| Sky Sports report takeover imminent on 21:39 - Jun 1 with 2622 views | jack247 |
| Sky Sports report takeover imminent on 21:29 - Jun 1 by pikeypaul |
The coont Morgan is already worth £60 million I think his "family" are already set up. |
Wasn't he one of the shareholders initially kept in the dark? |  | |  |
| Sky Sports report takeover imminent on 21:46 - Jun 1 with 2602 views | Dr_Winston |
| Sky Sports report takeover imminent on 21:39 - Jun 1 by jack247 |
Wasn't he one of the shareholders initially kept in the dark? |
Nobody seems to know for sure. Or if indeed 50% of the Morgan stake may be up for grabs for other, non football related reasons. |  |
| Pain or damage don't end the world. Or despair, or f*cking beatings. The world ends when you're dead. Until then, you got more punishment in store. Stand it like a man... and give some back. |
| |
| Sky Sports report takeover imminent on 21:50 - Jun 1 with 2580 views | morningstar |
| Sky Sports report takeover imminent on 21:39 - Jun 1 by jack247 |
Wasn't he one of the shareholders initially kept in the dark? |
Ha ha ha ha ha! Nice one Tim I like it son!  |  |
| |
| Sky Sports report takeover imminent on 21:58 - Jun 1 with 2545 views | londonlisa2001 |
| Sky Sports report takeover imminent on 17:11 - Jun 1 by londonlisa2001 |
Only four possibilities exist:
(1) Sky Sports has made this up (seems unlikely to me - yes on transfers, can't see why they would for this with such certainty)
(2) Sky Sports have been fed the story by either current owners or new owners either one of which are lying about how far the deal is progressed.
(3) Sky sports have been fed the story by either current owners or new owners who are telling the truth in which case:
(a) the Trust is lying about how much it knows at this point or
(b) the Trust is completely in the dark in which case it hasn't for whatever reason asserted any of its rights under either the Shareholders agreement or company law.
I very much hope it's not either of the options in (3) otherwise we really are buggered. Not because the deal is necessarily bad, but because the Trust is finished if that is the case as anything other than a supporters' interest group. |
IF and I repeat IF the current report on sky sports news is true, then can I ask Ux or Phil or anyone else involved whether 3(a) or 3(b) is true from my earlier post (above for ease).
And if it is 3(b) why hasn't the Trust asserted its rights under either the shareholders' agreement or company law?
As I say, this is a big IF it is true - if not then someone is feeding this to Sky without it being true which is entirely possible. | | | |
| Sky Sports report takeover imminent on 22:00 - Jun 1 with 2536 views | vetchonian |
| Sky Sports report takeover imminent on 14:52 - Jun 1 by Uxbridge |
It was in the 70% I believe, but TV money goes up almost 50% this season.
I'm not saying investment wouldn't be a good thing. If someone could come in and raise the funds to extend the stadium and finish the training facilities then that'd be superb. I'm far from convinced the yanks will do that ... we simply don't know.
However, this club has been self-sufficient for the last 12 years, and increased TV money makes that easier, not harder. |
The one big thing about this sale of our club is that those who "rescued" the club they said they loved from the hands of persons who only cared about what they could make have now sold us out to the same situation . As Uxbridge states from a financial situation we will now probably be at our best in all our time in the PL we have developed the clubs infrastructure ( academy and Fairwood) during this time. We see no investment a t this time from our new owners .......something isn't right in all of this and I worry where it will end | |
| |
| Sky Sports report takeover imminent on 22:02 - Jun 1 with 2557 views | Watchman |
| Sky Sports report takeover imminent on 21:25 - Jun 1 by Dr_Winston |
The Trust also benefited from the dividend. To be honest I had no problems with people getting a nice return on the work that they did over the period up until those dividends were paid.They'd earned those as far as I was concerned.
