| Hugill 08:20 - Oct 8 with 9875 views | RblockPrior |
Read a few bits and pieces this morning which says that West Ham are hoping to sell Hugill this January, surely with our year loan agreement that can't happen? Or at least the club buying him can't have him until the end of the season?
|  |
| |  |
| Hugill on 08:53 - Oct 8 with 6915 views | dubaistu |
I'd hope we have a first choice offer for Hugill and with Wells also out of contract at the end of the season it's the same for him also. |  | | |
| Hugill on 09:00 - Oct 8 with 6887 views | runningman75 |
I presume as West Ham own Hugill if someone comes in with a reasonable offer for him in January 2020 they will be able to sell. I would rather depending on circumstances we could sign Wells out of contract next season though I presume wages will be a stumbling block. |  | | |
| Hugill on 09:04 - Oct 8 with 6878 views | ozexile |
We should sit this one out for once. There's no way West ham will get a fee for him. | | | |
| Hugill on 09:27 - Oct 8 with 6826 views | loftus77 |
Rblock - I hope that's right, I'm not sure.
If West Ham were to sell him in January, I'd have thought we'd keep him on loan until May, as per the loan agreement, which would be transferred to his new club. But as he's West Ham's asset to sell I'm not sure what power we'd have if the 2 parent clubs agreed that he'd go to his new club in Jan and simply cancelled the loan. | | | |
| Hugill on 09:45 - Oct 8 with 6778 views | Northernr |
You can recall a season long loan at the halfway point if you want. |  | | |
| Hugill on 10:02 - Oct 8 with 6729 views | Esox_Lucius |
IIRC we had Kyle Walker on a season long loan but he was recalled and sent to Villa as Spuds wanted one of their players and he was used to sweeten the deal. |  |
| The grass is always greener. |
| |
| Hugill on 10:11 - Oct 8 with 6690 views | Antti_Heinola |
| Hugill on 10:02 - Oct 8 by Esox_Lucius |
IIRC we had Kyle Walker on a season long loan but he was recalled and sent to Villa as Spuds wanted one of their players and he was used to sweeten the deal. |
don't think that was a season long deal was it? thought we wanted to extend?
just checked - yes. one month deal, that was extended to Jan.
http://news.bbc.co.uk/sport1/hi/football/teams/q/qpr/9093535.stm
Still, Clive's right, if west ham get a bid he could be sold from under us. Assuming he wants to go i guess. |  |
| |
Login to get fewer ads
| Hugill on 10:14 - Oct 8 with 6681 views | francisbowles |
Was there a situation, a few years back, where we couldn't recall a loan because we hadn't included a call back option? | | | |
| Hugill on 10:45 - Oct 8 with 6566 views | enfieldargh |
Fella I met in the cafe was insistent that all squad players are on 2.5k/week except Wells and that West Ham pay all Hugills wages.
I said Eze is on more than that surely, NO was his reply.
He was adamant!!!
Adam adamant even |  |
| |
| Hugill on 10:47 - Oct 8 with 6558 views | nick_hammersmith |
| Hugill on 10:02 - Oct 8 by Esox_Lucius |
IIRC we had Kyle Walker on a season long loan but he was recalled and sent to Villa as Spuds wanted one of their players and he was used to sweeten the deal. |
I remember hearing at the time we could have signed him for 2.5m
What a deal that would have been! |  | | |
| Hugill on 10:47 - Oct 8 with 6557 views | Ned_Kennedys |
| Hugill on 09:04 - Oct 8 by ozexile |
We should sit this one out for once. There's no way West ham will get a fee for him. |
Of course they will get a fee for him: not the £10m they paid but probably about half of that.
Can see the likes of Forest or Leeds being interested if he keeps scoring: never a bad idea to top up the amount of forwards you have for the second half of the season if you are seriously involved in the promotion race. |  | | |
| Hugill on 10:57 - Oct 8 with 6511 views | Watford_Ranger |
| Hugill on 10:45 - Oct 8 by enfieldargh |
Fella I met in the cafe was insistent that all squad players are on 2.5k/week except Wells and that West Ham pay all Hugills wages.
I said Eze is on more than that surely, NO was his reply.
He was adamant!!!
Adam adamant even |
I’d have £2.5k on him talking bollocks. Cameron wouldn’t get out of bed for that for a start. | | | |
| Hugill on 10:59 - Oct 8 with 6507 views | WestbourneR |
| Hugill on 10:45 - Oct 8 by enfieldargh |
Fella I met in the cafe was insistent that all squad players are on 2.5k/week except Wells and that West Ham pay all Hugills wages.
