By continuing to use the site, you agree to our use of cookies and to abide by our Terms and Conditions. We in turn value your personal details in accordance with our Privacy Policy.
Please log in or register. Registered visitors get fewer ads.
9/11 unanswered questions on 07:34 - Mar 29 by Dr_Winston
The first video mentions explosions, not bombs. The uploader has made an assumption. Explosions in a burning building with a substantial gas supply aren't exactly a surprise.
As for the second one, firstly the bang is nowhere near loud enough for the amount of explosives that would be needed for the job, so see point #1. Secondly, there's a distinct lack of a building collapsing afterwards, so see point #1.
Frankly I'm a little surprised that you're a Truther.
It was the noise of explosions you were querying though. It's impossible to tell what caused the explosions from a you tube video (especially if they are loud enough or not!) but there is no denying that there were explosions.
These may, or may not have been as a result of a bomb.
As for being surprised that I'm a "Truther". I simply have a very open mind on the whole thing and in my opinion there are a number of peculiar things that happened on 9/11 that remain unanswered.
Frankly I'm a little surprised that you are happy to believe the narrative as has been put forward. But hey ho.
2
9/11 unanswered questions on 19:40 - Mar 29 with 2289 views
9/11 unanswered questions on 07:34 - Mar 29 by Dr_Winston
The first video mentions explosions, not bombs. The uploader has made an assumption. Explosions in a burning building with a substantial gas supply aren't exactly a surprise.
As for the second one, firstly the bang is nowhere near loud enough for the amount of explosives that would be needed for the job, so see point #1. Secondly, there's a distinct lack of a building collapsing afterwards, so see point #1.
Frankly I'm a little surprised that you're a Truther.
So 9/11 was just a simple gas leak? Well, suppose it could have been. Though they just should have said in the first place! Then again, if it had emerged that the gas fitter wasn't corgi registered there'd have been a lot of heads rolling i can tell you.
9/11 unanswered questions on 20:05 - Mar 29 by morningstar
So 9/11 was just a simple gas leak? Well, suppose it could have been. Though they just should have said in the first place! Then again, if it had emerged that the gas fitter wasn't corgi registered there'd have been a lot of heads rolling i can tell you.
9/11 unanswered questions on 20:05 - Mar 29 by morningstar
So 9/11 was just a simple gas leak? Well, suppose it could have been. Though they just should have said in the first place! Then again, if it had emerged that the gas fitter wasn't corgi registered there'd have been a lot of heads rolling i can tell you.
No gas apparently, everything was electrical
Each time I go to Bedd - au........................
9/11 unanswered questions on 20:21 - Mar 29 by Brynmill_Jack
No gas apparently, everything was electrical
Perhaps they used to have gas but the guy didn't hammer down the end of the lead pipe properly when they cut it off? it's all becoming much more clearer now isn't it. At least we're finally getting there after all these silly conspiracy theories!
The US government must be gutted to organise it all only for the oil price to plummet to below $30 a barrel,although they have probably made enough in the last 15 years to have made it worthwhile.
It must have cost a fortune to organise,the pay off to the pilots to commit suicide must have been massive,that's if you actually think the aeroplanes were manually piloted which I expect is doubtful.
OUT AFLI SUCK IT UP REMOANER LOSERS
🇬🇧 🇬🇧 🇬🇧 🇬🇧 🇬🇧 🇬🇧 🇬🇧 🇬🇧 🇬🇧 🇬🇧 🇬🇧 🇬🇧 🇬🇧 🇬🇧 🇬🇧
9/11 unanswered questions on 20:44 - Mar 29 by pikeypaul
The US government must be gutted to organise it all only for the oil price to plummet to below $30 a barrel,although they have probably made enough in the last 15 years to have made it worthwhile.
It must have cost a fortune to organise,the pay off to the pilots to commit suicide must have been massive,that's if you actually think the aeroplanes were manually piloted which I expect is doubtful.
It's ludicrous to suggest they were manned by remote control. I've seen some of the smaller ones down Singleton Park and the noise they give of is terrible! Imagine how loud the buzz would be on something as big as a Jet Airliner!
9/11 unanswered questions on 20:51 - Mar 29 by morningstar
It's ludicrous to suggest they were manned by remote control. I've seen some of the smaller ones down Singleton Park and the noise they give of is terrible! Imagine how loud the buzz would be on something as big as a Jet Airliner!
[Post edited 29 Mar 2016 20:52]
"Ludicrous" the whole conspiracy theory is absolutely ludicrous, at first I thought they were just wind up merchants, but I now think they actually believe this sh*t.
9/11 unanswered questions on 21:12 - Mar 29 by Flashberryjack
"Ludicrous" the whole conspiracy theory is absolutely ludicrous, at first I thought they were just wind up merchants, but I now think they actually believe this sh*t.
Oh this is nothing mun, you need to delve deeper into the 'dark side' of you tube. There are people on there still trying to prove the earth is flat, twice the size of the sun, And there are Cities on every planet and moon in our solar system!
9/11 unanswered questions on 21:19 - Mar 29 by morningstar
Oh this is nothing mun, you need to delve deeper into the 'dark side' of you tube. There are people on there still trying to prove the earth is flat, twice the size of the sun, And there are Cities on every planet and moon in our solar system!
9/11 unanswered questions on 21:38 - Mar 29 by morningstar
Of course!..................But they are hiding the fact they found skyscrapers there. But we should understand that really.
