| Crest Vote on 17:32 - Dec 15 with 2778 views | Antti_Heinola |
| Crest Vote on 17:28 - Dec 15 by PlanetHonneywood |
Apparently, some wag has tweeted that the Q in option 2 looks like a penis.
I don't wish to rake over old coals, but that hideous thing on the top of the badge in option 4, is it one of those old tomato ketchup dispenser things?
Personally, I think the options are poor. I was expecting a straight shoot out between something close to the 1970's badge or the 1982 version. Its like, the club has said ok we'll let you believe you're choosing the badge, but as long as its what we want.
With a Colt 45 to my head and electrodes wired to my gonads, option 1. Just mind you. |
but that's not what's happened, is it?
They went through a big consultation with fan groups, these were the four they agreed to, now everyone votes on them.
That might be right or wrong but no one can accuse the club of not collaborating/listening this time.
All these four are absolutely fine. |  |
|  |
| Crest Vote on 17:34 - Dec 15 with 2773 views | barbicanranger |
| Crest Vote on 17:32 - Dec 15 by Antti_Heinola |
but that's not what's happened, is it?
They went through a big consultation with fan groups, these were the four they agreed to, now everyone votes on them.
That might be right or wrong but no one can accuse the club of not collaborating/listening this time.
All these four are absolutely fine. |
Agreed. Don't think we're being fed anything here, its been as democratic as possible. |  | | |
| Crest Vote on 17:43 - Dec 15 with 2751 views | BrianMcCarthy |
| Crest Vote on 17:28 - Dec 15 by PlanetHonneywood |
Apparently, some wag has tweeted that the Q in option 2 looks like a penis.
I don't wish to rake over old coals, but that hideous thing on the top of the badge in option 4, is it one of those old tomato ketchup dispenser things?
Personally, I think the options are poor. I was expecting a straight shoot out between something close to the 1970's badge or the 1982 version. Its like, the club has said ok we'll let you believe you're choosing the badge, but as long as its what we want.
With a Colt 45 to my head and electrodes wired to my gonads, option 1. Just mind you. |
"Apparently, some wag has tweeted that the Q in option 2 looks like a penis."
Either he needs to see a doctor now or I do. |  |
| |
| Crest Vote on 18:05 - Dec 15 with 2721 views | Monkey_Roots |
I like number 2.
If they aren't going to go back to the old logo, and they want to move it on a bit, but maintain some of its finer qualities and stylings - this does that.
I prefer the old badge too, but this is a pretty decent fix to the badge we have currently.
Some of the comments on here are laughable.. I mean, this club isn't run very well, and it could certainly do things better, smarter etc, but some of you lot are so fcking miserable about everything... cheer up for fcks sake! We all pretty much hate the badge as it now. They want to give us a new badge, they want us a to have a say —Â they hear that we like the old badge, so they have tried to take that style through to something new. I bet they wish they hadn't of bothered. Bloody ingrates.
COYRs |  | | |
| Crest Vote on 19:09 - Dec 15 with 2649 views | DeepcutHoop |
I'm happy with the current badge. Not perfect but a better nod to the past than the options we have there.
As a lot of people have whined we're getting a new one. Fine. Don't like them, but they'll be the QPR badge and that's all good.
There will be a number of fans that won't like the new one, and will stamp their little feet until it gets changed again. That's what we do as a fanbase now. This will be Uncle Tony's badge, like the current one is Flavio's badge, and people will take against it.
Bring on the actual football tonight. |  | | |
| Crest Vote on 19:12 - Dec 15 with 2640 views | Neil_SI |
This is entirely for a bit of fun...
But was bored while waiting for the match to start, so did some quick interpretations of the current designs.
 |  | | |
| Crest Vote on 19:14 - Dec 15 with 2627 views | Gloucs_R |
| Crest Vote on 19:12 - Dec 15 by Neil_SI |
This is entirely for a bit of fun...
But was bored while waiting for the match to start, so did some quick interpretations of the current designs.
|
Middle left |  |
| |
Login to get fewer ads
| Crest Vote on 19:16 - Dec 15 with 2623 views | BklynRanger |
All those perfect circles drawn freehand, Neil - sure sign of madness. |  | | |
| Crest Vote on 19:22 - Dec 15 with 2618 views | kingo |
| Crest Vote on 19:12 - Dec 15 by Neil_SI |
This is entirely for a bit of fun...
But was bored while waiting for the match to start, so did some quick interpretations of the current designs.
|
Middle row, far right |  |
| RIP: Sniffer, Doug and Pat |
| |
| Crest Vote on 19:25 - Dec 15 with 2611 views | YorkRanger |
Number 2 for me. That said if it was 1 or 3 I could live with that. Much better than what we have and I'm surprised at the negativity. |  | | |
| Crest Vote on 20:25 - Dec 15 with 2573 views | MedwayR |
Did Dan Norris only submit those two or did he submit his decent ones too but the club decided to put forward the sh*t ones?
Number 2 but they're all very disappointing, all that time & effort and they end up with those 4 options, seems a bit half-arsed to me. |  |
| |
| Crest Vote on 20:49 - Dec 15 with 2541 views | PlanetHonneywood |
| Crest Vote on 17:32 - Dec 15 by Antti_Heinola |
but that's not what's happened, is it?
They went through a big consultation with fan groups, these were the four they agreed to, now everyone votes on them.
