| Rotherham at home on 18:19 - Feb 19 with 6787 views | James_Paddocks |
Kids for a quid was a great incentive from the new CEO. |  | |  |
| Rotherham at home on 18:23 - Feb 19 with 6740 views | DannyPaddox |
Is it because …
The Football League!
The Football League!
Is upside down!
Is upside down!
The Football League is upside down
We’re top with Rotherham and Wednesday
And Dirty Leeds are going down! |  | | |
| Rotherham at home on 18:24 - Feb 19 with 6731 views | T_Block |
Yes great ,but we all know this is not going to be easy |  | | |
| Rotherham at home on 18:51 - Feb 19 with 6532 views | QPRConor2000 |
I dont think it will quite be a sell out, as I doubt Rotherham will hardly bring over 500
That would mean we would have nearly 1300 empty seats in the upper tier when we could have sold it out.
I do honestly wonder if there is a case building to look at remodelling the School end into a single tiered stand within the current footprint, so it would make away allocations more flexible in future, so there arnt as many empty seats.
So you could give away fans a quarter of the stand, half the stand, three quarters of the stand or the whole of it. | | | |
| Rotherham at home on 19:31 - Feb 19 with 6336 views | Watford_Ranger |
| Rotherham at home on 18:51 - Feb 19 by QPRConor2000 |
I dont think it will quite be a sell out, as I doubt Rotherham will hardly bring over 500
That would mean we would have nearly 1300 empty seats in the upper tier when we could have sold it out.
I do honestly wonder if there is a case building to look at remodelling the School end into a single tiered stand within the current footprint, so it would make away allocations more flexible in future, so there arnt as many empty seats.
So you could give away fans a quarter of the stand, half the stand, three quarters of the stand or the whole of it. |
Even if that were feasible, which it probably isn’t, the ROI wouldn’t stack up I’m sure. It’s not often at full price we need more seats and you’d need segregation cutting out a few hundred. Also where do you house the away fans if it can’t all be done in a summer? | | | |
| Rotherham at home on 19:46 - Feb 19 with 6249 views | QPRConor2000 |
| Rotherham at home on 19:31 - Feb 19 by Watford_Ranger |
Even if that were feasible, which it probably isn’t, the ROI wouldn’t stack up I’m sure. It’s not often at full price we need more seats and you’d need segregation cutting out a few hundred. Also where do you house the away fans if it can’t all be done in a summer? |
Maybe its more doable that we think?
To not be able to sell 1300 or so seats purely cause of the layout of the stadium is crazy, thats lost revenue right there.
its something that does need addressing, especially as demand for tickets this year has been very high. [Post edited 19 Feb 19:56]
| | | |
| Rotherham at home on 19:55 - Feb 19 with 6190 views | Juzzie |
| Rotherham at home on 18:51 - Feb 19 by QPRConor2000 |
I dont think it will quite be a sell out, as I doubt Rotherham will hardly bring over 500
That would mean we would have nearly 1300 empty seats in the upper tier when we could have sold it out.
I do honestly wonder if there is a case building to look at remodelling the School end into a single tiered stand within the current footprint, so it would make away allocations more flexible in future, so there arnt as many empty seats.
So you could give away fans a quarter of the stand, half the stand, three quarters of the stand or the whole of it. |
Sold Out isn’t necessarily to capacity. It could be to availability and any given home team may not make every seat available. |  | | |
| Rotherham at home on 19:57 - Feb 19 with 6178 views | QPRConor2000 |
| Rotherham at home on 19:55 - Feb 19 by Juzzie |
Sold Out isn’t necessarily to capacity. It could be to availability and any given home team may not make every seat available. |
Thats true.
But to basically have a 1300 seat kill is crazy when demand is high for a ticket. | | | |
Login to get fewer ads
| Rotherham at home on 20:02 - Feb 19 with 6151 views | Juzzie |
| Rotherham at home on 19:57 - Feb 19 by QPRConor2000 |
Thats true.
But to basically have a 1300 seat kill is crazy when demand is high for a ticket. |
If the school end was demolished and a single tier built, how long would it take to break even?
Plus, how high could it go and what capacity would it yield bearing in mind single tiered stands have less capacity than a double tiered of the same height. If we can’t go higher than it currently is then a single tiered stand is a non starter.
Yes, it’s frustrating not being able to potentially sell 1300 tickets but the cost to remedy this may not be viable. | | | |
| Rotherham at home on 20:45 - Feb 19 with 5954 views | Lanhoop |
Yeah, missing out on about £40k from maybe 5 matches a year is not going to be a great payback. | | | |
| Rotherham at home on 20:45 - Feb 19 with 5966 views | nadera78 |
| Rotherham at home on 18:51 - Feb 19 by QPRConor2000 |
I dont think it will quite be a sell out, as I doubt Rotherham will hardly bring over 500
That would mean we would have nearly 1300 empty seats in the upper tier when we could have sold it out.
I do honestly wonder if there is a case building to look at remodelling the School end into a single tiered stand within the current footprint, so it would make away allocations more flexible in future, so there arnt as many empty seats.
