| Sala 08:49 - Dec 3 with 9692 views | Boundy |
Can they pay what they owe , it appears they’ve run out of appeal options .A lot of monies owed to various agencies and the latest is they have run out of appeals |  |
| "In a free society, the State is the servant of the people—not the master." |
| |  |
| Sala on 17:00 - Dec 9 with 1665 views | ReslovenSwan1 |
| Sala on 16:36 - Dec 9 by Catullus |
Insirance also only works when it is not rendered invalid.
The only person spinning here is you, you arre trying to spin a line about insurance when you, as an insurance purchaser yourself, should know that all policies come with conditins and if those conditins are broken the policy is worthless. This report,
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-wales-60767283
points out the flight was unlicensed and therefore illegal rendering any insurance void.
There can be only one conclusion now, this is just an ongoing wind up because nobody can be so stupid as to be continuously pushing this narrative given the evidence and the legal conclusions made by courts of law and the CAS. |
I draw you attention to public indemnity insurance. I was obliged to have if I worked on the railways for example. With Public liability insurance it cost going on £600 per year. Not cheap.
This is from google.
"Professional indemnity insurance protects you against claims for loss or damage made by clients or third parties as a result of the impact of negligent services you provided or negligent advice you offered. Compensation claims can be brought against you even if you provided a service or offered advice for free".
I like to believe authorised aviation firms or pilots would be obliged to have this sort of policy to cover the costs of the people and property their plane accidentally lands on. The innocent parties. |  |
| |
| Sala on 17:32 - Dec 9 with 1640 views | Dr_Parnassus |
| Sala on 16:36 - Dec 9 by Catullus |
Insirance also only works when it is not rendered invalid.
The only person spinning here is you, you arre trying to spin a line about insurance when you, as an insurance purchaser yourself, should know that all policies come with conditins and if those conditins are broken the policy is worthless. This report,
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-wales-60767283
points out the flight was unlicensed and therefore illegal rendering any insurance void.
There can be only one conclusion now, this is just an ongoing wind up because nobody can be so stupid as to be continuously pushing this narrative given the evidence and the legal conclusions made by courts of law and the CAS. |
Is the correct answer. |  |
| |
| Sala on 17:44 - Dec 9 with 1636 views | Boundy |
| Sala on 17:00 - Dec 9 by ReslovenSwan1 |
I draw you attention to public indemnity insurance. I was obliged to have if I worked on the railways for example. With Public liability insurance it cost going on £600 per year. Not cheap.
This is from google.
"Professional indemnity insurance protects you against claims for loss or damage made by clients or third parties as a result of the impact of negligent services you provided or negligent advice you offered. Compensation claims can be brought against you even if you provided a service or offered advice for free".
I like to believe authorised aviation firms or pilots would be obliged to have this sort of policy to cover the costs of the people and property their plane accidentally lands on. The innocent parties. |
I feel your pain , desperate to find any glimmer of hope which negates CCFC paying for a player which they denied 3 times in front of numerous of governing bodies bodies , the selling Club , the family the media ,in fact anyone who would listen that he wasn't a cardiff player , now that avenue has finally been firmly closed they want to make an insurance claim .Odious behaviour but an opinion you will undoubtably disagree with | |
| "In a free society, the State is the servant of the people—not the master." |
| |
| Sala on 18:22 - Dec 9 with 1614 views | JACKMANANDBOY |
| Sala on 17:44 - Dec 9 by Boundy |
I feel your pain , desperate to find any glimmer of hope which negates CCFC paying for a player which they denied 3 times in front of numerous of governing bodies bodies , the selling Club , the family the media ,in fact anyone who would listen that he wasn't a cardiff player , now that avenue has finally been firmly closed they want to make an insurance claim .Odious behaviour but an opinion you will undoubtably disagree with |
He's not our player, he's not our player, he's not our player, becomes our insurance brokers did not tell us when we had to insure our player....this is the behaviour of scoundrels. |  |
| |
| Sala on 18:27 - Dec 9 with 1607 views | Dr_Parnassus |
| Sala on 17:00 - Dec 9 by ReslovenSwan1 |
I draw you attention to public indemnity insurance. I was obliged to have if I worked on the railways for example. With Public liability insurance it cost going on £600 per year. Not cheap.
