By continuing to use the site, you agree to our use of cookies and to abide by our Terms and Conditions. We in turn value your personal details in accordance with our Privacy Policy.
Please log in or register. Registered visitors get fewer ads.
9/11 unanswered questions on 20:28 - Mar 27 by jackedup
And how to you explain the fact that very neat 45 degree angle cuts were found in the support columns in the sub-basement levels? Of course, if it were a controlled demolition, this would have been easily explained, because the support columns must be made to shift sideways shortly before these same support columns are cut up as they are collapsing. By the way, if it were indeed the kind of pancake collapse as NOVA and NIST and others would have us believe, then what destroyed the support columns themselves? How can you have a pancake collapse unless the support columns are sturdy enough to provide the structure that would ensure that the floors that they contain slide down them as records on a spindle? Why doesn't NIST ever tell us what numbers were plugged into their computer models, and why they cannot even offer an explanation for how the towers began to collapse, while only attempting to explain how they continued collapsing once they started.
Exactly.
Many of those who are trying to pretend it was a terrorist attack are in on it. Reptilians are amongst us even on Planet Swans.
POSTER OF THE YEAR 2013.
PROUD RECIPIENT OF THE SECOND PLANET SWANS LIFETIME ACHIEVEMENT AWARD.
If anyone has found any evidence at all to support the notion that carbon fuel fires can cause simultaneous truss failure, even in floors well beneath the demolition wave, then you're welcome to show me. Until then, you should stop talking about what is plausible and what is not. Especially when accomplished commercial architects such as Richard Gage have raised serious doubts about anything other than controlled demolition. Did you know that the current managing architect of the Sydney Opera House, whose father was the designer, is a member of Architects and Engineers for 911 Truth? They are not the tin foil types that you imagine.
1
9/11 unanswered questions on 20:38 - Mar 27 with 2089 views
9/11 unanswered questions on 19:37 - Mar 27 by jojaca
I watched a couple of documentaries on Netflix a few years, which raises your suspicion on a particular event(exactly like the moon landings) and I am getting abused on a football forum.
Don't accuse someone of being a soap-watching Sun reader then, you dopey f*cking c*nt.
0
9/11 unanswered questions on 20:41 - Mar 27 with 2075 views
9/11 unanswered questions on 20:21 - Mar 27 by jackedup
Yes, and shortly before 911, according to eyewitnesses who had been employed at the WTC, the security staff were working 12 hour shifts for two weeks while bomb-sniffing dogs were removed and the security cameras were turned off. This was supposedly for upgrading of the networks. This would have been the perfect time for the said explosive material to be put into place. But since you are talking about plausible explanations, then how do you explain that the nanothermite was found in all the samples of WTC tested by Dr. Steven Jones? And how do you explain that construction grade steel that had been tested for 22 hours to withstand 2000 degree fires failed to such a degree that these buildings collapsed in under 11 seconds? How do you explain the pyroclastic phenomena, where dust clouds were moving for several miles at great speeds? Gravity?
Having worked in the construction industry as a steel erector! Could you please explain to me how you facilitate the required partial demolition of concrete shuttered-moldings, wall and floor paneling to expose bare steel RSJ/girder trusses without getting any attention whatsoever from World Trace Centre employees?
Where would you have put all the debris? Where would you have hidden the skips and replacement materials required of which in my personal experience always ends (at some stage!) up outside in full view of the general public? Cos that's the only place it can go! Hint! Hint!
[Post edited 27 Mar 2016 20:48]
Argus!
0
9/11 unanswered questions on 20:42 - Mar 27 with 2070 views
9/11 unanswered questions on 20:41 - Mar 27 by Wingstandwood
Having worked in the construction industry as a steel erector! Could you please explain to me how you facilitate the required partial demolition of concrete shuttered-moldings, wall and floor paneling to expose bare steel RSJ/girder trusses without getting any attention whatsoever from World Trace Centre employees?
Where would you have put all the debris? Where would you have hidden the skips and replacement materials required of which in my personal experience always ends (at some stage!) up outside in full view of the general public? Cos that's the only place it can go! Hint! Hint!
[Post edited 27 Mar 2016 20:48]
It would go in the underground caverns beneath NEw York made for this very purpose.
POSTER OF THE YEAR 2013.
PROUD RECIPIENT OF THE SECOND PLANET SWANS LIFETIME ACHIEVEMENT AWARD.
9/11 unanswered questions on 20:41 - Mar 27 by Wingstandwood
Having worked in the construction industry as a steel erector! Could you please explain to me how you facilitate the required partial demolition of concrete shuttered-moldings, wall and floor paneling to expose bare steel RSJ/girder trusses without getting any attention whatsoever from World Trace Centre employees?
Where would you have put all the debris? Where would you have hidden the skips and replacement materials required of which in my personal experience always ends (at some stage!) up outside in full view of the general public? Cos that's the only place it can go! Hint! Hint!
[Post edited 27 Mar 2016 20:48]
Much of this debris was witnessed by people who had worked inside the buildings. By the way, if you haven't watched the testimony of William Rodriguez who worked in the WTC as a custodian for 22 years prior to 911 and was a decorated 911 hero, as he was helping the firefighters up the buildings, as he was one of two individuals having a master key, you should begin by watching that. He said that he was in one of the basements when there was a huge explosion in the sub-basements and that several of the people he personally knew -- he even named a few of them -- had to get facial reconstructive surgery and treatment for broken ribs and other conditions because of the explosions they experienced then.
