By continuing to use the site, you agree to our use of cookies and to abide by our Terms and Conditions. We in turn value your personal details in accordance with our Privacy Policy.
Please log in or register. Registered visitors get fewer ads.
Seriously though, you’ve been waxing lyrical about this for hours without even having bothered to look at the source material that led to the thread. Madness.
The Andrew Interview. on 20:31 - Nov 17 by exiledclaseboy
Seriously though, you’ve been waxing lyrical about this for hours without even having bothered to look at the source material that led to the thread. Madness.
I've not argued anything about his conduct or his comments in the interview though.
I'm just raising the fact that he actually committed no crime.
The guy who organised that party it appears committed crimes and Prince Andrew was one of no doubt many guests. He no doubt arranged many parties and gatherings to which Prince Andrew did not attend.
If Prince Andrew is guilty, then so are many others who attended the same and other functions.
I'm no fan of Prince Andrew by the way.
Groo does what Groo does best
0
The Andrew Interview. on 20:37 - Nov 17 with 1581 views
The Andrew Interview. on 20:31 - Nov 17 by exiledclaseboy
Seriously though, you’ve been waxing lyrical about this for hours without even having bothered to look at the source material that led to the thread. Madness.
Normal, when you have preconcieved views. Think Brexit, Evidence or reality is utterly irrelevant.
I've not argued anything about his conduct or his comments in the interview though.
I'm just raising the fact that he actually committed no crime.
The guy who organised that party it appears committed crimes and Prince Andrew was one of no doubt many guests. He no doubt arranged many parties and gatherings to which Prince Andrew did not attend.
If Prince Andrew is guilty, then so are many others who attended the same and other functions.
I'm no fan of Prince Andrew by the way.
Has anyone actually accused him of committing a crime?
The Andrew Interview. on 20:46 - Nov 17 by exiledclaseboy
And Andrew stayed with him for four days after his release from prison for that conviction.
If you’d watched the interview or actually, y’know, read anything about this you’d know this stuff. It helps when forming an opinion.
#PrinceAndrew So I didn't speak to him for 4 years because it wasn't appropriate, but when he was released from prison for sex offences I didn't ring him..no.., I flew to America to tell him in person that I STILL wasn't going to talk to him...RUN THAT BY ME AGAIN 🤔🤔
I've not argued anything about his conduct or his comments in the interview though.
I'm just raising the fact that he actually committed no crime.
The guy who organised that party it appears committed crimes and Prince Andrew was one of no doubt many guests. He no doubt arranged many parties and gatherings to which Prince Andrew did not attend.
If Prince Andrew is guilty, then so are many others who attended the same and other functions.
I'm no fan of Prince Andrew by the way.
Try to understand you moron:
The accusation (that you describe as mudslinging) is that Epstein had girls of various ages who were being trafficked as sex slaves.actualky it’s not even an accusation. It’s been proved.
And one of them at least has accused Prince Andrew as having sex with her. On three occasions.
In London, New York and in most of the civilised world, keeping sex slaves is, in fact, illegal. Forcing them to have sex with guests is illegal. The sheer evil of it should go without saying.
It makes no sodding difference what the age of consent for sex is. The key word is CONSENT. Being kept as a slave and forced to have sex is not consent. To make matters even worse she was underage as well.
Andrew, in the interview last night, described there being ‘staff’. You CANNOT have staff whose job it is is to have sex. It’s illegal.
The accusation is that he knew damn well what was going on. No one has said he’s been proved guilty. Everyone normal is saying he should be bloody investigated.
You understand that Andrew was staying with this monster AFTER he’d been convicted. He expressed no remorse. In fact he didn’t even mention the kids.
You should also understand that this mate of his, had girls as young as twelve being sold to him as sex slaves. Two sisters, aged 12, were allegedly supplied to him as a birthday present. For him to have sex with. You get that? The bloke he went on holiday with. Stayed with.
And yes, many others are being accused.
Now p*ss off and find yourself a moral code.
It makes no difference whether you’re a fan. You quite obviously don’t see anything wrong with these young kids being shipped around the world to satisfy the perverted desires of these monsters.
‘Ooh, ooh, but I think you’ll find the age of consent was 16... ‘
get stuffed.
3
The Andrew Interview. on 22:17 - Nov 17 with 1396 views
The Andrew Interview. on 21:56 - Nov 17 by londonlisa2001
Try to understand you moron:
The accusation (that you describe as mudslinging) is that Epstein had girls of various ages who were being trafficked as sex slaves.actualky it’s not even an accusation. It’s been proved.