This is from google.
"Professional indemnity insurance protects you against claims for loss or damage made by clients or third parties as a result of the impact of negligent services you provided or negligent advice you offered. Compensation claims can be brought against you even if you provided a service or offered advice for free".
I like to believe authorised aviation firms or pilots would be obliged to have this sort of policy to cover the costs of the people and property their plane accidentally lands on. The innocent parties. |
Who is the aviation firm? I’ve asked you a few times now, no answer.
You think a pilot without a commercial qualification was able to take out commercial insurance?
What you like to think, and what reflects reality are poles apart. | |
| |
| Sala on 19:25 - Dec 9 with 1585 views | ReslovenSwan1 |
| Sala on 18:27 - Dec 9 by Dr_Parnassus |
Who is the aviation firm? I’ve asked you a few times now, no answer.
You think a pilot without a commercial qualification was able to take out commercial insurance?
What you like to think, and what reflects reality are poles apart. |
The man who went to jail had his business referenced in the court case. He was not a simple pilot. Do you understand this? The name of the company can be found with research.
He organised flights. He provided planes, pilots (sometime himself) and other logistics like fuel and presumably insurances of some sort. If he was a simple pilot who organised and paid for fuel? The pilot did not. The person even organised accommodation for the pilot. It was a logistics business either on his own or with employed staff.
He took payment for this organisation work. He had used the late pilot before and possibly other pilots and certainly other planes like the one he flew Cardiff city staff in. He flew 3 Cardiff city staff including football celebrities out to France on a scouting mission. If you think they had no insurance protection you can believe it if you want to. I do not believe it personally. | |
| |
| Sala on 19:47 - Dec 9 with 1569 views | Dr_Parnassus |
| Sala on 19:25 - Dec 9 by ReslovenSwan1 |
The man who went to jail had his business referenced in the court case. He was not a simple pilot. Do you understand this? The name of the company can be found with research.
He organised flights. He provided planes, pilots (sometime himself) and other logistics like fuel and presumably insurances of some sort. If he was a simple pilot who organised and paid for fuel? The pilot did not. The person even organised accommodation for the pilot. It was a logistics business either on his own or with employed staff.
He took payment for this organisation work. He had used the late pilot before and possibly other pilots and certainly other planes like the one he flew Cardiff city staff in. He flew 3 Cardiff city staff including football celebrities out to France on a scouting mission. If you think they had no insurance protection you can believe it if you want to. I do not believe it personally. |
Henderson was a pilot, he did not have any such aviation firm. You made it up after it emerged he was a “businessman”.
He was a member of three Facebook groups who advertise odd jobs for pilots, including ferrying skydivers to jump sites. He used to acquire jobs there and also claim them to give to others for a cut of the fee.
This is also how he found Ibbotson to pass his job off to for a cut of the fee, as he did regularly.
Henderson did not have a FCP (Foreign Carrier Permit) so is impossible to have any insurance as it was an American plane. You seem to think insurance companies pay out due to the goodness of their own heart. The fact is, ANY discrepancy in the accident renders it useless.
But if you think someone looking for odd jobs on Facebook without an FCP has insurance to cover footballers transfer fees who crashed in an American plane with an unqualified pilot - then all power to you.
However Cardiff rightly don’t seem to think so considering their avenue of legal action seems to be a rather spurious complaint that a subsidiary of Lloyds didn’t inform them they had to insure him.
Take your medicine on this one champ, you aren’t discussing the Trust now. [Post edited 9 Dec 2022 20:15]
| |
| |
| Sala on 22:01 - Dec 9 with 1507 views | ReslovenSwan1 |
| Sala on 19:47 - Dec 9 by Dr_Parnassus |
Henderson was a pilot, he did not have any such aviation firm. You made it up after it emerged he was a “businessman”.
He was a member of three Facebook groups who advertise odd jobs for pilots, including ferrying skydivers to jump sites. He used to acquire jobs there and also claim them to give to others for a cut of the fee.
