The Andrew Interview. 21:59 - Nov 16 with 16111 views | lifelong | Anyone else watch it? I found it rather cringeworthy. | | | | |
The Andrew Interview. on 06:50 - Nov 18 with 1540 views | sainthelens | The world and its wife know deep down what's happened regarding his involvement. What offends me is that he is treating us like fckn idiots. And if anyone is naive to think he will ever be convicted is living in fantasy land. Royals are the most protected species on earth. The log book with times etc( his bodyguards) for his whereabouts will never be made public. | | | |
The Andrew Interview. on 07:23 - Nov 18 with 1515 views | WarwickHunt |
The Andrew Interview. on 01:04 - Nov 18 by Groo | You are a self rightous little Cnt arn't you. |
Are these Canadian spellings? | | | |
The Andrew Interview. on 08:42 - Nov 18 with 1474 views | raynor94 |
The Andrew Interview. on 01:04 - Nov 18 by Groo | You are a self rightous little Cnt arn't you. |
Surely a ban is warranted here? | |
| |
The Andrew Interview. on 08:54 - Nov 18 with 1466 views | Fireboy2 |
The Andrew Interview. on 08:42 - Nov 18 by raynor94 | Surely a ban is warranted here? |
Seconded. | | | |
The Andrew Interview. on 09:14 - Nov 18 with 1453 views | Darran |
The Andrew Interview. on 08:42 - Nov 18 by raynor94 | Surely a ban is warranted here? |
What for speaking the truth? | |
| |
The Andrew Interview. on 09:26 - Nov 18 with 1444 views | 3swan | Whether a ban is the correct course of action or not is down to admin, but as a general statement it isn’t the actual words used, but intent, that seems more a valid reason. We are getting more and more posts attacking a poster, than questioning their posts with controlled responses. Rose tinted glasses I know, but the humour that was on this site, and Jackarmy, seems to be getting less. Maybe a bit more leeway in accepting points of views are needed or just a shrug of the shoulder that others can see things differently. Maybe new week, new start? | | | |
The Andrew Interview. on 09:33 - Nov 18 with 1433 views | Darran |
The Andrew Interview. on 09:26 - Nov 18 by 3swan | Whether a ban is the correct course of action or not is down to admin, but as a general statement it isn’t the actual words used, but intent, that seems more a valid reason. We are getting more and more posts attacking a poster, than questioning their posts with controlled responses. Rose tinted glasses I know, but the humour that was on this site, and Jackarmy, seems to be getting less. Maybe a bit more leeway in accepting points of views are needed or just a shrug of the shoulder that others can see things differently. Maybe new week, new start? |
It’s ok for her to call people morons whenever she feels like though eh? I agree about the humour bit though. | |
| |
The Andrew Interview. on 09:42 - Nov 18 with 1424 views | 3swan |
The Andrew Interview. on 09:33 - Nov 18 by Darran | It’s ok for her to call people morons whenever she feels like though eh? I agree about the humour bit though. |
I'm not going to get involved in individual 'who said what' but I think I've covered it in the second part of the first first paragraph. It doesn't need what is accepted as a swear word too be wrong. | | | | Login to get fewer ads
The Andrew Interview. on 10:24 - Nov 18 with 1386 views | Darran | | |
| |
The Andrew Interview. on 10:41 - Nov 18 with 1375 views | theloneranger |
And ... That is the case for the prosecution!! | |
| Everyday above ground ... Is a good day! 😎 |
| |
The Andrew Interview. on 11:49 - Nov 18 with 1328 views | sainthelens | With Maxwell's daughter going AWOL, and the net closing in , you have to wonder how long before she's washed up on a beach somewhere. This cover up will be never ending. | | | |
The Andrew Interview. on 12:06 - Nov 18 with 1309 views | swancity |
The Andrew Interview. on 08:42 - Nov 18 by raynor94 | Surely a ban is warranted here? |
If you banned people for calling others a cu nt there’d be no one left. 😂😂 | |
| Only an idiot would eat a turkey curry on Christmas day |
| |
The Andrew Interview. on 12:07 - Nov 18 with 1306 views | Swanjaxs | Just when he thought things couldn't get any worse... Prince Andrew accused of using N-word https://f7td5.app.goo.gl/HJHPNj Sent via @updayUK | |
| |
The Andrew Interview. on 12:10 - Nov 18 with 1297 views | Darran |
The Andrew Interview. on 12:06 - Nov 18 by swancity | If you banned people for calling others a cu nt there’d be no one left. 😂😂 |
Exactly you bald ćunt. | |
| |
The Andrew Interview. on 12:11 - Nov 18 with 1295 views | Swanjaxs |
The Andrew Interview. on 12:10 - Nov 18 by Darran | Exactly you bald ćunt. |
You can't accuse somebody of being bald! Ban surely! | |
| |
The Andrew Interview. on 12:27 - Nov 18 with 1278 views | A_Fans_Dad |
The Andrew Interview. on 11:49 - Nov 18 by sainthelens | With Maxwell's daughter going AWOL, and the net closing in , you have to wonder how long before she's washed up on a beach somewhere. This cover up will be never ending. |
