By continuing to use the site, you agree to our use of cookies and to abide by our Terms and Conditions. We in turn value your personal details in accordance with our Privacy Policy.
Please log in or register. Registered visitors get fewer ads.
9/11 unanswered questions on 01:07 - Mar 28 by WarwickHunt
I could eat alphabet soup and sh1t more intelligent posts than you.
F*cking tinfoil hat-wearing fruitcake. See a shrink, you f*cking loon.
Woooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo!
Well then, Warwick, have a helping of this alphabet soup and give us some of your "shit" by answering the simple questions I asked.
Where have any of these so-called "debunkers" explained how small carbon fires can cause the simultaneous truss failure necessary for the sorts of pancake collapses that supposedly occurred on 911 according to PBS Nova?
Where have any of these so-called "debunkers" explained how concrete can be pulverized into tons of dust and make clouds travel for several miles as happens during volcanic eruptions?
Where have any of these so-called "debunkers" explained how 110-story steel-framed buildings collapse at speeds approaching free-fall without the use of explosives?
[Post edited 28 Mar 2016 1:20]
0
9/11 unanswered questions on 01:20 - Mar 28 with 2154 views
9/11 unanswered questions on 18:35 - Mar 27 by phact0rri
For me, most of the conspiracy and most of the did they know, didn't they know? have been written so much, that I wish it'd quit getting lipservice. To me if it was planned by the USG or they just didn't act on the intell it doesn't matter, a lot of death could have been prevented it its on the hands of the USG.
Webster Tarpley explains why the "They merely knew about it, yet didn't do anything" scenario doesn't work:
0
9/11 unanswered questions on 01:34 - Mar 28 with 2134 views
I saw a starting video on YouTube that showed evidence that Jimmy savile was heavily involved in 9/11 but the video has been since removed by I assume the illuminati or someone.
The creatures outside looked from pig to man, and from man to pig, and from pig to man again; but already it was impossible to say which was which.
9/11 unanswered questions on 01:19 - Mar 28 by jackedup
Well then, Warwick, have a helping of this alphabet soup and give us some of your "shit" by answering the simple questions I asked.
Where have any of these so-called "debunkers" explained how small carbon fires can cause the simultaneous truss failure necessary for the sorts of pancake collapses that supposedly occurred on 911 according to PBS Nova?
Where have any of these so-called "debunkers" explained how concrete can be pulverized into tons of dust and make clouds travel for several miles as happens during volcanic eruptions?
Where have any of these so-called "debunkers" explained how 110-story steel-framed buildings collapse at speeds approaching free-fall without the use of explosives?
[Post edited 28 Mar 2016 1:20]
Read some of the many books out there by people who can fart and chew gum at the same time. It's also debunked on your beloved PBS Nova. Google it.
You won't believe them though, so what's the point?
0
9/11 unanswered questions on 01:48 - Mar 28 with 2120 views
9/11 unanswered questions on 22:54 - Mar 27 by jackedup
The fact is that nanothermite was forensically proven to be present through multiple experiments that were documented in peer-reviewed articles by reputable scientists such as Dr. Steven Jones.
Besides this, you have video evidence of molten steel pouring out of one of the corners of one of the towers shortly before the collapse. This cannot be caused by any carbon fuel fires. Furthermore, you have evidence that there were thermal hotspots measuring temperatures far exceeding those of carbon fires for several days after 911:
Security at WTC complex was managed by the same firm that managed the security at the Murrah Federal Building, which was also destroyed by multiple bombs inside the building, contrary to the now sanitized story of a single lone nut named McVeigh. The local media reports that there were bomb-diffusing units inside the building diffusing other bombs was scrubbed from the national story. Again, you deny the mountains of evidence -- the many reports of multiple explosions; the fact that the fires consisted of 2 "isolated pockets" of carbon fires less than 400 degrees Centigrade incapable of producing simultaneous truss failure or near free-fall speed collapse of 110 story structures built from construction grade steel; the tiny bone fragments and pulverized concrete; the pyroclastic phenomena that caused dust clouds to travel at great speeds for several miles; and so many other facts.
Steven Jones is/was a physicist specialising in cold fusion, this does not make him a "reputable scientist" in the fields of structural or civil engineering.
Just because someone is a professor it doesn't make them an expert in every single subject known to man and in the case of Steven Jones' rag tag bunch of 'experts' most of the professors aren't even scientists let alone engineers. I wouldn't want a professor of philosophy to build me a bridge.
After publishing his first 9/11 paper Steven Jones was put on paid leave and investigated by his university because it was not convinced that his analyses and hypotheses had been submitted to relevant scientific venues that would ensure rigorous technical peer review.
If man evolved from monkeys why do we still have monkeys?
0
9/11 unanswered questions on 02:24 - Mar 28 with 2094 views
Steven Jones is/was a physicist specialising in cold fusion, this does not make him a "reputable scientist" in the fields of structural or civil engineering.
Just because someone is a professor it doesn't make them an expert in every single subject known to man and in the case of Steven Jones' rag tag bunch of 'experts' most of the professors aren't even scientists let alone engineers. I wouldn't want a professor of philosophy to build me a bridge.
After publishing his first 9/11 paper Steven Jones was put on paid leave and investigated by his university because it was not convinced that his analyses and hypotheses had been submitted to relevant scientific venues that would ensure rigorous technical peer review.
You are presenting a red herring.
One doesn't need to be a structural engineer in order to do a chemical analysis of dust samples and to establish that they contain nano-thermitic material.
