| Genuine question - from a Trust Member 19:19 - Nov 5 with 52200 views | marchamjack |
Were The Trust any part of the discussion process to keep Clement?
Thanks in advance. |  |
| Oh,..Dave, what's occuring? |
| |  |
| Genuine question - from a Trust Member on 23:06 - Nov 10 with 1981 views | IAN05 |
| Genuine question - from a Trust Member on 23:00 - Nov 10 by TheResurrection |
How do we get shot of them?
Is there an official process?
They have no shame in continuing in post.
I'm sorry but this just leaves people thinking very cynically about the people involved, what they knew when the Americans got on board, how much did they know about Cooze and does Jenkins and Co have something hanging over them? The way they covered up the Trust Director's remuneration with some sham new guidance on conflicts of interest and the way they've disappeared from sight, something's not right. There's something up but this is the danger in having the same people on board for all that time. They can get away with whatever they like, they know they'll be voted on every single time.
It's so frustrating. |
Definitely something stopping them speaking publicly. It looks more and more suspicious every day. |  | | |
| Genuine question - from a Trust Member on 23:07 - Nov 10 with 1966 views | 34dfgdf54 |
Absolutely shell shocked.
I though they were going to go big with this statement. Make it clear where they stand. They are an absolute embarrassment. They all need to go. |  | | |
| Genuine question - from a Trust Member on 23:08 - Nov 10 with 1960 views | SoberBaker |
| Genuine question - from a Trust Member on 22:58 - Nov 10 by Swanjaxs |
It just confirms what we already knew.... the trust is nicely cuddled up in bed with the yanks with Jenkins tucking them both in ..... |
Yep. And also reinforces the belief that they have "something" on the Trust.
Shambles. |  |
| |
| Genuine question - from a Trust Member on 23:08 - Nov 10 with 1953 views | monmouth |
You useless bastards, get out of our club.
Anyone who contributes a tenner to maintain that heap of shit is off their rocker. |  |
| |
| Genuine question - from a Trust Member on 23:10 - Nov 10 with 1932 views | 34dfgdf54 |
They all knew about the takeover and what the score was.
As the old saying goes, you can’t kid a kidder. | | | |
| Genuine question - from a Trust Member on 23:10 - Nov 10 with 1926 views | Gowerjack |
| Genuine question - from a Trust Member on 23:00 - Nov 10 by TheResurrection |
How do we get shot of them?
Is there an official process?
They have no shame in continuing in post.
I'm sorry but this just leaves people thinking very cynically about the people involved, what they knew when the Americans got on board, how much did they know about Cooze and does Jenkins and Co have something hanging over them? The way they covered up the Trust Director's remuneration with some sham new guidance on conflicts of interest and the way they've disappeared from sight, something's not right. There's something up but this is the danger in having the same people on board for all that time. They can get away with whatever they like, they know they'll be voted on every single time.
It's so frustrating. |
Ok
I'm astonished
If that is the official statement from the trust then they all should resign with immediate effect.
All of them.
Now.
That is unacceptable.
Give any monies left In the trust to Maggies and McMillan.
Not fit for purpose. |  |
| |
| Genuine question - from a Trust Member on 23:11 - Nov 10 with 1912 views | Martyrman57 |
So in summary it says we are $hit both on and off the field but dont rock the boat. Oh and HJ rules forever. Totally embarassing 😡. | | | |
| Genuine question - from a Trust Member on 23:14 - Nov 10 with 1875 views | whoflungdung |
We need to seriously up the ante then ,as Ive suggested before.
There is complacency and duplicity and fans are held in complete contempt.
The trust should be Leading the fans not turning on them
Look at the state we re in | |
| |
Login to get fewer ads
| Genuine question - from a Trust Member on 23:14 - Nov 10 with 1874 views | Gowerjack |
Come on then Lord Uxbridge Haw Haw
Please tell me that statement is an elaborate hoax.
Please. | |
| |
| Genuine question - from a Trust Member on 23:15 - Nov 10 with 1871 views | 34dfgdf54 |
| Genuine question - from a Trust Member on 23:08 - Nov 10 by SoberBaker |
Yep. And also reinforces the belief that they have "something" on the Trust.
Shambles. |
Course they do, the supporters director knew about the sale, I have no doubt.
[Post edited 11 Nov 2017 7:45]
| | | |
| Genuine question - from a Trust Member on 23:31 - Nov 10 with 1758 views | skacrazy |
It isn't f4cking hard it it. The next time we are live on TV the Trust could ask supporters to get behind them and show their support against the current regime by not entering the ground for 10 minutes. This is non violent and on entering the ground everyone gets right behind the team. It would be massive and will get world wide coverage. Unfortunately for some reason they seem unwilling to rock the boat. | | | |
| Genuine question - from a Trust Member on 23:38 - Nov 10 with 1716 views | jack2jack |
Let's face it chaps, football as we know it is truly fecked! [Post edited 10 Nov 2017 23:40]
|  | | |
| Genuine question - from a Trust Member on 23:45 - Nov 10 with 1692 views | barry_island |
On this occasion will the Trust accept the advice of their legal team thrashing out this deal with the club??? | |
| Swansea City, THE Austerity Club. |
| |
| Genuine question - from a Trust Member on 23:46 - Nov 10 with 1687 views | SoberBaker |
| Genuine question - from a Trust Member on 23:38 - Nov 10 by jack2jack |
Let's face it chaps, football as we know it is truly fecked! [Post edited 10 Nov 2017 23:40]
|
Monk, coupled with the sellouts did it for me a while ago, mate. The money and backstabbing has killed it.
