Matt Done scores again 21:19 - Feb 17 with 15076 views | SuddenLad | at Meadow lane | |
| “It is easier to fool people, than to convince them that they have been fooled†|
| | |
Matt Done scores again on 09:58 - Feb 18 with 2187 views | dingdangblue |
Matt Done scores again on 09:39 - Feb 18 by ColDale | Tutte never played last season against us. (not that we'd be particularly worried about him). I know that was a Hill and Flicker thing, but gut feeling says that Clough will honour the same agreement with Hill. Could be wrong. |
Hill and Flicker are best mates though and that would have been a gentleman's agreement between them both - he was a free transfer. Sheff Utd have paid (500k rumoured)for Done and still could get automatic promotion. Besides we need them to go up to get more cash in the pot so best he scores to help their cause. [Post edited 18 Feb 2015 10:03]
| |
| |
Matt Done scores again on 10:32 - Feb 18 with 2130 views | TVOS1907 |
Matt Done scores again on 09:36 - Feb 18 by lurker | I wouldn't. He is in scorching form and any "gentleman's agreement" will be negated by Nigel Clough being a prize nob! Unless such an agreement was made at a higher level I can't see any way he won't line up against us |
If Col's right, it wouldn't be a 'gentleman's agreement'; it would be included as part of the transfer deal. [Post edited 18 Feb 2015 10:38]
| |
| When I was your age, I used to enjoy the odd game of tennis. Or was it golf? |
| |
Matt Done scores again on 10:43 - Feb 18 with 2102 views | TVOS1907 |
Matt Done scores again on 09:37 - Feb 18 by dingdangblue | Why? Alf did, Lambert did and both scored goals to help beat us. They are going for promotion and he's just won them their last 2 games. [Post edited 18 Feb 2015 10:01]
|
We played at Bristol Rovers the week after we'd sold Lambert and he didn't play in that game as part of the deal, even though he had appeared for them the previous Saturday. I know he played and scored at Spotland the following January and ALF appeared against us twice for Rotherham, but every deal seems to be different, so it will be interesting to see what happens on Tuesday. | |
| When I was your age, I used to enjoy the odd game of tennis. Or was it golf? |
| |
Matt Done scores again on 10:44 - Feb 18 with 2095 views | TVOS1907 |
Matt Done scores again on 09:45 - Feb 18 by ParkinsGimp | You can be as sick as you want pal, but I bet its around that figure and not the stupid astonomical figures that some deluded mongs ascertain too! We gave this player away......and had no contingency to cover his release. |
So anyone who has a contrary opinion to yours is a 'deluded mong'? | |
| When I was your age, I used to enjoy the odd game of tennis. Or was it golf? |
| |
Matt Done scores again on 10:52 - Feb 18 with 2079 views | Rosun | Don't worry about next Tuesday ... Bunney will have Done in his back pocket. If he drifts to the other wing then we'll have Calvin at right back to thwart him. | | | | Login to get fewer ads
Matt Done scores again on 12:10 - Feb 18 with 1965 views | JimmyRustler | With regards to the loyalty thing, (and putting aside the fact that he's started like a house on for for a moment) there is an argument, just like there is with Keith Hill, that Done has seen that the grass isn't always greener on the other side and that it's sometimes better to be at a club that's familiar to you and where you know you're loved. Where was Matt Done before we signed him first time? I'm aware that Palace were allegedly after him for a brief spell but after Barnsley, he was once again almost on the scrap heap before we snapped him up and ONCE AGAIN rejuvenated his career. If Hill was approached by a Championship bottom dweller (as Barnsley were) and then fooked off to double his wages, what would be the consensus? Hill and Rochdale is a good fit as is Hill and Done and Rochdale and Done. Glad he's doing well though, seems like a nice lad. Thing is, it's incredibly important that he hit the ground running or else he could have easily been plucking splinters out of his arse and tbh he may still have to get used to doing that if he dries up - those massive clubs over the border are fickle bunch at the best of times. | | | |
Matt Done scores again on 12:38 - Feb 18 with 1888 views | dingdangblue |
Matt Done scores again on 12:10 - Feb 18 by JimmyRustler | With regards to the loyalty thing, (and putting aside the fact that he's started like a house on for for a moment) there is an argument, just like there is with Keith Hill, that Done has seen that the grass isn't always greener on the other side and that it's sometimes better to be at a club that's familiar to you and where you know you're loved. Where was Matt Done before we signed him first time? I'm aware that Palace were allegedly after him for a brief spell but after Barnsley, he was once again almost on the scrap heap before we snapped him up and ONCE AGAIN rejuvenated his career. If Hill was approached by a Championship bottom dweller (as Barnsley were) and then fooked off to double his wages, what would be the consensus? Hill and Rochdale is a good fit as is Hill and Done and Rochdale and Done. Glad he's doing well though, seems like a nice lad. Thing is, it's incredibly important that he hit the ground running or else he could have easily been plucking splinters out of his arse and tbh he may still have to get used to doing that if he dries up - those massive clubs over the border are fickle bunch at the best of times. |