This is also how he found Ibbotson to pass his job off to for a cut of the fee, as he did regularly.
Henderson did not have a FCP (Foreign Carrier Permit) so is impossible to have any insurance as it was an American plane. You seem to think insurance companies pay out due to the goodness of their own heart. The fact is, ANY discrepancy in the accident renders it useless.
But if you think someone looking for odd jobs on Facebook without an FCP has insurance to cover footballers transfer fees who crashed in an American plane with an unqualified pilot - then all power to you.
However Cardiff rightly don’t seem to think so considering their avenue of legal action seems to be a rather spurious complaint that a subsidiary of Lloyds didn’t inform them they had to insure him.
Take your medicine on this one champ, you aren’t discussing the Trust now. [Post edited 9 Dec 2022 20:15]
|
Yes I noticed you kept your nose clean on Trust debates with POY votes in the offing. The object is to be 'everyone's friend' and pick up those votes and nominations. No one ever got on suggesting Cardiff city may have been hard done by, or the Trust were poorly run. SCFC2 was like that lorded over by forum grandees. We have one or to on here with toxic narratives who will dish out threats if their feathers are ruffled too much.
We have simply put two different models. Your speculation and my speculation. I speculate not make things up. You picked that little spin from 'The Chief'. (Not willing to show up on here any more after those gruelling jousts).
a) Henderson was a odd jobbing facebooker getting casual gigs and getting minimal rewards for quite a lot of work . Not having a company would have opened him up for 40% tax on his income. Perhaps his business was tiny. Flying football VIPs around with no insurance cover. Possible but unlikely.
b) Henderson had a mature business model with his own aviation and logistic firm chartering aeroplanes and pilots for last minute short haul jobs through his business sourcing plane pilots fuel and insurance. Getting a decent reputation with his contacts.
The forum readership can believe either model. [Post edited 9 Dec 2022 22:15]
| |
| |
Login to get fewer ads
| Sala on 22:58 - Dec 9 with 1486 views | Boundy |
Cardiff City FC Sues Broker For £10M Over Player's Death
By Alex Baldwin
Law360, London (December 8, 2022, 10:48 PM GMT)
Cardiff City Football Club Ltd. has sued insurance broker Miller Insurance Services LLP claiming it owes more than £10 million ($12.2 million) over the death of Emiliano Sala, a player who was set to transfer to the club but died in a plane crash en route.
The football club said the insurance broker failed to communicate that not timely informing it of new players to be added to the club's policy would risk it not having coverage for those players, according to a High Court claim filed Nov. 21, which has now been made public
Cardiff City, which is known as the Bluebirds, plays in the second-tier of English soccer despite being based in the Welsh capital. It noted there was a "material delay" between acquiring an "insurable interest" in players and notifying the broker on "numerous occasions," according to the claim.
It was the broker's responsibility to communicate that this would mean the club would not be insured for a player's death until its policy was amended, the soccer club said. If it had known this, Cardiff City would have requested £20 million coverage for Sala on Jan. 19, 2019, two days before the fatal plane crash.
As such, the insurance broker failed to act with reasonable skill and care and breached its obligations as a broker, according to the claim.
Miller Insurance failed to properly explain the concept of an "insurable interest" for football player transfers and the requirement of a "prompt" notification of the transfer in order to secure coverage, the football club said.
The broker also did not let the Bluebirds know about the risks of delaying this notification of an interest, or the steps that might be taken to reduce or eliminate the risks, according to the Welsh club.
As such, the insurance broker failed to act with reasonable skill and care and breached its obligations as a broker, according to the claim.
Miller Insurance failed to properly explain the concept of an "insurable interest" for football player transfers and the requirement of a "prompt" notification of the transfer in order to secure coverage, the football club said.
The broker also did not let the Bluebirds know about the risks of delaying this notification of an interest, or the steps that might be taken to reduce or eliminate the risks, according to the Welsh club.
The club said Miller Insurance Services LLP should pay more than £10 million for its failure to act with the reasonable skill and care expected of an insurance broker.
