| Truth finally emerging 06:36 - Feb 1 with 6090 views | TailGunner |
I got destroyed on here October / November for posting what was happening contract wise. I was 'negative, clueless, wearying'..
The info was coming from inside the club, from people who care.
The yanks wanted Roberts, Rodon out in January, and Jenkins was fighting to get them contracts.
Ignore the smokescreens today from Leeds, Villa and Pearlman.
Jenkins halted the James and Fer deals.
The yanks wanted us to lose Fer, Carrol, Montero, James yesterday.
For all his faults, if he was not there now Rodon & Roberts would be gone as well as the above.
We are stuffed with these in charge.
Whatever your reservations are in the trust, we all need to join asap.
Unity in numbers is needed.
|  | | |  |
| Truth finally emerging on 06:57 - Feb 1 with 4882 views | 34dfgdf54 |
He sold the club to these guys. Buck has to stop with him.
They all need to go ASAP. |  | | |
| Truth finally emerging on 06:58 - Feb 1 with 4870 views | TailGunner |
| Truth finally emerging on 06:57 - Feb 1 by 34dfgdf54 |
He sold the club to these guys. Buck has to stop with him.
They all need to go ASAP. |
Just concentrating on what's happened this season here mate,
But of course you are correct. | | | |
| Truth finally emerging on 07:10 - Feb 1 with 4764 views | magicdaps10 |
The way I see it, if Jenkins stopped the deal then it indicates we were not financially forced to sell them.
The old board sold the club to them, the old board are the source of the problem.
The old board guys now have to put pressure on the yanks to sell the club.
It is one big mess. |  |
| |
| Truth finally emerging on 08:19 - Feb 1 with 4498 views | JACKMANANDBOY |
| Truth finally emerging on 07:10 - Feb 1 by magicdaps10 |
The way I see it, if Jenkins stopped the deal then it indicates we were not financially forced to sell them.
The old board sold the club to them, the old board are the source of the problem.
The old board guys now have to put pressure on the yanks to sell the club.
It is one big mess. |
It certainly is. |  |
| |
| Truth finally emerging on 11:45 - Feb 1 with 4172 views | AustinIsOurHero |
I have it on good authority that Van Der Hoorn would have gone as well, had it not been for Rodon's injury. |  |
| |
| Truth finally emerging on 12:24 - Feb 1 with 4103 views | _ |
Jiffy, One simple question....
Why would the Americans have wanted any player to go?
Serious question expecting an honest and fair answer? |  |
| |
| Truth finally emerging on 12:26 - Feb 1 with 4078 views | _ |
| Truth finally emerging on 07:10 - Feb 1 by magicdaps10 |
The way I see it, if Jenkins stopped the deal then it indicates we were not financially forced to sell them.
The old board sold the club to them, the old board are the source of the problem.
The old board guys now have to put pressure on the yanks to sell the club.
It is one big mess. |
Not financially forced?
Do you think James coming back will help SCFC off the field?
Do you think the world of football finance there's a never ending pot of money?
Serious questions? | |
| |
| Truth finally emerging on 12:26 - Feb 1 with 4073 views | _ |
| Truth finally emerging on 11:45 - Feb 1 by AustinIsOurHero |
I have it on good authority that Van Der Hoorn would have gone as well, had it not been for Rodon's injury. |
Not true | |
| |
Login to get fewer ads
| Truth finally emerging on 12:43 - Feb 1 with 4001 views | Badlands |
| Truth finally emerging on 07:10 - Feb 1 by magicdaps10 |
The way I see it, if Jenkins stopped the deal then it indicates we were not financially forced to sell them.
The old board sold the club to them, the old board are the source of the problem.
The old board guys now have to put pressure on the yanks to sell the club.
It is one big mess. |
Player attracted interest from another club.
Players agent sees a profit.
Player wants to move home.
Club sees it as a likely move and tries to get the best deal for the club.
Other club pi$$es about.
We slam the door.
Agent loses money.
Agent moans. |  |
| |
| Truth finally emerging on 12:50 - Feb 1 with 3972 views | nantywatcher |
| Truth finally emerging on 12:26 - Feb 1 by _ |
Not financially forced?
Do you think James coming back will help SCFC off the field?
Do you think the world of football finance there's a never ending pot of money?
Serious questions? |
If we win our next two cup matches (one of which might be against Barnet) we would bank £720k in prize money. That seems a more positive way to raise money?? | | | |
| Truth finally emerging on 12:54 - Feb 1 with 3961 views | TailGunner |
| Truth finally emerging on 12:24 - Feb 1 by _ |
Jiffy, One simple question....
Why would the Americans have wanted any player to go?
Serious question expecting an honest and fair answer? |
Dan wanted to say, you were correct in saying it last week.
The Americans refused to offer any sort of better deal to him. Not interested in entering any dialogue - They solely wanted to cash in .
Seems Jenkins also played a blinder, when Leeds tried it on for wriggle room, he pulled the plug. | | | |
| Truth finally emerging on 13:00 - Feb 1 with 3918 views | Badlands |
| Truth finally emerging on 12:54 - Feb 1 by TailGunner |
Dan wanted to say, you were correct in saying it last week.
The Americans refused to offer any sort of better deal to him. Not interested in entering any dialogue - They solely wanted to cash in .
Seems Jenkins also played a blinder, when Leeds tried it on for wriggle room, he pulled the plug. |
Dan asked to leave after it looked like he wasn't going to be sold.
Club pointed out he has 18 months on his contract and has only just started playing first team football.
Agent wanted to cash in.