And one of them at least has accused Prince Andrew as having sex with her. On three occasions.
In London, New York and in most of the civilised world, keeping sex slaves is, in fact, illegal. Forcing them to have sex with guests is illegal. The sheer evil of it should go without saying.
It makes no sodding difference what the age of consent for sex is. The key word is CONSENT. Being kept as a slave and forced to have sex is not consent. To make matters even worse she was underage as well.
Andrew, in the interview last night, described there being ‘staff’. You CANNOT have staff whose job it is is to have sex. It’s illegal.
The accusation is that he knew damn well what was going on. No one has said he’s been proved guilty. Everyone normal is saying he should be bloody investigated.
You understand that Andrew was staying with this monster AFTER he’d been convicted. He expressed no remorse. In fact he didn’t even mention the kids.
You should also understand that this mate of his, had girls as young as twelve being sold to him as sex slaves. Two sisters, aged 12, were allegedly supplied to him as a birthday present. For him to have sex with. You get that? The bloke he went on holiday with. Stayed with.
And yes, many others are being accused.
Now p*ss off and find yourself a moral code.
It makes no difference whether you’re a fan. You quite obviously don’t see anything wrong with these young kids being shipped around the world to satisfy the perverted desires of these monsters.
‘Ooh, ooh, but I think you’ll find the age of consent was 16... ‘
get stuffed.
Absolutely! Jeffrey Epstein was a convicted child molester who no doubt ran a pedophile ring...
Questions need answering.
And quickly
You might think I've forgotten, but one day, when you least expect it, my time will come.
I do believe peado's until caught and arrested are quite private about it though.
[Post edited 17 Nov 2019 20:31]
The fact is Epstein was NOT private about it!
He arranged orgies, frequently featuring underage girls, for the rich and famous, attended by politicians, Billionaires and royalty from all over the world. It was well known to the authorities, but he was considered untouchable because of his connections.
The private island where he lived was widely known as “Orgy island” and “Pedo Island” by those living nearby for decades.
His private jet was known as “the Lolita express” by all and sundry.
I believe the prosecutor in charge of his first trial, was told by his superiors to drop the case as he was a “person of importance” to the US government, and he ended up getting a scandalously (and suspiciously) lenient sentence. He knew too much about too many powerful people to stay alive when convicted second time around.
[Post edited 17 Nov 2019 22:23]
0
The Andrew Interview. on 22:27 - Nov 17 with 1378 views
The Andrew Interview. on 21:56 - Nov 17 by londonlisa2001
Try to understand you moron:
The accusation (that you describe as mudslinging) is that Epstein had girls of various ages who were being trafficked as sex slaves.actualky it’s not even an accusation. It’s been proved.
And one of them at least has accused Prince Andrew as having sex with her. On three occasions.
In London, New York and in most of the civilised world, keeping sex slaves is, in fact, illegal. Forcing them to have sex with guests is illegal. The sheer evil of it should go without saying.
It makes no sodding difference what the age of consent for sex is. The key word is CONSENT. Being kept as a slave and forced to have sex is not consent. To make matters even worse she was underage as well.
Andrew, in the interview last night, described there being ‘staff’. You CANNOT have staff whose job it is is to have sex. It’s illegal.
The accusation is that he knew damn well what was going on. No one has said he’s been proved guilty. Everyone normal is saying he should be bloody investigated.
You understand that Andrew was staying with this monster AFTER he’d been convicted. He expressed no remorse. In fact he didn’t even mention the kids.
You should also understand that this mate of his, had girls as young as twelve being sold to him as sex slaves. Two sisters, aged 12, were allegedly supplied to him as a birthday present. For him to have sex with. You get that? The bloke he went on holiday with. Stayed with.
And yes, many others are being accused.
Now p*ss off and find yourself a moral code.
It makes no difference whether you’re a fan. You quite obviously don’t see anything wrong with these young kids being shipped around the world to satisfy the perverted desires of these monsters.
‘Ooh, ooh, but I think you’ll find the age of consent was 16... ‘
get stuffed.
You are a self rightous little Cnt arn't you.
Groo does what Groo does best
0
The Andrew Interview. on 01:10 - Nov 18 with 1297 views
By continuing to use the site, you agree to our use of cookies and to abide by our Terms and Conditions.
