By continuing to use the site, you agree to our use of cookies and to abide by our Terms and Conditions. We in turn value your personal details in accordance with our Privacy Policy.
Please log in or register. Registered visitors get fewer ads.
It's just occurred to me that clown is apparently from London. I would assume his family live there... no doubt paid for by the likes of us, why can't they clap the bastards in irons and make it a quid pro quo: you kill a British hostage, we drown your entire family like unwanted kittens.
That would be 278 less to worry about.
An idea isn't responsible for those who believe in it.
-1
Jihadi John, this beheading bloke. on 10:20 - Sep 17 with 1691 views
Oh you mean like the war veteran in the video I posted above? Someone who has fought and knows what it's all about.
Pointless you contributing in this thread Darran as you've not got any answer to any questions raised, just denial. Facts are there yet you believe what's in the Zionist influenced media.
Every empire expires. I think this is the beginning of the end for America, won't see it in our lifetime but when Rothschild and Kissinger talk of a new world order it makes you think doesn't it.
Fuel doesn't have to melt the steel columns completely to cause the building to collapse. You can see from film footage of the planes hitting the buildings that many of the steel columns are taken out and badly damaged from the impact. This places extra stress on the remaining columns. Add on top of that the heat from the airline fuel and steel structure looses is strength/rigidity way before reaching melting point. Once the building begins to move slightly, the vertical load goes from static to dynamic causing the columns to break and building to collapse.
I've also seen footage of what looks like molten metal pouring out of the building, but this could be almost anything with there being so many materials inside the building.
Did the building in Madrid suffer from an initial impact taking out some of its structural columns? If not, then its not like for like.
There are pictures of building 7 with a large gash down one of its side caused by falling debris of one of the towers. As you would imagine, this gash would be on the opposite side to where most people taking photos would be standing. From their perspective, the building would have seemed intact before collapsing.
Can't believe i wasted 5 mins of my life writing this shit up.
[Post edited 17 Sep 2014 13:53]
4
Jihadi John, this beheading bloke. on 14:03 - Sep 17 with 1559 views
Falling debris includes big steel vertical columns on the outside of the towers. These aren't light, had fallen from height and fallen far out from the original footprint of the building.
[Post edited 17 Sep 2014 14:18]
0
Jihadi John, this beheading bloke. on 14:20 - Sep 17 with 1548 views
chrissy. Its a relief to seeing you on the other forum which normally has more civilised debates. You know the ones.. those that can see one opinion and then another, then we disagree. Watch me and Lohegrin at it-so to speak- we disagree and then move on.
Try it.You might learn something.
I promised that as long as you were polluting this site I d be around .
Anyway, that s enough for one day.. I ll be checking to see if you ve learned anything from your ban .
They've been waiting 50 years to find out how Oswald put two bullets in JFK's head from two different locations, and they're still waiting.
The pursuit of truth is a slow process. It often has to be distilled from a pool of lies.
There are still those among us who believe that the world was created in seven days and that God placed dinosaur bones in rocks to test our faith because he likes a bit of a laugh does God... Hallelulliah!
People also once believed the World was flat and some clowns still do....
....they're probably Dutch.
1
Jihadi John, this beheading bloke. on 16:51 - Sep 17 with 1449 views
Countless architects, engineers and physicians have debunked what you are saying there. Aviation fuel simply does not get to the correct temperature to melt steel. The planes impact would not bring the whole structure down like it did. To do as you have described would bend the laws of physics. To have a plane bring down a skyscraper like that is astonishing but to have it happen TWICE is quite mindblowing!
Not only that,but how in earth did the 3rd building collapse when it had not been hit?
Controlled demolitions were used. You can see them moments before they came down.
After studying thoroughly the situation myself ,quite intensively,I came to my own personal conclusion that something is not quite right there.
What really swayed it for me is that most architects and structural,engineers worldwide seem to agree it is scientifically and physically impossible for those towers to collapse like that after being hit....no steel framed structure has ever collapsed through fire.
Also Building 7 apparently collapsed close by without being hit...very odd.
A few months later we had the green light to start an invasion of Iraq and Afghanistan .
Listen to what these top American architects,not politicians have to say on the subject then make up your own mind...
He's not saying the steel melted though. Steel is tempered for strength and melting temperatures wouldn't be required to cause a catastrophic failure. Let's not forget almost 400 tonnes of plane hitting it at around 500mph as well
By continuing to use the site, you agree to our use of cookies and to abide by our Terms and Conditions.
