| Match Thread vs Reading 11:20 - Nov 9 with 13545 views | Nov77 |
Green, Simpson, Dunne, Hill, BAE, Phillips, Jenas, Barton, O'Neil, Hoilett, Austin
subs: Murphy, Traore, Johnson, Onuoha, Chevanton, Kranjcar, Henry [Post edited 9 Nov 2013 11:20]
|  |
| |  |
| Match Thread vs Reading on 14:15 - Nov 9 with 2029 views | newgolddream |
| Match Thread vs Reading on 14:12 - Nov 9 by Hooparoo |
2 points dropped. Reading were ordinary. |
Very good point considering all our injuries and a one goal deficit.  |  | | |
| Match Thread vs Reading on 14:16 - Nov 9 with 2021 views | TacticalR |
| Match Thread vs Reading on 14:12 - Nov 9 by Hooparoo |
2 points dropped. Reading were ordinary. |
They were a lot better than I was expecting. |  |
| |
| Match Thread vs Reading on 14:18 - Nov 9 with 1993 views | DylanP |
| Match Thread vs Reading on 14:12 - Nov 9 by Hooparoo |
2 points dropped. Reading were ordinary. |
So ordinary that they are 5th in the division (whereas we are 3rd) |  |
| |
| Match Thread vs Reading on 14:18 - Nov 9 with 1978 views | gueRRilla |
| Match Thread vs Reading on 14:14 - Nov 9 by kropotkin41 |
Agreed.
Amazing to think that it seemed like we had a surfeit of midfielders.
I just get a bit worried when we look casual and then get caught by hard working teams. Their goal and all their best chances seemed to come from us surrendering the ball too easily.
Thank goodness for Joey Barton!!   |
Barton anytime scorer @9/2 BOOM!
Thought it was a very entertaining match. Shame we never got the early goal that we threatened because it looked like we were going to dominate them at that stage. Very annoying to see Hoilett f*cked again. |  | | |
| Match Thread vs Reading on 14:18 - Nov 9 with 1973 views | JAPRANGERS |
| Match Thread vs Reading on 14:09 - Nov 9 by HollowayRanger |
but for injuries i think we would have won but still not enough bite for my liking |
Yep. AJ looked lively at times when he came on. Like to see AJ and Austin up front as a regular partnership. |  | | |
| Match Thread vs Reading on 14:20 - Nov 9 with 1952 views | isawqpratwcity |
Just got back on after watching 2nd half.
We could've won, but didn't, but a lose would have been disproportionate.
Still reckon it should've been ours. |  |
| |
| Match Thread vs Reading on 14:20 - Nov 9 with 1947 views | RBlock |
Win at home, Draw away. It's a proven formula. I didn't think Krancjar looked good at all, a lot of misplaced passes. Joey was class, but I thought BAE was pony. Just seemed a bit lazy with it all. |  | | |
Login to get fewer ads
| Match Thread vs Reading on 14:21 - Nov 9 with 1944 views | N12Hoop |
| Match Thread vs Reading on 14:18 - Nov 9 by JAPRANGERS |
Yep. AJ looked lively at times when he came on. Like to see AJ and Austin up front as a regular partnership. |
Starting to look a lot more fluid. Creating chances. It's a. marathon not a sprint and I think we are improving. AJ is real class, makes a huge difference. Still lost only 1 game. Just need Burnley and Leicester to start dropping a few points. |  |
| |
| Match Thread vs Reading on 14:21 - Nov 9 with 1940 views | QPR1882 |
| Match Thread vs Reading on 14:18 - Nov 9 by DylanP |
So ordinary that they are 5th in the division (whereas we are 3rd) |
I think the poster has pointed out that Reading were ordinary not are ordinary, and I have to agree. |  | | |
| Match Thread vs Reading on 14:24 - Nov 9 with 1911 views | Hooparoo |
| Match Thread vs Reading on 14:21 - Nov 9 by QPR1882 |
I think the poster has pointed out that Reading were ordinary not are ordinary, and I have to agree. |
Yes. We could have been 3 up before HT. |  |
| |
| Match Thread vs Reading on 14:25 - Nov 9 with 1894 views | QPRMUSO |
Reading were very lucky! |  | | |
| Match Thread vs Reading on 14:27 - Nov 9 with 1867 views | Nov77 |
| Match Thread vs Reading on 14:20 - Nov 9 by RBlock |
Win at home, Draw away. It's a proven formula. I didn't think Krancjar looked good at all, a lot of misplaced passes. Joey was class, but I thought BAE was pony. Just seemed a bit lazy with it all. |
I thought BAE was one of our better players, it was simpson who nearly got caught out a couple of times.