Club, like, almost all, wanted to get the most fora player they had nurtured and brought to his current standard.
Jenkins may have played a blinder but it could also be Leeds thinking they could treat us like dirt and eventually their Rsing about led to them failing to complete a simple deal form on time.
Whatever - if a player has decided to go I expect the club to get the best financial deal for the club whether that is to reduce debt, pay wages, was the kit of preferably to bring in new players. | |
| |
| Truth finally emerging on 13:02 - Feb 1 with 3888 views | TailGunner |
| Truth finally emerging on 13:00 - Feb 1 by Badlands |
Dan asked to leave after it looked like he wasn't going to be sold.
Club pointed out he has 18 months on his contract and has only just started playing first team football.
Agent wanted to cash in.
Club, like, almost all, wanted to get the most fora player they had nurtured and brought to his current standard.
Jenkins may have played a blinder but it could also be Leeds thinking they could treat us like dirt and eventually their Rsing about led to them failing to complete a simple deal form on time.
Whatever - if a player has decided to go I expect the club to get the best financial deal for the club whether that is to reduce debt, pay wages, was the kit of preferably to bring in new players. |
Believe what you want.
Take with as much salt as you like.
Exactly the same was happening with Roberts and Rodon.
Jenkins stepped in then too. | | | |
| Truth finally emerging on 13:03 - Feb 1 with 3885 views | _ |
| Truth finally emerging on 12:50 - Feb 1 by nantywatcher |
If we win our next two cup matches (one of which might be against Barnet) we would bank £720k in prize money. That seems a more positive way to raise money?? |
That's great but in the grand scheme of things it's peanuts.
You're talking about 2 or 3 months of just one players wages. | |
| |
| Truth finally emerging on 13:04 - Feb 1 with 3873 views | _ |
| Truth finally emerging on 12:54 - Feb 1 by TailGunner |
Dan wanted to say, you were correct in saying it last week.
The Americans refused to offer any sort of better deal to him. Not interested in entering any dialogue - They solely wanted to cash in .
Seems Jenkins also played a blinder, when Leeds tried it on for wriggle room, he pulled the plug. |
Agreed.
But there's a good reason for why they didn't as well. | |
| |
| Truth finally emerging on 13:09 - Feb 1 with 3849 views | hobo |
| Truth finally emerging on 13:03 - Feb 1 by _ |
That's great but in the grand scheme of things it's peanuts.
You're talking about 2 or 3 months of just one players wages. |
We don't have a single player who earns 700k in 2 or 3 months.
Try again |  | | |
| Truth finally emerging on 13:12 - Feb 1 with 3821 views | _ |
| Truth finally emerging on 13:09 - Feb 1 by hobo |
We don't have a single player who earns 700k in 2 or 3 months.
Try again |
They would have to be on around 53k a week.
Bony was on 80k a week and we only got him out with two hours to go.
Plus, we'll have a few others who wouldn't be far away from that.
Try again. | |
| |
| Truth finally emerging on 13:13 - Feb 1 with 3817 views | jasper_T |
| Truth finally emerging on 13:09 - Feb 1 by hobo |
We don't have a single player who earns 700k in 2 or 3 months.
Try again |
Bony's £80k x 12 weeks plus national insurance... | | | |
| Truth finally emerging on 13:14 - Feb 1 with 3798 views | hobo |
| Truth finally emerging on 13:12 - Feb 1 by _ |
They would have to be on around 53k a week.
Bony was on 80k a week and we only got him out with two hours to go.
Plus, we'll have a few others who wouldn't be far away from that.
Try again. |
Cool story but Bony plays for Al-Arabi
Next... | | | |
| Truth finally emerging on 13:19 - Feb 1 with 3752 views | _ |
| Truth finally emerging on 13:14 - Feb 1 by hobo |
Cool story but Bony plays for Al-Arabi
Next... |
Does he, because he's an SCFC player if you want to check out his registration and he was very much an SCFC player when the difficult decisions were being made right up until late yesterday evening.
What a mare | |
| |
| Truth finally emerging on 13:25 - Feb 1 with 3711 views | jasper_T |
We're still paying £1m a year of Andre Ayew's wages. Imagine what that's going to be when he comes back. | | | |
| Truth finally emerging on 13:26 - Feb 1 with 3705 views | nantywatcher |
| Truth finally emerging on 13:03 - Feb 1 by _ |
That's great but in the grand scheme of things it's peanuts.
You're talking about 2 or 3 months of just one players wages. |
I was making a direct comparison with the upfront payment from Leeds as agreed by our owners, whilst retaining our asset. | | | |
| Truth finally emerging on 13:27 - Feb 1 with 3684 views | hobo |
| Truth finally emerging on 13:19 - Feb 1 by _ |
Does he, because he's an SCFC player if you want to check out his registration and he was very much an SCFC player when the difficult decisions were being made right up until late yesterday evening.
What a mare |
Wrong, he is not available for selection by us and is an Al-Arabi player.
No-one has complained about moving Bony on, they understand his salary is too large for this league. So I think we can all agree that the chap who said it's better to raise money by winning matches rather than selling our best players, is absolutely spot on. | | | |
| Truth finally emerging on 13:31 - Feb 1 with 3660 views | longlostjack |
Pearlman and Jenkins are on over £25k per week. Every little helps. |  |
| |
| Truth finally emerging on 13:32 - Feb 1 with 3653 views | oh_tommy_tommy |
For all of Jenkins faults
Thank Fack he (allegedly) pulled the plug on James and Fer . |  |
| |
| |
By continuing to use the site, you agree to our use of cookies and to abide by our Terms and Conditions.
