Please log in or register. Registered visitors get fewer ads.
Forum index | Previous Thread | Next thread
Laudrup to QPR 18:02 - Feb 24 with 23355 viewsDarran

http://metro.co.uk/2014/02/24/michael-laudrup-in-the-frame-as-qpr-consider-sacki

The first ever recipient of a Planet Swans Lifetime Achievement Award.
Poll: Who’s got the most experts

0
Laudrup to QPR on 18:30 - Feb 24 with 9347 viewsQuakerJack

Am I right in thinking if he took this job it would effect his claim against us?

Poll: Some scummer on the anus board reckons 80% of us want them to go down. so... do

0
Laudrup to QPR on 19:49 - Feb 24 with 9125 viewsShaky

Laudrup to QPR on 18:30 - Feb 24 by QuakerJack

Am I right in thinking if he took this job it would effect his claim against us?


No.

Misology -- It's a bitch
Poll: Greatest PS Troll Hunter of all time

0
Laudrup to QPR on 20:05 - Feb 24 with 9039 viewsDyfnant

Laudrup to QPR on 19:49 - Feb 24 by Shaky

No.


Wrong, unless a settlement Is worked out

Poll: How much will SCFC spend on transfer fees this summer

0
Laudrup to QPR on 20:21 - Feb 24 with 8953 viewsShaky

Laudrup to QPR on 20:05 - Feb 24 by Dyfnant

Wrong, unless a settlement Is worked out


Whether or not this goes to court has nothing whatsoever to to do with the matter.

Swansea have terminated Laudrup's contract on the - in my view - utterly spurious grounds that he is in breach.

The question of whether there is a breach is a matter of fact.

If it is proven that there is a breach of contract it is then a matter of law whether that breach is material to the contract, and constitutes sufficient grounds to terminate the whole thing.

Notwithstanding all of the that, the fact remains that the contract has been terminated unilaterally by Swansea, and whatever job Laudrup can secure can have no bearing whatsoever on any sums payable on termination under he employment contract with Swansea.

Misology -- It's a bitch
Poll: Greatest PS Troll Hunter of all time

0
Laudrup to QPR on 20:21 - Feb 24 with 8953 viewsmonmouth

Laudrup to QPR on 18:30 - Feb 24 by QuakerJack

Am I right in thinking if he took this job it would effect his claim against us?


Yes, absolutely.

Poll: TRUST MEMBERS: What DID you vote in the, um, vote

0
Laudrup to QPR on 20:21 - Feb 24 with 8951 viewsperchrockjack

He s spent all his earnings as a player on a Danish pig farm has he?

QPR and him would be interesting indeed.

Poll: Who has left Wales and why

0
Laudrup to QPR on 20:23 - Feb 24 with 8932 viewsDarran

Shaky is wrong though there's nothing new there.

The first ever recipient of a Planet Swans Lifetime Achievement Award.
Poll: Who’s got the most experts

0
Laudrup to QPR on 20:25 - Feb 24 with 8906 viewsShaky

Laudrup to QPR on 20:23 - Feb 24 by Darran

Shaky is wrong though there's nothing new there.


Yah -- I defer to your no doubt vast legal experience.

Misology -- It's a bitch
Poll: Greatest PS Troll Hunter of all time

0
Login to get fewer ads

Laudrup to QPR on 20:26 - Feb 24 with 8896 viewsDarran

Laudrup to QPR on 20:25 - Feb 24 by Shaky

Yah -- I defer to your no doubt vast legal experience.


He won't get paid twice and we won't be paying his contract up in full in one lump sum,thats not the way it works.

The first ever recipient of a Planet Swans Lifetime Achievement Award.
Poll: Who’s got the most experts

0
Laudrup to QPR on 20:27 - Feb 24 with 8882 viewsShaky

Laudrup to QPR on 20:26 - Feb 24 by Darran

He won't get paid twice and we won't be paying his contract up in full in one lump sum,thats not the way it works.


