| Starting 11 17:05 - Aug 23 with 5916 views | RANGERS4EVER |
With Hemed and Wells now both in. Do we both start them? Can we have Eze and Freeman in the same team now? I'm intrigued to see what the team is. Any suggestions? |  |
| |  |
| Starting 11 on 17:10 - Aug 23 with 4800 views | Esox_Lucius |
Lumley
no defenders
Freeman, Scowen, Luongo, Chair, Wzsolek,
Smyth, Eze, Wells, Oteh & Hemed.
Just make sure we have 100% possession. |  |
| The grass is always greener. |
| |
| Starting 11 on 17:15 - Aug 23 with 4755 views | qprd |
How about a 4-4-2 with a diamond in MF?
Lumley
Kakay/ two of Leistner, Hall Baptiste/Bidwell
Scowen
Luongo Freeman
Eze
Hemed Wells [Post edited 23 Aug 2018 17:16]
|  | | |
| Starting 11 on 17:53 - Aug 23 with 4638 views | aston_hoop |
Lumley
Kakay
BFG
Baptiste
Bidwell
Scowen
Freeman
Luongo
Eze
Wells
Hemed
That'll do for now...well a new CB to replace Baptise would be even better. |  |
| |
| Starting 11 on 18:01 - Aug 23 with 4601 views | Watford_Ranger |
There’s still frighteningly little pace in the team if Little Smyth doesn’t play. | | | |
| Starting 11 on 18:02 - Aug 23 with 4592 views | aston_hoop |
| Starting 11 on 18:01 - Aug 23 by Watford_Ranger |
There’s still frighteningly little pace in the team if Little Smyth doesn’t play. |
Wells is pretty quick though aint he? | |
| |
| Starting 11 on 18:05 - Aug 23 with 4574 views | Blue_Castello |
| Starting 11 on 17:53 - Aug 23 by aston_hoop |
Lumley
Kakay
BFG
Baptiste
Bidwell
Scowen
Freeman
Luongo
Eze
Wells
Hemed
That'll do for now...well a new CB to replace Baptise would be even better. |
FWIW - Baptiste was better than BFG on Tuesday night, in an ideal world they would both be back up players. | | | |
| Starting 11 on 18:05 - Aug 23 with 4568 views | flynnbo |
Ingram
Kakay Lynch Leistner Bidwell
Scowen Luongo Eze Freeman
Smith Washington |  | | |
| Starting 11 on 18:34 - Aug 23 with 4460 views | bosh67 |
Lumley
Kakay Baptiste Leistner Bidwell
Smyth or Pav Luongo Freeman BOS (if available)
Hemed Wells
Subs: Ingram, Rangel, Lynch, Eze, Pav or Smyth, Scowen, Smith |  |
| |
Login to get fewer ads
| Starting 11 on 19:10 - Aug 23 with 4325 views | LongsufferingR |
100% sling them both in. If they get a couple each we'll have a fantastic chance of picking up our first point. |  | | |
| Starting 11 on 23:38 - Aug 23 with 4025 views | QPR_Nippon |
For Saturday maybe this:
Lumley
Kakay
Baptiste
Leistner
Bidwell
Smyth
Scowen
Freeman
Osayi-Samuel
Wells
Hemed
Subs: Ingram, Rangel, Hall, Luongo,
Wszolek, Eze, Smith. |  | | |
| Starting 11 on 23:46 - Aug 23 with 3999 views | distortR |
lumley,
pugh,pugh, barneymcgrew, cuthbert,
dibble, wells
eze
.......................................................................................bassong
................. hemed
...............................london ends.......................................
manning. [Post edited 23 Aug 2018 23:55]
| | | |
| Starting 11 on 07:25 - Aug 24 with 3818 views | Hunterhoop |
| Starting 11 on 23:46 - Aug 23 by distortR |
lumley,
pugh,pugh, barneymcgrew, cuthbert,
dibble, wells
eze
.......................................................................................bassong
................. hemed
...............................london ends.......................................
manning. [Post edited 23 Aug 2018 23:55]
|
We need to be realistic here. Especially given how porous our defence is.
IF we play both the new forwards, and keep a back 4 (which collected more points per game than a back 3 for Holloway last year, before history gets rewritten), we almost certainly cannot play both Freeman and Eze, and arguably can play neither.
Our back 4 will need protection. It will need tacklers. With the personnel available, it has to be Luongo and Scowen. Out wide we will need wingers who understand the defensive side of the game and are positionslly astute, as one fewer central midfielders will mean no one can come across to cover them without a huge hole in the middle being created.
IF we play 442, i’d go:
Lumley (he has to start!)
Rangel
Leistner
Baptiste
Bidwell
Wszolek
Scowen
Luongo
Freeman
Hamed
Wells
Freeman has to play as the left winger and hold his poisition, Wells can make channel runs which occasionally will allow Freeman to break forward centrally in his place.
However, I imagine he’ll keep the same shape. Also, bearing in mind they’ve both just signed and haven’t played much football this season, I guessxhe’ll Start one, Hamed.
Lumley
Rangel
Leistner
Baptiste
Bidwell
Scowen
Luongo
Freeman
Wszolek
Eze
Hamed.
Wells comes on for Eze to go 442 if we need to attack, or for Hamed if we’re ahead and want to catch them on the counter. |  | | |
| Starting 11 on 08:39 - Aug 24 with 3682 views | Toast_R |
Surely Ingram needs to be dropped and take some time out to reflect - preferably on that same island Luke Skywalker moved to.
