Pride tomorrow 23:04 - Jun 26 with 18755 views | Darran | Another complete and utter waste of the countries money. Just f*ck off and get on with your lives. | |
| | |
Pride tomorrow on 19:03 - Jun 28 with 1340 views | Curcubita_Ultra |
Pride tomorrow on 18:30 - Jun 28 by dgt73 | What scientific facts......? The only scientific fact that I'd like to know is what happened pre- Big Bang ? [Post edited 28 Jun 2015 18:32]
|
I can shed some light on this question. Janice down Studio 95 said you popped a little blue pill. | | | |
Pride tomorrow on 19:05 - Jun 28 with 1334 views | londonlisa2001 |
Pride tomorrow on 18:39 - Jun 28 by dgt73 | Perceived wisdom states the Big Bang happened some 13.7 billion yrs ago........now I'm not disputing this event taking place.......i just want someone from the scientific community to tell me what happened pre - 13.7 billon yrs ago....? |
I'm pretty sure that no one knows. There are theories about it - one being that the universe is constantly expanding and then contracting, so at the moment it is expanding, that will stop as the force of expansion becomes no longer powerful enough to stop the gravitational pull back to the centre so it will begin to contract to a single point again at which point the energy created will be so huge it will force another 'Big Bang' and so it continues. Forever. Since there is no 'before' as time doesn't exist other than as a man made concept. But I haven't a clue and find it all fairly incomprehensible. What I do know is that the Bible isn't correct on the subject. Which rather suggests it is not correct on a host of other things, since that's pretty much the one it starts with. Maybe then, it's just man trying to explain things they don't understand rather than anything else, so maybe we should treat it as such? | | | |
Pride tomorrow on 19:14 - Jun 28 with 1314 views | dgt73 |
Pride tomorrow on 19:05 - Jun 28 by londonlisa2001 | I'm pretty sure that no one knows. There are theories about it - one being that the universe is constantly expanding and then contracting, so at the moment it is expanding, that will stop as the force of expansion becomes no longer powerful enough to stop the gravitational pull back to the centre so it will begin to contract to a single point again at which point the energy created will be so huge it will force another 'Big Bang' and so it continues. Forever. Since there is no 'before' as time doesn't exist other than as a man made concept. But I haven't a clue and find it all fairly incomprehensible. What I do know is that the Bible isn't correct on the subject. Which rather suggests it is not correct on a host of other things, since that's pretty much the one it starts with. Maybe then, it's just man trying to explain things they don't understand rather than anything else, so maybe we should treat it as such? |
And there's me thinking science had all the answers what is the universe expanding into ? | |
| |
Pride tomorrow on 19:17 - Jun 28 with 1302 views | Curcubita_Ultra | "what is the universe expanding into ?" Polyester slacks like the rest of us probably... | | | |
Pride tomorrow on 19:18 - Jun 28 with 1296 views | dickythorpe | I Wonder if when I log on tomorrow morning that this will be a 12 pager? | | | |
Pride tomorrow on 19:26 - Jun 28 with 1281 views | Darran |
Pride tomorrow on 19:18 - Jun 28 by dickythorpe | I Wonder if when I log on tomorrow morning that this will be a 12 pager? |
Old skool thread Dick. | |
| |
Pride tomorrow on 19:28 - Jun 28 with 1275 views | dickythorpe |
Pride tomorrow on 19:26 - Jun 28 by Darran | Old skool thread Dick. |
Thank feck old bladder balls hasn't commented yet!!!! | | | |
Pride tomorrow on 19:30 - Jun 28 with 1272 views | Darran |
Pride tomorrow on 19:28 - Jun 28 by dickythorpe | Thank feck old bladder balls hasn't commented yet!!!! |
He's probably out with his boyfriend. | |
| | Login to get fewer ads
Pride tomorrow on 19:33 - Jun 28 with 1265 views | dickythorpe |
Pride tomorrow on 19:30 - Jun 28 by Darran | He's probably out with his boyfriend. |
| | | |
Pride tomorrow on 19:37 - Jun 28 with 1261 views | ItchySphincter |
Pride tomorrow on 15:47 - Jun 28 by Davillin | You might clarify for me your first sentence, please. Which "side" is the "one side of the argument" that is not able to accept the other side? It seems to me that one should more accurately say that there are persons on both sides of the argument who are not able to accept the other side. That is the basis of the extreme hypocrisy of some. "My opinion is the only right opinion, and if you don't agree, you're a bigot" [or substitute any other pejorative you wish]. By the way, is "dinosaurs" an example of name-calling of people with whom you disagree? One could -- with a bit of a stretch -- see that as a compliment. Nah. |
In a handful of lines I managed to upset the conservatives and the liberals. How'd I do that then? | |
| |
Pride tomorrow on 19:38 - Jun 28 with 1259 views | Darran |
Wilfrid Brambell c*nt. | |
| |
Pride tomorrow on 19:44 - Jun 28 with 1250 views | dgt73 |
