| This jackarmy site 21:22 - Feb 9 with 41503 views | perchrockjack |
Some alarming stuff on there..
Very disconcerting
Seems we basically have directors and a trust that cannot be trusted.
Well, are we in shite or not |  |
| |  |
| This jackarmy site on 22:10 - Feb 9 with 1373 views | NeathJack |
| This jackarmy site on 22:07 - Feb 9 by Parlay |
Of course there is clash of thought though.
Huw Cooze has been paid 400k by the club over the last 3 years into his personal business. 400k!
Thats an awful big incentive to toe the party line. [Post edited 10 Feb 2015 2:08]
|
Are you accusing him of doing that? |  | | |
| This jackarmy site on 22:11 - Feb 9 with 1368 views | Gretsch |
| This jackarmy site on 22:10 - Feb 9 by NeathJack |
Are you accusing him of doing that? |
Quite startled by that if its a fact |  | | |
| This jackarmy site on 22:11 - Feb 9 with 1365 views | Parlay |
| This jackarmy site on 22:07 - Feb 9 by Gretsch |
I am talking of the Laudrup gang, and the Monk hating gang, anf the Sumbler haters etc., and those with agendas to be leaders that no one necessarily wants.
In who else do we trust, we have a chairman who is a fan of the club, many/most of the executive are fans or people who put their hands in their picket to save us, and we have a trust who are obviously fans. Money can easily corrupt but I would rather have what we have rather than a Risdale or an Ashleigh etc. |
To be fair, anybody that isn't a happy clappy nodding seal no matter what is accused of having some sort of agenda.
The point being of course that this chairman fan of the club is in talks to sell to a Riddler and Mike Ashley type.
On thejackarmy.net site a trust board member has joined and categorically stated that it is nit an investment but a share sale. That is worrying. The exchange? Cheap loans. |  |
| |
| This jackarmy site on 22:11 - Feb 9 with 1365 views | skippyjack |
| This jackarmy site on 22:07 - Feb 9 by Parlay |
Of course there is clash of thought though.
Huw Cooze has been paid 400k by the club over the last 3 years into his personal business. 400k!
Thats an awful big incentive to toe the party line. [Post edited 10 Feb 2015 2:08]
|
It's not a clear conflict of interest though.. it's not factual (I'm doing a you) |  |
| The awkward moment when a Welsh Club become the Champions of England.. shh
The Swansea Way.. To upset the odds. | | Poll: | Best Swans Player |
| |
| This jackarmy site on 22:12 - Feb 9 with 1358 views | Parlay |
| This jackarmy site on 22:10 - Feb 9 by NeathJack |
Are you accusing him of doing that? |
Accusing him of doing what? There is no accusation there, only fact. | |
| |
| This jackarmy site on 22:13 - Feb 9 with 1355 views | Parlay |
| This jackarmy site on 22:11 - Feb 9 by skippyjack |
It's not a clear conflict of interest though.. it's not factual (I'm doing a you) |
You can do an anybody you like. But there is a clash of thought, clearly. [Post edited 10 Feb 2015 2:09]
| |
| |
| This jackarmy site on 22:13 - Feb 9 with 1354 views | Gretsch |
| This jackarmy site on 22:11 - Feb 9 by Parlay |
To be fair, anybody that isn't a happy clappy nodding seal no matter what is accused of having some sort of agenda.
The point being of course that this chairman fan of the club is in talks to sell to a Riddler and Mike Ashley type.
On thejackarmy.net site a trust board member has joined and categorically stated that it is nit an investment but a share sale. That is worrying. The exchange? Cheap loans. |
Obviously know more than me, so the investor is an untrustworthy type then, on what basis. Not saying your wrong but not read into it as much as you obviously have. | | | |
| This jackarmy site on 22:14 - Feb 9 with 1341 views | skippyjack |
| This jackarmy site on 22:13 - Feb 9 by Parlay |
You can do an anybody you like. But there is a clash of thought, clearly. [Post edited 10 Feb 2015 2:09]
|
It's not.. and you know it.. I know it.. | |
| The awkward moment when a Welsh Club become the Champions of England.. shh
The Swansea Way.. To upset the odds. | | Poll: | Best Swans Player |
| |
Login to get fewer ads
| This jackarmy site on 22:15 - Feb 9 with 1337 views | Gretsch |
| This jackarmy site on 22:11 - Feb 9 by Parlay |
To be fair, anybody that isn't a happy clappy nodding seal no matter what is accused of having some sort of agenda.
