| Swansea City : Sorry Luke, but this simply isn’t working on 01:20 - Jan 19 with 496 views | jackrmee |
| Swansea City : Sorry Luke, but this simply isn’t working on 20:11 - Jan 18 by SullutaCreturned |
This website was split badly oiver Martin, many of us wanted him gone before the second season. Some of us took longer and others still would have him back.
Maybe they have learned from that? |
I wanted Martin to stay, but I wouldn’t want him back |  |
|  |
| Swansea City : Sorry Luke, but this simply isn’t working on 05:44 - Jan 19 with 391 views | jack247 |
Sheehans football wasn’t too dissimilar to Duffs when he was in charge. I’m assuming he’d have us playing similarly to Williams if he stepped in now. All we need is the team playing with a bit more conviction.
Not change too much, just remove the bad apple/boss the team have lost respect for from the equation. He’s not a kong term option, but I’m sure that would be enough to steady the ship for the rest of the season.
Sheehan promoted
Williams on gardening leave
No real impact on PSR
Or is that too simplistic? |  | | |
| Swansea City : Sorry Luke, but this simply isn’t working on 07:15 - Jan 19 with 321 views | Whiterockin |
| Swansea City : Sorry Luke, but this simply isn’t working on 05:44 - Jan 19 by jack247 |
Sheehans football wasn’t too dissimilar to Duffs when he was in charge. I’m assuming he’d have us playing similarly to Williams if he stepped in now. All we need is the team playing with a bit more conviction.
Not change too much, just remove the bad apple/boss the team have lost respect for from the equation. He’s not a kong term option, but I’m sure that would be enough to steady the ship for the rest of the season.
Sheehan promoted
Williams on gardening leave
No real impact on PSR
Or is that too simplistic? |
Not too simplistic as I've said elsewhere. It's the perfect short term solution until we sort ourselves out financially. Restructure at the end of the season. |  | | |
| Swansea City : Sorry Luke, but this simply isn’t working on 09:26 - Jan 19 with 155 views | onehunglow |
| Swansea City : Sorry Luke, but this simply isn’t working on 22:09 - Jan 18 by vetchonian |
how can we be so sure Sheehan will steady the d
ship? |
We can’t
Can we be sure Luke won’t see the ship sink | |
| |
| Swansea City : Sorry Luke, but this simply isn’t working on 10:08 - Jan 19 with 115 views | TenbySwan |
| Swansea City : Sorry Luke, but this simply isn’t working on 22:10 - Jan 18 by Whiterockin |
And your answer is. It's easy to criticise without putting forward a sensible alternative. |
I didn't criticise you mate, I just disagreed with the suggestion.
Sheehan is a big part of Williams's team also.
Some are for him, some against. |  | | |
| Swansea City : Sorry Luke, but this simply isn’t working on 10:50 - Jan 19 with 49 views | magicdaps10 |
| Swansea City : Sorry Luke, but this simply isn’t working on 01:20 - Jan 19 by jackrmee |
I wanted Martin to stay, but I wouldn’t want him back |
I am in the same boat.
Think we need a major cut from any links with him as it will just be deja vu all over again.
When Williams goes then Sheehan needs to go also.....tors need to be cut with Watson also.
I fear now if Williams turns things around even in the slightest that some will just play on it's being done by others at the club or he is now playing players in their correct positions etc.
I just feel that some posters have too much pride to turn around and say well done to him due to his links with Martin.
I know it can be argued that some won't say he needs to go if it's going bad.....I would cross that bridge if we are in a dog fight rather than where we sit presently in mid table.
Fans have made their minds up,some stronger characters won't go back on it.
Things need sorting to as align fans and getting rid of Williams might be the start that's needed. |  |
| |
| |
By continuing to use the site, you agree to our use of cookies and to abide by our Terms and Conditions.