What we've seen lately is those supposed "by the fans, for the fans" principles that we were apparently run by kicked to the curb with all alacrity as soon as a whacking great profit raised it's ugly head. |
In what way has the Trust benefitted! it has a stack of worthless cash (that some members of the board would never been used to buy existing share options!!) that it can do nothing with
worse case scenario it all goes to wrack and ruin and any future owner knows that the trust has a shed load of cash to save their beloved cloob!
If Tan was seen to have taken as much cash out (in the open) as the owners here then we would have ripped into that lot in the East.
When Mary Mungo and Midge were seen on Twutter drinking champers in the AFC boardroom! sign of just classless, couldnt give a fugh, you jack tvvats! sign there ever was |  |
| |
| Sky Sports report takeover imminent on 22:06 - Jun 1 with 2522 views | jack247 |
| Sky Sports report takeover imminent on 21:50 - Jun 1 by morningstar |
Ha ha ha ha ha! Nice one Tim I like it son! |
Only what was reported Gar. I don't know if it's true any more than you do | | | |
| Sky Sports report takeover imminent on 22:07 - Jun 1 with 2515 views | pikeypaul |
| Sky Sports report takeover imminent on 21:39 - Jun 1 by jack247 |
Wasn't he one of the shareholders initially kept in the dark? |
Was he ?
If he and the trust stuck together I do not think the others would be on a very good position and the takeover highly unlikely. |  |
| |
Login to get fewer ads
| Sky Sports report takeover imminent on 22:15 - Jun 1 with 2469 views | Big_Phil |
Should we wait for an official statement from the Trust before we get the knives and pitchforks out??
Just a thought.... |  | | |
| Sky Sports report takeover imminent on 23:47 - Jun 1 with 2335 views | dobjack2 |
| Sky Sports report takeover imminent on 19:27 - Jun 1 by Highjack |
And the creatures outside looked from pig to man and man to pig and back again, but already it was impossible to tell which was which. |
The pigs started trying on the men's clothes during the failed attempt at a sale.
Once that was thwarted it was obvious that the pigs and the rest of the animals had differing agendas. The animals representatives were naive in the extreme if they thought otherwise. It would be harsh to describe the animals representative with the pigs as boxer but the reality is they convinced him that he was their friend until they had no further need for him. Then it was off to the glue factory for their profit. | | | |
| Sky Sports report takeover imminent on 00:00 - Jun 2 with 2320 views | morningstar |
| Sky Sports report takeover imminent on 22:06 - Jun 1 by jack247 |
Only what was reported Gar. I don't know if it's true any more than you do |
No of course not. Bless you my son.  | |
| |
| Sky Sports report takeover imminent on 05:22 - Jun 2 with 2262 views | jack247 |
| Sky Sports report takeover imminent on 00:00 - Jun 2 by morningstar |
No of course not. Bless you my son. |
Come on Gar, you're better than soft patronising and smilies. Just say what's on your mind mun | | | |
| Sky Sports report takeover imminent on 07:08 - Jun 2 with 2214 views | Dr_Winston |
| Sky Sports report takeover imminent on 22:02 - Jun 1 by Watchman |
In what way has the Trust benefitted! it has a stack of worthless cash (that some members of the board would never been used to buy existing share options!!) that it can do nothing with
worse case scenario it all goes to wrack and ruin and any future owner knows that the trust has a shed load of cash to save their beloved cloob!
If Tan was seen to have taken as much cash out (in the open) as the owners here then we would have ripped into that lot in the East.
When Mary Mungo and Midge were seen on Twutter drinking champers in the AFC boardroom! sign of just classless, couldnt give a fugh, you jack tvvats! sign there ever was |
You answered your own question with your third sentence. If it all goes to shit The Trust has a much bigger cash reserve to use.
The dividends weren't in themselves inherently wrong or "evil". I'd have been happy for them to continue if the current ownership split had also remained in place. In that case those same shareholders could ultimately have made even more cash if they had the nerve to hold the course and not cash in now.
