Please log in or register. Registered visitors get fewer ads.
Forum index | Previous Thread | Next thread
CAMERON?! AND RANGEL?! 20:35 - Jul 4 with 14752 viewsPhil_i_P_Daddy

No. No. No.

Phil_i_P

0
CAMERON?! AND RANGEL?! on 21:56 - Jul 4 with 7449 viewsbrad

yes yes yes
0
CAMERON?! AND RANGEL?! on 21:59 - Jul 4 with 7434 viewsQPR1980

Yes yes yes desperate for some experience in this squad!
0
CAMERON?! AND RANGEL?! on 22:01 - Jul 4 with 7413 viewswortonranger

Did they tell you had to go to rehab?
2
CAMERON?! AND RANGEL?! on 22:01 - Jul 4 with 7408 viewsbosh67

Glad we are getting all these strikers in.

Never knowingly right.
Poll: How long before new signings become quivering wrecks of the players they were?

3
CAMERON?! AND RANGEL?! on 22:16 - Jul 4 with 7344 viewsBklynRanger

It's an affirmative from me but I'll be looking for them to double up on the old cod liver oil, glucosamine suppositories, eye of newt liqueur, leech therapy and whatever other white magic can keep them available for an actual season.
1
CAMERON?! AND RANGEL?! on 22:21 - Jul 4 with 7312 viewsHunterhoop

If we sign both it does feel like we’ll be very top heavy when it comes to defence and central midfield.

Saving grace is the timing of this. Both players’ agents will have tested the market, and I would strongly wager they’ll be on significantly less this coming season than last as the leverage is with us. They’d have gone elsewhere if the demand had existed.
0
CAMERON?! AND RANGEL?! on 22:32 - Jul 4 with 7255 viewsCroydonCaptJack

I do feel we can trust LF and LH with the finances now.
1
CAMERON?! AND RANGEL?! on 04:46 - Jul 5 with 7183 viewsVancouverHoop

IIRC Rangel was offered a contract back when the rest of the old wood had been let go. He just hadn't agreed terms I guess. Cameron could get peanuts in MLS, maybe we added a bit of salt to make him stay. Neither of them are a total waste of space, either on or off the pitch.
0
Login to get fewer ads

CAMERON?! AND RANGEL?! on 06:01 - Jul 5 with 7133 viewsWoodlaneR

CAMERON?! AND RANGEL?! on 22:01 - Jul 4 by bosh67

Glad we are getting all these strikers in.


https://www.qpr.co.uk/news/club-news/warburton-i-know-what-else-we-need/
0
CAMERON?! AND RANGEL?! on 08:07 - Jul 5 with 6881 viewsNorthernr

If we sign Cameron then that Ball transfer looks weirder than it already does.
2
CAMERON?! AND RANGEL?! on 08:43 - Jul 5 with 6764 viewsDorse

CAMERON?! AND RANGEL?! on 04:46 - Jul 5 by VancouverHoop

IIRC Rangel was offered a contract back when the rest of the old wood had been let go. He just hadn't agreed terms I guess. Cameron could get peanuts in MLS, maybe we added a bit of salt to make him stay. Neither of them are a total waste of space, either on or off the pitch.



'What do we want? We don't know! When do we want it? Now!'

2
CAMERON?! AND RANGEL?! on 09:04 - Jul 5 with 6691 viewsGloucs_R

CAMERON?! AND RANGEL?! on 08:07 - Jul 5 by Northernr

If we sign Cameron then that Ball transfer looks weirder than it already does.


A bit like Gobern a few years ago....

Just feel like we are getting a really bloated squad again. At RB we would have Furlong, Rangel and Kakay. No need for Furlong to go centre now as we have 5 CB's.

Is Warburton a 532 manager? I keep looking at the squad thinking where does everyone fit in.

4231 would still be my choice.

Poll: Are we staying up?

0
CAMERON?! AND RANGEL?! on 09:09 - Jul 5 with 6671 viewsNorthernr

CAMERON?! AND RANGEL?! on 09:04 - Jul 5 by Gloucs_R

A bit like Gobern a few years ago....

Just feel like we are getting a really bloated squad again. At RB we would have Furlong, Rangel and Kakay. No need for Furlong to go centre now as we have 5 CB's.

Is Warburton a 532 manager? I keep looking at the squad thinking where does everyone fit in.

4231 would still be my choice.


I think it'll be his choice as well.
0
CAMERON?! AND RANGEL?! on 10:22 - Jul 5 with 6504 viewsqprd

CAMERON?! AND RANGEL?! on 09:04 - Jul 5 by Gloucs_R

A bit like Gobern a few years ago....

Just feel like we are getting a really bloated squad again. At RB we would have Furlong, Rangel and Kakay. No need for Furlong to go centre now as we have 5 CB's.

Is Warburton a 532 manager? I keep looking at the squad thinking where does everyone fit in.

4231 would still be my choice.


gobern haha, thank you for the reminder... i think he played about 20 minutes in a meaningless efl cup match against yeovil

we really have signed some random players
0
CAMERON?! AND RANGEL?! on 10:29 - Jul 5 with 6465 viewskingsburyR

Yes to both from me.

We need some experience and both impressed when playing.

The kids are going to need some help this season.

We are either going to be top 4 or bottom 4. The joys of QPR!

Dont know why we bother. .... but we do!

1
CAMERON?! AND RANGEL?! on 10:32 - Jul 5 with 6452 viewsdaveB

CAMERON?! AND RANGEL?! on 09:04 - Jul 5 by Gloucs_R

A bit like Gobern a few years ago....