The point being of course that this chairman fan of the club is in talks to sell to a Riddler and Mike Ashley type.
On thejackarmy.net site a trust board member has joined and categorically stated that it is nit an investment but a share sale. That is worrying. The exchange? Cheap loans. |
And to be fair if you say you have confidence in the board you are subordinate or as you say "happy claper" same both ways. [Post edited 9 Feb 2015 22:23]
| | | |
| This jackarmy site on 22:16 - Feb 9 with 1333 views | NeathJack |
| This jackarmy site on 22:12 - Feb 9 by Parlay |
Accusing him of doing what? There is no accusation there, only fact. |
There is a clear insinuation of wrongdoing.
Just to clarify, in your opinion do you believe there has been any wrongdoing? | | | |
| This jackarmy site on 22:17 - Feb 9 with 1329 views | Parlay |
| This jackarmy site on 22:13 - Feb 9 by Gretsch |
Obviously know more than me, so the investor is an untrustworthy type then, on what basis. Not saying your wrong but not read into it as much as you obviously have. |
John Moores is the American we all refer to.
He owned the San Diego Padres baseball side. When he left he ensured as part of the deal he kept $200m of the Padres TV rights money. | |
| |
| This jackarmy site on 22:17 - Feb 9 with 1329 views | skippyjack |
| This jackarmy site on 22:16 - Feb 9 by NeathJack |
There is a clear insinuation of wrongdoing.
Just to clarify, in your opinion do you believe there has been any wrongdoing? |
I'll put it down as morally wrong.. it's certainly not a conflict of interest though | |
| The awkward moment when a Welsh Club become the Champions of England.. shh
The Swansea Way.. To upset the odds. | | Poll: | Best Swans Player |
| |
| This jackarmy site on 22:17 - Feb 9 with 1329 views | ScoobyWho |
| This jackarmy site on 21:29 - Feb 9 by Gretsch |
People want to remember who the trust were when we weren't A billy big bollucks club, when you had to pay to join the trust if you wanted to. To help the swans keep their 20% because you wanted to help the club and it was only a few seasons ago. People like Phil (who I don't know and have never met) were in fairness bothered to get off their arse and do whatever they could to HELP the club, I was happy to hand over my tenner and sell my raffles and sit on my arse, so I am greatful to people who put in an effort.
Some people just disrespect or can't remember the past. But all to their own opinions. |
Exactly, and fair play to Phil for not taking the bait laid down by some of those so called concerned fans. |  |
| |
| This jackarmy site on 22:21 - Feb 9 with 1312 views | Parlay |
| This jackarmy site on 22:16 - Feb 9 by NeathJack |
There is a clear insinuation of wrongdoing.
Just to clarify, in your opinion do you believe there has been any wrongdoing? |
No there isn't, you are being a drama queen.
There is a clear clash of thought - is the factual statement been made. Who knows if it affects his business with the Trust, he may not even consciously know. He is supposed to be making decisions and working solely with the interest of the fans... Yet has a yearly paycheque coming from the other side.
If you cant see that is a clash of thought then i despair.
Its like saying it is wrong for Nathan Dyer to bet on the opposite outcome of a match he is involved in. Nobody is suggesting he is throwing the match, but it is wrong to put yourself in that scenario where your focus isn't solely on the side you are employed by, and there is a clash of thought. [Post edited 10 Feb 2015 2:10]
| |
| |
| This jackarmy site on 22:21 - Feb 9 with 1310 views | whiterock |
| This jackarmy site on 22:07 - Feb 9 by Parlay |
Of course there is clash of thought though.
Huw Cooze has been paid 400k by the club over the last 3 years into his personal business. 400k!
Thats an awful big incentive to toe the party line. [Post edited 10 Feb 2015 2:08]
|
Harcourt print the programme, does he own that? | | | |
| This jackarmy site on 22:22 - Feb 9 with 1276 views | NeathJack |
| This jackarmy site on 22:21 - Feb 9 by Parlay |
No there isn't, you are being a drama queen.
