Please log in or register. Registered visitors get fewer ads.
Forum index | Previous Thread | Next thread
transfer embargos... 10:30 - Apr 6 with 9344 viewsPhildo

10 clubs in the championship embargoed due to filing accounts late. For some of these it will be administrative as the government allowed late filing but EFL rules did not but for others it means trouble ahead. The fact the EFL imposed this in a pandemic suggests they mean business:

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/sport/football/article-9438517/Championship-facing-f

0
transfer embargos... on 10:34 - Apr 6 with 5795 viewstoboboly

Apparently Huddersfield was just administrative and they are now no longer subject to the embargo.

Sexy Asian dwarves wanted.

0
transfer embargos... on 10:35 - Apr 6 with 5783 viewsdaveB

EFL coming across as idiots here imo if the Government have told companies they can file accounts later
2
transfer embargos... on 10:53 - Apr 6 with 5699 viewsNorthernr

Yeh it's a bit of a odd story this. Looks like financial collapse is imminent at multiple clubs, which it might well be, and it's certainly a big thing that nearly half the division was quietly under a transfer embargo by the end of the last window (very wrong IMO that they're allowed to impose embargoes on clubs without announcing them) but actually this is because the government gave three months leeway on filing accounts but the EFL, rather ridiculously, didn't. Still, good to know we're still all up to date etc.

This post has been edited by an administrator
0
transfer embargos... on 10:59 - Apr 6 with 5674 viewsMickS

transfer embargos... on 10:53 - Apr 6 by Northernr

Yeh it's a bit of a odd story this. Looks like financial collapse is imminent at multiple clubs, which it might well be, and it's certainly a big thing that nearly half the division was quietly under a transfer embargo by the end of the last window (very wrong IMO that they're allowed to impose embargoes on clubs without announcing them) but actually this is because the government gave three months leeway on filing accounts but the EFL, rather ridiculously, didn't. Still, good to know we're still all up to date etc.

This post has been edited by an administrator


They’d be better off informing us about WEATHER ARMAGEDDON.
0
transfer embargos... on 11:13 - Apr 6 with 5620 viewsBostonR

How many Championship teams will be in business for next season given the critical nature of some of the finances at clubs?
Will be interesting to see how this impacts the league next season.
1
transfer embargos... on 11:15 - Apr 6 with 5598 viewsswitchingcode

Transfer embargo while the window is shut 😃yes that’ll show em.
The real issues will hit home in the summer for many efl clubs
0
transfer embargos... on 11:16 - Apr 6 with 5607 viewsnix

transfer embargos... on 11:13 - Apr 6 by BostonR

How many Championship teams will be in business for next season given the critical nature of some of the finances at clubs?
Will be interesting to see how this impacts the league next season.


It's a bit worrying. While there are some teams we love to hate, obviously, we need to have some opposition and I don't want to see other clubs go to the wall.
3
transfer embargos... on 11:19 - Apr 6 with 5594 viewsdavman

transfer embargos... on 10:35 - Apr 6 by daveB

EFL coming across as idiots here imo if the Government have told companies they can file accounts later


"EFL coming across as idiots"

What a surprise.

A National Tragedy what is happening to the administration of our game - every single level of the FA appears to be full of incompetent pedants with very few decisions being made for the good of the game.
Their interest is absolutely the financial side, but only making the big clubs bigger and richer.

Disgrace of an organisation.

Anyway, Birmingham managed to sign a player when on an embargo with no penalty even in the aftermath of their pointless (sic) points deduction, so none of the rules count unless you have a Q in your name...

Can we go out yet?
Poll: What would you take for Willock if a bid comes this month?

3
Login to get fewer ads

transfer embargos... on 11:24 - Apr 6 with 5567 viewsQPR_John

Amazed that the FL could not find a way to include us in that list.
4
transfer embargos... on 12:18 - Apr 6 with 5397 viewsbosh67

transfer embargos... on 11:24 - Apr 6 by QPR_John

Amazed that the FL could not find a way to include us in that list.


Shhhh!

Never knowingly right.
Poll: How long before new signings become quivering wrecks of the players they were?

0
transfer embargos... on 12:24 - Apr 6 with 5367 viewssuperhoopdownunder

transfer embargos... on 11:16 - Apr 6 by nix

It's a bit worrying. While there are some teams we love to hate, obviously, we need to have some opposition and I don't want to see other clubs go to the wall.


Only club I would like to go out of business is Chelscum
2
transfer embargos... on 13:06 - Apr 6 with 5213 viewsEsox_Lucius

on 01:00 - Jan 1 by



We already did, and failed for the most part.

The grass is always greener.

0
transfer embargos... on 13:12 - Apr 6 with 5186 viewsStanisgod

No Forest 🤐

It's being so happy that keeps me going.