The seemingly cavalier way they've gone about trying to hawk the club out to any passing buyer without even knowing who they're selling to in full is the big problem here. | |
| Pain or damage don't end the world. Or despair, or f*cking beatings. The world ends when you're dead. Until then, you got more punishment in store. Stand it like a man... and give some back. |
| |
| Sky Sports report takeover imminent on 15:50 - Jun 2 with 2064 views | morningstar |
| Sky Sports report takeover imminent on 05:22 - Jun 2 by jack247 |
Come on Gar, you're better than soft patronising and smilies. Just say what's on your mind mun |
Ok Tim. I didn't mean to patronise you, just the time of night, but honestly your being more than a little naive if you think that other board members entered into any negotiation of a sale of their shares (including Martins mind!) without MM knowing exactly what was going on all the way down the line. (no smiley as i know you don't like them) | |
| |
| Sky Sports report takeover imminent on 17:26 - Jun 2 with 2000 views | tomdickharry |
| Sky Sports report takeover imminent on 22:15 - Jun 1 by Big_Phil |
Should we wait for an official statement from the Trust before we get the knives and pitchforks out??
Just a thought.... |
Spot on, as far as I can see the last piece of official news from the Trust was -
Where do we go from here — Part 4
April 21, 2016 | | | |
| Sky Sports report takeover imminent on 18:55 - Jun 2 with 1938 views | max936 |
| Sky Sports report takeover imminent on 17:26 - Jun 2 by tomdickharry |
Spot on, as far as I can see the last piece of official news from the Trust was -
Where do we go from here — Part 4
April 21, 2016 |
"Where do we go from here" become another Wimbledon in our case Swansea United  |  |
| |
| Sky Sports report takeover imminent on 19:48 - Jun 2 with 1900 views | Oldjack |
| Sky Sports report takeover imminent on 18:55 - Jun 2 by max936 |
"Where do we go from here" become another Wimbledon in our case Swansea United |
i said it before and i'll say it again if this lot rape us ,Huw and co had better walk in the shadows ,they've had enough warnings about this lot ,they've sold to the only buyers they could find to make a massive quick buck is the thoughts of many many people atm |  |
| Prosser the Tosser dwells on Phil's bum hole like a rusty old hemorrhoid ,fact
You Greedy Bastards Get Out Of OUR Club!
|
| |
| Sky Sports report takeover imminent on 20:39 - Jun 2 with 1861 views | Millie |
| Sky Sports report takeover imminent on 17:26 - Jun 2 by tomdickharry |
Spot on, as far as I can see the last piece of official news from the Trust was -
Where do we go from here — Part 4
April 21, 2016 |
perhaps nothing has happened from then until now, I'm all for information but not just for the sake of it | | | |
| Sky Sports report takeover imminent on 20:44 - Jun 2 with 1854 views | londonlisa2001 |
| Sky Sports report takeover imminent on 20:39 - Jun 2 by Millie |
perhaps nothing has happened from then until now, I'm all for information but not just for the sake of it |
I agree with that, but when Sky and now the Post are reporting it's done, you would expect a comment if that is not true? | | | |
| Sky Sports report takeover imminent on 21:09 - Jun 2 with 1800 views | jack247 |
| Sky Sports report takeover imminent on 15:50 - Jun 2 by morningstar |
Ok Tim. I didn't mean to patronise you, just the time of night, but honestly your being more than a little naive if you think that other board members entered into any negotiation of a sale of their shares (including Martins mind!) without MM knowing exactly what was going on all the way down the line. (no smiley as i know you don't like them) |
It did strike me as far fetched, but I'm pretty sure Phil S had said that (either to the best of his, or the trusts knowledge, I can't remember), MM was one of the shareholders kept in the dark, alomg with the trust.
Given Phils position with the trust, I wouldn't have thought he would have said that if he didn't think it was true. More likely to have just not commented or said he didn't know. That's all I was basing it on.
