data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ee045/ee045de2dd2f5dfdc1d5792a90e0120507316719" alt="" | Forum Thread | Willock at 15:24 10 Jul 2024
Goneock |
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ee045/ee045de2dd2f5dfdc1d5792a90e0120507316719" alt="" | Forum Thread | Bluesky at 10:36 4 Dec 2023
If like me you've found twitter, sorry, sorry, sorry X increasingly unusable with its ads for gun holsters and its owner endorsing antisemitic conspiracy theories, perhaps you've looked to other social platforms for a hit. But where! I've joined bluesky which is a spin off for the original twitter devs and very much feels like twitter in 2014 (i.e the halycon days). It's a bit quiet as it's in beta but I much prefer it to Threads which is a typical Zuckerberg mess. But there's a big issue with the platform! There's so few Rs on it! I have 4 invite codes, DM me if you want one (purely so we get interested parties and not someone who signs up and never posts) to ensure Rangers feel massive on it |
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ee045/ee045de2dd2f5dfdc1d5792a90e0120507316719" alt="" | Forum Thread | Moses at 09:35 24 Feb 2022
I thought he deserved his own thread. He's had an up and down time since signing - but he made a big contribution on Saturday, and last night he was just...relentless. He didn't stop, I thought he did outstandingly well, and was a big part of the rear-guard action. Let's hope this marks the start of a bit more of a consistent run for him, co there's a good player there if so |
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ee045/ee045de2dd2f5dfdc1d5792a90e0120507316719" alt="" | Forum Thread | DUNE (2021) (Part One) at 11:43 9 Nov 2021
Any fans on the board? I've been to see it twice already. A truly stunning cinematic experience, and emphasis on experience. Some minor pacing quibbles, but I thought it was astonishing, borderline masterpiece. I serve only one master, and his name is Shai-Hulud |
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ee045/ee045de2dd2f5dfdc1d5792a90e0120507316719" alt="" | Forum Thread | robith's 21/22 Promotion/Relegation Index Thread at 16:29 4 Nov 2021
Hello Fellow Rs, Some of you may remember from years gone by I have run a thread where we track our chances of making promotion, and inevitably how many points we need to avoid relegation. I had to stop making it just before COVID, as I had my laptop stolen which had the valuable excel sheet stuck on it. Well, what I can tell you is OneDrive is a magical thing. It has been in the cloud all this time! I have fixed it up and updated it for the season to date, so prepare to join me on the journey! Historical Precedent The average points needed to make the playoffs over the last 7 years is 75 The average points needed to avoid relegation over the last 7 years is 46 Handily the median for both is also 75 and 46, meaning there isn't one season warping our numbers Plays offs there fore = 1.57 points per game Survival = 0.97 points per game Our current trajectory is 1.562 PPG, with a forecast points total of 72 If we convert this to an index, where 1 is hitting the target needed Play Off Index 0.99 Survival Index 1.61 We are in an around the PPG total we need, but our current points trajectory only gets us to the play offs once in the last 7 years. Now obviously we need a real world comparison too. Usually around the half way point of the season when the table is a bit more fixed, I'll start to compare each week vs the team in 6th and 21st and their trajectory. Bossing last season, though obviously we had a pretty rough 1st half of the season This shows our forecast points based on PPG by week and where it would've got us last season. As you can see historically we'd need to get just a little better to get over 75 to be in with a shot TL;DR - we're in the mix for sure, but at the 5/6th marker rather than guaranteed play offs. I'll update weekly(ish) [Post edited 8 Nov 2021 10:32]
|
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ee045/ee045de2dd2f5dfdc1d5792a90e0120507316719" alt="" | Forum Thread | How did you celebrate Dom's Blooter? at 12:55 2 Nov 2020
Obviously if we'd been there it would've been full #LIMBZ and I'd have been trying to stop the auld fella running on the pitch. As it was, it was ou first real "moment" of behind closed doors. I was watching in my bedroom on my laptop and couldn't really see the ball go in - i was looking for it carrying over the bar tbh. I noticed the same time as the comms guys, leapt up, sent my bedside table flying. My wife ran in cos she thought I'd had a heart attack or something. Deffo would've got the first round in down the ShepFlo afterwards, probably have gotten home at 1am. First time I've genuinely missed being there. So thought it might be nice to share the disparate ways it was celebrated [Post edited 2 Nov 2020 12:56]
