| Calvin 11:08 - Nov 2 with 64570 views | macro |
Charged with violent conduct (I assume it's the challenge which Clarke went mad about)
Club going to protest against it so fingers crossed. [Post edited 2 Nov 2016 11:37]
|  | | |  |
| Calvin on 18:01 - Nov 2 with 5256 views | TVOS1907 |
| Calvin on 16:21 - Nov 2 by dingdangblue |
Come on , you've seen Clarke play. He loves the physical battle and is well capable of dishing it out as he did during the game - and as he does most games. Crying and reporting people afterwards is bad form. |
But we don't know he did. |  |
| When I was your age, I used to enjoy the odd game of tennis. Or was it golf? |
| |
| Calvin on 18:07 - Nov 2 with 5204 views | dingdangblue |
| Calvin on 18:01 - Nov 2 by TVOS1907 |
But we don't know he did. |
So the ref and 4th official have took it upon themselves, without any prompting, to search through a video of the game for an incident that no one at the game saw? |  |
| |
| Calvin on 18:08 - Nov 2 with 5221 views | AtThePeake |
| Calvin on 16:54 - Nov 2 by dingdangblue |
It was Ivanovic the 2nd bite. The difference is both of those incidents were seen by millions. [Post edited 2 Nov 2016 17:02]
|
Right you are.
What difference does it make how many people saw it? If a player does something wrong on the pitch they should be punished for it, regardless of how many people saw it at the time. |  |
| |
| Calvin on 18:15 - Nov 2 with 5202 views | SuddenLad |
The suggestion that any subsequent ban 'could exceed the normal 3 matches' implies that something akin to a bite, or an eye gouge is being alleged.
If indeed that is the case, it will be a minimum 8 games. I can think of no other kind of incident that would attract such a statement for some thing that went apparently completely unseen by everyone except Clarke.
It is certainly a mystery, shrouded by very carefully worded statements. |  |
| “It is easier to fool people, than to convince them that they have been fooled†|
| |
| Calvin on 18:19 - Nov 2 with 5189 views | TVOS1907 |
| Calvin on 18:07 - Nov 2 by dingdangblue |
So the ref and 4th official have took it upon themselves, without any prompting, to search through a video of the game for an incident that no one at the game saw? |
No, I think the match observer has been involved, as I've already mentioned, but it's only supposition.
We need Boss Hog to come on and explain how the process works. | |
| When I was your age, I used to enjoy the odd game of tennis. Or was it golf? |
| |
| Calvin on 18:23 - Nov 2 with 5174 views | 442Dale |
| Calvin on 18:07 - Nov 2 by dingdangblue |
So the ref and 4th official have took it upon themselves, without any prompting, to search through a video of the game for an incident that no one at the game saw? |
No. Maybe the ref/linesman/4th official/match observer saw the aftermath of whatever went on and thought it was worth reviewing after. Without having seen the alleged incident, we don't know whether the player was right to be annoyed, but what we do know is that the video held sufficient evidence to lead to what's happened today. If it didn't, it wouldn't have got this far.
If something similar to what is contained in that video were to happen to a Dale player, would be having a go at him and the club should anyone else involved end up being charged after the event? |  |
| |
| Calvin on 19:26 - Nov 2 with 5026 views | lyberoc |
I was in the Sandy, I didnt see the incident just the aftermath the Oldham goalie definitely pointed out Calvin ti the ref. I,d suggest that because the onfield protests by the Oldham players the ref himself suggested that he would review the video later |  | | |
Login to get fewer ads
| Calvin on 19:36 - Nov 2 with 4996 views | 49thseason |
I noticed that after the final whistle, Calvin went to shake hands with Clarke and was promptly given the bums rush in no uncertain terms, to be fair, Calvin looked a bit bemused by Clarke's reaction. |  | | |
| Calvin on 23:17 - Nov 2 with 4740 views | Shun |
Very curious as to what actually occurred that 5,000 people missed, including a hundred or so only yards from the scene of the crime. If he is charged will it be released what actually happened? |  | | |
| Calvin on 08:53 - Nov 3 with 4556 views | mikehunt |
I was in the Sandy, remember being surprised that someone was on the deck so long after the corner, which seemed fairly innocuous to me. I remember their keeper pointing and making an elbow gesture to the ref, so Icould only conclude that that is what they were grumbling about. |  |
| The worm of time turns not for the cuckoo of circumstance. |
| |
| Calvin on 11:40 - Nov 3 with 4378 views | dingdangblue |
From the F.A.
Off the ball incidents which are not seen at the time by the match officials are referred to a panel of three former elite match officials.
Each panel member will review the video footage independently of one another to determine whether they consider it a sending-off offence.
For retrospective action to be taken, and an FA charge to follow, the decision of the panel must be unanimous.
Reading that - we are going to be missing Calvin for at least 3 games. Lets hope they take his usual calm nature into consideration and leave it at that. | |
| |
| Calvin on 14:48 - Nov 3 with 4174 views | aleanddale |
Verdict has to be unanimous. 3/3 if it's the panel.
5000 missed what is going to be decided retrospectively let's hope Calvin gets the benefit of the doubt.
The allegation is just so un Calvin like! |  | | |
| Calvin on 15:25 - Nov 3 with 4116 views | SuddenLad |
| Calvin on 14:48 - Nov 3 by aleanddale |
Verdict has to be unanimous. 3/3 if it's the panel.