PhD chemist Dr. Niels Harrit of the University of Copenhagen is one of co-authors of this paper:
Harrit has published extensively, and he is more than qualified to perform the kinds of analyses done in this paper.
Are you going to claim that Harrit is not a "reputable scientist" and that Dr. Steven Jones isn't either?
As for the administrative leave, it is not improbable that it was largely due to do with the political implications of his paper. After all BYU stands to lose a lot if one of their faculty bites the hand that feeds them when they are reliant on so many federal research grants and other funding.
[Post edited 28 Mar 2016 2:30]
0
9/11 unanswered questions on 02:33 - Mar 28 with 2086 views
Here is the actual transcript of the speech by then Unocal VP John Maresca given in February of 1998 to the U.S. Congress on why it is necessary for to have a new government in Afghanistan and why it is important to build the pipeline across Afghanistan:
9/11 unanswered questions on 00:48 - Mar 28 by WarwickHunt
Mate, it's all out there. In spades. All this is nonsense has been debunked with proper research.
If people want to be selective, quote nutjobs on Youtube and believe this infantile guff then there's not much point in indulging in rational debate, especially when trying to prove a negative.
Steven Jones is/was a physicist specialising in cold fusion, this does not make him a "reputable scientist" in the fields of structural or civil engineering.
Just because someone is a professor it doesn't make them an expert in every single subject known to man and in the case of Steven Jones' rag tag bunch of 'experts' most of the professors aren't even scientists let alone engineers. I wouldn't want a professor of philosophy to build me a bridge.
After publishing his first 9/11 paper Steven Jones was put on paid leave and investigated by his university because it was not convinced that his analyses and hypotheses had been submitted to relevant scientific venues that would ensure rigorous technical peer review.
On the move at moment so trust I got the gist. A few months ago someone contacted me as and was stupid enough to think I could offer a reason for the building collapsing. Got bombarded with eccentric theories after I looked at the structure and the designers inputs. I could not find a reliable source to back up the strange claims. Everyone of them is not reliable.
0
9/11 unanswered questions on 04:01 - Mar 28 with 2052 views
9/11 unanswered questions on 03:41 - Mar 28 by dameedna
On the move at moment so trust I got the gist. A few months ago someone contacted me as and was stupid enough to think I could offer a reason for the building collapsing. Got bombarded with eccentric theories after I looked at the structure and the designers inputs. I could not find a reliable source to back up the strange claims. Everyone of them is not reliable.
Another one who thinks that restating an unproven conclusion lends credibility to the conclusion.
These are serious questions that have yet to be answered.
Nobody has bothered to explain how carbon fires cause simultaneous truss failures even on a single floor much less multiple floors in quick succession.
After all, thousands of tons of asbestos-laden steel would serve as a massive heat-sink, dissipating even the relatively modest temperatures caused by a carbon fire.
0
9/11 unanswered questions on 04:02 - Mar 28 with 2051 views
Of course it was planned for f*ck sake.. Osama Bin Laden was a CIA operative who went rogue, he had a lot of contacts who were 'Americans' and muslim based Americans..
he's not the only 'government' operative who has gone AWOL and vehemently hate what their government is actually doing... in the 'real world'.
A 200000 billion ton building does not collapse downwards, because a mosquito plane jabbed it a few times.
It's not even 'tin foil'... it's simple basics.. People who have worked for the American government have come out and have spoken.. the extremists have come out and spoken about it..
It's all about ideology, agenda and power.. position, status, progression.
The aliens are here.. it's no secret, just ask the appropriate people.. and they will tell you.. the aliens have structured this world..
you wake up every morning.. and you have 'options'... different paths, and down every path you go, you're effectively a cog in the machine.. the world is a structured machine.. the aliens let humans have 'free will'.. they let 'human nature' take 'its course'..
in every human mind, an 'energy' is inbuilt.. in the brain or mind a specific type of 'genetic' metal is inbuilt that can be magnetised.. mercury has been pumped into the atmosphere for years.. mercury is liquid, it is a conductor of electricity.. it creates acid rain and lightening.. it gets distributed all over the world.. contaminates every item we touch.. including food.. plus we are attracted to mercury, due to our inbuilt magnet and our electrical energy source..
it's not even 'tin foil' to suggest it.. over a period of time mercury destroy's our cognitive functioning.. our immune system gets damaged.. therefore all diseases become common..
and the only viable option to regenerate our bodies is by administering oxygen with sleep.. which is what the majority of hospitals do.
But one question that really scratches my head.. why is west wales the only place in the world where electromagnetic energy is sparse?.. there is hardly any radiation or electromagnetic fields around the place mun.. it's like a 'clean zone'
The awkward moment when a Welsh Club become the Champions of England.. shh
The Swansea Way.. To upset the odds.
I just looked it up mun.. the Cawdor Barracks was the main electronic warfare base.. so it probably has specific protections from unwanted electromagnetic fields
The awkward moment when a Welsh Club become the Champions of England.. shh
The Swansea Way.. To upset the odds.
If the Pentagon wasn't hit by an airliner, where is American Airline 77 and the 64 people on board? I didn't get to the end of Lost, maybe that was twist in the last episode.........
[Post edited 28 Mar 2016 10:55]
0
9/11 unanswered questions on 10:03 - Mar 28 with 1908 views
Those people on this thread calling others names clearly do not have the intellectual capacity to think outside the box and just accept what they are told.
POSTER OF THE YEAR 2013.
PROUD RECIPIENT OF THE SECOND PLANET SWANS LIFETIME ACHIEVEMENT AWARD.
By continuing to use the site, you agree to our use of cookies and to abide by our Terms and Conditions.
