By continuing to use the site, you agree to our use of cookies and to abide by our Terms and Conditions. We in turn value your personal details in accordance with our Privacy Policy.
Please log in or register. Registered visitors get fewer ads.
He is now desperately trying to justify his actions. Bottom line, he knew she was a climate protester, he was angry that she was 'spoiling' his wealthy, privileged meal and he took action wholly expected from a bully boy misogynist. They all try to say sorry after the violence.
Would he have slammed a well built male and grabbed him by the throat? I think not. The man is a coward. If you or I was seen by a police officer doing this we’d be arrested. The same should apply here regardless if you support the protest or not, it does not give him the freedom to physically assault people.
Preventing a potential assault is fine as long as reasonable force is used, which it was as per PACE.
You need to watch the video again.She was walking past and didn't confront the guy, she didn't even see him and he attacked her. No defence for that at all
That reminded me of a teacher dealing with a naughty child at break time. Maybe the initial grab was a bit strong, but he pretty much just turned her around and frogmarched her out.
Obviously you can’t condone violence, but protesters can’t expect carte blanche to disrupt at will. Didn’t see a lot wrong there.
You’re right but that’s mainly because you’re not a silly twà t like Ebo.
The first ever recipient of a Planet Swans Lifetime Achievement Award.
You need to watch the video again.She was walking past and didn't confront the guy, she didn't even see him and he attacked her. No defence for that at all
If he believed an assault was to be committed, he was entitled to do so. He seemed to use a minimum of force; it's a fine line certainly but he was hardly throwing punches for example.
Again, if she'd been found to be carrying a weapon, acid, whatever would inactivity have been the correct option? Given attacks on politicians increasing, you can't say he was wrong to do something. You can argue if that something was correct...
The real issue is what the fvck security were doing to even allow them into the area.
So just to get this right, If I throw a liquid on someone, I get arrested and go to court. If I lay my hands on someone and force them out of a room, I'm in the clear as long as I think they may have been about to assault me?
You know, Hobbes, some days even my lucky rocket ship underpants don't help.
I see the usual hypocrites are out in force again! If she had been a far right activist you would be asking why he didn’t knock her out. She shouldn’t have been there. If she had pulled a knife or gun out people would be questioning why she got where she did. Ffs he spun her around and marched her out. He should have rugby tackled her to the ground and held her down until she was taken away by police.
Not so different on either side of The House really are they, Eb?
Remember this?
Both ejections used inappropriate levels of force; the difference here though is the Labour ejection was by some jobsworth security guards, and last night's was by a sitting MP who should have known better and has now quite rightly been suspended.
I see the usual hypocrites are out in force again! If she had been a far right activist you would be asking why he didn’t knock her out. She shouldn’t have been there. If she had pulled a knife or gun out people would be questioning why she got where she did. Ffs he spun her around and marched her out. He should have rugby tackled her to the ground and held her down until she was taken away by police.
â˜ðŸ»
The first ever recipient of a Planet Swans Lifetime Achievement Award.
I was criticised on here yesterday for sharing a video of a bunch of youths beating up an innocent man earning a living. Today, the very same people criticising me are directing abuse at a man removing someone from a room. What an embarrassment
If he believed an assault was to be committed, he was entitled to do so. He seemed to use a minimum of force; it's a fine line certainly but he was hardly throwing punches for example.
Again, if she'd been found to be carrying a weapon, acid, whatever would inactivity have been the correct option? Given attacks on politicians increasing, you can't say he was wrong to do something. You can argue if that something was correct...
The real issue is what the fvck security were doing to even allow them into the area.
You’re words...
“If he believed an assault was to be committed, he was entitled to do so.” I didn’t see any assault and it was patently obvious none was coming!
By that logic if someone believes an assault is to be committed they can use A violent act to stop the assault right? Just think about that for a second.
I was criticised on here yesterday for sharing a video of a bunch of youths beating up an innocent man earning a living. Today, the very same people criticising me are directing abuse at a man removing someone from a room. What an embarrassment
You’re paranoid! Or attention seeker, awwwwww! Your both aren’t you.
I didn’t critise or respond to any of your posts yesterday.
What if a 16 year old pupil is hitting shit out of a teacher?
The thought process would direct me to restrain the pupil, remove him from the scene. But of corse that completely different to what we’re actually discussing.
You’re paranoid! Or attention seeker, awwwwww! Your both aren’t you.
I didn’t critise or respond to any of your posts yesterday.
[Post edited 21 Jun 2019 12:21]
I’m not paranoid mate, just pointing out the blatant hypocrisy by some on this forum. You didn’t even come into my head to be honest, I’ve forgotten you already.
By continuing to use the site, you agree to our use of cookies and to abide by our Terms and Conditions.
