 | Forum
Thread | Perfect time to play Spurs
at 14:15 13 Dec 2024
Rusty has been complaining about our luck this season. But he can't complain about the scheduling of this fixture. Spurs:
- have only 4 points from their last 5 games
- are now in the bottom half of the table
- have a long injury list
- had 7 youngsters on th bench for their last game
- try to play out from the back with Fraser Forster in the side
- played a Thursday night European away game where they had to work hard
- deserved to lose to Rangers who aren't up to PL standards
- a senior player, Timo Werner, was publicly slammed by the manager
- another senior player, Romero, has just publicly criticised the club
- the manager is not just under pressure but is clearly showing it too
Surely, even a Russell Martin side can't lose at home to this lot???
|
| Forum
Thread | Rumour suggests terrible news
at 18:23 12 Dec 2024
Football Insider seem to be publishing Saints rumours sourced from Mick Brown. No idea if he has an inside track or not, but he seems to have been right so far. The latest from him, if it's right, confirms my fears: if we sack Rusty, they're just going to appoint Rusty Lite.
https://www.footballinsider247.com/southampton-work-on-russell-martin-replacemen
The article says: "If they do make a change, I wouldn’t expect it to be a completely different style. They, rightly or wrongly, want to continue with the progressive football and building from the back."
I only hope that someone on the board has 2 brain cells and can see the contradiction here. To quote the article:
"Their constant defensive errors, which are quickly becoming a feature of Martin’s side, have seen them ship 31 goals in that time – the second-worst in the division. As a result, scrutiny and pressure is continuing to grow both on the manager and the board and a change may have to be made soon."
So, Rusty faces the sack because of the defensive errors, which are mostly caused by trying to play out from the back, yet they want to appoint another manager who plays the same way? If this is true, it is like a scene from Dumb and Dumber.
The consolation would be that at least we'd be one step nearer to ditching this nonsense. Soon they'll be faced with the evidence that any manager that tries to play this way in the PL will fail. So far, 2 have tried it (Selles and RM). One more failure should be enough to get the message across. |
| Prediction | Prediction Logged by at 14:46:27
Southampton v Tottenham Hotspur prediction logged |
| Forum
Thread | Is fan sentiment changing?
at 12:20 9 Dec 2024
Fan sentiment towards RM changed on this board a while ago, but that's probably not representative of the wider fan base. Generally it seemed that most fans were still supportive of him. Now it feels like it's changing and most people want him gone. But I'm not really a social media user and I might be just picking up on a few random comments. What do people think?
As far as I'm concerned it would be a good thing if the majority of fans really turn against him, the atmosphere at games turned poisonous and everyone at the club knew that.
Am I hoping for too much? |
| Prediction | Prediction Logged by at 07:48:15
Aston Villa v Southampton prediction logged |
| Prediction | Prediction Logged by at 10:17:52
Brighton and Hove Albion v Southampton prediction logged |
| Forum
Thread | Dibling goal involvements
at 13:22 27 Nov 2024
Sometimes when a youngster comes in, you can tell they're a prospect but there's no consistent end product there yet. Dibling is one of the few who have immediately delivered over a number of games at the top level.
Of the league games that we've scored in, he's been directly involved in these goals:
Brentford - directly involved in the move
Ipswich - scorer
B'mouth - put in the free kick that caused chaos and led to the goal after another cross
Arsenal - no involvement
Leicester - no involvement
Everton - no involvement
Liverpool - won the penalty for one and directly involved in the other goal
So, out of our 9 goals he's directly contributed to 5 of them and that's without including the penalty he won against Man U that Archer missed. This is despite the fact that he's only been on the pitch for 60% of our playing time.
So, he's not just promising, he's consistently delivering at the top level which is very rare for a teenager. Hopefully he can take the physical and mental stresses better than most 18 year olds would. Fernandes isn't far behind, he's delivering too. Thank God we've had these 2 real finds this season otherwise there would be nothing positive about Saints at all. I'm sure RM hates the fact they risk losing the ball by moving it quickly and taking people on, but I'm praying they ignore him when he tells them not to do it. |
| Forum
Thread | SFC would be better off if we'd lost 10 nil
at 19:46 24 Nov 2024
At least then it would have forced the board to question what they're doing. As it is, we have no more points and it just prolongs the agony of having RM as manager.
Today showed again that 1 rapid counter attack will create a better chance than 90 mins of turgid possession. Expect that lesson to be ignored by RM, just like he ignores the countless lessons that it's too risky for us to play out from the back against a PL side.
