| US grand jury's decision not to indict? 20:35 - Dec 4 with 5910 views | Swanzay |
Why are they so against prosecuting the relevant white police officers, what going on?
Protests after N.Y. cop not indicted in chokehold death; feds reviewing case
http://edition.cnn.com/2014/12/03/justice/new-york-grand-jury-chokehold/
Same happened Michael Brown shooting in Ferguson, Missouri.
So wrong, show the breadth of corruption in the US on these matters.
|  | | |  |
| US grand jury's decision not to indict? on 18:26 - Dec 6 with 885 views | exiledclaseboy |
| US grand jury's decision not to indict? on 18:23 - Dec 6 by Shaky |
Total indifference, boob. |
You didn't desist for long.  |  |
| |
| US grand jury's decision not to indict? on 18:29 - Dec 6 with 874 views | Shaky |
| US grand jury's decision not to indict? on 18:26 - Dec 6 by exiledclaseboy |
You didn't desist for long. |
Think you'll find the precise term I used was defer.  |  |
| |
| US grand jury's decision not to indict? on 18:29 - Dec 6 with 873 views | mbl1966 |
| US grand jury's decision not to indict? on 18:26 - Dec 6 by exiledclaseboy |
You didn't desist for long. |
Replying suggests otherwise.
I would say SMS but your tendency towards using a pet name makes PMS possible. |  |
| |
| US grand jury's decision not to indict? on 18:32 - Dec 6 with 867 views | exiledclaseboy |
| US grand jury's decision not to indict? on 18:29 - Dec 6 by Shaky |
Think you'll find the precise term I used was defer. |
Fair point. You didn't defer for long then! | |
| |
| US grand jury's decision not to indict? on 18:40 - Dec 6 with 850 views | Shaky |
| US grand jury's decision not to indict? on 18:32 - Dec 6 by exiledclaseboy |
Fair point. You didn't defer for long then! |
As you may know, a contract can only be legally binding if there is some form of consideration offered in return for the goods or services provided thereunder, regardless of whether it is adequate in terms of a fair exchange.
I take the position that an implicit if unspoken element of my offer was an implied demand for a cessation of boobishness, and since that state of affairs has not materialised any and all undertakings previously provided have fallen away or otherwise lapsed.
Or to put it another way, tough titty.  | |
| |
| US grand jury's decision not to indict? on 18:46 - Dec 6 with 840 views | mbl1966 |
| US grand jury's decision not to indict? on 18:40 - Dec 6 by Shaky |
As you may know, a contract can only be legally binding if there is some form of consideration offered in return for the goods or services provided thereunder, regardless of whether it is adequate in terms of a fair exchange.
I take the position that an implicit if unspoken element of my offer was an implied demand for a cessation of boobishness, and since that state of affairs has not materialised any and all undertakings previously provided have fallen away or otherwise lapsed.
Or to put it another way, tough titty. |
That's it you're an Oompa Loompa with inverted periods.
Not very graceful are you? | |
| |
| US grand jury's decision not to indict? on 23:56 - Dec 6 with 796 views | ScoobyWho |
| US grand jury's decision not to indict? on 20:45 - Dec 4 by dickythorpe |
You never see white men rioting when the police shoot white men. |
Is the right answer ! |  |
| |
| |
By continuing to use the site, you agree to our use of cookies and to abide by our Terms and Conditions.