Its the stuff of dreams for Matt Done. 3 games, 3 wins, 4 goals and scoring the winning goals away at Bristol City and Notts County. If they had bought Aguero for 50 million they might have expected a start like that! Brilliant move for him - he is flying at the minute. Nigel Clough must think all his Christmas's have come at once. | |
| |
Matt Done scores again on 13:54 - Feb 18 with 1752 views | 1907 | Nowhere in that post did he write about boo'ing Done you pillock. Ever point he made was valid and true. I'm sick of reading your ridiculous comments to people you don't agree with. Mong. | | | |
Matt Done scores again on 14:10 - Feb 18 with 1722 views | ColDale |
Matt Done scores again on 12:10 - Feb 18 by JimmyRustler | With regards to the loyalty thing, (and putting aside the fact that he's started like a house on for for a moment) there is an argument, just like there is with Keith Hill, that Done has seen that the grass isn't always greener on the other side and that it's sometimes better to be at a club that's familiar to you and where you know you're loved. Where was Matt Done before we signed him first time? I'm aware that Palace were allegedly after him for a brief spell but after Barnsley, he was once again almost on the scrap heap before we snapped him up and ONCE AGAIN rejuvenated his career. If Hill was approached by a Championship bottom dweller (as Barnsley were) and then fooked off to double his wages, what would be the consensus? Hill and Rochdale is a good fit as is Hill and Done and Rochdale and Done. Glad he's doing well though, seems like a nice lad. Thing is, it's incredibly important that he hit the ground running or else he could have easily been plucking splinters out of his arse and tbh he may still have to get used to doing that if he dries up - those massive clubs over the border are fickle bunch at the best of times. |
I think the potential Palace move had a big impact on this. In a very short space of time, he went from Palace wanting to sign him for £625,000 to being out of work. Missing out on that move robbed him of the chance of being set for life, and will no doubt have influenced his desire to leave. | | | |
Matt Done scores again on 14:28 - Feb 18 with 1692 views | dingdangblue |
Matt Done scores again on 14:10 - Feb 18 by ColDale | I think the potential Palace move had a big impact on this. In a very short space of time, he went from Palace wanting to sign him for £625,000 to being out of work. Missing out on that move robbed him of the chance of being set for life, and will no doubt have influenced his desire to leave. |
Hill probably feels a bit of guilt about that also. Pretty sure he blocked the move having just sold Vaz Te and lost Butterfield and Drinkwater. Whitey may elaborate if he reads this. | |
| |
Matt Done scores again on 14:38 - Feb 18 with 1680 views | BladeBen | Blades fan here. Done is certainly a lot better than some of us expected. Regarding a couple of things... * there is no agreement in place that he cant play on Tuesday, he will play if fit & selected. * regarding the fee, a board member has told me the fee was less than 400k, he didn't mentionany add ons for promotion/appearances etc | | | |
Matt Done scores again on 14:39 - Feb 18 with 1672 views | fitzochris |
Matt Done scores again on 14:38 - Feb 18 by BladeBen | Blades fan here. Done is certainly a lot better than some of us expected. Regarding a couple of things... * there is no agreement in place that he cant play on Tuesday, he will play if fit & selected. * regarding the fee, a board member has told me the fee was less than 400k, he didn't mentionany add ons for promotion/appearances etc |
Funny how many people know board members and how these board members are quite casual about revealing undisclosed fees. | |
| |
Matt Done scores again on 14:40 - Feb 18 with 1671 views | 442Dale |
Matt Done scores again on 14:38 - Feb 18 by BladeBen | Blades fan here. Done is certainly a lot better than some of us expected. Regarding a couple of things... * there is no agreement in place that he cant play on Tuesday, he will play if fit & selected. * regarding the fee, a board member has told me the fee was less than 400k, he didn't mentionany add ons for promotion/appearances etc |
If that's the case, that board member has disclosed an undisclosed fee. Name the board member or never return. Tedious. | |
| |
Matt Done scores again on 14:44 - Feb 18 with 1667 views | lurker |
Matt Done scores again on 14:38 - Feb 18 by BladeBen | Blades fan here. Done is certainly a lot better than some of us expected. Regarding a couple of things... * there is no agreement in place that he cant play on Tuesday, he will play if fit & selected. * regarding the fee, a board member has told me the fee was less than 400k, he didn't mentionany add ons for promotion/appearances etc |
