| Genuine question - from a Trust Member 19:19 - Nov 5 with 52016 views | marchamjack |
Were The Trust any part of the discussion process to keep Clement?
Thanks in advance. |  |
| Oh,..Dave, what's occuring? |
| |  |
| Genuine question - from a Trust Member on 18:57 - Nov 12 with 1535 views | Alarch |
| Genuine question - from a Trust Member on 15:09 - Nov 12 by TheResurrection |
Just look at the farcical way we find out this information.
No wonder the Trust is in the mess it is. No balls whatsoever.
And do you know what, this is now worse. We all know now the issues among the Trust run so deep some can't continue against their principles. There is no leadership, no strong characters. They just continue like nothing's happened.
Clearly Ux hasn't the balls you have, Matt. I'm hoping Phil Sumbler will and soon. |
I'm sure that the irony of this post is not lost on many.
Remind us again of the time you "had the balls" to stand as a board member... You prefer having your belly tickled by Dineen... |  | | |
| Genuine question - from a Trust Member on 19:03 - Nov 12 with 1494 views | Darran |
| Genuine question - from a Trust Member on 18:57 - Nov 12 by Alarch |
I'm sure that the irony of this post is not lost on many.
Remind us again of the time you "had the balls" to stand as a board member... You prefer having your belly tickled by Dineen... |
lol |  |
| |
| Genuine question - from a Trust Member on 19:24 - Nov 12 with 1468 views | 34dfgdf54 |
| Genuine question - from a Trust Member on 18:56 - Nov 12 by Uxbridge |
Ian resigned a couple of weeks ago. Actually so did Duncan. Both for personal business reasons to the best of anyone's knowledge, at least based on their comments, so no conspiracy there. As I said earlier, they've historically been announced as part of the monthly minutes which aren't out yet. So there are 3 vacancies there. In my opinion, these need to be advertised ASAP, and I hope that there is some interest from those opposed to the way things are progressing to fill those roles, with the need for balance being one of if not the most important criteria.
PA system? No will from the club to replace it. It's been raised plenty of times. Afraid I don't know about the DSA side.
Is the Trust fulfilling its role? In some ways yes, but badly in other ways. And yeah, annoyed is a fair comment. Frustrated is probably most accurate. Completely agree that full disclosure always needs to be given to the members, particularly when it relates to a vote from the members. That latter bit happened with regards to the sale, however clearly that hasn't happened in terms of things lately.
Anyway, I hope the energy that some are showing here to try and action some change actually takes hold. Not that there'd be any interest I suspect, but if anyone wants my help I'm happy to offer it. |
<< Completely agree that full disclosure always needs to be given to the members, particularly when it relates to a vote from the members. That latter bit happened with regards to the sale, however clearly that hasn't happened in terms of things lately. >>
Why hasn’t it happened lately, what’s changed? |  | | |
| Genuine question - from a Trust Member on 19:38 - Nov 12 with 1421 views | Vetchfielder |
Matt -
I voted for you so I can't say that to see you resigning is a good thing. However. well done for taking action if you felt the Trust is not doing the right thing.
Thanks also for coming on here to post during the sale vote even though I disagreed with your stance, and for giving us that news on here today.
Good luck |  |
| Proud to have been one of the 231 |
| |
| Genuine question - from a Trust Member on 19:42 - Nov 12 with 1404 views | TheResurrection |
| Genuine question - from a Trust Member on 18:57 - Nov 12 by Alarch |
I'm sure that the irony of this post is not lost on many.
Remind us again of the time you "had the balls" to stand as a board member... You prefer having your belly tickled by Dineen... |
Ah the balls? You are the vvanker that popped up in the Summer singling Lisa out and everyone called you a kunt.
Big belly tickler, you on the Trust board? |  |
| |
| Genuine question - from a Trust Member on 19:58 - Nov 12 with 1340 views | Alarch |
| Genuine question - from a Trust Member on 19:42 - Nov 12 by TheResurrection |
Ah the balls? You are the vvanker that popped up in the Summer singling Lisa out and everyone called you a kunt.
Big belly tickler, you on the Trust board? |
If by "singled Lisa out" you mean disagreed with some of the things she said, yup, that was me.
If by "everyone" you mean one person, Murph, I believe, well you've got me again.
Am I on the Trust board, nope. Though I doubt there are any left who are willing to enter into online discussions with the fans.
I stand by the belly tickling comment too. You loved it, that much was obvious. | | | |
| Genuine question - from a Trust Member on 20:02 - Nov 12 with 1306 views | Darran |
| Genuine question - from a Trust Member on 19:58 - Nov 12 by Alarch |
If by "singled Lisa out" you mean disagreed with some of the things she said, yup, that was me.
If by "everyone" you mean one person, Murph, I believe, well you've got me again.
Am I on the Trust board, nope. Though I doubt there are any left who are willing to enter into online discussions with the fans.
I stand by the belly tickling comment too. You loved it, that much was obvious. |
He did love it mind he started about 20 threads on it.