There is a clear clash of thought - is the factual statement been made. Who knows if it affects his business with the Trust, he may not even consciously know. He is supposed to be making decisions and working solely with the interest of the fans... Yet has a yearly paycheque coming from the other side.
If you cant see that is a clash of thought then i despair.
Its like saying it is wrong for Nathan Dyer to bet on the opposite outcome of a match he is involved in. Nobody is suggesting he is throwing the match, but it is wrong to put yourself in that scenario where your focus isn't solely on the side you are employed by, and there is a clash of thought. [Post edited 10 Feb 2015 2:10]
|
Ok, so you are saying there has been no wrongdoing. | | | |
| This jackarmy site on 22:23 - Feb 9 with 1273 views | Darran |
| This jackarmy site on 22:11 - Feb 9 by Gretsch |
Quite startled by that if its a fact |
It's not a fact. |  |
| |
| This jackarmy site on 22:24 - Feb 9 with 1266 views | Gretsch |
| This jackarmy site on 22:23 - Feb 9 by Darran |
It's not a fact. |
Didn't think it would be | | | |
| This jackarmy site on 22:24 - Feb 9 with 1262 views | skippyjack |
| This jackarmy site on 22:23 - Feb 9 by Darran |
It's not a fact. |
It's obvious it isn't.. but some moral wrongdoing. | |
| The awkward moment when a Welsh Club become the Champions of England.. shh
The Swansea Way.. To upset the odds. | | Poll: | Best Swans Player |
| |
| This jackarmy site on 22:26 - Feb 9 with 1249 views | Parlay |
| This jackarmy site on 22:22 - Feb 9 by NeathJack |
Ok, so you are saying there has been no wrongdoing. |
No, I'm not saying that either. You seem determined to put words in my mouth for whatever reason.
Im saying there is a clash of thought. Just as there would be if one of our players placed a bet on Swansea to lose.
Is there wrong doing apart from creating that clash of thought? Who knows. But it is wrong to be in that position when you have this clash of thought. So if thats wrong doing then yes. [Post edited 10 Feb 2015 2:11]
| |
| |
| This jackarmy site on 22:27 - Feb 9 with 1240 views | Parlay |
| This jackarmy site on 22:23 - Feb 9 by Darran |
It's not a fact. |
What is not a fact?
That Huw Coozes company has been paid almost 400k in 3 years?
Want a bet? [Post edited 9 Feb 2015 22:27]
| |
| |
| This jackarmy site on 22:28 - Feb 9 with 1236 views | whiterock |
| This jackarmy site on 22:27 - Feb 9 by Parlay |
What is not a fact?
That Huw Coozes company has been paid almost 400k in 3 years?
Want a bet? [Post edited 9 Feb 2015 22:27]
|
Harcourt print the programme, does he own harcourt? | | | |
| This jackarmy site on 22:29 - Feb 9 with 1223 views | Parlay |
| This jackarmy site on 22:28 - Feb 9 by whiterock |
Harcourt print the programme, does he own harcourt? |
Visions creative is his business i believe, whether harcourt is a version of that I couldnt tell you. | |
| |
| This jackarmy site on 22:33 - Feb 9 with 1194 views | whiterock |
| This jackarmy site on 22:29 - Feb 9 by Parlay |
Visions creative is his business i believe, whether harcourt is a version of that I couldnt tell you. |
Casting aspersions when you haven't got a clue, well done. | | | |
| This jackarmy site on 22:33 - Feb 9 with 1194 views | NeathJack |
| This jackarmy site on 22:26 - Feb 9 by Parlay |
No, I'm not saying that either. You seem determined to put words in my mouth for whatever reason.
Im saying there is a clash of thought. Just as there would be if one of our players placed a bet on Swansea to lose.
Is there wrong doing apart from creating that clash of thought? Who knows. But it is wrong to be in that position when you have this clash of thought. So if thats wrong doing then yes. [Post edited 10 Feb 2015 2:11]
|
If one of our players placed a bet on us to lose it would be against FA rules so your analogy is nonsense. | | | |
| |
By continuing to use the site, you agree to our use of cookies and to abide by our Terms and Conditions.