Representatives for the Welsh soccer club and Millers Insurance Services did not immediately respond to requests for comment Thursday.
Cardiff City Football Club is represented by David Phillips KC of Wilberforce Chambers and Tom Cleaver of Blackstone Chambers, instructed by Céline Jones of Capital Law Ltd.
Millers Insurance is represented by CMS Cameron McKenna Nabarro Olswang LLP.
The case is Cardiff City Football Club Ltd. v. Miller Insurance Services LLP, case number CL-2022-000604, in the High Court of Justice of England and Wales | |
| "In a free society, the State is the servant of the people—not the master." |
| |
| Sala on 23:29 - Dec 9 with 1476 views | max936 |
| Sala on 22:58 - Dec 9 by Boundy |
Cardiff City FC Sues Broker For £10M Over Player's Death
By Alex Baldwin
Law360, London (December 8, 2022, 10:48 PM GMT)
Cardiff City Football Club Ltd. has sued insurance broker Miller Insurance Services LLP claiming it owes more than £10 million ($12.2 million) over the death of Emiliano Sala, a player who was set to transfer to the club but died in a plane crash en route.
The football club said the insurance broker failed to communicate that not timely informing it of new players to be added to the club's policy would risk it not having coverage for those players, according to a High Court claim filed Nov. 21, which has now been made public
Cardiff City, which is known as the Bluebirds, plays in the second-tier of English soccer despite being based in the Welsh capital. It noted there was a "material delay" between acquiring an "insurable interest" in players and notifying the broker on "numerous occasions," according to the claim.
It was the broker's responsibility to communicate that this would mean the club would not be insured for a player's death until its policy was amended, the soccer club said. If it had known this, Cardiff City would have requested £20 million coverage for Sala on Jan. 19, 2019, two days before the fatal plane crash.
As such, the insurance broker failed to act with reasonable skill and care and breached its obligations as a broker, according to the claim.
Miller Insurance failed to properly explain the concept of an "insurable interest" for football player transfers and the requirement of a "prompt" notification of the transfer in order to secure coverage, the football club said.
The broker also did not let the Bluebirds know about the risks of delaying this notification of an interest, or the steps that might be taken to reduce or eliminate the risks, according to the Welsh club.
As such, the insurance broker failed to act with reasonable skill and care and breached its obligations as a broker, according to the claim.
Miller Insurance failed to properly explain the concept of an "insurable interest" for football player transfers and the requirement of a "prompt" notification of the transfer in order to secure coverage, the football club said.
The broker also did not let the Bluebirds know about the risks of delaying this notification of an interest, or the steps that might be taken to reduce or eliminate the risks, according to the Welsh club.
The club said Miller Insurance Services LLP should pay more than £10 million for its failure to act with the reasonable skill and care expected of an insurance broker.
Representatives for the Welsh soccer club and Millers Insurance Services did not immediately respond to requests for comment Thursday.
Cardiff City Football Club is represented by David Phillips KC of Wilberforce Chambers and Tom Cleaver of Blackstone Chambers, instructed by Céline Jones of Capital Law Ltd.
Millers Insurance is represented by CMS Cameron McKenna Nabarro Olswang LLP.
The case is Cardiff City Football Club Ltd. v. Miller Insurance Services LLP, case number CL-2022-000604, in the High Court of Justice of England and Wales |
How can they sue anybody over a player that they have claimed countless times that the player wasn't theirs ? |  |
| |
| Sala on 23:56 - Dec 9 with 1462 views | Dr_Parnassus |
| Sala on 22:01 - Dec 9 by ReslovenSwan1 |
Yes I noticed you kept your nose clean on Trust debates with POY votes in the offing. The object is to be 'everyone's friend' and pick up those votes and nominations. No one ever got on suggesting Cardiff city may have been hard done by, or the Trust were poorly run. SCFC2 was like that lorded over by forum grandees. We have one or to on here with toxic narratives who will dish out threats if their feathers are ruffled too much.