Couldn’t fit it all in one see.  | |
| |
| Genuine question - from a Trust Member on 20:04 - Nov 12 with 1310 views | londonlisa2001 |
| Genuine question - from a Trust Member on 19:58 - Nov 12 by Alarch |
If by "singled Lisa out" you mean disagreed with some of the things she said, yup, that was me.
If by "everyone" you mean one person, Murph, I believe, well you've got me again.
Am I on the Trust board, nope. Though I doubt there are any left who are willing to enter into online discussions with the fans.
I stand by the belly tickling comment too. You loved it, that much was obvious. |
No. It was more than disagreeing.
It was trying to discredit anyone disagreeing with the Trust view.
I'd forgotten about that - it was when I said I welcomed the initiative to involve people with specific expertise in certain areas on an ad hoc basis wasn't it. | | | |
Login to get fewer ads
| Genuine question - from a Trust Member on 20:05 - Nov 12 with 1296 views | TheResurrection |
| Genuine question - from a Trust Member on 19:58 - Nov 12 by Alarch |
If by "singled Lisa out" you mean disagreed with some of the things she said, yup, that was me.
If by "everyone" you mean one person, Murph, I believe, well you've got me again.
Am I on the Trust board, nope. Though I doubt there are any left who are willing to enter into online discussions with the fans.
I stand by the belly tickling comment too. You loved it, that much was obvious. |
You can stand by you want you no mark lurker in the cowardly bushes. Crack on mush.
Ask Dineen if he thought he was tickling my belly. But yeah, I did enjoy it. Was a chance to get a few things off my chest, oh and it gave a chance for some Trust Board members to ask a few of their questions too, which I did on their behalf.
You got anything else to say? | |
| |
| Genuine question - from a Trust Member on 20:09 - Nov 12 with 1280 views | Alarch |
| Genuine question - from a Trust Member on 20:04 - Nov 12 by londonlisa2001 |
No. It was more than disagreeing.
It was trying to discredit anyone disagreeing with the Trust view.
I'd forgotten about that - it was when I said I welcomed the initiative to involve people with specific expertise in certain areas on an ad hoc basis wasn't it. |
No Lisa, I was disagreeing with your view.
I read your points and gave my reasons for disagreeing with them. If I discredited them then I achieved more than I set out to. [Post edited 12 Nov 2017 20:11]
| | | |
| Genuine question - from a Trust Member on 20:10 - Nov 12 with 1277 views | longlostjack |
| Genuine question - from a Trust Member on 19:58 - Nov 12 by Alarch |
If by "singled Lisa out" you mean disagreed with some of the things she said, yup, that was me.
If by "everyone" you mean one person, Murph, I believe, well you've got me again.
Am I on the Trust board, nope. Though I doubt there are any left who are willing to enter into online discussions with the fans.
I stand by the belly tickling comment too. You loved it, that much was obvious. |
Coeden Nadolig |  |
| |
| Genuine question - from a Trust Member on 20:13 - Nov 12 with 1263 views | Neath_Jack |
Alarch is one of those Trust stooges who only pops up and posts when the Trust are coming into question.
This is another thing that Res has got correct on here, one of these characters always pops up to try and discredit or derail the thread.
He went specifically after Lisa last time, he even made his own special thread for her. |  |
| |
| Genuine question - from a Trust Member on 20:16 - Nov 12 with 1253 views | londonlisa2001 |
| Genuine question - from a Trust Member on 20:09 - Nov 12 by Alarch |
No Lisa, I was disagreeing with your view.
I read your points and gave my reasons for disagreeing with them. If I discredited them then I achieved more than I set out to. [Post edited 12 Nov 2017 20:11]
|
Trying to.
Something about you saying that there was no way of knowing what advice the Trust had taken?
When I'd said that it was good they were planning on taking advice on certain topics.
Which, when you think about it, is a pretty odd thing to disagree with on the face of it. | | | |
| Genuine question - from a Trust Member on 20:16 - Nov 12 with 1253 views | Alarch |
| Genuine question - from a Trust Member on 20:05 - Nov 12 by TheResurrection |
You can stand by you want you no mark lurker in the cowardly bushes. Crack on mush.
Ask Dineen if he thought he was tickling my belly. But yeah, I did enjoy it. Was a chance to get a few things off my chest, oh and it gave a chance for some Trust Board members to ask a few of their questions too, which I did on their behalf.
You got anything else to say? |
I do actually. What makes you think I'm a no mark lurker in the cowardly bushes?
Because I called you out? Disagreed with you?
Is no one entitled to an opinion unless it's the same as yours? Considering what's going on with Matt's resignation from the Trust board, surely what's needed is more opinions, not people being shouted down because they believe differently. | | | |
| Genuine question - from a Trust Member on 20:18 - Nov 12 with 1240 views | waynekerr55 |
| Genuine question - from a Trust Member on 20:05 - Nov 12 by TheResurrection |
You can stand by you want you no mark lurker in the cowardly bushes. Crack on mush.
Ask Dineen if he thought he was tickling my belly. But yeah, I did enjoy it. Was a chance to get a few things off my chest, oh and it gave a chance for some Trust Board members to ask a few of their questions too, which I did on their behalf.
