| Hills Comments After Game 22:43 - Aug 10 with 12520 views | CoventryDale |
Keith Hill Was Livid After The Red Card But Even Though The Referee And The 1 Nil Lose He Said He Was Happy With The Possession. |  |
| |  |
| Hills Comments After Game on 23:25 - Aug 10 with 8251 views | ColDale |
on the beeb
"I think 90% of the crowd would tell you it wasn't a sending-off.
"I know the coaches on both benches and the majority of players realise, because they've actually played the game, that it wasn't a sending-off and it was purely accidental.
"What helped make the referee's decision was the challenge previously, where Peter probably should have been booked, and he didn't book him. Instead of booking him for the second offence, he decided to show him a straight red.
"We'll have a look at it [appealing]. It costs the club a lot of money to appeal, but it will cost the club for Peter to be suspended for three games." |  | | |
| Hills Comments After Game on 00:44 - Aug 11 with 8136 views | 442Dale |
Having now seen it on tv, it's an understandable decision. Cavanagh may well have had his eyes on the ball all the way but it was a dangerous challenge.
Little point in appealing. |  |
| |
| Hills Comments After Game on 01:11 - Aug 11 with 8097 views | blakeyj |
Looking at it on FLS it was quite like the nani sending off against real madrid this year that was very debatable | | | |
| Hills Comments After Game on 01:36 - Aug 11 with 8080 views | KenBoon |
| Hills Comments After Game on 00:44 - Aug 11 by 442Dale |
Having now seen it on tv, it's an understandable decision. Cavanagh may well have had his eyes on the ball all the way but it was a dangerous challenge.
Little point in appealing. |
I've not seen it yet, but dangerous isn't a red card. you need to be a psycho about it too. Dangerous is a yellow card... unless they've changed the laws again! |  | | |
| Hills Comments After Game on 07:19 - Aug 11 with 7975 views | davidab2202 |
Seen it on FLS- possibly a bit unlucky in that Cav was turning towards their player with his foot raised in an attempt to control ball going beyond him.Is it worth an appeal--probably not as with a Ref only officiating in his second game at this level it may be seen as a knock to his confidence to overturn his decision .Accept it and get on to the next game. | | | |
| Hills Comments After Game on 08:19 - Aug 11 with 7916 views | ColDale |
| Hills Comments After Game on 07:19 - Aug 11 by davidab2202 |
Seen it on FLS- possibly a bit unlucky in that Cav was turning towards their player with his foot raised in an attempt to control ball going beyond him.Is it worth an appeal--probably not as with a Ref only officiating in his second game at this level it may be seen as a knock to his confidence to overturn his decision .Accept it and get on to the next game. |
I don't think there's any chance of winning an appeal having seen the replays. Yes there was no malice and Weir made a meal of it, but the foot was high and will be deemed as being dangerous. A shame for Cav as if the team does well in his absence, he might struggle to get his place back. | | | |
| Hills Comments After Game on 09:06 - Aug 11 with 7836 views | TalkingSutty |
| Hills Comments After Game on 08:19 - Aug 11 by ColDale |
I don't think there's any chance of winning an appeal having seen the replays. Yes there was no malice and Weir made a meal of it, but the foot was high and will be deemed as being dangerous. A shame for Cav as if the team does well in his absence, he might struggle to get his place back. |
To be fair Cav was lucky not to be booked for a similar challenge just prior to the red card.
Hilly was bemoaning the fact he had to substitute Henderson because he didnt trust the referee not to send him off having previously been booked. In reality Henderson needs a good bo*******g for stupidly kicking the ball away and giving the ref no option but to book him, he let his team down and forced the managers hand.
This post has been edited by an administrator |  | | |
| Hills Comments After Game on 10:10 - Aug 11 with 7690 views | CockneyDale |
I agree: no point appealing as there's enough there to justify the decision. 'Umpire's decision', if it were cricket.
Sad that he misses three games as there is very clearly no malice to the incident (I won't even call it a tackle as he didn't know there was anyone there).
An opportunity for someone else to shine and for Cav to get a rest and work hard in training.