There should be wholesale changes for Saturday. Drop Freeman to the bench as his recent performances have been simply unacceptable. Bring back those with no fear such as Smyth and Bright Samuel. Luongo should also be aware that the post World Cup sulking need to stop and he needs to grow a pair and start earning his place again. [Post edited 24 Aug 2018 8:41]
|  | | |
| Starting 11 on 11:29 - Aug 24 with 3490 views | ElHoop |
I don't think that he's going to die wondering.
Lumley
Wangle Dangle, Hall, Leistner, Bidwell
Scowen, Luongo, Freeman
Eze
Wells Hemed
This will definitely be a 'goals game' - more than 4 goals. |  | | |
| Starting 11 on 12:11 - Aug 24 with 3436 views | WadR |
Wells played wide in a 4-2-3-1 for Huddersfield in their promotion season.
For Schteeve's preferred 4-3-3, I'd go:
Lumley
Rangel Leistner Baptiste Bidwell
Luongo Scowen Freeman
Wells Hemed Bright
Subs: Ingram, Lynch, Cousins, Eze, Wszolek, Smith, Smyth.
Maybe a little harsh on Eze, but agree with Hunter, at the moment I don't think you can play both him and Freeman. And think the pace of Bright is important in an otherwise slow side. | | | |
| Starting 11 on 12:42 - Aug 24 with 3347 views | Juzzie |
Go 6-5-3 and hope no one notices. |  | | |
| Starting 11 on 12:56 - Aug 24 with 3320 views | Ashdown_Ranger |
| Starting 11 on 12:42 - Aug 24 by Juzzie |
Go 6-5-3 and hope no one notices. |
Lumley
Kakay
Lynch
Baptiste
Bidwell
Hall (if fit)
Scowen
Freeman
Eze
Smyth
Wells
or, using Juzzie's preferred formation, plus:
Hemed
Luongo |  | | |
| Starting 11 on 13:54 - Aug 24 with 3227 views | wombat |
| Starting 11 on 12:56 - Aug 24 by Ashdown_Ranger |
Lumley
Kakay
Lynch
Baptiste
Bidwell
Hall (if fit)
Scowen
Freeman
Eze
Smyth
Wells
or, using Juzzie's preferred formation, plus:
Hemed
Luongo |
so far brollmyman hasn't started with two out and out srtikers so not sure hes going to now |  |
| |
| Starting 11 on 13:55 - Aug 24 with 3227 views | PinnerPaul |
| Starting 11 on 18:05 - Aug 23 by flynnbo |
Ingram
Kakay Lynch Leistner Bidwell
Scowen Luongo Eze Freeman
Smith Washington |
Ingram????????????? | | | |
| Starting 11 on 13:56 - Aug 24 with 3221 views | PinnerPaul |
| Starting 11 on 19:10 - Aug 23 by LongsufferingR |
100% sling them both in. If they get a couple each we'll have a fantastic chance of picking up our first point. |
"4-3, we're gonna win 4-3" | | | |
| Starting 11 on 15:28 - Aug 24 with 3149 views | thompsonridd |
INGRAM
RANGEL LEISTNER BAPTISTE BIDWELL
SCOWEN
SMYTH FREEMAN
EZE
WELLS HEMED
Scowen in holding role
Smyth right side winger
Freeman left side winger
Eze free role behind strikers | | | |
| Starting 11 on 16:19 - Aug 24 with 3114 views | HAYESBOY |
Lumley
Kakay Leistner Lynch Bidwell
Scowen
Freeman Luongo
Eze
Wells
Hemed
Chuck them in. Play Wells as a no 10. Diamond in midfield.
Or Cousins in for Freeman to be a bit more solid in the middle. Kakay has played well for me so why he was changed I do not know. Sorted! |  |
| Smells like a trout farm in here |
| |
| Starting 11 on 17:00 - Aug 24 with 3041 views | Watford_Ranger |
| Starting 11 on 16:19 - Aug 24 by HAYESBOY |
Lumley
Kakay Leistner Lynch Bidwell
Scowen
Freeman Luongo
Eze
Wells
Hemed
Chuck them in. Play Wells as a no 10. Diamond in midfield.
Or Cousins in for Freeman to be a bit more solid in the middle. Kakay has played well for me so why he was changed I do not know. Sorted! |
Cousins is in the wrong sport. Total waste of a shirt. | | | |
| Starting 11 on 17:22 - Aug 24 with 3008 views | dannyblue |
| Starting 11 on 12:11 - Aug 24 by WadR |
Wells played wide in a 4-2-3-1 for Huddersfield in their promotion season.
For Schteeve's preferred 4-3-3, I'd go:
Lumley
Rangel Leistner Baptiste Bidwell
Luongo Scowen Freeman
Wells Hemed Bright
Subs: Ingram, Lynch, Cousins, Eze, Wszolek, Smith, Smyth.
Maybe a little harsh on Eze, but agree with Hunter, at the moment I don't think you can play both him and Freeman. And think the pace of Bright is important in an otherwise slow side. |
This is what I'd go for too. |  | | |
| Starting 11 on 17:47 - Aug 24 with 2958 views | Silverfoxqpr |
Ok bit of ITK here but Lumley has been told he's DEFINITELY starting. |  | | |
| |
By continuing to use the site, you agree to our use of cookies and to abide by our Terms and Conditions.