1
9/11 unanswered questions on 20:49 - Mar 27 with 2045 views
9/11 unanswered questions on 20:47 - Mar 27 by jackedup
Much of this debris was witnessed by people who had worked inside the buildings. By the way, if you haven't watched the testimony of William Rodriguez who worked in the WTC as a custodian for 22 years prior to 911 and was a decorated 911 hero, as he was helping the firefighters up the buildings, as he was one of two individuals having a master key, you should begin by watching that. He said that he was in one of the basements when there was a huge explosion in the sub-basements and that several of the people he personally knew -- he even named a few of them -- had to get facial reconstructive surgery and treatment for broken ribs and other conditions because of the explosions they experienced then.
You live in absolute cloud cuckoo land and are completely devoid common sense! Large HGV trucks carrying new paneling, building materials and concrete pouring transportation would have been required to help hide the hundreds upon hundreds of previously exposed locations.......And where would the utterly inexplicable relentless comings and goings of ready mix lorries park (they tend to go outside, hint!, hint!) without detection from New York general public?
Argus!
0
9/11 unanswered questions on 21:04 - Mar 27 with 1992 views
Voodoo Histories by David Aaronovitch (about as anti-establishment as it gets) exposes this conspiracy nonsense with proper research. He's also good on the psychology of the nutters who keep on believing this drivel even after it's been exposed for the fantasy it obviously is.
I'd recommend it to a few on here but I doubt if it would make any difference...
1
9/11 unanswered questions on 21:06 - Mar 27 with 1984 views
9/11 unanswered questions on 21:06 - Mar 27 by WarwickHunt
Voodoo Histories by David Aaronovitch (about as anti-establishment as it gets) exposes this conspiracy nonsense with proper research. He's also good on the psychology of the nutters who keep on believing this drivel even after it's been exposed for the fantasy it obviously is.
I'd recommend it to a few on here but I doubt if it would make any difference...
I've read it, it's very good. Jewish though. He would say that see.
9/11 unanswered questions on 21:12 - Mar 27 by NeathJack
I'd like to know why there has never been any footage of the "plane that crashed into the Pentagon" released.
Other than those 2 frames which show nothing at all.
Depends if there's more than two frames with anything to see.
I'd imagine that the plane was moving at a fair lick. Say a generously slow 300mph (roughly half of the normal cruising speed of a 757). Were security cameras in 2001, even military ones, capable of catching more than a glimpse of something moving that fast through a limited field of vision?
Pain or damage don't end the world. Or despair, or f*cking beatings. The world ends when you're dead. Until then, you got more punishment in store. Stand it like a man... and give some back.
-1
9/11 unanswered questions on 21:19 - Mar 27 with 1919 views
9/11 unanswered questions on 21:03 - Mar 27 by Wingstandwood
You live in absolute cloud cuckoo land and are completely devoid common sense! Large HGV trucks carrying new paneling, building materials and concrete pouring transportation would have been required to help hide the hundreds upon hundreds of previously exposed locations.......And where would the utterly inexplicable relentless comings and goings of ready mix lorries park (they tend to go outside, hint!, hint!) without detection from New York general public?
Why do you suppose that they would have to hide anything from the general public? They explained that they were doing network upgrades. As I mentioned, it was published in national media that the security cameras were turned off for two weeks and bomb-sniffing dogs were removed. You are the one who is lacking common sense. Crashes from planes do not cause multiple explosions and people to get burnt and injured badly in the sub-basements. Carbon fires do not cause collapses of buildings that tall in 11 seconds on their own footprint while not significantly damaging surrounding buildings. Otherwise, they could save millions of dollars and demolish other buildings of that kind in like manner. Furthermore, if explosives were not used, why is it that thousands of bone fragments were found on the rooftops of surrounding buildings which were no longer than a centimeter in length? How can a fire pulverize concrete? Just because you've worked in construction doesn't mean that you can pretend that you've answered these questions.
0
9/11 unanswered questions on 21:25 - Mar 27 with 1902 views
9/11 unanswered questions on 21:17 - Mar 27 by Dr_Winston
Depends if there's more than two frames with anything to see.
I'd imagine that the plane was moving at a fair lick. Say a generously slow 300mph (roughly half of the normal cruising speed of a 757). Were security cameras in 2001, even military ones, capable of catching more than a glimpse of something moving that fast through a limited field of vision?
I think it's a reasonable assumption that more than one camera was in operation in the vicinity of a building such as the Pentagon, even in 2001, that would have captured far more than has been released.
0
9/11 unanswered questions on 21:28 - Mar 27 with 1885 views
Yes, and the photos have the wrong date. Rather surreal I'd say. Of course, if anyone points that out, they could just pretend that they've made a mistake.
0
9/11 unanswered questions on 21:29 - Mar 27 with 1882 views
9/11 unanswered questions on 21:25 - Mar 27 by NeathJack
I think it's a reasonable assumption that more than one camera was in operation in the vicinity of a building such as the Pentagon, even in 2001, that would have captured far more than has been released.
I don't doubt that there was more than one camera. I do doubt that something shifting at 300mph+, even something as large as a 757, would show up in a field of vision of about 40/50 yards for more than a millisecond.
Pain or damage don't end the world. Or despair, or f*cking beatings. The world ends when you're dead. Until then, you got more punishment in store. Stand it like a man... and give some back.
0
9/11 unanswered questions on 21:31 - Mar 27 with 1873 views
9/11 unanswered questions on 21:29 - Mar 27 by Dr_Winston
I don't doubt that there was more than one camera. I do doubt that something shifting at 300mph+, even something as large as a 757, would show up in a field of vision of about 40/50 yards for more than a millisecond.
On a purely side on close up view, probably.
I'm sure there were other angles that would have shown it though, assuming it happened obviously.
The lack of plane debris was a bit peculiar as well.
By continuing to use the site, you agree to our use of cookies and to abide by our Terms and Conditions.