Seems like we have much to be proud of in the performance: well done to the team. |  | | |
Login to get fewer ads
| Hills Comments After Game on 11:05 - Aug 11 with 7574 views | wmgunit |
Seeing the replay, it's not malicious but very clumsy from a player who had just received a warning. Not worth appealing that one. |  | | |
| Hills Comments After Game on 11:17 - Aug 11 with 7548 views | Sandyman |
Didn't look as bad at the game - Cav was clearly ball watching and did appear to win it. He couldn't have known there would be a Burton player behind him - bad luck. Throughout the game the ref was very inconsistent and missed some blatantly obvious fouls. However, the Football League will defend a new ref, even a shocker like the one we got yesterday. Appeal would not overturn a  IMHO. |  | | |
| Hills Comments After Game on 13:49 - Aug 11 with 7327 views | isitme |
Having just watched the challenge again I can see why he was sent off as it was high. I do not think for one minute that it was malicious and some other refs would have used a bit of empathy and common sense and not sent him off.
I cannot see an appeal being successful, unfortunately. |  | | |
| Hills Comments After Game on 14:25 - Aug 11 with 7290 views | Yorkshire_Dale |
| Hills Comments After Game on 09:06 - Aug 11 by TalkingSutty |
To be fair Cav was lucky not to be booked for a similar challenge just prior to the red card.
Hilly was bemoaning the fact he had to substitute Henderson because he didnt trust the referee not to send him off having previously been booked. In reality Henderson needs a good bo*******g for stupidly kicking the ball away and giving the ref no option but to book him, he let his team down and forced the managers hand.
This post has been edited by an administrator |
These are two of our experienced players........both giving the new Ref no options.
Poor form lads.
Must have cost us a least a point? | | | |
| Hills Comments After Game on 14:56 - Aug 11 with 7229 views | Shun |
| Hills Comments After Game on 09:06 - Aug 11 by TalkingSutty |
To be fair Cav was lucky not to be booked for a similar challenge just prior to the red card.
Hilly was bemoaning the fact he had to substitute Henderson because he didnt trust the referee not to send him off having previously been booked. In reality Henderson needs a good bo*******g for stupidly kicking the ball away and giving the ref no option but to book him, he let his team down and forced the managers hand.
This post has been edited by an administrator |
I don't think Henderson was booked for kicking the ball away, was he? I think it was one of those "I'll sneakily walk in front of you before you try and take the free kick" moments.
I wonder who'll take Cav's place? I haven't seen Hery yet but people were suggesting he was in the defensive midfielder mould? |  | | |
| Hills Comments After Game on 15:01 - Aug 11 with 7218 views | isitme |
He kicked the ball away when the ball was set for a Burton free kick , which was an obvious, but unnecessary yellow card.
I think Tutte is the 'next cab off the rank' with Lund playing a deeper role. | | | |
| Hills Comments After Game on 16:17 - Aug 11 with 7108 views | sandylaner23 |
The most infuriating thing about the ref was his inconsistency, he was extremely picky and every 50-50 call seemed to go burtons way, even shoulder to shoulder challenges were given as a foul against.
And to top it all in the 2nd half the blatant 2 footed tackle from behind on Lund around the halfway line which didnt even warrant a talking to, can't remember which 1 of theirs it was. |  | | |
| Hills Comments After Game on 16:33 - Aug 11 with 7063 views | SalwaDale |
| Hills Comments After Game on 15:01 - Aug 11 by isitme |
He kicked the ball away when the ball was set for a Burton free kick , which was an obvious, but unnecessary yellow card.
I think Tutte is the 'next cab off the rank' with Lund playing a deeper role. |
I'm sure he was booked for standing in front, they took a quick one straight at him and he got booked. |  |
| |
| Hills Comments After Game on 16:59 - Aug 11 with 7028 views | AtThePeake |
| Hills Comments After Game on 16:33 - Aug 11 by SalwaDale |
I'm sure he was booked for standing in front, they took a quick one straight at him and he got booked. |
Nope, he definitely rolled the ball a whole yard away.
For me, it's a very unlucky sending off. I understand why the laws are there and why it's a red card, but anyone who has played an 11-a-side game at any level will tell you that there was absolutely nothing Cav could do. He went to control the ball, and there just so happened to be a Burton player there at the wrong place and the wrong time. |  |
| |
| Hills Comments After Game on 17:09 - Aug 11 with 7002 views | Brierls |
Hendo was booked for blocking a quick freekick, not kicking the ball away. Players do it for pretty much every freekick, but refs only take action when the player taking the freekick purposely hits it against the offender.
