| Calvin 11:08 - Nov 2 with 64564 views | macro |
Charged with violent conduct (I assume it's the challenge which Clarke went mad about)
Club going to protest against it so fingers crossed. [Post edited 2 Nov 2016 11:37]
|  | | |  |
| Calvin on 16:26 - Nov 4 with 3613 views | kirbys |
When the video evidence is released someone must look at the challenge on calvin a few minutes before Clarke hit the ground. Calvin was walloped from behind and took some recovery whilst the game went on. No foul was given. When Calvin got up he was furious and this was the catalyst for the incident in question. I was stood in the Sandy and remarked that I had never seen Calvin so angry. The next minute Clarke is on the deck and also very angry.
The video footage needs to be looked at to judge what led up to the 77th minute. I honestly can't say whether is was Clarke who walloped Calvin but he took a big hit and I think this would at least make an Oldham player (probably Clarke) culpable. In turn it may lessen the punishment on Calvin which more or less finishes his season. |  | | |
| Calvin on 16:28 - Nov 4 with 3582 views | Daley_Lama |
| Calvin on 16:24 - Nov 4 by fitzochris |
But it's fine. He was sporting the club's luminous gilet at the time. |
As aquick aside, i thought the gilet was gash.
Grey bodywarmer with lights barely visible in pitch black conditions for £100? Aving s laff |  |
| |
| Calvin on 16:28 - Nov 4 with 3580 views | fitzochris |
| Calvin on 16:25 - Nov 4 by judd |
Whore? |
I couldn't possibly comment on how many gillets were in attendance. |  |
| |
| Calvin on 16:29 - Nov 4 with 3553 views | sykeboy |
| Calvin on 16:20 - Nov 4 by fitzochris |
Twelve games for an elbow? Ridiculously inconsistent if so.
It would need to be an eye gouge or something, surely? Only something that's banned in UFC could warrant a 12-game ban. |
Have to agree it got to be more than elbow a 12 match ban is a truly excessive penalty and needs to fully explained | | | |
| Calvin on 16:30 - Nov 4 with 3517 views | dingdangblue |
| Calvin on 16:18 - Nov 4 by dale4ever |
A few twitter sources now stating it was for an elbow. Ludicrous length ban if so! |
No chance! Unless he's broken Clarke's jaw and we haven't heard yet. |  |
| |
| Calvin on 16:32 - Nov 4 with 3485 views | judd |
| Calvin on 16:28 - Nov 4 by Daley_Lama |
As aquick aside, i thought the gilet was gash.
Grey bodywarmer with lights barely visible in pitch black conditions for £100? Aving s laff |
Gilet/gash.
Arf! |  |
| |
Login to get fewer ads
| Calvin on 16:32 - Nov 4 with 3485 views | SalwaDale |
| Calvin on 16:30 - Nov 4 by dingdangblue |
No chance! Unless he's broken Clarke's jaw and we haven't heard yet. |
Did he refuse to wear a poppy at the hearing? |  |
| |
| Calvin on 16:33 - Nov 4 with 3456 views | judd |
| Calvin on 16:32 - Nov 4 by SalwaDale |
Did he refuse to wear a poppy at the hearing? |
He turned up wearing a puppy.
Misheard instructions or summat | |
| |
| Calvin on 16:33 - Nov 4 with 3455 views | DaleiLama |
| Calvin on 16:30 - Nov 4 by dingdangblue |
No chance! Unless he's broken Clarke's jaw and we haven't heard yet. |
|  |
| |
| Calvin on 16:36 - Nov 4 with 3411 views | nordenblue |
| Calvin on 16:08 - Nov 4 by fitzochris |
There needs to be full and detailed statement from the club as to what has transpired here.
