Matty done 18:13 - Jun 17 with 6337 views | ONTHEUP | Sky says Wigan to make improved bid for him ,do we have a sell on clause | | | | |
Matty done on 18:31 - Jun 17 with 6278 views | dalefan | Yes. I believe either 20 or 25%. How much have Wigan offered? Not seen anything | | | |
Matty done on 18:39 - Jun 17 with 6236 views | nordenblue | On profit id imagine,what happens to the promotion add on concerning sheff united then is that just scrapped? | | | |
Matty done on 23:17 - Jun 17 with 5697 views | Morden |
bladesmark2 "The last thing United want to do is sell our best players especially to our promotion rivals" | | | |
Matty done on 23:30 - Jun 17 with 5669 views | Yorkshire_Dale |
Matty done on 23:17 - Jun 17 by Morden | bladesmark2 "The last thing United want to do is sell our best players especially to our promotion rivals" |
......now why did n't we think of that? | | | |
Matty done on 06:01 - Jun 18 with 5546 views | tazzydjr |
Matty done on 23:17 - Jun 17 by Morden | bladesmark2 "The last thing United want to do is sell our best players especially to our promotion rivals" |
Now that's irony I'd be happy my clubs making a profit at this level after having a player for more or less half a season | |
| |
Matty done on 09:03 - Jun 18 with 5377 views | con_dale | Wonder how much he knows about this, he's in Dubai with rose and Lancashire at moment! | | | |
Matty done on 09:16 - Jun 18 with 5344 views | dingdangblue |
Matty done on 09:03 - Jun 18 by con_dale | Wonder how much he knows about this, he's in Dubai with rose and Lancashire at moment! |
Lets hope he has a mobile phone. | |
| | Login to get fewer ads
Matty done on 10:16 - Jun 18 with 5228 views | CamdenDale | Surely we'd not get much from any sell-on now. Best he stays, does well, and a bigger fish than Wigan bites... | | | |
Matty done on 10:31 - Jun 18 with 5186 views | SuddenLad |
Matty done on 10:16 - Jun 18 by CamdenDale | Surely we'd not get much from any sell-on now. Best he stays, does well, and a bigger fish than Wigan bites... |
The 'sell-on' clause won't matter whether he's transferred after 1 game or 10 seasons, provided they sell him for more than they paid. What we won't get, is any bonus due, had they achieved promotion last season. With the amount of money that must be swilling around in the coffers at Wigan, it could be a substantial pay day for Dale if Matty goes there for a big fee. | |
| “It is easier to fool people, than to convince them that they have been fooled†|
| |
Matty done on 10:38 - Jun 18 with 5158 views | dingdangblue |
Matty done on 10:16 - Jun 18 by CamdenDale | Surely we'd not get much from any sell-on now. Best he stays, does well, and a bigger fish than Wigan bites... |
These things often happen when a manager is replaced. Maybe Adkins wants other players to be brought in and has been told he has to sell 1st? Or maybe he doesn't rate Done? Who knows. | |
| |
Matty done on 07:22 - Jun 19 with 4456 views | CamdenDale |
Matty done on 10:31 - Jun 18 by SuddenLad | The 'sell-on' clause won't matter whether he's transferred after 1 game or 10 seasons, provided they sell him for more than they paid. What we won't get, is any bonus due, had they achieved promotion last season. With the amount of money that must be swilling around in the coffers at Wigan, it could be a substantial pay day for Dale if Matty goes there for a big fee. |
Aye Sudden, know it's not the time he's at Sheff U that matters but the profit they make on a resale. Our 25% or whatever it is a percentage of that profit. Just think if Done stays there and can score say 10/12 by the January window, then his value could be double what Wigan or anyone else would have to pay right now - which surely won't be so very much over what SU paid us. | | | |
Matty done on 08:23 - Jun 19 with 4361 views | dingdangblue |
Matty done on 07:22 - Jun 19 by CamdenDale | Aye Sudden, know it's not the time he's at Sheff U that matters but the profit they make on a resale. Our 25% or whatever it is a percentage of that profit. Just think if Done stays there and can score say 10/12 by the January window, then his value could be double what Wigan or anyone else would have to pay right now - which surely won't be so very much over what SU paid us. |
Agreed, if Sheff Utd sell him now it should be for exactly what they paid us. He is the same player only 6 months older - he didn't go there and score goals in a better division than us - it was the same level. If they make any profit on him in such a short time it would just mean we under valued him. [Post edited 19 Jun 2015 8:26]
| |
| |
Matty done on 10:20 - Jun 19 with 4215 views | D_Alien | Not necessarily. If Done had a release clause in his contract which stipulated he could be sold if a certain figure was reached, there's little we could've done about it. I'd argue that his value might've increased through demonstrating he can be successful immediately following a move, and to a biggish club. That means Wigan (or anyone else) should have no qualms about him settling in, plus they've got a higher threshold due to their greater spending capacity. If we get our add-on, it might'nt be much but we shouldn't knock it for that. | |
| |
Matty done on 12:48 - Jun 19 with 4068 views | SuddenLad |
Matty done on 07:22 - Jun 19 by CamdenDale | Aye Sudden, know it's not the time he's at Sheff U that matters but the profit they make on a resale. Our 25% or whatever it is a percentage of that profit. Just think if Done stays there and can score say 10/12 by the January window, then his value could be double what Wigan or anyone else would have to pay right now - which surely won't be so very much over what SU paid us. |
I was really trying to make the point that the 'bonus' payment we were likely to have receive if SUFC had been promoted would have probably been a larger sum than any proposed percentage payment from a 'sell-on' clause if he goes to (wherever) for a profit. | |
| “It is easier to fool people, than to convince them that they have been fooled†|
| |
| |