Cav was unlucky with the red card, but there's little point in appealing. I said the same as one of the posters above when comparing to DRS in the cricket; we could appeal, but it is going to be "Umpires Call". |  | | |
| Hills Comments After Game on 17:14 - Aug 11 with 6990 views | SalwaDale |
Controversy with the Henderson booking then, were we all at the same game? | |
| |
| Hills Comments After Game on 17:25 - Aug 11 with 6964 views | Yorkshire_Dale |
It's good to see that bury did n't let the side down in the stupid red card stakes......
....Cameron booked for foul,argues after resulting penalty is scored,second yellow and off.
Not his day for using the family brain cell. | | | |
| Hills Comments After Game on 17:31 - Aug 11 with 6953 views | sandylaner1 |
| Hills Comments After Game on 14:56 - Aug 11 by Shun |
I don't think Henderson was booked for kicking the ball away, was he? I think it was one of those "I'll sneakily walk in front of you before you try and take the free kick" moments.
I wonder who'll take Cav's place? I haven't seen Hery yet but people were suggesting he was in the defensive midfielder mould? |
this was my understanding of the incident at the time too
he was walking back in position but went across the ball and blocked the quick free kick - he was having a good game first half in centre mid
harsh when you factor in the inconsistencies of referee performance when burton players kicked the ball away in the second half and a few tackles that were yellows went unpunished |  | | |
| Hills Comments After Game on 17:52 - Aug 11 with 6910 views | mr_fri_night |
Henderson was booked for kicking the ball away | | | |
| Hills Comments After Game on 17:54 - Aug 11 with 6910 views | love_the_dale |
Re Cav, it might be useful to look at FIFA's 'Interpretation of Law 12 :-
“CARELESS” means that the player has shown a lack of attention or consideration when making a challenge or that he acted without precaution.
- NO FURTHER DISCIPLINARY SANCTION is needed if a foul is judged to be careless.
“RECKLESS” means that the player has acted with complete disregard to the danger to, or consequences for, his opponent.
- A player who plays in a reckless manner must be CAUTIONED.
“USING EXCESSIVE FORCE” means that the player has far exceeded the necessary
use of force and is in danger of injuring his opponent.
- A player who uses excessive force must be SENT OFF.
If bringing the ball down is careless (!!) then it was a free-kick! There is no way it could have been described as reckless, let alone using excessive force.
Re Henderson, he was booked for kicking the ball away - only a short distance, but nevertheless a silly thing to do. They weren't even trying to take a quick free-kick. I do wonder though why Burton players were not booked on two occasions for kicking the ball a long distance after the whistle had gone. |  | | |
| Hills Comments After Game on 18:22 - Aug 11 with 6864 views | AtThePeake |
| Hills Comments After Game on 17:54 - Aug 11 by love_the_dale |
Re Cav, it might be useful to look at FIFA's 'Interpretation of Law 12 :-
“CARELESS” means that the player has shown a lack of attention or consideration when making a challenge or that he acted without precaution.
- NO FURTHER DISCIPLINARY SANCTION is needed if a foul is judged to be careless.
“RECKLESS” means that the player has acted with complete disregard to the danger to, or consequences for, his opponent.
- A player who plays in a reckless manner must be CAUTIONED.
“USING EXCESSIVE FORCE” means that the player has far exceeded the necessary
use of force and is in danger of injuring his opponent.
- A player who uses excessive force must be SENT OFF.
If bringing the ball down is careless (!!) then it was a free-kick! There is no way it could have been described as reckless, let alone using excessive force.
Re Henderson, he was booked for kicking the ball away - only a short distance, but nevertheless a silly thing to do. They weren't even trying to take a quick free-kick. I do wonder though why Burton players were not booked on two occasions for kicking the ball a long distance after the whistle had gone. |
Would love to hear the referees reasoning for the red card then. Cav had absolutely no idea the player was there, how can he have used excessive force? | |
| |
| Hills Comments After Game on 19:15 - Aug 11 with 6801 views | sandylaner1 |
| Hills Comments After Game on 18:22 - Aug 11 by AtThePeake |
Would love to hear the referees reasoning for the red card then. Cav had absolutely no idea the player was there, how can he have used excessive force? |
he didn't want to look like he bottled a big decision in only his second football league game - probably couldn't wait to get a red out
as he'd already talked to cav he was probably entitled to book him
ref got it wrong and wont have to answer to anyone, not a chance of winning an appeal | | | |
| |
By continuing to use the site, you agree to our use of cookies and to abide by our Terms and Conditions.
