| The Ukrainian lad 06:23 - Apr 2 with 3582 views | builthjack |
If he is unfit how come he played for Ukraine U23 v Japan the other night? |  |
| Swansea Indepenent Poster Of The Year 2021. Dr P / Mart66 / Roathie / Parlay / E20/ Duffle was 2nd, but he is deluded and thinks in his little twisted brain that he won. Poor sod. We let him win this year, as he has cried for a whole year. His 14 usernames, bless his cotton socks.
|
| |  |
| The Ukrainian lad on 21:43 - Apr 2 with 1211 views | jackrmee |
| The Ukrainian lad on 09:07 - Apr 2 by jack247 |
He hasn’t had a sniff from two permanent managers and a caretaker. That’s not coincidence.
I don’t know the reason he’s not playing, but there clearly is one. All things being equal, he’d have been perfect for the way QPR set up. |
Exactly. And this is why surely something is going on behind the scenes.
Even if he’s not training well, or cannot press well enough for LW, or something like that…there have still been a good few moments when a striker of his ilk was needed on the pitch. Inexplicable |  |
| |
| The Ukrainian lad on 21:44 - Apr 2 with 1210 views | jackrmee |
| The Ukrainian lad on 09:11 - Apr 2 by Whiterockin |
We are being taken for mugs by saying he's injured. |
I think so.
LW seems uncomfortable talking about him. I just don’t get it | |
| |
| The Ukrainian lad on 22:21 - Apr 2 with 1165 views | RichardO |
| The Ukrainian lad on 13:18 - Apr 2 by ReslovenSwan1 |
Williams stated that if the team wanted big Lad up front they could play Darling up there. This tells me Kuharevych has zero future with the Swans. Either a problem with technical aspects or personality issues. Did he decline a loan for example.? |
Does seem silly now that Darling isn't playing centre forward as we keep on putting a high percentages of high balls into the box, add the quickly whipped in balls into the box requiring a player to get across defenders, maybe Tymon or Key have the pace and intelligence to do so, let'suse them.
Are we having another we are not going to play Fulton at all, Martin moment from another manager re Kuharevich, sometimes needs must.
Something must be amiss. |  | | |
| The Ukrainian lad on 22:24 - Apr 2 with 1158 views | builthjack |
| The Ukrainian lad on 13:18 - Apr 2 by ReslovenSwan1 |
Williams stated that if the team wanted big Lad up front they could play Darling up there. This tells me Kuharevych has zero future with the Swans. Either a problem with technical aspects or personality issues. Did he decline a loan for example.? |
Does Williams think Darling is the new John Charles? | |
| Swansea Indepenent Poster Of The Year 2021. Dr P / Mart66 / Roathie / Parlay / E20/ Duffle was 2nd, but he is deluded and thinks in his little twisted brain that he won. Poor sod. We let him win this year, as he has cried for a whole year. His 14 usernames, bless his cotton socks.
|
| |
| The Ukrainian lad on 01:02 - Apr 3 with 1098 views | jack247 |
| The Ukrainian lad on 22:24 - Apr 2 by builthjack |
Does Williams think Darling is the new John Charles? |
Saying Darling can go up front is a way of publicly making it clear where our owners need to strengthen in the summer, without directly calling them out.
Aside from leaving him up for the last few minutes when we’re chasing a game, I highly doubt it’s. a serious option. | | | |
| The Ukrainian lad on 08:56 - Apr 3 with 1039 views | onehunglow |
| The Ukrainian lad on 01:02 - Apr 3 by jack247 |
Saying Darling can go up front is a way of publicly making it clear where our owners need to strengthen in the summer, without directly calling them out.
Aside from leaving him up for the last few minutes when we’re chasing a game, I highly doubt it’s. a serious option. |
Couldn’t agree more.
It is clear we are being taken for idiots.
We were told Coleman was ll about transparency .
He is not.
Fans would accept the truth about this player .
Just let us have it.
If we survive this season,we need to secure Rushworth ,find a new captain and a proper striker worthy of the name .
This is the spine of the time and any sports team needs a good spine . | |
| |
| The Ukrainian lad on 10:58 - Apr 3 with 967 views | dobjack2 |
| The Ukrainian lad on 21:43 - Apr 2 by jackrmee |
Exactly. And this is why surely something is going on behind the scenes.
Even if he’s not training well, or cannot press well enough for LW, or something like that…there have still been a good few moments when a striker of his ilk was needed on the pitch. Inexplicable |
Indeed - QPR being a fine example where bringing him off the bench would have given their defence something to think about.
There is bound to be speculation about why he hasn't been given game time apart from injuries- playing for Ukraine U21 in Japan came as a shock.
Is there a clause in his contract that additional monies need to be paid if he hits a certain number of appearance's or minutes this season? Is he unable to grasp our tactics (he wouldn't be alone if that was the case): is his hold up play not up to scratch or does he not train well? Is he continually late for training or has he taken half a house brick to training? is it something disciplinary that he has done off the pitch?
It has the feeling that Williams is under orders not to give him much game time as he seems reluctant to discuss the elephant in the room.
