| Jihadi John, this beheading bloke. 23:56 - Sep 14 with 19543 views | Lohengrin |
It's just occurred to me that clown is apparently from London. I would assume his family live there... no doubt paid for by the likes of us, why can't they clap the bastards in irons and make it a quid pro quo: you kill a British hostage, we drown your entire family like unwanted kittens.
That would be 278 less to worry about. | |
| An idea isn't responsible for those who believe in it. |
| |  |
| Jihadi John, this beheading bloke. on 01:11 - Sep 18 with 2018 views | Brynmill_Jack |
500 -560 mph is a passenger jets speed cruising at 25-40000 feet. Those planes were not doing mealy half that. A jumbo jet can take off fully laden at 120-130 mph. If they were flying at 500 mph they wouldn't have been able to hit the buildings so accurately | |
| Each time I go to Bedd - au........................ |
| |
| Jihadi John, this beheading bloke. on 07:16 - Sep 18 with 1952 views | Brynmill_Jack |
He's right about the planes being unable to maintain 500 mph speed at 1000 feet though. It can't be done | |
| Each time I go to Bedd - au........................ |
| |
| Jihadi John, this beheading bloke. on 07:18 - Sep 18 with 1950 views | Lord_Bony |
Well when a person of that high standard and professionalism ,the son of the Lear Jet inventor,is willing to put his reputation on the line you have to at least question certain things .
For instance why was there not one piece of aircraft recovered that day,no wheels,no engines nothing,but they found the passports of the highjackers remarkably intact,scattered on the ground....
There was also not one piece of aircraft recovered after one is alleged to have hit the Pentagon frontage that day...not one single piece,..surely a massive wheel or engine would have been found but no...not even the black boxes ..
Anyway back to that airline pilot....
‘The debris of the collapse should have contained massive sections of the Boeing 767, including 3 engine cores weighing approximately 9000 pounds apiece which could not have been hidden. Yet there is no evidence of any of these massive structural components from either 767 at the WTC. Such complete disappearance of 767s is impossible.' | |
| |
| Jihadi John, this beheading bloke. on 09:14 - Sep 18 with 1910 views | perchrockjack |
Ebo.
Good morning.
Ok so far?
Done of I pad so apologies ,then again the posts on here regarding the America 9/11 scandal deserves such ridicule.
People believe what they want to believe.
I dont believe America would shatter their country, put Wall St into meltdown and cause mayhem of that scale for reasons you allude to. It precipidated financial Armageddon in one of the world s most influential markets and because I don't believe as you do it doesn't make me and the millions of areas d1ckeds..la | |
| |
| Jihadi John, this beheading bloke. on 09:17 - Sep 18 with 1907 views | _ |
You don't "want" to believe mate... I can understand that, but not the comment about David Blaine....
The whole wacky concept of it all and subsequent rubbishing and ridiculing (if it wasn't so tragic) by experts since, tell us all we need to know....if you're not ready or wanting to believe that's a different matter.
The more people that stay steadfast to the bollocks reported at the time means the more likelihood this could happen again.
They do what they want....money is no object. | |
| |
| Jihadi John, this beheading bloke. on 10:06 - Sep 18 with 1890 views | Dyfnant |
Unless they were in descent | |
| |
| Jihadi John, this beheading bloke. on 10:12 - Sep 18 with 1884 views | Dyfnant |
Bring the buildings down with controlled detonations killing thousands - blaming it on terrorists - is effective enough. Why would any 'plotters' risk things by involving 100's of others in imaginary plane stories | |
| |
| Jihadi John, this beheading bloke. on 10:39 - Sep 18 with 1847 views | Batterseajack |
What I don't understand about the controlled detonation claims is that the buildings started collapsing at the point where the planes impacted with it.
We'll all agree it would be hard enough to fly a plane into a building, but not impossible. But how much harder would it be to fly it into say level 82 (or whatever) which is pre-packed with explosives? On top of that, how hard would it be to protect the explosives and the detonation cables from the impact of the plane and the burning fuel? What if the plane hit the wrong floor, you couldn't use the explosives otherwise your game would be up when the building starts collapsing at the wrong spot. You also have to wonder, why bother going to the trouble of bringing the buildings down? The planes have already hit them, you've got the money shot, loads of people have died, message delivered to the masses. | | | |
| Jihadi John, this beheading bloke. on 10:40 - Sep 18 with 1842 views | C_jack |
I'm still waiting for someone to hurriedly google an explanation as to why United 93 crashed [Post edited 18 Sep 2014 10:41]
| |
| |
| Jihadi John, this beheading bloke. on 10:44 - Sep 18 with 1832 views | MillJack |
Nobodies asking you to believe Perch, and I don't think anyone has called you a d*ckhead (not on this thread at least).
