| transfer embargos... on 10:34 - Apr 6 with 5784 views | toboboly |
Apparently Huddersfield was just administrative and they are now no longer subject to the embargo. |  |
| Sexy Asian dwarves wanted. |
|  |
| transfer embargos... on 10:35 - Apr 6 with 5772 views | daveB |
EFL coming across as idiots here imo if the Government have told companies they can file accounts later |  | | |
| transfer embargos... on 10:53 - Apr 6 with 5688 views | Northernr |
Yeh it's a bit of a odd story this. Looks like financial collapse is imminent at multiple clubs, which it might well be, and it's certainly a big thing that nearly half the division was quietly under a transfer embargo by the end of the last window (very wrong IMO that they're allowed to impose embargoes on clubs without announcing them) but actually this is because the government gave three months leeway on filing accounts but the EFL, rather ridiculously, didn't. Still, good to know we're still all up to date etc.
This post has been edited by an administrator |  | | |
| transfer embargos... on 10:59 - Apr 6 with 5663 views | MickS |
| transfer embargos... on 10:53 - Apr 6 by Northernr |
Yeh it's a bit of a odd story this. Looks like financial collapse is imminent at multiple clubs, which it might well be, and it's certainly a big thing that nearly half the division was quietly under a transfer embargo by the end of the last window (very wrong IMO that they're allowed to impose embargoes on clubs without announcing them) but actually this is because the government gave three months leeway on filing accounts but the EFL, rather ridiculously, didn't. Still, good to know we're still all up to date etc.
This post has been edited by an administrator |
They’d be better off informing us about WEATHER ARMAGEDDON. |  | | |
| transfer embargos... on 11:13 - Apr 6 with 5609 views | BostonR |
How many Championship teams will be in business for next season given the critical nature of some of the finances at clubs?
Will be interesting to see how this impacts the league next season. |  | | |
| transfer embargos... on 11:15 - Apr 6 with 5587 views | switchingcode |
Transfer embargo while the window is shut 😃yes that’ll show em.
The real issues will hit home in the summer for many efl clubs | | | |
| transfer embargos... on 11:16 - Apr 6 with 5596 views | nix |
| transfer embargos... on 11:13 - Apr 6 by BostonR |
How many Championship teams will be in business for next season given the critical nature of some of the finances at clubs?
Will be interesting to see how this impacts the league next season. |
It's a bit worrying. While there are some teams we love to hate, obviously, we need to have some opposition and I don't want to see other clubs go to the wall. |  | | |
| transfer embargos... on 11:19 - Apr 6 with 5583 views | davman |
| transfer embargos... on 10:35 - Apr 6 by daveB |
EFL coming across as idiots here imo if the Government have told companies they can file accounts later |
"EFL coming across as idiots"
What a surprise.
A National Tragedy what is happening to the administration of our game - every single level of the FA appears to be full of incompetent pedants with very few decisions being made for the good of the game.
Their interest is absolutely the financial side, but only making the big clubs bigger and richer.
Disgrace of an organisation.
Anyway, Birmingham managed to sign a player when on an embargo with no penalty even in the aftermath of their pointless (sic) points deduction, so none of the rules count unless you have a Q in your name... |  |
| |
Login to get fewer ads
| transfer embargos... on 11:24 - Apr 6 with 5556 views | QPR_John |
Amazed that the FL could not find a way to include us in that list. | | | |
| transfer embargos... on 12:18 - Apr 6 with 5386 views | bosh67 |
| transfer embargos... on 11:24 - Apr 6 by QPR_John |
Amazed that the FL could not find a way to include us in that list. |
Shhhh! |  |
| |
| transfer embargos... on 12:24 - Apr 6 with 5356 views | superhoopdownunder |
| transfer embargos... on 11:16 - Apr 6 by nix |
It's a bit worrying. While there are some teams we love to hate, obviously, we need to have some opposition and I don't want to see other clubs go to the wall. |
Only club I would like to go out of business is Chelscum | | | |
| transfer embargos... on 13:06 - Apr 6 with 5202 views | Esox_Lucius |
We already did, and failed for the most part. |  |
| The grass is always greener. |
| |
| transfer embargos... on 13:12 - Apr 6 with 5175 views | Stanisgod |
No Forest 🤠|  |
| It's being so happy that keeps me going. |
| |
| transfer embargos... on 13:14 - Apr 6 with 5161 views | Northernr |
| transfer embargos... on 13:12 - Apr 6 by Stanisgod |
No Forest 🤠|