I said Eze is on more than that surely, NO was his reply.
He was adamant!!!
Adam adamant even |
This is laughable. A whole raft of our players are on considerably more than £2.5K a week. |  |
| |
| Hugill on 10:59 - Oct 8 with 6504 views | Mick_S |
| Hugill on 10:45 - Oct 8 by enfieldargh |
Fella I met in the cafe was insistent that all squad players are on 2.5k/week except Wells and that West Ham pay all Hugills wages.
I said Eze is on more than that surely, NO was his reply.
He was adamant!!!
Adam adamant even |
Remember:
Don't tread on an ant he's done nothing to you
There might come a day when he's treading on you
Don't tread on an ant you'll end up black and blue
You cut off his head, legs come looking for you. |  |
| Did I ever mention that I was in Minder? |
| |
| Hugill on 11:06 - Oct 8 with 6479 views | Antti_Heinola |
| Hugill on 10:59 - Oct 8 by WestbourneR |
This is laughable. A whole raft of our players are on considerably more than £2.5K a week. |
Spot on. As laughable as the other rumour that Leistner is on 25k p/w. No one knows except the players, their agents and key people at the club. Makes me laugh stuff like this. | |
| |
| Hugill on 11:26 - Oct 8 with 6424 views | LunarJetman |
"no option to recall him from his loan until January next year."
Worth noting that there are conflicting views on this so the actual truth seems to be far from clear.. [Post edited 8 Oct 2019 11:28]
|  | | |
| Hugill on 11:50 - Oct 8 with 6374 views | LazyFan |
He can be recalled in Jan, at which point they can sell him to the highest bidder.
His wages must be high, Wet Spam will know it is far higher than QPR can ever afford. Therefore they know we shall never buy him.
Thus whiles hes on form, Wet Spam will see if someone else will take a punt on him and his high wages. So, they put it about he's available as they clearly do not fancy him and would prefer to get a fee and his full wages off the books.
Also, this probably means we are not paying all or even a large part of his wages, hence their desire to get rid. Unless he starts scoring every game from here to Jan, I suspect that no one will pay it and we shall have him for the rest of the year.
I am more worried some other club comes in for Wells. As not only is he on form goal scoring-wise, but he also seems to have a great pass on him. This for me puts him ahead of Hugnill and he is probably cheaper on wages and fee.
Wells is the real risk.
zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz |  |
| |
| Hugill on 12:58 - Oct 8 with 6195 views | BrianMcCarthy |
| Hugill on 11:50 - Oct 8 by LazyFan |
He can be recalled in Jan, at which point they can sell him to the highest bidder.
His wages must be high, Wet Spam will know it is far higher than QPR can ever afford. Therefore they know we shall never buy him.
Thus whiles hes on form, Wet Spam will see if someone else will take a punt on him and his high wages. So, they put it about he's available as they clearly do not fancy him and would prefer to get a fee and his full wages off the books.
Also, this probably means we are not paying all or even a large part of his wages, hence their desire to get rid. Unless he starts scoring every game from here to Jan, I suspect that no one will pay it and we shall have him for the rest of the year.
I am more worried some other club comes in for Wells. As not only is he on form goal scoring-wise, but he also seems to have a great pass on him. This for me puts him ahead of Hugnill and he is probably cheaper on wages and fee.
Wells is the real risk.
zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz |
Sorry, Lazyfan.
Your post seems at odds with Sean Gallagher's tweet.
Is it that you think he's saying that there is no recall until January, or that you think he's saying no recall all season but that he's mistaken? |  |
| |
| Hugill on 13:03 - Oct 8 with 6169 views | smegma |
| Hugill on 10:45 - Oct 8 by enfieldargh |
Fella I met in the cafe was insistent that all squad players are on 2.5k/week except Wells and that West Ham pay all Hugills wages.
I said Eze is on more than that surely, NO was his reply.
He was adamant!!!
Adam adamant even |
Bloke in the cafe ???
Must be true then. | | | |
| Hugill on 13:05 - Oct 8 with 6140 views | Ned_Kennedys |
| Hugill on 13:03 - Oct 8 by smegma |
Bloke in the cafe ???
Must be true then. |
Depends which café really.
Nailed on true if it was a Café Rouge. | | | |
| Hugill on 13:05 - Oct 8 with 6139 views | TacticalR |
| Hugill on 13:03 - Oct 8 by smegma |
Bloke in the cafe ???
Must be true then. |
Say no more squire. |  |
| |
| |
By continuing to use the site, you agree to our use of cookies and to abide by our Terms and Conditions.