That might be right or wrong but no one can accuse the club of not collaborating/listening this time.
All these four are absolutely fine. |
You're entitled to your view fella, but I think three and four are appalling and they look like Paul the octopus has been let loose in the middle of it.
When we got the chance to vote on the style/layout, maybe my recollection is wrong, but I thought we were getting something more 1970s or the 1982 badge.
As one and two are, rightly, the more preferred, I wonder why we don't just return to the 1982 myself. |  |
| |
| Crest Vote on 20:50 - Dec 15 with 2544 views | rrrspricey |
Agree with Paul Parker, bring back the previous one but as it isn't a choice it has to be no 2 as it's the closest. Vote cast! |  | | |
| Crest Vote on 21:41 - Dec 15 with 2584 views | HOOPNO7 |
Voted for No2, now all we need to do is get the Air Asia sponsor off the shirt as they are a S**T airline. I would rather walk than fly with them. Maybe get a sponsor that is more local & relative to this club instead of TF's tat. |  | | |
| Crest Vote on 21:52 - Dec 15 with 2571 views | isawqpratwcity |
| Crest Vote on 21:41 - Dec 15 by HOOPNO7 |
Voted for No2, now all we need to do is get the Air Asia sponsor off the shirt as they are a S**T airline. I would rather walk than fly with them. Maybe get a sponsor that is more local & relative to this club instead of TF's tat. |
No need for you to walk...On yer bike, you miserable git! |  |
| |
| Crest Vote on 22:44 - Dec 15 with 2534 views | CiderwithRsie |
"Just a mess of previous badges."
To my mind the best thing about them is that they are based on previous badges; about time we showed a bit of pride in our history. Don't look messy to me.
None of them set the world alight, but they don't have to. 1st two are based on our history, the original designs were fine so I've no problem with that, either will do for me but I'd go for the second as I've always liked the way the letters curl around each other on that font. 3's OK if you want it to look a bit more contemporary.
Absolutely any of them a massive improvement on the current one. | | | |
| Crest Vote on 23:12 - Dec 15 with 2502 views | Ollie23 |
Do not understand the negativity. Club listened to the fans and these options are the outcome.
Anything is better than the current badge, which i can't bear to look at.
Number 2 for me. |  | | |
| Crest Vote on 23:28 - Dec 15 with 2480 views | baz_qpr |
Obviously in a minority of 1 but I like 3 its a modern interpretation with a nod to the past rather than being a retro badge |  | | |
| Crest Vote on 00:46 - Dec 16 with 2895 views | DeepcutHoop |
| Crest Vote on 23:12 - Dec 15 by Ollie23 |
Do not understand the negativity. Club listened to the fans and these options are the outcome.
Anything is better than the current badge, which i can't bear to look at.
Number 2 for me. |
My 'negativity' is that I don't like the badges they've offered as a choice, and would prefer to stick with the current one if those are the alternative.
I will not get a badge that I like aesthetically, but it will be the QPR badge and will mean as much to me as any of them have.
i won't be boycotting the club shop, or tweeting the chairman demanding it gets changed. I guarantee you there will be some that do, like there has been with the current badge. | | | |
| Crest Vote on 00:48 - Dec 16 with 2888 views | DeepcutHoop |
| Crest Vote on 22:44 - Dec 15 by CiderwithRsie |
"Just a mess of previous badges."
To my mind the best thing about them is that they are based on previous badges; about time we showed a bit of pride in our history. Don't look messy to me.
None of them set the world alight, but they don't have to. 1st two are based on our history, the original designs were fine so I've no problem with that, either will do for me but I'd go for the second as I've always liked the way the letters curl around each other on that font. 3's OK if you want it to look a bit more contemporary.
Absolutely any of them a massive improvement on the current one. |
Our current one is as much a nod to our past as any of the new options are.
I get people don't like the current badge, but let's not pretend it wasn't designed with some thought about what it represented. [Post edited 16 Dec 2015 0:49]
| | | |
| Crest Vote on 01:14 - Dec 16 with 2860 views | PunteR |
I prefer daveB's avatar one tbh.
Out of the four shown,I cant make my mind up on 2 or 3.
There's elements in both that would work well.
I prefer the lettering of QPR in the 2nd but I like the size and how it fits on the badge within that 2nd circle on the third one. Plus I like 1882 rather than est 1882.
The forth one is terrible with that thing on the top that's supposed to be a crown. The first ones lettering,although classic looks dated now.
Are these the only choice we have? |  |
| Occasional providers of half decent House music. |
| |
| Crest Vote on 01:21 - Dec 16 with 2854 views | Yugohoop |
Had it pointed out at the pub that in badge number 2 the Q extends under the PR to create a big fat cock and from then on that's all I can see when I look at it.
Personally don't like any of them and I think I could create something better while down the pub. [Post edited 16 Dec 2015 1:24]
|  | | |
| Crest Vote on 01:23 - Dec 16 with 2853 views | Dorse |
Ask Jimmy. He's getting most things right. |  |
| 'What do we want? We don't know! When do we want it? Now!' |
| |
| Crest Vote on 08:23 - Dec 16 with 2784 views | hopphoops |
Last night i was warming to no.3. Today its just a load of squiggles again. Perhaps we can have no.2 as the day badge and no.3 for evenings? |  |
| |
| |
By continuing to use the site, you agree to our use of cookies and to abide by our Terms and Conditions.
