Please log in or register. Registered visitors get fewer ads.
Forum
Reply		Premier league approve saints takeover
at 12:40 4 Jan 2022

Fair play to FT. Whatever the outcome his source was good. Happy to put my hand up and say so.
Forum
Reply		Premier league approve saints takeover
at 13:01 30 Dec 2021

I have had the opportunity of investigating many previous claims around the time before we went into Administration. I was close to many who gave me what appeared to be plausible evidence. However, when I looked into it more and spoke to those who were part of the club at that time such evidence did not stack up and proved to be false.

Big egos with little or no real knowledge is often the case.

Is this one another false dawn/false prophet. I think so!
Forum
Reply		Ovsaldo on his way
at 18:14 18 Aug 2013

All signed :)
[Post edited 18 Aug 2013 18:17]
Forum
Reply		Osvaldo
at 19:11 17 Aug 2013

Do I know you Mr Smith?
Forum
Reply		Osvaldo
at 18:56 17 Aug 2013

He is on his way.
Forum
Reply		Non Payments
at 12:48 25 Nov 2012

"There has been two or three tribunals from former workers who took action only to see the club pay just before it started"

Seems to happen an awful lot with many companies. They seem to hope that the employees will not have the spirit for a fight and will go away. It is wrong but it does happen frequently I believe
Forum
Reply		Non Payments
at 12:23 25 Nov 2012

But it is not binding.

My brother is appointed by Trading Standards to do the same thing.
Forum
Reply		fishing or football ?
at 12:21 25 Nov 2012

I think you must have missed my "parental responsibility" bit. That encompasses what you say but fishing will be a chance to discuss such thinks. Better that sitting in front of a television/radio/internet

Anyway I suspect Patred is already fishing with his son :)
Forum
Reply		Non Payments
at 12:07 25 Nov 2012

You cannot refuse to"communicate" Nick Judgement will have beed applied in default at a very early stage. There is a strict court procedure and time limits. That is the problem with just reading bits on it.
Forum
Reply		fishing or football ?
at 12:04 25 Nov 2012

Take him fishing.

It is not on Sky but you can watch it later in the evening or record it on your sky box.

If you were that keen you would have had a ticket for the game for you and the nipper

Parental responsibility will pay you back in spades when they become adults

Forum
Reply		Non Payments
at 11:57 25 Nov 2012

Is there a link to this "rumour" or did the UTS hear it in a pub?

Nick, why do you say the court did not have both sides of the argument?

Procedure - Claimant asks for payment with Defendent refuses and probably gives reasons.

Arbritration clause of contract evoked by one party. Decision given but SFC do not accept and so Claimant issues court procedings with a Statement of Claim. Defendent will have entered a defence or the Claimant would have applied to the court for judgementin defaut.

After defence served, evidence from both sides will have been served on the court. Failure to do so from either side would have again meant a request for judgement in default,

Court date set and Bundles have to be filed in court by both sides within a certain period before court hearing. It seems at that stage the Defendent decided not to proceed. That may be because the Counsel they would have appointed to represent them in court indicated their chances were low. It may have been that once a Judge was appointed for the case they realised he had a record for sympathy to Claimants and their evidence would not come up to scratch for such a judge.

The Defendents simply indicated they would not be attending to defend the claim.

Hardly a case of the court only knowing one side!

I am not defending SFC's behavour here. On what I can deduce from the report and the fact they decided not to defend so late in the claim is poor and not what I would expect from a competent. I agree with Nicks views on that.

I have taken a case to the Commercial court valued at £1m and won.

I have also taked a case to the RoyalCourts of Justice and has a 11 day trial finished after one day because the Lord Justice (Judge) indicated to my QC in open court that, having read all the evidence (we had 11 experts on both sides who could not agree) he preferred their evidence! Had to pay the claim of just under £1m and costs of both side at £200,000 so I know what I am talking about.
[Post edited 1 Jan 1970 1:00]
Forum
Reply		Nineteencanteen
at 22:26 20 Feb 2012

Don't worry, I do not have it now. I deleted it when I had no need for it any more. You can sleep easy. I am off line now.
Forum
Reply		Nineteencanteen
at 22:19 20 Feb 2012

Not that you would have realised TS
Forum
Reply		Nineteencanteen
at 22:15 20 Feb 2012

Had your once as well Dune when I was carrying out an investigation but had a clear out and that has gone as well.
Forum
Reply		Nineteencanteen
at 22:04 20 Feb 2012

I had their email addresses. Is that not clear?
Forum
Reply		Nineteencanteen
at 21:48 20 Feb 2012

19C is not verbal. 19C lives in Noth Hampshire and is/or was in Finance

Verbal is in London and is involved in media work

I used to have the emails for both so I am sure.

Also 19C tends towards the right, Verbal to the left
Please log in to use all the site's facilities

Longstock


Site Scores

Forum Votes: 1
Comment Votes: 0
Prediction League: 0
TOTAL: 1
About Us Contact Us Terms & Conditions Privacy Cookies Advertising
© FansNetwork 2024