5000 missed what is going to be decided retrospectively let's hope Calvin gets the benefit of the doubt.
The allegation is just so un Calvin like! |
What's the allegation ? Does anyone know yet ? | |
| “It is easier to fool people, than to convince them that they have been fooled†|
| |
| Calvin on 15:46 - Nov 3 with 4051 views | dingdangblue |
| Calvin on 14:48 - Nov 3 by aleanddale |
Verdict has to be unanimous. 3/3 if it's the panel.
5000 missed what is going to be decided retrospectively let's hope Calvin gets the benefit of the doubt.
The allegation is just so un Calvin like! |
Its already been decided by the panel - hence the F.A. charge. If 3 of them have all seen it on video independently and agreed it must be fairly clear cut. I guess Dale are just appealing the talk of more than 3 games suspended. | |
| |
| Calvin on 08:00 - Nov 4 with 3678 views | aleanddale |
| Calvin on 15:46 - Nov 3 by dingdangblue |
Its already been decided by the panel - hence the F.A. charge. If 3 of them have all seen it on video independently and agreed it must be fairly clear cut. I guess Dale are just appealing the talk of more than 3 games suspended. |
Sounds bad reading the statement properly.
FFS could really do without this! | | | |
| Calvin on 08:53 - Nov 4 with 3583 views | dingdangblue |
Does anyone know when Calvin's hearing is? Obviously if it isn't today he can play on Sunday. If it is today and he is suspended - how will the EFL trophy game stand? As it wasn't a red card and was a retrospective punishment and a violent conduct charge surely he would be suspended from all football? | |
| |
| Calvin on 08:58 - Nov 4 with 3584 views | TVOS1907 |
| Calvin on 08:53 - Nov 4 by dingdangblue |
Does anyone know when Calvin's hearing is? Obviously if it isn't today he can play on Sunday. If it is today and he is suspended - how will the EFL trophy game stand? As it wasn't a red card and was a retrospective punishment and a violent conduct charge surely he would be suspended from all football? |
Good question re Hartlepool.
Red cards in the Checkatrade Trophy lead to suspensions in that competition only, so I wonder if it works the other way round?
I'm sure all will be revealed today. | |
| When I was your age, I used to enjoy the odd game of tennis. Or was it golf? |
| |
| Calvin on 13:49 - Nov 4 with 3356 views | D_Dale |
What is it about the 77th minute?
From FA webpages:
Calvin Andrew has been charged following an incident which was not seen by the match officials but caught on video.
The Rochdale player was involved in an alleged act of violent conduct in or around the 77th minute of the game against Oldham Athletic on 29 October 2016.
Furthermore, it is alleged that the standard punishment of three matches that would otherwise apply is clearly insufficient.
The player has until 6pm on 2 November 2016 to respond to the charge.
Read more at http://www.thefa.com/news/2016/nov/02/calvin-andrew-rochdale-violent-conduct-cha
Thursday 20 October 2016
Bury FC
Rochdale AFC v Bury FC
Football League 1, 15 October 2016
Breach of FA Rule E20 (a) — it is alleged that in or around the 77th minute of the fixture, Bury FC failed to ensure that its players conducted themselves in an orderly fashion.
Charge admitted, paper hearing requested.
Bury FC was fined £12,500 and warned as to its future conduct.
Wednesday 19 October
Rochdale AFC
Rochdale AFC v Bury FC
Football League 1, 15 October 2016
Breach of FA Rule E20 (a) — it is alleged that in or around the 77th minute of the fixture, Rochdale AFC failed to ensure that its players conducted themselves in an orderly fashion.
Charge admitted, standard penalty 1 (£2,500 fine) accepted
Read more at http://www.thefa.com/news/2016/Sep/30/fa-charges-suspensions-wrongful-dismissal- | | | |
| Calvin on 14:13 - Nov 4 with 3301 views | SuddenLad |
What was it specifically that drew the £2,500 fine ? | |
| “It is easier to fool people, than to convince them that they have been fooled†|
| |
| Calvin on 14:35 - Nov 4 with 3226 views | Yorkshire_Dale |
No wonder the FA have so much loot.......proper money maker this discipline jobby. | | | |
| Calvin on 15:18 - Nov 4 with 3147 views | ColDale |
| Calvin on 14:35 - Nov 4 by Yorkshire_Dale |
No wonder the FA have so much loot.......proper money maker this discipline jobby. |
You're assuming that it will get paid |  | | |
| Calvin on 15:31 - Nov 4 with 3097 views | sykeboy |
| Calvin on 15:18 - Nov 4 by ColDale |
You're assuming that it will get paid |
12 match ban wow!! | | | |
| Calvin on 15:36 - Nov 4 with 3070 views | sykeboy |
| Calvin on 15:31 - Nov 4 by sykeboy |
12 match ban wow!! |
As previously stated its got to be a bite or eye contact appears he has admitted the charge | | | |
| Calvin on 15:40 - Nov 4 with 3038 views | nordenblue |
| Calvin on 15:31 - Nov 4 by sykeboy |
12 match ban wow!! |
That seems ridiculously excessive whatever he's done.... | | | |
| |
By continuing to use the site, you agree to our use of cookies and to abide by our Terms and Conditions.