A 12-game ban is more than significant and I can't imagine anyone involved at our end is embracing this news gladly. |
Apparently the offence is "a nasty elbow" | | | |
| Calvin on 16:37 - Nov 4 with 3398 views | fitzochris |
| Calvin on 16:36 - Nov 4 by nordenblue |
Apparently the offence is "a nasty elbow" |
As opposed to his "friendly" one? | |
| |
| Calvin on 16:39 - Nov 4 with 3360 views | deeplishblue |
I think that the club should try to keep this as low-profile as possible. Therefore I don't think that we need to "Know exactly what happened" or "See the video for ourselves" or "have a full statement from the club"
Best to try and make a mole hill out of a mountain. |  |
| |
| Calvin on 16:40 - Nov 4 with 3343 views | sykeboy |
| Calvin on 16:37 - Nov 4 by fitzochris |
As opposed to his "friendly" one? |
Amazed that length of ban for an elbow Dale can appeal surely they have too given the sanction | | | |
| Calvin on 16:41 - Nov 4 with 3324 views | fitzochris |
| Calvin on 16:39 - Nov 4 by deeplishblue |
I think that the club should try to keep this as low-profile as possible. Therefore I don't think that we need to "Know exactly what happened" or "See the video for ourselves" or "have a full statement from the club"
Best to try and make a mole hill out of a mountain. |
For real?
There has only ever been one ban handed out that is longer.
I think we, the fans, have an absolute right to be informed as to what went on. Especially as we're going to be deprived of a key player for 12 games. | |
| |
| Calvin on 16:44 - Nov 4 with 3275 views | DaleiLama |
| Calvin on 16:41 - Nov 4 by fitzochris |
For real?
There has only ever been one ban handed out that is longer.
I think we, the fans, have an absolute right to be informed as to what went on. Especially as we're going to be deprived of a key player for 12 games. |
And that wasn't even player-to-player so this is as bad as it gets on the pitch.
#asyetunsubstantiated | |
| |
| Calvin on 16:44 - Nov 4 with 3267 views | D_Alien |
| Calvin on 16:41 - Nov 4 by fitzochris |
For real?
There has only ever been one ban handed out that is longer.
I think we, the fans, have an absolute right to be informed as to what went on. Especially as we're going to be deprived of a key player for 12 games. |
Perhaps Calvin has asked the club not to release anything? |  |
| |
| Calvin on 16:46 - Nov 4 with 3242 views | dingdangblue |
| Calvin on 16:36 - Nov 4 by nordenblue |
Apparently the offence is "a nasty elbow" |
Guy Garvey? | |
| |
| Calvin on 16:46 - Nov 4 with 3232 views | nordenblue |
| Calvin on 16:37 - Nov 4 by fitzochris |
As opposed to his "friendly" one? |
Heard via a decent source(not HP) it was for a "nasty" elbow,presumingly a pretty meditated one,even so it is ridiculously over the top,not like the good old FA to be inconsistent at all though either..... | | | |
| Calvin on 16:48 - Nov 4 with 3194 views | D_Alien |
| Calvin on 16:46 - Nov 4 by nordenblue |
Heard via a decent source(not HP) it was for a "nasty" elbow,presumingly a pretty meditated one,even so it is ridiculously over the top,not like the good old FA to be inconsistent at all though either..... |
Daddie? | |
| |
| Calvin on 16:50 - Nov 4 with 3170 views | fitzochris |
| Calvin on 16:44 - Nov 4 by D_Alien |
Perhaps Calvin has asked the club not to release anything? |
I think the fact alone that the ban is so monumental warrants the offence being released. | |
| |
| Calvin on 16:51 - Nov 4 with 3145 views | nordenblue |
| Calvin on 16:48 - Nov 4 by D_Alien |
Daddie? |
It's HP or nothing I'm afraid...who's the Daddie? | | | |
| Calvin on 16:54 - Nov 4 with 3097 views | D_Alien |
| Calvin on 16:51 - Nov 4 by nordenblue |
It's HP or nothing I'm afraid...who's the Daddie? |
Sorry, I can't reveal my sauce | |
| |
| Calvin on 16:56 - Nov 4 with 3052 views | judd |
He said nasty.
Not hugely over-rated pile of monotonous bury shite. | |
| |
| |
By continuing to use the site, you agree to our use of cookies and to abide by our Terms and Conditions.
