By continuing to use the site, you agree to our use of cookies and to abide by our Terms and Conditions. We in turn value your personal details in accordance with our Privacy Policy.
Please log in or register. Registered visitors get fewer ads.
31 plays 18 at present. Chris isn't doing too bad.
Swansea Indepenent Poster Of The Year 2021. Dr P / Mart66 / Roathie / Parlay / E20/ Duffle was 2nd, but he is deluded and thinks in his little twisted brain that he won. Poor sod. We let him win this year, as he has cried for a whole year. His 14 usernames, bless his cotton socks.
0
Should E20jack/Dimi be banned again? on 22:04 - Jul 26 with 2084 views
No. I will admit that he can be hard to ignore sometimes but it is best that you don't respond...even to trivial stuff as you will soon get sucked in, just like I do on occasion.
Still a no though.
It is far better to grasp the universe as it really is than to persist in delusion, however satisfying and reassuring. - Carl Sagan
0
Should E20jack/Dimi be banned again? on 02:10 - Jul 27 with 1982 views
Should E20jack/Dimi be banned again? on 01:17 - Jul 27 by DJack
No. I will admit that he can be hard to ignore sometimes but it is best that you don't respond...even to trivial stuff as you will soon get sucked in, just like I do on occasion.
Still a no though.
Responding to what?
Look at this thread for a prime example. Responding isn't the issue, seeking my attention is. Then complaining when I respond.
I have never heard of someone suckering someone in by minding their own business before.
An interesting take on it. Although quite clearly a wrong one.
Should E20jack/Dimi be banned again? on 02:10 - Jul 27 by E20Jack
Responding to what?
Look at this thread for a prime example. Responding isn't the issue, seeking my attention is. Then complaining when I respond.
I have never heard of someone suckering someone in by minding their own business before.
An interesting take on it. Although quite clearly a wrong one.
Responding to what? Your posting "style"
Look at this thread for a prime example. Responding isn't the issue I disagree, their responses are part of the issue , seeking my attention is. I'm not convinced that they are seeking your attention. Then complaining when I respond. The fact that you respond is not worthy of complaint. I do believe that it is the manner/prose &/or the "facts"of your response is what drives their complaints - they may be right or wrong here
I have never heard of someone suckering someone in by minding their own business before. Posting comments is NOT minding your own business and posting comments using dubious logic or contentious "facts" is less so.
An interesting take on it. Although quite clearly a wrong one. Incorrect, you've demonstrated nothing "clearly". However that is all I'm going to say on the matter...feel free to have the last word, I bid you a good night.
It is far better to grasp the universe as it really is than to persist in delusion, however satisfying and reassuring. - Carl Sagan
0
Should E20jack/Dimi be banned again? on 03:10 - Jul 27 with 1968 views
Should E20jack/Dimi be banned again? on 02:32 - Jul 27 by DJack
Responding to what? Your posting "style"
Look at this thread for a prime example. Responding isn't the issue I disagree, their responses are part of the issue , seeking my attention is. I'm not convinced that they are seeking your attention. Then complaining when I respond. The fact that you respond is not worthy of complaint. I do believe that it is the manner/prose &/or the "facts"of your response is what drives their complaints - they may be right or wrong here
I have never heard of someone suckering someone in by minding their own business before. Posting comments is NOT minding your own business and posting comments using dubious logic or contentious "facts" is less so.
An interesting take on it. Although quite clearly a wrong one. Incorrect, you've demonstrated nothing "clearly". However that is all I'm going to say on the matter...feel free to have the last word, I bid you a good night.
**Your posting "style"** .... So being polite and informative while giving as good as I get - yet in far more calm and erudite manner? Sounds a great posting style.
** I'm not convinced that they are seeking your attention.** .. . Which is probably why you have such an off kilter view of what is in front of you. If seeking me out daily and creating threads about me isn't seeking my attention - I don't know what is.
** The fact that you respond is not worthy of complaint.** ... We agree.
** I do believe that it is the manner/prose &/or the "facts"of your response is what drives their complaints - they may be right or wrong here. ** ... So responses should be full of insults, rubbish and not based on fact or common sense now?
** Posting comments is NOT minding your own business**... Posting responses is absolutely minding my own business. If you were walking down the street and someone said ''DJACK! What do you think of this?'' and you respond - Are you then liable to be accused of not minding your own business if they don't like your reply? Your logic is flawed.
Posting comments using dubious logic or contentious "facts" is less so. **... Dubious in whose mind? Which dubious logic or contentious facts are you referring to specifically? Or are you throwing out a nothing generalistic comment in the hope it sticks?
Incorrect, you've demonstrated nothing "clearly". However that is all I'm going to say on the matter...feel free to have the last word, I bid you a good night. *** ... I have absolutely demonstrated it. People are seeking my attention and complaining when I reply, as has been pointed out by others here. If you disagree then prove your theory, as it stands it is just a load of noise.., Which is why you are disappearing quick sharp, as others do when asked to back up their rubbish - something I will always do of course.
