 by exiledclaseboy |
See ya, Rumpole. |
Don't. You might conjure up the real legal eagle.... |  |
| |
| The Resurrections Agenda on 19:05 - Oct 30 with 1103 views | exiledclaseboy |
| The Resurrections Agenda on 19:03 - Oct 30 by monmouth |
Don't. You might conjure up the real legal eagle.... |
I read some of Shaky on the other site earlier. He's still pleasantly mental. And brevity is still not Spratty's forte [Post edited 30 Oct 2016 19:08]
| |
| |
Login to get fewer ads
| The Resurrections Agenda on 19:14 - Oct 30 with 1070 views | BigPhilG |
| The Resurrections Agenda on 18:48 - Oct 30 by TheResurrection |
big Phil? How do you know me? |
For the benefit of any doubt I will not be revealing any personal details to anyone on this forum |  | | |
| The Resurrections Agenda on 19:15 - Oct 30 with 1062 views | Darran |
| The Resurrections Agenda on 19:14 - Oct 30 by BigPhilG |
For the benefit of any doubt I will not be revealing any personal details to anyone on this forum |
Don't tell him Pike. | |
| |
| The Resurrections Agenda on 19:17 - Oct 30 with 1050 views | BigPhilG |
| The Resurrections Agenda on 19:15 - Oct 30 by Darran |
Don't tell him Pike. |
Brilliant | | | |
| The Resurrections Agenda on 19:19 - Oct 30 with 1038 views | Jackfath |
| The Resurrections Agenda on 19:14 - Oct 30 by BigPhilG |
For the benefit of any doubt I will not be revealing any personal details to anyone on this forum |
Unless of course someone already knows who you are.
 |  |
| |
| The Resurrections Agenda on 19:47 - Oct 30 with 980 views | BigPhilG |
| The Resurrections Agenda on 19:19 - Oct 30 by Jackfath |
Unless of course someone already knows who you are.
|
I hadn't thought of that | | | |
| The Resurrections Agenda on 19:51 - Oct 30 with 959 views | Darran |
| The Resurrections Agenda on 19:19 - Oct 30 by Jackfath |
Unless of course someone already knows who you are.
|
I've had some nice PMs off Big Philip in the past. | |
| |
| The Resurrections Agenda on 20:02 - Oct 30 with 924 views | TheResurrection |
Phil Sumbler
See the above and it's up to you what you want me to do with your private messages to me. |  |
| |
| The Resurrections Agenda on 20:29 - Oct 30 with 843 views | Starsky |
| The Resurrections Agenda on 16:30 - Oct 30 by TheResurrection |
I think it's important to make it clear. And I thank you for your well balanced post because I know you find it really difficult to post anything sensible, normally.
But it was never about him being on the make as you put it.
It was always more about the going into battle and bringing up thorny issues whilst being dependent on his overall income streams.
He should never have been put in a position to even worry about these things yet the Trust Board deemed them satisfactory.
They are the real problems here, not Cooze. He just got on with things and was put in a terrible position by both the Trust and the Board of Directors.
I understand he will keep the SLO role and I think he's the right man for the job
He just should never have been Trust Director and the real problems are still here today.
It's their fault and from what I'm hearing it's them who are going to get another chance to make more mistakes.
. |
I have to agree with this. |  |
| It's just the internet, init. |
| |
| The Resurrections Agenda on 20:34 - Oct 30 with 820 views | Starsky |
| The Resurrections Agenda on 18:25 - Oct 30 by Uxbridge |
Maybe it should have been taken off. Life would certainly have been easier.
The issue of the SD/SLO role is still entirely its own issue though. That in itself should not have happened. The printing business does not make that more or less an conflict of interest. |
Disagree | |
| It's just the internet, init. |
| |
| The Resurrections Agenda on 20:37 - Oct 30 with 807 views | BigPhilG |
| The Resurrections Agenda on 19:51 - Oct 30 by Darran |
I've had some nice PMs off Big Philip in the past. |
That's true and I had some nice ones back. Why wouldn't they be ? They weren't about T2C either | | | |
| |
By continuing to use the site, you agree to our use of cookies and to abide by our Terms and Conditions.