Good performance all round but desperately lacking killer instinct. | |
| |
| Match Thread vs Reading on 14:31 - Nov 9 with 1825 views | JAPRANGERS |
| Match Thread vs Reading on 14:27 - Nov 9 by Nov77 |
I thought BAE was one of our better players, it was simpson who nearly got caught out a couple of times.
Good performance all round but desperately lacking killer instinct. |
lacking a killer instinct. yes we are never going to thrash anyone. | | | |
| Match Thread vs Reading on 14:34 - Nov 9 with 1803 views | Loft1979 |
| Match Thread vs Reading on 14:31 - Nov 9 by JAPRANGERS |
lacking a killer instinct. yes we are never going to thrash anyone. |
beg to differ..... |  | | |
| Match Thread vs Reading on 14:34 - Nov 9 with 1798 views | dermyqpr |
| Match Thread vs Reading on 14:12 - Nov 9 by Hooparoo |
2 points dropped. Reading were ordinary. |
Yes. A bit like a sulky kid at times. Things dont go our way-we go into ourselves.
Injuries are a big worry now but there are options and Harry needs to try a few things when the chips are down.
AJ caused lots of problems for them and we need to help Charlie big time. |  | | |
| Match Thread vs Reading on 14:36 - Nov 9 with 1785 views | WeaverQPR |
Could AJ play in the Hoilett position? Johnno looked good again when brought on. |  |
| |
| Match Thread vs Reading on 14:40 - Nov 9 with 1756 views | cheeseydane |
Good to see Onuha carrying on where he left off. |  |
| Technology advances, unfortunately humans do not. |
| |
| Match Thread vs Reading on 14:43 - Nov 9 with 1736 views | WeaverQPR |
Hopefully one of burnley or Leicester will get beat or drop points. | |
| |
| Match Thread vs Reading on 15:24 - Nov 9 with 1618 views | RBlock |
| Match Thread vs Reading on 14:27 - Nov 9 by Nov77 |
I thought BAE was one of our better players, it was simpson who nearly got caught out a couple of times.
Good performance all round but desperately lacking killer instinct. |
Your right about Simpson, but it was the yellow card that annoyed me. It seemed a relatively straight forward challenge, instead he casually poked a foot at it and followed up with a light push. A couple of balls got punted down the line where we could have held possession as well. It isn't that he does that badly, just he could do so much better. | | | |
| Match Thread vs Reading on 17:24 - Nov 9 with 1535 views | ShotKneesHoop |
| Match Thread vs Reading on 13:56 - Nov 9 by Toast_R |
Where is SWP these days? |
Please don't even mention his name, unless its a transfer bid from some other looney. |  |
| Why does it feel like R'SWiPe is still on the books? Yer Couldn't Make It Up.Well Done Me! |
| |
| Match Thread vs Reading on 17:30 - Nov 9 with 1522 views | OnlyHereForTheNiko |
| Match Thread vs Reading on 14:43 - Nov 9 by WeaverQPR |
Hopefully one of burnley or Leicester will get beat or drop points. |
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
This man is a prophet!!
 |  | | |
| Match Thread vs Reading on 17:54 - Nov 9 with 1492 views | TheBlob |
What pissed me off constantly is we had no one on the edge of their box for the nod out. |  |
| |
| Match Thread vs Reading on 20:21 - Nov 9 with 1413 views | cjc |
Not a bad day really if you look at everyone else's results. We gained a point away.
Keep on fighting. |  |
| Where there is hoop there's the hoops. |
| |
| |
By continuing to use the site, you agree to our use of cookies and to abide by our Terms and Conditions.