Thanks for posting but I would be astounded if your 2nd statement is true given Done's contract situation and our board being obsessed with add ons | | | |
Matt Done scores again on 14:46 - Feb 18 with 1657 views | jokerthief | The real conundrum is he is not really a born striker...S.K.H. had him @ L.B. then a makeshift striker to replace Scott Hogan... | | | |
Matt Done scores again on 14:46 - Feb 18 with 1655 views | TVOS1907 |
Matt Done scores again on 14:38 - Feb 18 by BladeBen | Blades fan here. Done is certainly a lot better than some of us expected. Regarding a couple of things... * there is no agreement in place that he cant play on Tuesday, he will play if fit & selected. * regarding the fee, a board member has told me the fee was less than 400k, he didn't mentionany add ons for promotion/appearances etc |
To be fair, a board member who has bought a player isn't going to make out his club have paid over the odds. | |
| When I was your age, I used to enjoy the odd game of tennis. Or was it golf? |
| |
Matt Done scores again on 14:48 - Feb 18 with 1647 views | ChaffRAFC | It's all well and good speculating, which is all these figures are, but we'll soon find out if he can play when the team sheet gets read out. We'll know how much we received for him when the accounts come out. | |
| If I hadn't seen such riches, I could live with being poor |
| |
Matt Done scores again on 14:55 - Feb 18 with 1632 views | BladeBen | I didn't come on here to speculate etc. I merely offered what I have been told. Barring injury v Cov on sat he will play against you next Tuesday | | | |
Matt Done scores again on 15:05 - Feb 18 with 1592 views | 442Dale |
Matt Done scores again on 14:55 - Feb 18 by BladeBen | I didn't come on here to speculate etc. I merely offered what I have been told. Barring injury v Cov on sat he will play against you next Tuesday |
Told by who? Means nothing until you say. You won't, so stop until you are prepared to. | |
| |
Matt Done scores again on 15:07 - Feb 18 with 1592 views | TVOS1907 |
Matt Done scores again on 14:55 - Feb 18 by BladeBen | I didn't come on here to speculate etc. I merely offered what I have been told. Barring injury v Cov on sat he will play against you next Tuesday |
No, thanks for coming on here. Your input is very interesting and I'm pleased Done is doing so well, especially after reading some of the derogatory comments on one of your boards when you signed him. However, what you've been told may or may not be the truth; that's the point we're trying to make. Given the transfer was 'undisclosed', I'd take things with a pinch of salt as some directors are very good at telling their audiences what they want them to hear. | |
| When I was your age, I used to enjoy the odd game of tennis. Or was it golf? |
| |
Matt Done scores again on 15:12 - Feb 18 with 1571 views | BladeBen |
Matt Done scores again on 15:07 - Feb 18 by TVOS1907 | No, thanks for coming on here. Your input is very interesting and I'm pleased Done is doing so well, especially after reading some of the derogatory comments on one of your boards when you signed him. However, what you've been told may or may not be the truth; that's the point we're trying to make. Given the transfer was 'undisclosed', I'd take things with a pinch of salt as some directors are very good at telling their audiences what they want them to hear. |
That's a fair point. Obviously he's an SUFC director and I'm not going to disclose his name as you would imagine. The reason, as stated our transfers are are undisclosed is so future selling clubs don't over inflate their fee. I asked him about the 1.5 mill banded about on here on deadline day and was told less than 400k. He as no reason to play down a fee as we're very critical for not spending a lot!! A further example is when we signed John Brayford the fee was reported at 1.5 mill, he actually told me this was wrong and we paid more | | | |
Matt Done scores again on 15:22 - Feb 18 with 1551 views | TalkingSutty |
Matt Done scores again on 15:12 - Feb 18 by BladeBen | That's a fair point. Obviously he's an SUFC director and I'm not going to disclose his name as you would imagine. The reason, as stated our transfers are are undisclosed is so future selling clubs don't over inflate their fee. I asked him about the 1.5 mill banded about on here on deadline day and was told less than 400k. He as no reason to play down a fee as we're very critical for not spending a lot!! A further example is when we signed John Brayford the fee was reported at 1.5 mill, he actually told me this was wrong and we paid more |
Thanks for the information Ben but it means bugger all really. Anyway, without trying to inflate or deflate any figures what sort of away following are you expecting to bring over the hill next Tuesday? Just to confirm, you've got a good un with Matt Done and just like you i will be very surprised if he doesn't play in our upcoming fixture. | | | |
| |