Their accounts are in, we were chatting about them a week or so back. This is purely about timing of account filing, not how much sht they're in. | | | |
| transfer embargos... on 13:41 - Apr 6 with 5038 views | daveB |
was it over the top? We got a fine several years after the event and a transfer embargo for one window. The fine was only so big because we spent so much that season, if they had stuck with the original rules the fine would have been more than double what we ended up with. | | | |
| transfer embargos... on 13:51 - Apr 6 with 4998 views | rsonist |
This is more interesting for the depressing dogs breakfast of crap journalism and the total disinclination towards reading it properly. |  | | |
| transfer embargos... on 14:37 - Apr 6 with 4868 views | QPR_John |
| transfer embargos... on 13:41 - Apr 6 by daveB |
was it over the top? We got a fine several years after the event and a transfer embargo for one window. The fine was only so big because we spent so much that season, if they had stuck with the original rules the fine would have been more than double what we ended up with. |
Agree but the point is should any other team spend as much as us the rules have been changed the punishment would be nowhere as draconian. So even the FL by changing the rules admitted the original punishment specified in the rules was over the top. That did not make them consider our punishment which is why a lot of supporters think it was over the top. | | | |
| transfer embargos... on 14:39 - Apr 6 with 4858 views | QPR_John |
| transfer embargos... on 13:06 - Apr 6 by Esox_Lucius |
We already did, and failed for the most part. |
Really I must have missed the court case. | | | |
| transfer embargos... on 14:58 - Apr 6 with 4808 views | Boston |
| transfer embargos... on 11:16 - Apr 6 by nix |
It's a bit worrying. While there are some teams we love to hate, obviously, we need to have some opposition and I don't want to see other clubs go to the wall. |
Whether we like ‘em or not, it’s only fair that the other clubs in the division play their away fixture at the Den. | |
| |
| transfer embargos... on 15:28 - Apr 6 with 4720 views | daveB |
| transfer embargos... on 14:37 - Apr 6 by QPR_John |
Agree but the point is should any other team spend as much as us the rules have been changed the punishment would be nowhere as draconian. So even the FL by changing the rules admitted the original punishment specified in the rules was over the top. That did not make them consider our punishment which is why a lot of supporters think it was over the top. |
Lets be honest here we are all pretty biased where this is concerned, When other clubs get points deductions we think it should be more, when they are fined we think it should be more but when we were fined we think it should be a lot less.
We cheated as did Leicester but they made a better fist of the prem than us so never really had to worry about any punishment | | | |
| transfer embargos... on 15:45 - Apr 6 with 4662 views | BrianMcCarthy |
| transfer embargos... on 12:24 - Apr 6 by superhoopdownunder |
Only club I would like to go out of business is Chelscum |
Yes, but doesn't it suit the law and evolutionary scholars that all those types are kept in the one place? |  |
| |
| transfer embargos... on 15:49 - Apr 6 with 4644 views | kensalriser |
| transfer embargos... on 15:28 - Apr 6 by daveB |
Lets be honest here we are all pretty biased where this is concerned, When other clubs get points deductions we think it should be more, when they are fined we think it should be more but when we were fined we think it should be a lot less.
We cheated as did Leicester but they made a better fist of the prem than us so never really had to worry about any punishment |
Whatever you say and however reasonable it might be, some people just enjoy the victim narrative. |  |
| |
| transfer embargos... on 15:50 - Apr 6 with 4641 views | SimplyNico |
Whilst it's all very serious, the hilarious thing about that article is that the Mail refer to "Wayne Rooney's Derby". | | | |
| transfer embargos... on 16:12 - Apr 6 with 2709 views | QPR_John |
| transfer embargos... on 15:28 - Apr 6 by daveB |
Lets be honest here we are all pretty biased where this is concerned, When other clubs get points deductions we think it should be more, when they are fined we think it should be more but when we were fined we think it should be a lot less.
We cheated as did Leicester but they made a better fist of the prem than us so never really had to worry about any punishment |
It would seem what you are saying is that FFP means that if you reach your target by breaking the rules you will only get punished if you fail to make the most of reaching said target. Interesting rule. | | | |
| |
By continuing to use the site, you agree to our use of cookies and to abide by our Terms and Conditions.