This. You can undersatnd her going to ground. Putting herself in the hands of the authorities is a death (suicide) sentence. But she can't hide from them (and I don't mean the authorities) for long | | | |
The Andrew Interview. on 12:35 - Nov 18 with 1271 views | swancity |
The Andrew Interview. on 12:10 - Nov 18 by Darran | Exactly you bald ćunt. |
Phuck off u scruffy cu nt | |
| Only an idiot would eat a turkey curry on Christmas day |
| |
The Andrew Interview. on 12:36 - Nov 18 with 1268 views | swancity |
The Andrew Interview. on 12:11 - Nov 18 by Swanjaxs | You can't accuse somebody of being bald! Ban surely! |
Yes def ban the cu nt | |
| Only an idiot would eat a turkey curry on Christmas day |
| |
The Andrew Interview. on 12:44 - Nov 18 with 1253 views | londonlisa2001 |
The Andrew Interview. on 08:42 - Nov 18 by raynor94 | Surely a ban is warranted here? |
No one needs to be banned. I called him a moron so he’s entitled to respond. I’m sure both of us feel that we’re right! | | | |
The Andrew Interview. on 12:55 - Nov 18 with 1236 views | londonlisa2001 |
The Andrew Interview. on 09:26 - Nov 18 by 3swan | Whether a ban is the correct course of action or not is down to admin, but as a general statement it isn’t the actual words used, but intent, that seems more a valid reason. We are getting more and more posts attacking a poster, than questioning their posts with controlled responses. Rose tinted glasses I know, but the humour that was on this site, and Jackarmy, seems to be getting less. Maybe a bit more leeway in accepting points of views are needed or just a shrug of the shoulder that others can see things differently. Maybe new week, new start? |
That’s a fair point. I would say, however, that it’s quite hard to post controlled responses when quite venal views are constantly repeated. Maybe we should try harder, but I’m not sure it’s right to say that less leeway is being given to different points of view. I believe it may be more accurate to say that points of view which are becoming more and more extreme are becoming the norm. The natural reaction is to become less good humoured about our reactions to them. Particularly when such extreme views are so often at the expense of the same groups and being expressed by the same people. | | | |
The Andrew Interview. on 13:01 - Nov 18 with 1227 views | londonlisa2001 |
The Andrew Interview. on 12:27 - Nov 18 by A_Fans_Dad | This. You can undersatnd her going to ground. Putting herself in the hands of the authorities is a death (suicide) sentence. But she can't hide from them (and I don't mean the authorities) for long |
If rumours are true that she is in possession of a lot of evidence concerning some powerful people, that’s one hell of an insurance policy if it sits somewhere to be emailed to the world’s media if anything happens to her. Because otherwise, as you say, her chances of a long and healthy life seem very slim. | | | |
The Andrew Interview. on 13:15 - Nov 18 with 1198 views | ladyjack |
The Andrew Interview. on 21:56 - Nov 17 by londonlisa2001 | Try to understand you moron: The accusation (that you describe as mudslinging) is that Epstein had girls of various ages who were being trafficked as sex slaves.actualky it’s not even an accusation. It’s been proved. And one of them at least has accused Prince Andrew as having sex with her. On three occasions. In London, New York and in most of the civilised world, keeping sex slaves is, in fact, illegal. Forcing them to have sex with guests is illegal. The sheer evil of it should go without saying. It makes no sodding difference what the age of consent for sex is. The key word is CONSENT. Being kept as a slave and forced to have sex is not consent. To make matters even worse she was underage as well. Andrew, in the interview last night, described there being ‘staff’. You CANNOT have staff whose job it is is to have sex. It’s illegal. The accusation is that he knew damn well what was going on. No one has said he’s been proved guilty. Everyone normal is saying he should be bloody investigated. You understand that Andrew was staying with this monster AFTER he’d been convicted. He expressed no remorse. In fact he didn’t even mention the kids. You should also understand that this mate of his, had girls as young as twelve being sold to him as sex slaves. Two sisters, aged 12, were allegedly supplied to him as a birthday present. For him to have sex with. You get that? The bloke he went on holiday with. Stayed with. And yes, many others are being accused. Now p*ss off and find yourself a moral code. It makes no difference whether you’re a fan. You quite obviously don’t see anything wrong with these young kids being shipped around the world to satisfy the perverted desires of these monsters. ‘Ooh, ooh, but I think you’ll find the age of consent was 16... ‘ get stuffed. |
is there a yellow card smiley on here ? [Post edited 18 Nov 2019 13:20]
| | | |
The Andrew Interview. on 13:18 - Nov 18 with 1190 views | ladyjack | I'm the only person that gets banned from here for Porthcawl and i'm one of the best behaved posters on this site if I say so myself. | | | |
| |