Pride tomorrow on 18:58 - Jun 28 by londonlisa2001 | If you're not religious, then using the whole 'Adam and Steve' argument is simply, as Clasie pointed out, a convenient cover for your own bigotry. You can't quote the Bible to support your argument and then say you don't believe in it? |
Did I say i don't believe it ? I must have missed that. | |
| |
Pride tomorrow on 19:44 - Jun 28 with 1250 views | Treforys_Jack |
Pride tomorrow on 19:30 - Jun 28 by Darran | He's probably out with his boyfriend. |
Genuine LOL moment. | | | |
Pride tomorrow on 20:53 - Jun 28 with 1209 views | Davillin |
Pride tomorrow on 18:55 - Jun 28 by dgt73 | Well its like saying......is everyone who gets married in a church - religious ? Have i said I'm religious ? I must have missed that....? |
dgt, some simple advice for you, which I hope you will accept. You can't succeed in this discussion. [I had first written "win this argument," but it's not really an "argument."] One can never succeed in any discussion when faced off against the classic art of shifting the discussion, or, as we say over here, "moving the goalposts." And introducing straw men, attributing them to you, and knocking them down. Be especially wary when the straw men [and straw womyn] come from the confusion of religion with that old bugaboo "the Bible," and that other old bugaboo "science." And closed minds. And intolerance -- doubly unacceptable when used to accuse you of intolerance. And fury. Oh, the carnage! Oh, the bloodletting! | |
| |
Pride tomorrow on 20:56 - Jun 28 with 1202 views | exiledclaseboy | Some people do get very hot under the collar about the gays don't they? I find it very odd. | |
| |
Pride tomorrow on 20:59 - Jun 28 with 1195 views | ItchySphincter | It's cos they're gayist init. [Post edited 28 Jun 2015 21:02]
| |
| |
Pride tomorrow on 21:00 - Jun 28 with 1193 views | Neath_Jack | Some people try to dress their obvious homophobia in very interesting turns of phrases. | |
| |
Pride tomorrow on 21:01 - Jun 28 with 1192 views | londonlisa2001 |
Pride tomorrow on 20:53 - Jun 28 by Davillin | dgt, some simple advice for you, which I hope you will accept. You can't succeed in this discussion. [I had first written "win this argument," but it's not really an "argument."] One can never succeed in any discussion when faced off against the classic art of shifting the discussion, or, as we say over here, "moving the goalposts." And introducing straw men, attributing them to you, and knocking them down. Be especially wary when the straw men [and straw womyn] come from the confusion of religion with that old bugaboo "the Bible," and that other old bugaboo "science." And closed minds. And intolerance -- doubly unacceptable when used to accuse you of intolerance. And fury. Oh, the carnage! Oh, the bloodletting! |
I see that you are persisting with your use of 'womyn' because you believe it to be both clever and pointed. How wrong you are on both counts. I will not bother commenting on the rest. | | | |
Pride tomorrow on 21:01 - Jun 28 with 1188 views | exiledclaseboy |
Pride tomorrow on 20:59 - Jun 28 by ItchySphincter | It's cos they're gayist init. [Post edited 28 Jun 2015 21:02]
|
That's one potential explanation! | |
| |
Pride tomorrow on 21:01 - Jun 28 with 1187 views | Davillin |
Pride tomorrow on 20:56 - Jun 28 by exiledclaseboy | Some people do get very hot under the collar about the gays don't they? I find it very odd. |
As long as they don't get hot under the belt, it's O.K., don't you think? p,s, I trust you weren't referring to my post immediately above yours, as it is inapropos to your post. | |
| |
Pride tomorrow on 21:03 - Jun 28 with 1178 views | exiledclaseboy |
Pride tomorrow on 21:01 - Jun 28 by Davillin | As long as they don't get hot under the belt, it's O.K., don't you think? p,s, I trust you weren't referring to my post immediately above yours, as it is inapropos to your post. |
I'm referring to the thread in general, your contributions included. It's certainly a subject you seem to be passionate about. | |
| |
Pride tomorrow on 21:04 - Jun 28 with 1176 views | Davillin |
Pride tomorrow on 21:00 - Jun 28 by Neath_Jack | Some people try to dress their obvious homophobia in very interesting turns of phrases. |
Like yours above? | |
| |
Pride tomorrow on 21:07 - Jun 28 with 1171 views | londonlisa2001 |
Pride tomorrow on 20:56 - Jun 28 by exiledclaseboy | Some people do get very hot under the collar about the gays don't they? I find it very odd. |
Do you? I find it fairly easy to understand. I have never met anyone that was comfortable and confident with their own sexuality (whether male or female) who was stridently anti gay. Why on earth would they be? Why is it, I wonder, that women are in general so much more at ease about sexual preference than men are? That's a whole new topic I guess. | | | |
Pride tomorrow on 21:24 - Jun 28 with 1154 views | monmouth | Glad to see Lisa kicking a fair bit of ass in this thread. Why wouldn't people celebrate the easing of millennia of repression and discrimination? And why does anyone feel the need to care about which body parts people like to rub together in private? It even pays for itself! | |
| |
| |