0
transfer embargos... on 13:14 - Apr 6 with 5172 viewsNorthernr

transfer embargos... on 13:12 - Apr 6 by Stanisgod

No Forest 🤐


Their accounts are in, we were chatting about them a week or so back. This is purely about timing of account filing, not how much sht they're in.
0
transfer embargos... on 13:41 - Apr 6 with 5049 viewsdaveB

on 01:00 - Jan 1 by



was it over the top? We got a fine several years after the event and a transfer embargo for one window. The fine was only so big because we spent so much that season, if they had stuck with the original rules the fine would have been more than double what we ended up with.
1
transfer embargos... on 13:51 - Apr 6 with 5009 viewsrsonist

This is more interesting for the depressing dogs breakfast of crap journalism and the total disinclination towards reading it properly.
0
transfer embargos... on 14:37 - Apr 6 with 4879 viewsQPR_John

transfer embargos... on 13:41 - Apr 6 by daveB

was it over the top? We got a fine several years after the event and a transfer embargo for one window. The fine was only so big because we spent so much that season, if they had stuck with the original rules the fine would have been more than double what we ended up with.


Agree but the point is should any other team spend as much as us the rules have been changed the punishment would be nowhere as draconian. So even the FL by changing the rules admitted the original punishment specified in the rules was over the top. That did not make them consider our punishment which is why a lot of supporters think it was over the top.
0
transfer embargos... on 14:39 - Apr 6 with 4869 viewsQPR_John

transfer embargos... on 13:06 - Apr 6 by Esox_Lucius

We already did, and failed for the most part.


Really I must have missed the court case.
0
transfer embargos... on 14:58 - Apr 6 with 4819 viewsBoston

transfer embargos... on 11:16 - Apr 6 by nix

It's a bit worrying. While there are some teams we love to hate, obviously, we need to have some opposition and I don't want to see other clubs go to the wall.


Whether we like ‘em or not, it’s only fair that the other clubs in the division play their away fixture at the Den.

Poll: Thank God The Seaons Over.

0
transfer embargos... on 15:09 - Apr 6 with 4789 viewsEsox_Lucius

transfer embargos... on 14:39 - Apr 6 by QPR_John

Really I must have missed the court case.


Note 6 on page 19 of the filed accounts.
https://s3.eu-west-2.amazonaws.com/document-api-images-live.ch.gov.uk/docs/cvzHZ
[Post edited 6 Apr 2021 15:10]

The grass is always greener.

0
transfer embargos... on 15:28 - Apr 6 with 4731 viewsdaveB

transfer embargos... on 14:37 - Apr 6 by QPR_John

Agree but the point is should any other team spend as much as us the rules have been changed the punishment would be nowhere as draconian. So even the FL by changing the rules admitted the original punishment specified in the rules was over the top. That did not make them consider our punishment which is why a lot of supporters think it was over the top.


Lets be honest here we are all pretty biased where this is concerned, When other clubs get points deductions we think it should be more, when they are fined we think it should be more but when we were fined we think it should be a lot less.

We cheated as did Leicester but they made a better fist of the prem than us so never really had to worry about any punishment
4
transfer embargos... on 15:45 - Apr 6 with 4673 viewsBrianMcCarthy

transfer embargos... on 12:24 - Apr 6 by superhoopdownunder

Only club I would like to go out of business is Chelscum


Yes, but doesn't it suit the law and evolutionary scholars that all those types are kept in the one place?

"The opposite of love, after all, is not hate, but indifference."
Poll: Player of the Year (so far)

0
transfer embargos... on 15:49 - Apr 6 with 4655 viewskensalriser

transfer embargos... on 15:28 - Apr 6 by daveB

Lets be honest here we are all pretty biased where this is concerned, When other clubs get points deductions we think it should be more, when they are fined we think it should be more but when we were fined we think it should be a lot less.

We cheated as did Leicester but they made a better fist of the prem than us so never really had to worry about any punishment


Whatever you say and however reasonable it might be, some people just enjoy the victim narrative.

Poll: QPR to finish 7th or Brentford to drop out of the top 6?

0
transfer embargos... on 15:50 - Apr 6 with 4652 viewsSimplyNico

Whilst it's all very serious, the hilarious thing about that article is that the Mail refer to "Wayne Rooney's Derby".
0
transfer embargos... on 16:12 - Apr 6 with 2720 viewsQPR_John

transfer embargos... on 15:28 - Apr 6 by daveB

Lets be honest here we are all pretty biased where this is concerned, When other clubs get points deductions we think it should be more, when they are fined we think it should be more but when we were fined we think it should be a lot less.

We cheated as did Leicester but they made a better fist of the prem than us so never really had to worry about any punishment


It would seem what you are saying is that FFP means that if you reach your target by breaking the rules you will only get punished if you fail to make the most of reaching said target. Interesting rule.
0
About Us Contact Us Terms & Conditions Privacy Cookies Advertising
© FansNetwork 2024