Just feel like we are getting a really bloated squad again. At RB we would have Furlong, Rangel and Kakay. No need for Furlong to go centre now as we have 5 CB's.

Is Warburton a 532 manager? I keep looking at the squad thinking where does everyone fit in.

4231 would still be my choice.


given Hall's injury record it's more like 4 and a half centre halves but know what you mean

Cameron coming in seems an odd one
0
CAMERON?! AND RANGEL?! on 10:33 - Jul 5 with 6437 viewsToast_R

Let the manager and DOF do their jobs and we can pick the bones out of it come January. We rarely call it right as fans when the club recruits players.
3
CAMERON?! AND RANGEL?! on 10:44 - Jul 5 with 6390 viewsCliveWilsonSaid

CAMERON?! AND RANGEL?! on 09:04 - Jul 5 by Gloucs_R

A bit like Gobern a few years ago....

Just feel like we are getting a really bloated squad again. At RB we would have Furlong, Rangel and Kakay. No need for Furlong to go centre now as we have 5 CB's.

Is Warburton a 532 manager? I keep looking at the squad thinking where does everyone fit in.

4231 would still be my choice.


I’d say Kakay might go out on loan. Remember Cousins and Pav were utilised there a few times last season and they’ve gone. As for centre backs they’re definitely needed. Some of the signings like Masterson probably won’t be first choice from the off. Most likely won’t get more than 10-15 games out of Hall. We need these players. Only question mark is will they be good enough.

Poll: Expectations for this season?

0
CAMERON?! AND RANGEL?! on 10:50 - Jul 5 with 6357 viewsderbyhoop

Depending on wages I'd be happy with both.
By all accounts Rangel is a thoroughly good character to have around the club. Expect him to play second fiddle to Furlong.
We usually looked better last year with Cameron in the side. And he offers a physical presence in a midfield full of midgets.
Both would bring experience to an otherwise very young squad.

The first sentence is the most important but I'd trust MW, Sir Les and Hoos to get this right.

"Travel is fatal to prejudice, bigotry and narrow-mindedness, and many of our people need it sorely on these accounts. Broad, wholesome, charitable views of men and things cannot be acquired by vegetating in one little corner of the Earth all one's lifetime." (Mark Twain) Find me on twitter @derbyhoop and now on Bluesky

1
CAMERON?! AND RANGEL?! on 10:54 - Jul 5 with 6344 viewsGloucs_R

CAMERON?! AND RANGEL?! on 10:32 - Jul 5 by daveB

given Hall's injury record it's more like 4 and a half centre halves but know what you mean

Cameron coming in seems an odd one


We must be up to a squad of 25 now and thats without a couple of strikers.

What are we going to do with the likes of

Hall - possible loan would be good for him and us
Kakay
Phillips
Nick
Goss
Wheeler
Walker
Oteh

and how much development time will Manning and Smyth realistically get?

Lets say 4231, with Cameron and Angel signing...

Lumley
Furlong / BFG / Barbet / Wallace
Cameron / Scowen
BOS / Eze / Chair
Smyth

Subs Kelly, Amos, Ball, Rangel, Shodipo, Smith + a striker (although not sure if its only the Prem that allow 7 now?)

Poll: Are we staying up?

0
CAMERON?! AND RANGEL?! on 11:10 - Jul 5 with 6269 viewsHeadington

CAMERON?! AND RANGEL?! on 10:54 - Jul 5 by Gloucs_R

We must be up to a squad of 25 now and thats without a couple of strikers.

What are we going to do with the likes of

Hall - possible loan would be good for him and us
Kakay
Phillips
Nick
Goss
Wheeler
Walker
Oteh

and how much development time will Manning and Smyth realistically get?

Lets say 4231, with Cameron and Angel signing...

Lumley
Furlong / BFG / Barbet / Wallace
Cameron / Scowen
BOS / Eze / Chair
Smyth

Subs Kelly, Amos, Ball, Rangel, Shodipo, Smith + a striker (although not sure if its only the Prem that allow 7 now?)


Think I would disagree with this line-up. I think Smith and Amos will be first choice. Also believe that Kelly will be number 1 before Lumley. In fact wouldn't be that surprised to see Lumley go as the (apparently) highly-rated Dieng has signed a new contract - to be 3rd choice?

We have lost/losing 8-11 players - Freeman, (Luongo prob), Ingram, Lynch, Bidwell, Pavel, Smith, Baptiste, Cousins, and two loanees, so need quite a few though Cameron is a bit of a strange one.
0
CAMERON?! AND RANGEL?! on 11:14 - Jul 5 with 6253 viewsrsonist

Agree that MW is very unlikely to deviate but a three of Furlong Cameron Barbet looks quite good on paper actually. Smith and Manning at WB too maybe.

Of course the worry is it that the free flowing 4-2-3-1 is going to be so all over the place no one will be able to tell either way...
0
CAMERON?! AND RANGEL?! on 11:29 - Jul 5 with 6178 viewsDavieQPR

Clubs don't loan us players like Smith and Amos to sit on the bench.
1
CAMERON?! AND RANGEL?! on 11:34 - Jul 5 with 6157 views00calben

Evil Warbs only signing players he's worked with before & from his agent mates
0
CAMERON?! AND RANGEL?! on 12:48 - Jul 5 with 5939 viewsCliveWilsonSaid

CAMERON?! AND RANGEL?! on 11:29 - Jul 5 by DavieQPR

Clubs don't loan us players like Smith and Amos to sit on the bench.


Smith maybe but Amos is coming back from injury I think so Spurs may not want him flogged to death.

Poll: Expectations for this season?

0
About Us Contact Us Terms & Conditions Privacy Cookies Advertising
© FansNetwork 2024