BTW smilies don't bother me, I just don't like the way some people use them to belittle others or use them as a weak attempt to give a shit post credibility. Not you, as your posts don't need a crutch. The likes of Monmouth, Lohegrin, Lisa etc don't seem to use them every ther as they don't need to.
I use them all the time on Whatsapp and Facebook!
Cue a reply with smilies in it. | | | |
| Sky Sports report takeover imminent on 21:11 - Jun 2 with 1793 views | Jackfath |
| Sky Sports report takeover imminent on 21:09 - Jun 2 by jack247 |
It did strike me as far fetched, but I'm pretty sure Phil S had said that (either to the best of his, or the trusts knowledge, I can't remember), MM was one of the shareholders kept in the dark, alomg with the trust.
Given Phils position with the trust, I wouldn't have thought he would have said that if he didn't think it was true. More likely to have just not commented or said he didn't know. That's all I was basing it on.
BTW smilies don't bother me, I just don't like the way some people use them to belittle others or use them as a weak attempt to give a shit post credibility. Not you, as your posts don't need a crutch. The likes of Monmouth, Lohegrin, Lisa etc don't seem to use them every ther as they don't need to.
I use them all the time on Whatsapp and Facebook!
Cue a reply with smilies in it. |
I don't use them either my friend. |  |
| |
| Sky Sports report takeover imminent on 21:18 - Jun 2 with 1774 views | jack247 |
| Sky Sports report takeover imminent on 21:11 - Jun 2 by Jackfath |
I don't use them either my friend. |
Sorry Jackfath, didn't mean to exclude you | | | |
| Sky Sports report takeover imminent on 21:44 - Jun 2 with 1725 views | Millie |
| Sky Sports report takeover imminent on 20:44 - Jun 2 by londonlisa2001 |
I agree with that, but when Sky and now the Post are reporting it's done, you would expect a comment if that is not true? |
Who knows, but the point I was making to TDH is that perhaps nothing had happened to warrant a statement until now, putting out statements for the sake of it is pointless IMHO | | | |
| Sky Sports report takeover imminent on 22:00 - Jun 2 with 1697 views | Brynmill_Jack |
| Sky Sports report takeover imminent on 20:44 - Jun 2 by londonlisa2001 |
I agree with that, but when Sky and now the Post are reporting it's done, you would expect a comment if that is not true? |
Perhaps the b*****ds are too ashamed to comment or show their faces after this sell out to end all sell outs?? |  |
| Each time I go to Bedd - au........................ |
| |
| Sky Sports report takeover imminent on 22:10 - Jun 2 with 1677 views | morningstar |
| Sky Sports report takeover imminent on 21:09 - Jun 2 by jack247 |
It did strike me as far fetched, but I'm pretty sure Phil S had said that (either to the best of his, or the trusts knowledge, I can't remember), MM was one of the shareholders kept in the dark, alomg with the trust.
Given Phils position with the trust, I wouldn't have thought he would have said that if he didn't think it was true. More likely to have just not commented or said he didn't know. That's all I was basing it on.
BTW smilies don't bother me, I just don't like the way some people use them to belittle others or use them as a weak attempt to give a shit post credibility. Not you, as your posts don't need a crutch. The likes of Monmouth, Lohegrin, Lisa etc don't seem to use them every ther as they don't need to.
I use them all the time on Whatsapp and Facebook!
Cue a reply with smilies in it. |
Of course it's far fetched Tim. Phil has to report what he is told, and his position at this moment surely doesn't allow him to give his personal opinion of what he believes to be the truth or not.
I prefer not to use smilies to patronise or belittle people, hence my simple 'wink' smiley to you in my last post that you referred to (although sometimes it helps!). But i must correct you as Lisa only a few days ago replied to a post of mine with a which i may add i felt quite comfortable with. Jackfath of course doesn't need to use smilies as you only have to look at his avatar to put a smile on your face. But I disagree with Monmouth and Lohegrin who both use them randomly when needs must. | |
| |
| |
By continuing to use the site, you agree to our use of cookies and to abide by our Terms and Conditions.