Season ticket in the bin & no interest in entering the ground anymore.
I'll still watch a snide link and look out for the results but I'm not far off done here 😟 | |
| |
| Genuine question - from a Trust Member on 23:50 - Nov 10 with 1662 views | barry_island |
Perhaps a member of the Trust Board will stand down and Stephen Handley can be voted in? | |
| Swansea City, THE Austerity Club. |
| |
| Genuine question - from a Trust Member on 00:02 - Nov 11 with 1625 views | skacrazy |
| Genuine question - from a Trust Member on 23:46 - Nov 10 by SoberBaker |
Monk, coupled with the sellouts did it for me a while ago, mate. The money and backstabbing has killed it.
Season ticket in the bin & no interest in entering the ground anymore.
I'll still watch a snide link and look out for the results but I'm not far off done here 😟 |
It's not good. The real supporters are truly being f4cked over. We were such a good model for other clubs and that made me so proud after the crap we went through during the 80s/90s. This club is just rotten to the core. Ifeel for the good players that we have because ultimately it affects their careers but most of all it's the fans that are seriously buing taken for a ride.It must be so much easier to take with millions in the bank. | | | |
| Genuine question - from a Trust Member on 00:13 - Nov 11 with 1594 views | jack2jack |
| Genuine question - from a Trust Member on 23:46 - Nov 10 by SoberBaker |
Monk, coupled with the sellouts did it for me a while ago, mate. The money and backstabbing has killed it.
Season ticket in the bin & no interest in entering the ground anymore.
I'll still watch a snide link and look out for the results but I'm not far off done here 😟 |
Yep the money involved,means the fan comes a poor last I'm afraid.Sorry you feel the way you do,but I appreciate how you feel. | | | |
| Genuine question - from a Trust Member on 00:29 - Nov 11 with 1572 views | pembsjack |
Any chance the trust explaining why at this time when there is so much unrest, they thought a bland statement like that would suffice? | | | |
| Genuine question - from a Trust Member on 01:19 - Nov 11 with 1545 views | BillyChong |
Pathetic stuff from the Trust | | | |
| Genuine question - from a Trust Member on 01:28 - Nov 11 with 1540 views | wobbly |
That was disappointing. |  | | |
| Genuine question - from a Trust Member on 01:52 - Nov 11 with 1529 views | longlostjack |
Just read that load of politically correct crap. Very disappointed.
Edit: Is this some kind of wind up ? I can't find a link to the statement and have had a couple too many Gwatkins ciders so fair play if a wind up. Time to get some shut eye. [Post edited 11 Nov 2017 2:21]
|  |
| |
| Genuine question - from a Trust Member on 07:06 - Nov 11 with 1456 views | Vetchfielder |
They forgot to include :
"Diolch i Huw Jenkins" ©Ceredigion Jacks |  |
| Proud to have been one of the 231 |
| |
| Genuine question - from a Trust Member on 08:18 - Nov 11 with 1419 views | marchamjack |
So to answer my original question in this thread (which wasn't answered...) I take it the silence in the response means our 20% shareholding 'interest' brought zero actual influence to bear on whether to keep Clement on or not.
I can't find a shakes head emoji... | |
| Oh,..Dave, what's occuring? |
| |
| Genuine question - from a Trust Member on 09:02 - Nov 11 with 1361 views | monmouth |
| Genuine question - from a Trust Member on 23:50 - Nov 10 by barry_island |
Perhaps a member of the Trust Board will stand down and Stephen Handley can be voted in? |
Now co-opting him, which they can do - would be a hell of a powerful statement, agree with him or not. Unlike that shit from last night that I am still fuming about. But they should all stand down. Either because they want a radically different approach and lost the argument (which I would bet at least one or two are seriously pissed off about), or because they are spineless minges. [Post edited 11 Nov 2017 9:03]
| |
| |
| Genuine question - from a Trust Member on 09:05 - Nov 11 with 1350 views | Darran |
| Genuine question - from a Trust Member on 09:02 - Nov 11 by monmouth |
Now co-opting him, which they can do - would be a hell of a powerful statement, agree with him or not. Unlike that shit from last night that I am still fuming about. But they should all stand down. Either because they want a radically different approach and lost the argument (which I would bet at least one or two are seriously pissed off about), or because they are spineless minges. [Post edited 11 Nov 2017 9:03]
|
I think what you meant there was which they can do as long as he’s a member |  |
| |
| |
By continuing to use the site, you agree to our use of cookies and to abide by our Terms and Conditions.