We have simply put two different models. Your speculation and my speculation. I speculate not make things up. You picked that little spin from 'The Chief'. (Not willing to show up on here any more after those gruelling jousts).
a) Henderson was a odd jobbing facebooker getting casual gigs and getting minimal rewards for quite a lot of work . Not having a company would have opened him up for 40% tax on his income. Perhaps his business was tiny. Flying football VIPs around with no insurance cover. Possible but unlikely.
b) Henderson had a mature business model with his own aviation and logistic firm chartering aeroplanes and pilots for last minute short haul jobs through his business sourcing plane pilots fuel and insurance. Getting a decent reputation with his contacts.
The forum readership can believe either model. [Post edited 9 Dec 2022 22:15]
|
So you “speculated” he had an aviation firm now? Where in any of your previous utterings did you suggest it was anything but a fact?
You even said the name of the firm was mentioned in the report. Safe to say you made it up.
As for the Trust, I have been the main voice against them for years, long before you came onto the scene.
I am not speculating at all, I’m telling you for a fact that Cardiff have not launched any legal action against any firm for negligence.
I also told you that Cardiff did not have insurance on him, hence the action they took to not pay. This has been confirmed by them ridiculously suing a company for not informing them they had to (?!).
I am also telling you for a fact that even if he were insured to the eyeballs from every direction - no insurance pays out in such circumstances where policies would obviously be invalidated by the circumstances surrounding it.
You lost this one a while back. [Post edited 10 Dec 2022 0:36]
| |
| |
| Sala on 10:11 - Dec 10 with 1380 views | max936 |
| Sala on 23:56 - Dec 9 by Dr_Parnassus |
So you “speculated” he had an aviation firm now? Where in any of your previous utterings did you suggest it was anything but a fact?
You even said the name of the firm was mentioned in the report. Safe to say you made it up.
As for the Trust, I have been the main voice against them for years, long before you came onto the scene.
I am not speculating at all, I’m telling you for a fact that Cardiff have not launched any legal action against any firm for negligence.
I also told you that Cardiff did not have insurance on him, hence the action they took to not pay. This has been confirmed by them ridiculously suing a company for not informing them they had to (?!).
I am also telling you for a fact that even if he were insured to the eyeballs from every direction - no insurance pays out in such circumstances where policies would obviously be invalidated by the circumstances surrounding it.
You lost this one a while back. [Post edited 10 Dec 2022 0:36]
|
He's suffered so many defeats he should now be put out to grass, in all honesty. | |
| |
| Sala on 11:37 - Dec 10 with 1354 views | Dr_Parnassus |
| Sala on 10:11 - Dec 10 by max936 |
He's suffered so many defeats he should now be put out to grass, in all honesty. |
It’s a very tired schtick now.
He’s looking for his next subject to obsess over now his mate posts elsewhere and that saga is over.
He needs to choose his subjects more wisely though, be more patient. This one has less legs than Oscar Pristorius. | |
| |
| Sala on 18:10 - Dec 10 with 1292 views | ReslovenSwan1 |
| Sala on 10:11 - Dec 10 by max936 |
He's suffered so many defeats he should now be put out to grass, in all honesty. |
I have only speculated that the accident was an insurable event (which it seems it is) and Henderson had a business of some sort. (He had to - to be tax efficient) . I also highlighted the importance of Public indemnity insurance for the forum readership. This protects the policy holder from their mistakes and being sued. I was obliged to have it to work on the railway.
I am not a forum natural where 'point scoring' is the important thing. I am never going to be popular after calling the 1000+ Trust members 'dim' for handing over £400k to London legal people.
I contest certain scenarios and some people do not like it and use well worn forum technique to discredit. | |
| |
| Sala on 19:08 - Dec 10 with 1244 views | Dr_Parnassus |
| Sala on 18:10 - Dec 10 by ReslovenSwan1 |
I have only speculated that the accident was an insurable event (which it seems it is) and Henderson had a business of some sort. (He had to - to be tax efficient) . I also highlighted the importance of Public indemnity insurance for the forum readership. This protects the policy holder from their mistakes and being sued. I was obliged to have it to work on the railway.