If there isn't a satisfactory settlement, that will quite clearly be a matter for the High Court to decide.

Misology -- It's a bitch
Poll: Greatest PS Troll Hunter of all time

0
Laudrup to QPR on 20:28 - Feb 24 with 8882 viewsgibs0n

Laudrup is famous for not joining a club in the middle of a season.

.....QPR, really doubt that would be interesting.
0
Laudrup to QPR on 20:29 - Feb 24 with 8870 viewsexiledclaseboy

Laudrup to QPR on 20:28 - Feb 24 by gibs0n

Laudrup is famous for not joining a club in the middle of a season.

.....QPR, really doubt that would be interesting.


He always said he'd never leave a club mid-season too. Until we sacked him.

Things change.

Poll: Tory leader

0
Laudrup to QPR on 20:32 - Feb 24 with 8848 viewsgibs0n

"He always said he'd never leave a club mid-season too. Until we sacked him"

One thing is leaving/getting sacked. Another thing is joining.
0
Laudrup to QPR on 20:35 - Feb 24 with 8809 viewsShaky

Laudrup to QPR on 20:29 - Feb 24 by exiledclaseboy

He always said he'd never leave a club mid-season too. Until we sacked him.

Things change.


3 (the sack) - informal dismissal from employment: he got the sack for swearing

http://www.oxforddictionaries.com/definition/english/sack

Remind me, what were the grounds for Laudrup's sacking again?

Misology -- It's a bitch
Poll: Greatest PS Troll Hunter of all time

0
Laudrup to QPR on 20:38 - Feb 24 with 8781 viewsfbreath

Tutu fruity would get on well with the owners at qpr
[Post edited 24 Feb 2014 20:46]

We are the first Welsh club to reach the Premier League Simples

0
Laudrup to QPR on 20:43 - Feb 24 with 8760 viewsDyfnant

Laudrup to QPR on 20:21 - Feb 24 by Shaky

Whether or not this goes to court has nothing whatsoever to to do with the matter.

Swansea have terminated Laudrup's contract on the - in my view - utterly spurious grounds that he is in breach.

The question of whether there is a breach is a matter of fact.

If it is proven that there is a breach of contract it is then a matter of law whether that breach is material to the contract, and constitutes sufficient grounds to terminate the whole thing.

Notwithstanding all of the that, the fact remains that the contract has been terminated unilaterally by Swansea, and whatever job Laudrup can secure can have no bearing whatsoever on any sums payable on termination under he employment contract with Swansea.


He'd be chasing loss of earnings. If he's working this will be taken into account

Poll: How much will SCFC spend on transfer fees this summer

0
Laudrup to QPR on 20:47 - Feb 24 with 8710 viewsShaky

Laudrup to QPR on 20:43 - Feb 24 by Dyfnant

He'd be chasing loss of earnings. If he's working this will be taken into account


I am sorry, but you are simply wrong.

Once the club claimed a breach this matter falls firmly under the jurisdiction of law of contract.

The contract will contain certain provisions for payments in the event of a termination of that contract, that ought then be adjusted for the seriousness and relevance of any proven breaches.

And that is it. Nothing more to discuss.

Misology -- It's a bitch
Poll: Greatest PS Troll Hunter of all time

0
Laudrup to QPR on 20:54 - Feb 24 with 8665 viewsShaky

Laudrup to QPR on 20:47 - Feb 24 by Shaky

I am sorry, but you are simply wrong.

Once the club claimed a breach this matter falls firmly under the jurisdiction of law of contract.

The contract will contain certain provisions for payments in the event of a termination of that contract, that ought then be adjusted for the seriousness and relevance of any proven breaches.

And that is it. Nothing more to discuss.


Obviously that assumes that Laudrup doesn't pursue an action for defamation. . .

Misology -- It's a bitch
Poll: Greatest PS Troll Hunter of all time

0
Laudrup to QPR on 20:57 - Feb 24 with 8643 viewsexiledclaseboy

Laudrup to QPR on 20:35 - Feb 24 by Shaky

3 (the sack) - informal dismissal from employment: he got the sack for swearing

http://www.oxforddictionaries.com/definition/english/sack

Remind me, what were the grounds for Laudrup's sacking again?