Sadly Jerry Yates has been a massive disappointment. Did we watch him before we signed him or was it just stats based? His confidence is shot, but defenders seem to have an easy game against him.
We are now playing with 2 wingers, getting crosses into the box but are not playing a forward that could trouble defenders and get on the end of them, even though we appear to have such a forward on our books.
All speculation of course, but that's what happens when you have a misfiring attack and a striker that we have allegedly paid comparatively big money for that can't get any game time. | | | |
Login to get fewer ads
| The Ukrainian lad on 11:07 - Apr 3 with 942 views | KeithHaynes |
| The Ukrainian lad on 10:58 - Apr 3 by dobjack2 |
Indeed - QPR being a fine example where bringing him off the bench would have given their defence something to think about.
There is bound to be speculation about why he hasn't been given game time apart from injuries- playing for Ukraine U21 in Japan came as a shock.
Is there a clause in his contract that additional monies need to be paid if he hits a certain number of appearance's or minutes this season? Is he unable to grasp our tactics (he wouldn't be alone if that was the case): is his hold up play not up to scratch or does he not train well? Is he continually late for training or has he taken half a house brick to training? is it something disciplinary that he has done off the pitch?
It has the feeling that Williams is under orders not to give him much game time as he seems reluctant to discuss the elephant in the room.
Sadly Jerry Yates has been a massive disappointment. Did we watch him before we signed him or was it just stats based? His confidence is shot, but defenders seem to have an easy game against him.
We are now playing with 2 wingers, getting crosses into the box but are not playing a forward that could trouble defenders and get on the end of them, even though we appear to have such a forward on our books.
All speculation of course, but that's what happens when you have a misfiring attack and a striker that we have allegedly paid comparatively big money for that can't get any game time. |
No speculation there mate.
Just the truth. |  |
| |
| The Ukrainian lad on 11:20 - Apr 3 with 915 views | onehunglow |
The idea that he’s not selected because he can’t “ press” as Williams wants shows just how plain stupid is Lukey.
It is beyond comprehension .
If so,this is a worse dud for a coach than Duff . | |
| |
| The Ukrainian lad on 11:30 - Apr 3 with 915 views | jack247 |
| The Ukrainian lad on 11:20 - Apr 3 by onehunglow |
The idea that he’s not selected because he can’t “ press” as Williams wants shows just how plain stupid is Lukey.
It is beyond comprehension .
If so,this is a worse dud for a coach than Duff . |
I don’t think it’s a Luke Williams thing. Duff and Sheehan both largely ignored him too. | | | |
| The Ukrainian lad on 13:24 - Apr 3 with 835 views | onehunglow |
| The Ukrainian lad on 11:30 - Apr 3 by jack247 |
I don’t think it’s a Luke Williams thing. Duff and Sheehan both largely ignored him too. |
Not just a Luke thing,but it dies raise questions,or it should | |
| |
| The Ukrainian lad on 14:37 - Apr 3 with 796 views | jack247 |
| The Ukrainian lad on 13:24 - Apr 3 by onehunglow |
Not just a Luke thing,but it dies raise questions,or it should |
It should absolutely raise questions.
You’d think he’d have been tailor made for the way QPR play but putting that aside…
He hasn’t had a run under anyone. In his cameos earlier in the season, he looked raw but looked to have something about him.
Yates has struggled all season
Cullen isn’t a lone centre forward and neither of them have height or physicality
Lowe can do a job there but again isn’t really a centre forward
If we had a Piroe knocking 20 in, I doubt eyebrows would be raised, but the fact is we’re light up front.
I don’t know if it’s the player, the club, the three managers or anything else, but something doesn’t add up.
Likewise Patino who can be a liability when we’re not in possession, but is the type of player who can create a goal out of nowhere. Logically, both could have made an impact Monday. | | | |
| The Ukrainian lad on 15:10 - Apr 3 with 757 views | onehunglow |
| The Ukrainian lad on 14:37 - Apr 3 by jack247 |
It should absolutely raise questions.
You’d think he’d have been tailor made for the way QPR play but putting that aside…
He hasn’t had a run under anyone. In his cameos earlier in the season, he looked raw but looked to have something about him.
Yates has struggled all season
Cullen isn’t a lone centre forward and neither of them have height or physicality
Lowe can do a job there but again isn’t really a centre forward
If we had a Piroe knocking 20 in, I doubt eyebrows would be raised, but the fact is we’re light up front.
I don’t know if it’s the player, the club, the three managers or anything else, but something doesn’t add up.
Likewise Patino who can be a liability when we’re not in possession, but is the type of player who can create a goal out of nowhere. Logically, both could have made an impact Monday. |
It makes me wonder as to any planning at all goes into our club
I read it does but don’t believe a word of that crap.
We had/ have quick wide men. At this level that means they cross the ball to a very tall forward . Tall because the defenders are tall so little Jez is buggered before it starts .
That said,smaller players,should be more nimble,mobile ,cunning and be looking to mover these large lumps around.
Yates ,to our disgust,actually stands motionless cravenly watching to see if he might get a whack. He is the biggest craphouse we have ever employed . Without question.