|
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ee045/ee045de2dd2f5dfdc1d5792a90e0120507316719" alt="" | Forum Thread | The Smallest Space You've Seen the Biggest Band in at 11:44 9 Apr 2020
A trend I noticed in the best gig/worst gig a lot of people seen some big bands in small spaces, and I thought a nice brag thread was in order. Maybe we could even work out a ratio like record sales divided by capacity! Saw Arctic Monkeys in the cluny in Newcastle. They weren't even the headline act (MIlburn were LOLOLOLOL) Saw Coldpay at ULU. Couldn't have imagined the scale they'd reach Not terribly small, but I saw blur at their Astoria residency in 2003. Being in the front couple of rows it felt insane to see a band of that size in that venue Saw Arcade Fire at a church in Westminster. It was rubbish. I was gutted |
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ee045/ee045de2dd2f5dfdc1d5792a90e0120507316719" alt="" | Forum Thread | Robith's Relegation Index 19/20 at 10:25 16 Sep 2019
Hello fellow travellers of the night. You may remember this thread from last year where I tried to create a way of seeing our chances of survival (aside from the brief fortnight we thought we were gonna make the play offs). I had planned to bring it back, and had some nice feedback that people wanted to see it again. Now we've played 15% of our game it feels robust enough to have a look Also, others made great contributions too, so maybe this could be a catch all stats thread From last year - "So I've tried to create a basic statistics system to see. Totally based in the numbers we need to post rather than subjective analysis of how games have gone. So each week I'll post the index of our chance of survival. Indices work by converting separate numbers into a base (which is scored as 100) and working out how more or less likely an outcome is. 120 is the mark for something significantly being likely to happen, 80 is the mark for something being significantly unlikely to happen." So in summary - 100 equals standard. Above 100 = good, below 100=bad I've taken the average points for the last 5 years. Play offs = 76.2. Survival = 46.6 Survival: 191 Play Offs: 117 Interestingly though when we look at vs the same results last year (so discounting Hudd & Luton) we have 9 points vs last year's 10. I've built this in this year so will keep monitoring it. Encouraging start. 28% of points for survival accomplished already. |
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ee045/ee045de2dd2f5dfdc1d5792a90e0120507316719" alt="" | Forum Thread | Robith's Relegation Index at 09:42 3 Oct 2018
I think we can all agree that our primary objective this year needs to be first and foremost to stay up. Further it's been say a mixed bag of a season, where even I, the perennial happy clapper was calling for the manager to be sacked after 5 games. I saw a comment in Brian's thread of someone saying "well, they'll just say Reading were crap" and that got me thinking. Yeah people will. So I've tried to create a basic statistics system to see. Totally based in the numbers we need to post rather than subjective analysis of how games have gone. So each week I'll post the index of our chance of survival. Indices work by converting separate numbers into a base (which is scored as 100) and working out how more or less likely an outcome is. 120 is the mark for something significantly being likely to happen, 80 is the mark for something being significantly unlikely to happen. I've set the base for safety at 50 points. Can revise on feedback So Gameweek 11: Played: 11/46 - 24% of games played Points: 13/50 - 26% of points needed Based on this our current survival index is 109 At this stage we look like staying up, but it's not a sure thing - we're tracking very close to the baseline run rate. Stay tuned for more exciting stats action as it comes |
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ee045/ee045de2dd2f5dfdc1d5792a90e0120507316719" alt="" | Forum Thread | Grenfell Game at 13:54 26 Oct 2017
Raised over £900k. Amazing stuff |
Please log in to use all the site's facilities | data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ee045/ee045de2dd2f5dfdc1d5792a90e0120507316719" alt="" | robith
|
Site ScoresForum Votes: | 3128 | Comment Votes: | 3 | Prediction League: | 0 | TOTAL: | 3131 |
|