I don't think they did .....I reckon it was all filmed in Warner Bros studios just to fool the Russians, although you'd have thought somebody would have spilled the beans by now.
9/11 unanswered questions on 21:49 - Mar 29 by Flashberryjack
I don't think they did .....I reckon it was all filmed in Warner Bros studios just to fool the Russians, although you'd have thought somebody would have spilled the beans by now.
No! Please don't do this! I'm trying my best here to bring this stupid thread to a silly natural ending! Don't stoke the embers!
9/11 unanswered questions on 21:12 - Mar 29 by Flashberryjack
"Ludicrous" the whole conspiracy theory is absolutely ludicrous, at first I thought they were just wind up merchants, but I now think they actually believe this sh*t.
They started to come really unstuck when they introduced the 'controlled-demolition' theory to their conspiracy in an attempt to really 'sex' it up. When people (who know what they're talking about!) whom actually have worked in demolition, steel erecting and construction said that?
Over a period of many many months?..... Large scale disruption would be caused, miles of detonating cable would be seen, hundreds of demolition specialists would be walking about, constant pneumatic drilling of explosive containing holes would be heard, the stripping of tons upon tons of wall/floor membrane and surrounding layers would have to be forcefully removed to expose columns/girders etc etc?........Their gobsmaking lack of common sense and naivety was exposed!
But hey! They didn't give up and went back to the drawing board....... enter 'thermite' and accusations that vastly more grown-up, knowledgeable, qualified people that knew what they were actually taking about? Had 'closed-minds'.
Argus!
0
9/11 unanswered questions on 22:11 - Mar 29 with 1949 views
In fairness over two and a half thousand top architects and engineers in America have signed a petition for truth of what really happened that day. These are top people in their field who have put their reputation on the line. They are certainly not happy with the official explanation and the subsequent inquiry afterwards....its probably because such an elite,professional group such as this, along with many New York firefighters,policemen,military personell etc who also voice concerns on it, keeps millions of people world wide still questioning the official story of what happened that day.
Remember,these events shortly afterwards took us into the Iraq and Afghanistan wars looking for the perpetrators.
9/11 unanswered questions on 21:56 - Mar 29 by Wingstandwood
They started to come really unstuck when they introduced the 'controlled-demolition' theory to their conspiracy in an attempt to really 'sex' it up. When people (who know what they're talking about!) whom actually have worked in demolition, steel erecting and construction said that?
Over a period of many many months?..... Large scale disruption would be caused, miles of detonating cable would be seen, hundreds of demolition specialists would be walking about, constant pneumatic drilling of explosive containing holes would be heard, the stripping of tons upon tons of wall/floor membrane and surrounding layers would have to be forcefully removed to expose columns/girders etc etc?........Their gobsmaking lack of common sense and naivety was exposed!
But hey! They didn't give up and went back to the drawing board....... enter 'thermite' and accusations that vastly more grown-up, knowledgeable, qualified people that knew what they were actually taking about? Had 'closed-minds'.
Just playing devils advocate here because it does appear that the collapsing of the two towers is fairly cut and dried, but how do you explain the collapsing of the 3rd building when it suffered very little damage in comparison?
0
9/11 unanswered questions on 22:29 - Mar 29 with 1912 views
9/11 unanswered questions on 22:14 - Mar 29 by MillJack
Just playing devils advocate here because it does appear that the collapsing of the two towers is fairly cut and dried, but how do you explain the collapsing of the 3rd building when it suffered very little damage in comparison?
I really have no idea myself but the official explanation was it was caused through office fires.. From what Ive read this building was not hit by anything.
I suppose the reason some people find it incredible is that steel structured buildings do not collapse through fire,its never happenend before and if it did it would partially fall in on itself not pancake fashion?...I m no expert so I dont know...
PROUD RECIPIENT OF THE THIRD PLANET SWANS LIFETIME ACHIEVEMENT AWARD.
"Per ardua ad astra"
9/11 unanswered questions on 22:11 - Mar 29 by Jackfath
Bang on the money! They are the huge remote control buzzing planes like I mentioned in Singleton Park (although they have helicopters there as well). These ones are laden with all the thermite that jackedup describes. And the explosion just before the plane hits is the gas pipe blowing which the non corgi registered gas man failed to hammer down properly when they turned the gas off.
9/11 unanswered questions on 22:29 - Mar 29 by Lord_Bony
I really have no idea myself but the official explanation was it was caused through office fires.. From what Ive read this building was not hit by anything.
I suppose the reason some people find it incredible is that steel structured buildings do not collapse through fire,its never happenend before and if it did it would partially fall in on itself not pancake fashion?...I m no expert so I dont know...
It was hit by debris from the collapsing towers.
0
9/11 unanswered questions on 22:51 - Mar 29 with 1872 views
9/11 unanswered questions on 22:39 - Mar 29 by Humpty
It was hit by debris from the collapsing towers.
I've no doubt that it would have, it was basically next door to it after all. However, the video you posted shows no obvious damage to that side of the building. Even if the back of the building was completely obliterated, surely it wouldn't collapse straight down but rather towards the point of least resistance? I.e. the part of the building that has been damaged?
I'm not trying to prove anyone right or wrong here but I've always been a bit puzzled by this particular collapse. The fact that it was "hit by debris" wouldn't make it collapse like that imo, particularly when there were buildings nearer to the towers that suffered much more damage, but managed to continue standing after 9/11.
By continuing to use the site, you agree to our use of cookies and to abide by our Terms and Conditions.