There is an ignore button, so if you don't like any poster, use the ignore button and their posts don't appear. So for those that want him banned, effectively you are creating your own ban list for your personal viewing.
If you choose not to use this then there is no reason for a ban. If you class posting on a forum with an opinion (no matter how many times the same opinion is repeated with long drawn out posts) then there is little point in a forum.
So it is relatively simple. If you want him banned, place him on ignore and to your viewing eyes you have banned him. If you can't do that then the easiest way to deal with it is elect not to read his posts. Self control is relatively simple.
It's a bit like the Darran v Perch posts. They bore me so I don't read them.
Should E20jack/Dimi be banned again? on 07:23 - Jul 27 by moonie
That may well be sp Phil but there is are parameters for what is legal.
If a person of colour was insulted in any way,whilst utilising the " n" word,for example then the author of the post is clearly in shite
It's why you have mods
Have nice day
Which is of course not the point that was being debated
The point that I was making is that if you find a poster/subject boring then you simply elect not to read it
I frankly don't care for people who decide to take a board disagreement into a social media world and play it out in front of my family so I elect now not to pay much attention to a debate over who did or didn't pay for a meal that took place at some time in the past.
Same as Dimi - there are times when I read his posts (Andre Ayew thread as an example) but I wont get drawn into long debates with him because its clear he has far more time on his hands than me.
The report post button is your friend for the rest of it - all the mods (and the network) get a copy of this...
The ignore button is your friend for people you don't like.
Self control is a bigger friend. For example I couldn't tell you the last time I read a Shaky post.
1
Should E20jack/Dimi be banned again? on 07:28 - Jul 27 with 1907 views
Should E20jack/Dimi be banned again? on 07:16 - Jul 27 by Phil_S
I remain in a position that is simple
There is an ignore button, so if you don't like any poster, use the ignore button and their posts don't appear. So for those that want him banned, effectively you are creating your own ban list for your personal viewing.
If you choose not to use this then there is no reason for a ban. If you class posting on a forum with an opinion (no matter how many times the same opinion is repeated with long drawn out posts) then there is little point in a forum.
So it is relatively simple. If you want him banned, place him on ignore and to your viewing eyes you have banned him. If you can't do that then the easiest way to deal with it is elect not to read his posts. Self control is relatively simple.
It's a bit like the Darran v Perch posts. They bore me so I don't read them.
This in spades.
The only reason my posts become repetitive and drawn out is the fact that in order to try and debate against me the other poster has to distance themself from the initial point in order to find any sort of ground in order to get a foot hold. This inevitably means the debate will often circle back to the point in hand that is being chosen to be ignored.
They also have to be drawn out as I have enough experience to know that any small detail is pounced upon so ironically to save an awful lot of future back and forth, the are explained meticulously.
Personally a ban wont change a individual, some cases it might but I dont see it here.
There is a issue here, the poll suggests there is but it is down to the individual to change his attitude, the issue is the person cant or wont see what he/she is doing wrong.
I just keep thinking Mario Balotelli here, like a teenage child unwilling to accept the truth off others.
Should E20jack/Dimi be banned again? on 07:53 - Jul 27 by magicdaps10
Personally a ban wont change a individual, some cases it might but I dont see it here.
There is a issue here, the poll suggests there is but it is down to the individual to change his attitude, the issue is the person cant or wont see what he/she is doing wrong.
I just keep thinking Mario Balotelli here, like a teenage child unwilling to accept the truth off others.
Should E20jack/Dimi be banned again? on 19:32 - Jul 25 by Drizzy
The people have spoken. Nothing against you personally, Dim. Just you're clearly unwell and your ramblings have made this board unreadable. Can't even put you on ignore as there are so many people arguing with you that it's impossible to mute.
Add Perch and Mo to the list too. Both dribbling idiots with nothing to contribute whatsoever.
Should E20jack/Dimi be banned again? on 11:05 - Jul 27 by Darran
Any person that posts their support for nonces on this Forum should be banned for life.
Mo is a great poster though.
Perch should leave for his own good. Called Islam a "filth religion" in his rant the other day. Frequently misogynistic and vitriolic towards certain nationalities.
Should E20jack/Dimi be banned again? on 11:12 - Jul 27 by Drizzy
Perch should leave for his own good. Called Islam a "filth religion" in his rant the other day. Frequently misogynistic and vitriolic towards certain nationalities.
Should E20jack/Dimi be banned again? on 11:12 - Jul 27 by Drizzy
Perch should leave for his own good. Called Islam a "filth religion" in his rant the other day. Frequently misogynistic and vitriolic towards certain nationalities.
How the mods haven't intervened is baffling.
I couldn’t agree more.
The first ever recipient of a Planet Swans Lifetime Achievement Award.
By continuing to use the site, you agree to our use of cookies and to abide by our Terms and Conditions.