I am not a forum natural where 'point scoring' is the important thing. I am never going to be popular after calling the 1000+ Trust members 'dim' for handing over £400k to London legal people.
I contest certain scenarios and some people do not like it and use well worn forum technique to discredit. |
What makes you think people don’t like it?
Having someone make up nonsense for me to tear apart is pretty fun. | |
| |
| Sala on 19:22 - Dec 10 with 1239 views | Catullus |
| Sala on 17:00 - Dec 9 by ReslovenSwan1 |
I draw you attention to public indemnity insurance. I was obliged to have if I worked on the railways for example. With Public liability insurance it cost going on £600 per year. Not cheap.
This is from google.
"Professional indemnity insurance protects you against claims for loss or damage made by clients or third parties as a result of the impact of negligent services you provided or negligent advice you offered. Compensation claims can be brought against you even if you provided a service or offered advice for free".
I like to believe authorised aviation firms or pilots would be obliged to have this sort of policy to cover the costs of the people and property their plane accidentally lands on. The innocent parties. |
Which will still have clauses and conditions that would render it invalid.
Anyway, it's a moot point now because despite all your ludicrous claims, Cardiff City's legal action against their broker proves beyond doubt there was no insurance.
Doesn't that make all their claims and court cases frivolous because they accept he was ther player?
Are Cardiff really admitting they are that stupid that they didn't think to insure their new player? They are claiming they needed to be told it should be done, it makes them look a laughing stock to be honest. I didnt think they had any straws left to grasp. | |
| |
| Sala on 19:47 - Dec 10 with 1214 views | Dr_Parnassus |
| Sala on 19:22 - Dec 10 by Catullus |
Which will still have clauses and conditions that would render it invalid.
Anyway, it's a moot point now because despite all your ludicrous claims, Cardiff City's legal action against their broker proves beyond doubt there was no insurance.
Doesn't that make all their claims and court cases frivolous because they accept he was ther player?
Are Cardiff really admitting they are that stupid that they didn't think to insure their new player? They are claiming they needed to be told it should be done, it makes them look a laughing stock to be honest. I didnt think they had any straws left to grasp. |
Despite Vincent Tan being an insurance clerk in a former life.
Pleading ignorance and blaming someone for not telling them is hilarious. | |
| |
| Sala on 20:16 - Dec 10 with 1194 views | Catullus |
| Sala on 22:01 - Dec 9 by ReslovenSwan1 |
Yes I noticed you kept your nose clean on Trust debates with POY votes in the offing. The object is to be 'everyone's friend' and pick up those votes and nominations. No one ever got on suggesting Cardiff city may have been hard done by, or the Trust were poorly run. SCFC2 was like that lorded over by forum grandees. We have one or to on here with toxic narratives who will dish out threats if their feathers are ruffled too much.
We have simply put two different models. Your speculation and my speculation. I speculate not make things up. You picked that little spin from 'The Chief'. (Not willing to show up on here any more after those gruelling jousts).
a) Henderson was a odd jobbing facebooker getting casual gigs and getting minimal rewards for quite a lot of work . Not having a company would have opened him up for 40% tax on his income. Perhaps his business was tiny. Flying football VIPs around with no insurance cover. Possible but unlikely.
b) Henderson had a mature business model with his own aviation and logistic firm chartering aeroplanes and pilots for last minute short haul jobs through his business sourcing plane pilots fuel and insurance. Getting a decent reputation with his contacts.
The forum readership can believe either model. [Post edited 9 Dec 2022 22:15]
|
he ran a cowboy outfit,
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-wales-59251852
it blows your "model" out of the water. | |
| |
| Sala on 20:24 - Dec 10 with 1184 views | Catullus |
| Sala on 18:10 - Dec 10 by ReslovenSwan1 |
I have only speculated that the accident was an insurable event (which it seems it is) and Henderson had a business of some sort. (He had to - to be tax efficient) . I also highlighted the importance of Public indemnity insurance for the forum readership. This protects the policy holder from their mistakes and being sued. I was obliged to have it to work on the railway.