The glimpses of what we could do under a decent manager (and with a centre forward in the team) are actually torture. It just shows the opportunity that's being wasted by RM. It would be better to just play pure RM style and suffer a few heavy defeats, but then quickly get shot of him. |
| Forum
Thread | Ankersen's propaganda
at 14:49 12 Nov 2024
This BBC article seems a bit ridiculous to me:
https://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/football/articles/clyr6g4d0weo
For example we're told that "There is a firm belief Saints are not far away - and have not been - from a breakthrough" which is utter bollux. We're no further forward than we were at the start of the season.
But the bit that really takes the biscuit is the bit (obviously propaganda provided by the club media rep) that says:
"The experience of Rasmus Ankersen, co-founder and chief executive of Saints owners Sport Republic, means he remains patient and strategic.
His time at Brentford as co-director of football - helping to oversee the Bees' rise and Premier League promotion - has given him knowledge of how to build a sustainable model and a successful team."
This bit of propaganda was then copied across to the Echo website by Alfie House. But all the evidence says that this is utter tosh. Brentford do things completely differently to Saints. If these were Ankersen's choices at Brentford, then why has he made the completely opposite decisions at Saints?
Three key aspects of Brentford's success have been:
1) Thomas Frank's style of play, which is a world away from possession football.
2) Shutting down the academy to concentrate on recruiting players from minor leagues into their B team.
3) Heavy use of data e.g. to find optimal set piece tactics, which are a special focus, as opposed to the chaos that we see regularly.
It's just a world away from what we do. I reckon if they fed our match data into their machine it would have hysterics. 70% possession and no shots on target? Ha ha ha.
Ankersen obviously knows how to market himself if nothing else, so we keep on hearing what a genius he is. But the reality is that Brentford is the only success he's been associated with and it was probably nothing to do with him. If it was, then why is he implementing the complete opposite here?
"A sustainable model and a successful team", my arse. |
| Forum
Thread | We will have 4 points at Xmas
at 19:42 9 Nov 2024
With RM in charge I can't see us getting any more points from this run of fixtures through to Xmas:
Liverpool H
Brighton A
Chelsea H
Aston Villa A
Spurs H
Fulham A
No manager on earth would want to come in after Xmas with 4 points on the board. If we don't get rid of him in the international break then the season is over. |
| Prediction | Prediction Logged by at 14:00:48
Wolverhampton Wanderers v Southampton prediction logged |
| Forum
Thread | Mixed Feelings
at 10:11 3 Nov 2024
A win is a win and always worth celebrating. Even more so if it is the first of the season when we looked as though we would struggle to get one.
But, in the cold light of day, I think that this was also the worst result of the season so far because I think we'll look back at yesterday and see it as the day that confirmed relegation. This result means RM will be here for the foreseeable future and that confirms that it will be too late when they decide to dump him.
If we had played really well and destroyed Everton it might be different. But the truth is that we were poor and a bit lucky to win. Ramsdale was our best player and that says a lot. There was nothing there to say that we won't go back on our losing streak again soon. Everton were equally poor, but I still expect them to finish above us.
I hope I'm wrong but that's my opinion. |
| Forum
Thread | Pep praises Saints for "defending with the ball"
at 14:10 28 Oct 2024
I see that on Saturday's MOTD, Pep was complimentary about Saints, in particular the way we "defended with the ball". What he means is that we recycled possession instead of risking losing it by attacking. This denied City possession and meant that there were periods when City couldn't score because they didn't have the ball.
Wake up Pep lad. Perhaps, like your team, you're a bit tired after your Champions League week, but if this was an effective strategy then we wouldn't be bottom of the table with the worst goal difference. It might work for City, but we're more likely to turn the ball over in the defensive third resulting in an easy goal for the opposition. We managed to avoid that on Saturday (just) but it will happen again.
Meanwhile "defending with the ball" means that we are not attacking. What Pep describes as "defending with the ball" is mostly, when Saints do it, just pointless possession, where we bore the fans shitless and do nothing to threaten the opposition.
I'm from the old skool that thinks when you have the ball you should try to use it to score a goal instead of defending with it. That means moving the ball forward quickly before the opposition form a defensive block which is difficult to break down. Once again our best chances in this match came when we moved the ball quickly up the pitch instead of defending with it. Once again we will probably fail to learn from that.
Pep's compliments actually just sum up the chasm between City and Saints. They show how a tactic can make perfect sense for a team of world class players but be an exercise in stupidity for mediocre players like our lot. The fact that we didn't get absolutely walloped on Saturday doesn't change that. |
| Prediction | Prediction Logged by at 17:39:31
Manchester City v Southampton prediction logged |
| | Ifonly
|
Site Scores| Forum Votes: | 161 | | Comment Votes: | 367 | | Prediction League: | 26 | | TOTAL: | 554 |
|
By continuing to use the site, you agree to our use of cookies and to abide by our Terms and Conditions.