So you could give away fans a quarter of the stand, half the stand, three quarters of the stand or the whole of it. |
I'm sure we've gone over this before. If you demolished the School End and rebuilt it as a single-tiered stand - on the same footprint as we currently have - the capacity would be reduced. | | | |
| Rotherham at home on 21:28 - Feb 19 with 5756 views | Ned_Kennedys |
| Rotherham at home on 18:19 - Feb 19 by James_Paddocks |
Kids for a quid was a great incentive from the new CEO. |
They did Kids For A Quid this time last year for the Blackburn game so nothing to do with new CEO. |  | | |
| Rotherham at home on 22:46 - Feb 19 with 5492 views | numptydumpty |
| Rotherham at home on 20:45 - Feb 19 by Lanhoop |
Yeah, missing out on about £40k from maybe 5 matches a year is not going to be a great payback. |
Yeah and cost of change ,probably at least £600k plus.
So would not pay for 10 to 15 years.
Can't see that idea ever being considered.
Some day, we really will be forced to move but could be 15 to 20 years time perhaps - and could not see us being in the area we are currently.
If we stabilised miraculously in Premier league, I think the leg room issue would be deemed a health and safety issue.
For all of those that attended Ashton Gate, crikey could have had a rather large Great Dane Dog in the space given to the row in front. |  |
| |
| Rotherham at home on 01:08 - Feb 20 with 5232 views | barbicanranger |
Are we expecting Rotherham to park the proverbial?! Deep lines and banks of... |  | | |
| Rotherham at home on 01:33 - Feb 20 with 5213 views | SydneyRs |
| Rotherham at home on 01:08 - Feb 20 by barbicanranger |
Are we expecting Rotherham to park the proverbial?! Deep lines and banks of... |
Given how far behind they are surely draws are useless to them. | | | |
| Rotherham at home on 03:59 - Feb 20 with 5134 views | barbicanranger |
| Rotherham at home on 01:33 - Feb 20 by SydneyRs |
Given how far behind they are surely draws are useless to them. |
Agree. Curious to see how they set up. | | | |
| Rotherham at home on 07:15 - Feb 20 with 4942 views | Wegerles_Stairs |
This weekend, for the first time ever, total attendance in the 2. Bundesliga (284,643) was higher than the Bundesliga (261,099):
📈 Incl:
Schalke 1-0 Wiesbaden (60,542)
Hertha 3-2 Magdeburg (52,652)
Nürnberg 1-1 Kaiserslautern (35,462)
Hannover 2-1 Fürth (31,500)
via @kicker | | | |
| Rotherham at home on 07:35 - Feb 20 with 4889 views | Gloucs_R |
Won't need a new stadium in League 1.... |  |
| |
| Rotherham at home on 07:43 - Feb 20 with 4863 views | Watford_Ranger |
| Rotherham at home on 01:08 - Feb 20 by barbicanranger |
Are we expecting Rotherham to park the proverbial?! Deep lines and banks of... |
Depends maybe who we pick. If Armstrong plays I expect so.
We’ve conceded fewer goals than everyone up to tenth which is remarkable considering some of the humpings under Ainsworth. [Post edited 20 Feb 8:26]
| | | |
| Rotherham at home on 09:37 - Feb 20 with 4566 views | SpongeParr |
| Rotherham at home on 19:46 - Feb 19 by QPRConor2000 |
Maybe its more doable that we think?
To not be able to sell 1300 or so seats purely cause of the layout of the stadium is crazy, thats lost revenue right there.
its something that does need addressing, especially as demand for tickets this year has been very high. [Post edited 19 Feb 19:56]
|
In fairness, we could have offered them the lower tier only, and home fans in the top?
Probably down to us having to offer at least 10% of the capacity, so I don't think lower loft covers that. | | | |
| Rotherham at home on 10:31 - Feb 20 with 4402 views | MrSheen |
| Rotherham at home on 07:15 - Feb 20 by Wegerles_Stairs |
This weekend, for the first time ever, total attendance in the 2. Bundesliga (284,643) was higher than the Bundesliga (261,099):
📈 Incl:
Schalke 1-0 Wiesbaden (60,542)
Hertha 3-2 Magdeburg (52,652)
Nürnberg 1-1 Kaiserslautern (35,462)
Hannover 2-1 Fürth (31,500)
via @kicker |
That's amazing, with the 2nd, 4th and 5th best supported teams away...Hamburg, Kaiserslautern and Dusseldorf.
Talking of 1FCK, RIP Andi Brehme |  | | |
| Rotherham at home on 11:56 - Feb 20 with 4162 views | QPRConor2000 |
| Rotherham at home on 09:37 - Feb 20 by SpongeParr |
In fairness, we could have offered them the lower tier only, and home fans in the top?
Probably down to us having to offer at least 10% of the capacity, so I don't think lower loft covers that. |
That probably might be the reason.
I think the lower tier holds 1418, and the upper has a max capacity of 1880 according to the safety certificate which ive linked here.
Its just a shame cause of the way the stand is designed, we cant use those 1300 extra seats. | | | |
| Rotherham at home on 12:45 - Feb 20 with 4035 views | Hayesender |
Less than a thousand now |  |
| |
| Rotherham at home on 17:57 - Feb 20 with 3669 views | Stainrod |
Couldn't you just add an extendable perspex or similar roof/ sheeting over the lower tier (to stop coin throwing and the like from the upper loft and then you could fill the upper and lower tiers with opposing fans? That would surely be very cheap, but maybe I'm missing something. | | | |
| Rotherham at home on 19:26 - Feb 20 with 3471 views | Lanhoop |
Looks like there's only around 150 available now!
We must be mad. | | | |
| |
By continuing to use the site, you agree to our use of cookies and to abide by our Terms and Conditions.