I am not a forum natural where 'point scoring' is the important thing. I am never going to be popular after calling the 1000+ Trust members 'dim' for handing over £400k to London legal people.
I contest certain scenarios and some people do not like it and use well worn forum technique to discredit. |
You haven't speculated though, you have insisted there must have been insurance.
You don't insure acidents, you insure against them but to repeat the point from a slightly different tangent, get in your car and drive it illegally (no MOT, no licence) and try claiming on insurance.
There arent 1000 trust members on here and the members didn't hand the money over and then blow the case, that was the trust board.
That well worn technique would be presenting facts that prove what you are saying here is wrong. it's not to discredit, or it wasn't until you kept on with your own version ad nauseum. | |
| |
| Sala on 11:09 - Sep 16 with 783 views | bennytheblue |
| Sala on 09:02 - Dec 3 by pencoedjack |
Let’s hope they go bust. |
Because you lot were a tad more obsessed than usual on this subject, surprised none of you have posted the news that came out last night…..
https://www.ccmb.co.uk/showthread.php?458913-Club-Statement-on-Insurance-Claim
Insurers have paid out pending the case, apparently they told the club any player was “automatically” covered on signing, however this wasn’t the case, so they were shafted.
Why it takes 4/5 yrs of embarrassing nonsense I don’t know. |  | | |
| Sala on 11:10 - Sep 16 with 781 views | bennytheblue |
| Sala on 11:09 - Sep 16 by bennytheblue |
Because you lot were a tad more obsessed than usual on this subject, surprised none of you have posted the news that came out last night…..
https://www.ccmb.co.uk/showthread.php?458913-Club-Statement-on-Insurance-Claim
Insurers have paid out pending the case, apparently they told the club any player was “automatically” covered on signing, however this wasn’t the case, so they were shafted.
Why it takes 4/5 yrs of embarrassing nonsense I don’t know. |
Looking back at this thread, what the hell happened to the loon dr p? Jail? Or is he Rhonddaswan? | | | |
| Sala on 11:20 - Sep 16 with 764 views | JACKMANANDBOY |
| Sala on 11:09 - Sep 16 by bennytheblue |
Because you lot were a tad more obsessed than usual on this subject, surprised none of you have posted the news that came out last night…..
https://www.ccmb.co.uk/showthread.php?458913-Club-Statement-on-Insurance-Claim
Insurers have paid out pending the case, apparently they told the club any player was “automatically” covered on signing, however this wasn’t the case, so they were shafted.
Why it takes 4/5 yrs of embarrassing nonsense I don’t know. |
Insurers settling out of court for a reduced sum not unusual to avoid the risk of a court case. | |
| |
| Sala on 12:07 - Sep 16 with 715 views | bennytheblue |
| Sala on 11:20 - Sep 16 by JACKMANANDBOY |
Insurers settling out of court for a reduced sum not unusual to avoid the risk of a court case. |
Quite a large sum if rumours are to be believed…… | | | |
| Sala on 13:05 - Sep 16 with 654 views | ReslovenSwan1 |
| Sala on 12:07 - Sep 16 by bennytheblue |
Quite a large sum if rumours are to be believed…… |
Perhaps the insurers had insurance themselves. I have a lot of faith in British insurance. The principle is people who do nothing wrong should not be penalised for the bad actions of others.
I was staggered CCFC had no insurance and it seems the insurer was in part at least at fault. This was very poor by them.
Disasters occur when several things all go wrong at once. Almost no one in the affair come out looking good. In my opinion that includes Nantes FC and their agent.
Dr P said the affair was over. He was wrong. [Post edited 16 Sep 2023 13:07]
| |
| |
| Sala on 13:11 - Sep 16 with 645 views | ReslovenSwan1 |
| Sala on 11:10 - Sep 16 by bennytheblue |
Looking back at this thread, what the hell happened to the loon dr p? Jail? Or is he Rhonddaswan? |
Completely different characters.
I reinvented myself on another forum and was outed and identified and banned immediately for matters relating to w you know what. This is an anagram STURT. | |
| |
| |
By continuing to use the site, you agree to our use of cookies and to abide by our Terms and Conditions.