However, more than one person has provided evidence on this thread about why the whole 9/11 debacle could very well be an inside job, if you watch it and decide that it's a load of bollocks then fine but don't just dismiss it out of hand and claim those, who question the official version of events, are somehow nutcases.
The fact that you don't believe that America would 'shatter their country' doesn't mean that they wouldn't. Personally I believe that governments will do what they want as long as it suits their own agenda.
Also, could you explain to me what the 9/11 attacks had to do with Wall St going into meltdown? | | | |
| Jihadi John, this beheading bloke. on 10:45 - Sep 18 with 1831 views | Curcubita_Ultra |
Shock and awe. The image of hijacked planes slamming into skyscrapers will be forever etched in the consciousness of billions of people around the globe for generations to come. It's a visceral reaction that De Mille or Spielberg could only dream of achieving. Rumsfeld and the PNAC thinktank got their New Pearl Harbour complete with kamikaze fundamentalists...
When you begin to realise just how powerful unchecked and unimpeachable some of these monaterist, warmongering psychopaths are you have to accept that they are capable of anything. | | | |
| Jihadi John, this beheading bloke. on 10:48 - Sep 18 with 1815 views | Lord_Bony |
Lot of crazy stuff went down that day...I really don t know what to believe anymore. | |
| |
| Jihadi John, this beheading bloke. on 10:49 - Sep 18 with 1815 views | Batterseajack |
The odds of highjacking a plane and flying them into buildings seems to be 3/4 [Post edited 18 Sep 2014 11:13]
| | | |
| Jihadi John, this beheading bloke. on 10:51 - Sep 18 with 1808 views | MillJack |
Why was there no wreckage found at the seen of the crash? No fuselage? No debris? No body parts? Nothing?
Aaaaah but they made a film about it, must be true. | | | |
| Jihadi John, this beheading bloke. on 11:14 - Sep 18 with 1780 views | C_jack |
You what? 
and I quote "No wreckage found" | |
| |
| Jihadi John, this beheading bloke. on 12:01 - Sep 18 with 1750 views | _ |
?? | |
| |
| Jihadi John, this beheading bloke. on 12:16 - Sep 18 with 1731 views | Le_Swans |
If this was an inside job, then surely all terrorist groups / cells would be stating that, it would cause far more damage to the US if they were to be found guilty of this.
The fact that they aren't would suggest that they had no involvement. Much like the moon landing, if that was faked then Russia would have been all over them and the media proving it was faked, the fact that they accepted it would suggest it was true.
My take is that it was a terrorist attack (far too many numbers would have been required to pull it off as an "inside job"), from which the US saw an opportunity to put forward an agenda to suit their needs. | | | |
| Jihadi John, this beheading bloke. on 12:23 - Sep 18 with 1722 views | MillJack |
Do you know what the biggest problem with that photo you've produced is? | | | |
| Jihadi John, this beheading bloke. on 13:12 - Sep 18 with 1667 views | C_jack |
No idea, there's plenty of others though, go have a look at them. To suggest it left 'no wreckage' whatsoever is bananas, was the plane made out of some super elastic substance that made it bounce some place else on impact? [Post edited 18 Sep 2014 13:13]
| |
| |
| Jihadi John, this beheading bloke. on 13:21 - Sep 18 with 1657 views | Captain_Sham |
No one has ever been able to answer my question about" controlled demolitions". Why would you want to control the demolition? If you were going to blow up a building, thus killing thousands of people inside it, you would want it to look as uncontrolled as possible, as if, say, a plane had flown into it. | |
| |
| Jihadi John, this beheading bloke. on 13:23 - Sep 18 with 1651 views | dickythorpe |
Vincent Tan is a one isnt he? | | | |
| Jihadi John, this beheading bloke. on 15:13 - Sep 18 with 1595 views | Dyfnant |
That's opinion though, not evidence. The evidence clearly shows his opinion was wrong | |
| |
| Jihadi John, this beheading bloke. on 15:31 - Sep 18 with 1579 views | MillJack |
It's that it isn't actually a photo of the crash site.
If you can find a photo OF THE ACTUAL CRASH SITE with any sign of debris then I'll be very impressed.
Clue - Don't just use the first picture of a plane crash that you find on google images | | | |
| |
By continuing to use the site, you agree to our use of cookies and to abide by our Terms and Conditions.