You got anything else to say? |
Hasn't Dineen blocked you on Twitter Res? |  |
| |
| Genuine question - from a Trust Member on 20:19 - Nov 12 with 1229 views | Swanzay |
I am truly amazed Phil S said "owner" of this site, so far has been silent on any of the issues on HERE and silent in general.
The Trust have multiple platforms with which to communicate with fans and utilise, yet choose not to...
What the point of being a "leader" if no members have a clue about what your mission and objectives are? |  | | |
| Genuine question - from a Trust Member on 20:19 - Nov 12 with 1227 views | Alarch |
| Genuine question - from a Trust Member on 20:16 - Nov 12 by londonlisa2001 |
Trying to.
Something about you saying that there was no way of knowing what advice the Trust had taken?
When I'd said that it was good they were planning on taking advice on certain topics.
Which, when you think about it, is a pretty odd thing to disagree with on the face of it. |
Are we really doing this again?
Unless you or I were party to the discussions we could have no way of knowing what advice was taken.
Unless, of course, you know something we don't. | | | |
| Genuine question - from a Trust Member on 20:22 - Nov 12 with 1209 views | londonlisa2001 |
| Genuine question - from a Trust Member on 20:19 - Nov 12 by Alarch |
Are we really doing this again?
Unless you or I were party to the discussions we could have no way of knowing what advice was taken.
Unless, of course, you know something we don't. |
It doesn't matter what advice was taken. I said it was good that they were planning on taking advice on specialist areas. Nothing to disagree with. Apart from to attempt to discredit. | | | |
| Genuine question - from a Trust Member on 20:26 - Nov 12 with 1184 views | TheResurrection |
| Genuine question - from a Trust Member on 20:16 - Nov 12 by Alarch |
I do actually. What makes you think I'm a no mark lurker in the cowardly bushes?
Because I called you out? Disagreed with you?
Is no one entitled to an opinion unless it's the same as yours? Considering what's going on with Matt's resignation from the Trust board, surely what's needed is more opinions, not people being shouted down because they believe differently. |
Cool, what have you got to say and who are you?
Chris | |
| |
| Genuine question - from a Trust Member on 20:27 - Nov 12 with 1172 views | Alarch |
| Genuine question - from a Trust Member on 20:13 - Nov 12 by Neath_Jack |
Alarch is one of those Trust stooges who only pops up and posts when the Trust are coming into question.
This is another thing that Res has got correct on here, one of these characters always pops up to try and discredit or derail the thread.
He went specifically after Lisa last time, he even made his own special thread for her. |
I am nobody's stooge.
I don't come on this site often and post even less frequently.
Work, home, partner & 3 kids afford me very little time to do so. I chose to pipe up tonight. Shoot me. | | | |
| Genuine question - from a Trust Member on 20:27 - Nov 12 with 1162 views | TheResurrection |
| Genuine question - from a Trust Member on 20:18 - Nov 12 by waynekerr55 |
Hasn't Dineen blocked you on Twitter Res? |
He did, yeah, about a week after we met. | |
| |
| Genuine question - from a Trust Member on 20:29 - Nov 12 with 1150 views | TheResurrection |
| Genuine question - from a Trust Member on 20:19 - Nov 12 by Alarch |
Are we really doing this again?
Unless you or I were party to the discussions we could have no way of knowing what advice was taken.
Unless, of course, you know something we don't. |
Who is we? Whats your name? | |
| |
| Genuine question - from a Trust Member on 20:30 - Nov 12 with 1147 views | Neath_Jack |
| Genuine question - from a Trust Member on 20:27 - Nov 12 by Alarch |
I am nobody's stooge.
I don't come on this site often and post even less frequently.
Work, home, partner & 3 kids afford me very little time to do so. I chose to pipe up tonight. Shoot me. |
But defending the trust is the only thing that whets your typing fingers?
Why would anyone want to shoot you? Bit harsh that, although we do have a poster called ishootpeople, so you may be in business if he logs on. | |
| |
| Genuine question - from a Trust Member on 20:34 - Nov 12 with 1120 views | Alarch |
| Genuine question - from a Trust Member on 20:26 - Nov 12 by TheResurrection |
Cool, what have you got to say and who are you?
Chris |
I've told you what I have to say so far. Was just calling you out on your double standards.
Alarch | | | |
| Genuine question - from a Trust Member on 20:39 - Nov 12 with 1093 views | Uxbridge |
| Genuine question - from a Trust Member on 19:24 - Nov 12 by 34dfgdf54 |
<< Completely agree that full disclosure always needs to be given to the members, particularly when it relates to a vote from the members. That latter bit happened with regards to the sale, however clearly that hasn't happened in terms of things lately. >>
Why hasn’t it happened lately, what’s changed? |
Not specifically lately but it all comes down to the mechanics of how the Trust works and expresses it's views to the members, without fear of what will happen if it does. |  |
| |
| |
By continuing to use the site, you agree to our use of cookies and to abide by our Terms and Conditions.