Last Saturday,I am certain any striker from most Vanarama teams would have taken a few crosses and buried them.
Yates is one we really just accept as @ bad debt and offload . Even though we are “ poor” he really is a waste if a shirt and should never start ,ever. Cullen is limited but he doesn’t lack guts or commitment and he must be insulsuoted Yates is preferred.
I’m not having playe rotation either as an excuse . If that were true,then Grimes would be “ rested”
God,I’m off out … | |
| |
| The Ukrainian lad on 15:11 - Apr 3 with 757 views | onehunglow |
| The Ukrainian lad on 14:37 - Apr 3 by jack247 |
It should absolutely raise questions.
You’d think he’d have been tailor made for the way QPR play but putting that aside…
He hasn’t had a run under anyone. In his cameos earlier in the season, he looked raw but looked to have something about him.
Yates has struggled all season
Cullen isn’t a lone centre forward and neither of them have height or physicality
Lowe can do a job there but again isn’t really a centre forward
If we had a Piroe knocking 20 in, I doubt eyebrows would be raised, but the fact is we’re light up front.
I don’t know if it’s the player, the club, the three managers or anything else, but something doesn’t add up.
Likewise Patino who can be a liability when we’re not in possession, but is the type of player who can create a goal out of nowhere. Logically, both could have made an impact Monday. |
It makes me wonder as to any planning at all goes into our club
I read it does but don’t believe a word of that crap.
We had/ have quick wide men. At this level that means they cross the ball to a very tall forward . Tall because the defenders are tall so little Jez is buggered before it starts .
That said,smaller players,should be more nimble,mobile ,cunning and be looking to mover these large lumps around.
Yates ,to our disgust,actually stands motionless cravenly watching to see if he might get a whack. He is the biggest craphouse we have ever employed . Without question.
Last Saturday,I am certain any striker from most Vanarama teams would have taken a few crosses and buried them.
Yates is one we really just accept as @ bad debt and offload . Even though we are “ poor” he really is a waste if a shirt and should never start ,ever. Cullen is limited but he doesn’t lack guts or commitment and he must be insulsuoted Yates is preferred.
I’m not having playe rotation either as an excuse . If that were true,then Grimes would be “ rested”
God,I’m off out …  | |
| |
| The Ukrainian lad on 16:26 - Apr 4 with 571 views | ReslovenSwan1 |
| The Ukrainian lad on 10:58 - Apr 3 by dobjack2 |
Indeed - QPR being a fine example where bringing him off the bench would have given their defence something to think about.
There is bound to be speculation about why he hasn't been given game time apart from injuries- playing for Ukraine U21 in Japan came as a shock.
Is there a clause in his contract that additional monies need to be paid if he hits a certain number of appearance's or minutes this season? Is he unable to grasp our tactics (he wouldn't be alone if that was the case): is his hold up play not up to scratch or does he not train well? Is he continually late for training or has he taken half a house brick to training? is it something disciplinary that he has done off the pitch?
It has the feeling that Williams is under orders not to give him much game time as he seems reluctant to discuss the elephant in the room.
Sadly Jerry Yates has been a massive disappointment. Did we watch him before we signed him or was it just stats based? His confidence is shot, but defenders seem to have an easy game against him.
We are now playing with 2 wingers, getting crosses into the box but are not playing a forward that could trouble defenders and get on the end of them, even though we appear to have such a forward on our books.
All speculation of course, but that's what happens when you have a misfiring attack and a striker that we have allegedly paid comparatively big money for that can't get any game time. |
Summed up the situation beautifully. I had not thought of the contractual aspects. ( Payment terms etc). The same might apply to the Dutchman. |  |
| |
| The Ukrainian lad on 16:44 - Apr 4 with 559 views | KeithHaynes |
| The Ukrainian lad on 10:58 - Apr 3 by dobjack2 |
Indeed - QPR being a fine example where bringing him off the bench would have given their defence something to think about.
There is bound to be speculation about why he hasn't been given game time apart from injuries- playing for Ukraine U21 in Japan came as a shock.
Is there a clause in his contract that additional monies need to be paid if he hits a certain number of appearance's or minutes this season? Is he unable to grasp our tactics (he wouldn't be alone if that was the case): is his hold up play not up to scratch or does he not train well? Is he continually late for training or has he taken half a house brick to training? is it something disciplinary that he has done off the pitch?
It has the feeling that Williams is under orders not to give him much game time as he seems reluctant to discuss the elephant in the room.
Sadly Jerry Yates has been a massive disappointment. Did we watch him before we signed him or was it just stats based? His confidence is shot, but defenders seem to have an easy game against him.
We are now playing with 2 wingers, getting crosses into the box but are not playing a forward that could trouble defenders and get on the end of them, even though we appear to have such a forward on our books.
All speculation of course, but that's what happens when you have a misfiring attack and a striker that we have allegedly paid comparatively big money for that can't get any game time. |
He hasn’t played a full game for the Swans. | |
| |
| |
By continuing to use the site, you agree to our use of cookies and to abide by our Terms and Conditions.
