| CAMERON?! AND RANGEL?! 20:35 - Jul 4 with 15632 views | Phil_i_P_Daddy |
No. No. No. |  |
| |  |
| CAMERON?! AND RANGEL?! on 23:50 - Jul 8 with 2909 views | CroydonCaptJack |
| CAMERON?! AND RANGEL?! on 23:34 - Jul 8 by daveB |
hardly pointless, he has already taken over the Karl Henry position as scapegoat without kicking a ball |
This.
Strange though the signing seems to be, I'm prepared to see how it pans out before judging.
I'm old-fashioned like that. |  | | |
| CAMERON?! AND RANGEL?! on 09:00 - Jul 9 with 2660 views | CamberleyR |
| CAMERON?! AND RANGEL?! on 22:48 - Jul 8 by UPPERLOFTNZ |
absolutely. Of all the transfers the Ball one seems completely pointless - not a scrap of evidence to support him even being a decent squad player. |
He can cover centre back and full back so he's surely got to be an upgrade on Baptiste. |  |
| |
| CAMERON?! AND RANGEL?! on 19:16 - Jul 10 with 2349 views | VancouverHoop |
| CAMERON?! AND RANGEL?! on 09:00 - Jul 9 by CamberleyR |
He can cover centre back and full back so he's surely got to be an upgrade on Baptiste. |
Baptiste did that (only occasionally at RB, and not brilliantly, but he did it.) |  | | |
| CAMERON?! AND RANGEL?! on 20:56 - Jul 10 with 2158 views | Phil_i_P_Daddy |
Can’t BELIEVE we’re looking at Cameron on a permanent. | |
| |
| CAMERON?! AND RANGEL?! on 23:08 - Jul 10 with 1951 views | derbyhoop |
I can. As per my earlier post on this thread. |  |
| "Travel is fatal to prejudice, bigotry and narrow-mindedness, and many of our people need it sorely on these accounts. Broad, wholesome, charitable views of men and things cannot be acquired by vegetating in one little corner of the Earth all one's lifetime." (Mark Twain)
Find me on twitter @derbyhoop and now on Bluesky |
| |
| CAMERON?! AND RANGEL?! on 08:22 - Jul 11 with 1701 views | TheChef |
| CAMERON?! AND RANGEL?! on 20:56 - Jul 10 by Phil_i_P_Daddy |
Can’t BELIEVE we’re looking at Cameron on a permanent. |
Why not?
Who would you have instead?
This squad needs all the experience it can get, he's someone we know, and if the price/wage is right then it would be silly not to. |  |
| |
| CAMERON?! AND RANGEL?! on 09:02 - Jul 11 with 1654 views | Gloucs_R |
| CAMERON?! AND RANGEL?! on 19:16 - Jul 10 by VancouverHoop |
Baptiste did that (only occasionally at RB, and not brilliantly, but he did it.) |
I think that was his nail in the coffin. He was awful for that game. |  |
| |
Login to get fewer ads
| CAMERON?! AND RANGEL?! on 09:28 - Jul 11 with 1609 views | paulparker |
Cameron is s better CB than midfielder and is injury prone as hell (19 games last season ) im not a fan and think our resources would be better spent elsewhere |  |
| And Bowles is onside, Swinburne has come rushing out of his goal , what can Bowles do here , onto the left foot no, on to the right foot
That’s there that’s two, and that’s Bowles
Brian Moore
|
| |
| CAMERON?! AND RANGEL?! on 09:58 - Jul 11 with 1556 views | Antti_Heinola |
| CAMERON?! AND RANGEL?! on 09:28 - Jul 11 by paulparker |
Cameron is s better CB than midfielder and is injury prone as hell (19 games last season ) im not a fan and think our resources would be better spent elsewhere |
I'm not sure you can call getting absolutely battered by a horrific tackle at Leeds 'injury prone', but maybe you have a different definition to me!
I think if he fits in the structure he's a good signing for his experience, but also agree we seem to be building up a lot of players in similar positions, and I do want to see us get a striker or ten! |  |
| |
| |
By continuing to use the site, you agree to our use of cookies and to abide by our Terms and Conditions.
