Why have signed another left back? 10:35 - Jan 30 with 3058 views | spudoodles | Yun Suk-Young | ![](/images/avatars/8312.gif) | | | ![](/images/icons/ignore-user.png) |
Why have signed another left back? on 10:37 - Jan 30 with 3051 views | chris1969 | 3rd thread and counting | ![](/images/avatars/0.gif) | | ![](/images/icons/ignore-user.png) |
Why have signed another left back? on 10:47 - Jan 30 with 3025 views | swisscottage |
Why have signed another left back? on 10:37 - Jan 30 by chris1969 | 3rd thread and counting |
Because with Nelson goign and us short on Centre Halves, it gives Harry the Option to play Onouha at Centre Back with Fabio/Young for right back and Fabio defensive right wing. Otherwise Fabio will be playing every other game at left back with Traore being a sick note and leaving Onouha at right back with no replacement for Nelson. | ![](/images/avatars/0.gif) | | ![](/images/icons/ignore-user.png) |
Why have signed another left back? on 10:53 - Jan 30 with 2986 views | BerkoRanger | He's quality and he improves the squad. Simples. | ![](/images/avatars/0.gif) | | ![](/images/icons/ignore-user.png) |
Why have signed another left back? on 12:12 - Jan 30 with 2850 views | exiled_dictator |
Why have signed another left back? on 10:53 - Jan 30 by BerkoRanger | He's quality and he improves the squad. Simples. |
Yes, but why? Just why, why, why, why, why???????? Surely a midfield player or even a striker would have been better ...... | ![](/images/avatars/5042.gif) |
| It's not what you've got; it's where you stick it. | Poll: | Climate Change |
| ![](/images/icons/ignore-user.png) |
Why have signed another left back? on 12:45 - Jan 30 with 2776 views | LowerloftLad | On sky sports it says fabio played in midfield so looks to me as fabio will push up and young at left back | ![](/images/avatars/1297.gif) |
| ![](/images/icons/ignore-user.png) |
Why have signed another left back? on 12:49 - Jan 30 with 2761 views | Tonto | boo him quick - whilst you still can... bbbbbbboooooooooooooooooooooo you damned left back. booooooooooo | ![](/images/avatars/1261.gif) |
| ![](/images/icons/ignore-user.png) |
Why have signed another left back? on 12:52 - Jan 30 with 2744 views | adhoc_qpr | Because we only own one left back and he's made of glass? Because Fabio can play RB and midfield and Traore can also play midfield - so Suk gives us a lot of options? | ![](/images/avatars/0.gif) | | ![](/images/icons/ignore-user.png) |
Why have signed another left back? on 12:55 - Jan 30 with 2729 views | Loft1979 |
Why have signed another left back? on 10:53 - Jan 30 by BerkoRanger | He's quality and he improves the squad. Simples. |
Because one is marginal at best, the other on loan. | ![](/images/avatars/8307.gif) | | ![](/images/icons/ignore-user.png) | Login to get fewer ads
Why have signed another left back? on 13:00 - Jan 30 with 2708 views | olderR |
Why have signed another left back? on 12:55 - Jan 30 by Loft1979 | Because one is marginal at best, the other on loan. |
Because it gives us an excuse to keep Park as his translator? So we can add a second crush barrier outside the players entrance after the game? Or maybe it's a footballing reason. | ![](/images/avatars/2425.gif) | | ![](/images/icons/ignore-user.png) |
| |