So you want to discuss semantics on the definition of the term "sacked" now? It's a colloquial term meaning he no longer has his job. He was dismissed, relieved of his duties, put on gardening leave (which may well actually be the most accurate description of the current situation). Use whichever term you want, the end result is just the same.

Poll: Tory leader

0
Laudrup to QPR on 20:59 - Feb 24 with 8625 viewsswanny

Gotta love a barrack room lawyer....

'Sorry, your password must contain a capital letter, two numbers, a symbol, an inspiring message, a spell, a gang sign, a hieroglyph and the blood of a virgin"

0
Laudrup to QPR on 21:06 - Feb 24 with 8568 viewsShaky

Laudrup to QPR on 20:57 - Feb 24 by exiledclaseboy

So you want to discuss semantics on the definition of the term "sacked" now? It's a colloquial term meaning he no longer has his job. He was dismissed, relieved of his duties, put on gardening leave (which may well actually be the most accurate description of the current situation). Use whichever term you want, the end result is just the same.


The point is; what are the grounds?

In the programme notes a few weeks ago, Jenkins apparently said words to the effect that Laudrup threatened the very ethos of the club, but he didn't elaborate.

He has cited breach of contract in the termination of Laudrup's contract, but again offered no details.

Your position if I understand it correctly is that the Board must have had a bloody good reason to sack him - which they technically didn't otherwise they wouldn't be disputing the payout - but you have no idea precisely what that may be.

The whole thing is simply absurd.

Misology -- It's a bitch
Poll: Greatest PS Troll Hunter of all time

0
Laudrup to QPR on 21:13 - Feb 24 with 8511 viewsDarran

Laudrup to QPR on 21:06 - Feb 24 by Shaky

The point is; what are the grounds?

In the programme notes a few weeks ago, Jenkins apparently said words to the effect that Laudrup threatened the very ethos of the club, but he didn't elaborate.

He has cited breach of contract in the termination of Laudrup's contract, but again offered no details.

Your position if I understand it correctly is that the Board must have had a bloody good reason to sack him - which they technically didn't otherwise they wouldn't be disputing the payout - but you have no idea precisely what that may be.

The whole thing is simply absurd.


It's no more absurd than any sacking unless you want it to be if course.

The first ever recipient of a Planet Swans Lifetime Achievement Award.
Poll: Who’s got the most experts

0
Laudrup to QPR on 21:14 - Feb 24 with 8506 viewswaynekerr55

Laudrup to QPR on 20:54 - Feb 24 by Shaky

Obviously that assumes that Laudrup doesn't pursue an action for defamation. . .


One of the hardest things to prove in court (as you are well aware Mr Shake!)

How many of you know what DP stands for?
Poll: POTY 2019
Blog: Too many things for a title, but stop with the xenophobia accusations!

0
Laudrup to QPR on 21:17 - Feb 24 with 8483 viewsScoobyWho

Laudrup isnt in any frame for QPR or any other club in this country unless they are decidely bigger than the swans. And that wont happen. His ego wont allow it. Next time we see him will be abroad.

DGT Bullshit Connoisseur.
Poll: Election 2015 Thread : Who will you vote for ?

0
Laudrup to QPR on 21:18 - Feb 24 with 8470 viewswaynekerr55

Laudrup to QPR on 21:17 - Feb 24 by ScoobyWho

Laudrup isnt in any frame for QPR or any other club in this country unless they are decidely bigger than the swans. And that wont happen. His ego wont allow it. Next time we see him will be abroad.


With cross c*ntry Garcia wrecking hamstrings and groins in his path!

How many of you know what DP stands for?
Poll: POTY 2019
Blog: Too many things for a title, but stop with the xenophobia accusations!

0
About Us Contact Us Terms & Conditions Privacy Cookies Advertising
© FansNetwork 2024