| Posts Being Deleted Again 18:50 - Jun 5 with 7625 views | Spratty |
Phil can you tell my why your oppo is deleting my posts again please
This post has been edited by an administrator |  | | |  |
| Posts Being Deleted Again on 11:13 - Jun 6 with 1571 views | Spratty |
Bump - Phil could you respond please?
I submitted a light hearted homage to those sympathetic and tolerant posters who have never taken their eyes off their children for 1 second until they were 18. (“Madeline macan” thread).
It asked if Huw should be prosecuted if he let Wenger take Bony (it did mention whilst his attention was drawn gazing doe eyed at his new bootroom prospect — perhaps that is what enraged “the computer”)
It was made approx 17:17 I would say and appeared in the position where Baker’s subsequent post now resides.
I immediately realised I had put AV for Wenger so changed it to AW and saw it with the edit (1 minute later than the post) and noticed that 2 people had already viewed it (so quickly that the omnipresent Daily Huw had not got round to down arrowing it yet).
A couple of hours later I noticed it had gone. Given it was stored on the database and displayed, edited, redisplayed and also viewed by at least 1 other; then it has either been deleted, moved or put into a non-display status. All of which equate to deleting my post from the form (yet again).
Please explain. Also interested that the OP in this thread has been edited by an admin. | | | |
| Posts Being Deleted Again on 11:28 - Jun 6 with 1563 views | Spratty |
| Posts Being Deleted Again on 19:00 - Jun 5 by Darran |
He's a tw*t,he also wanted the club to lose if Laudrup had taken us to court over unfair dismissal. |
Dear me still can not get what I said right (even after editing what I was supposed to have said in the other thread).
Why did you say I did not say "I hope fairness prevails" (when I did and provided the post) - such lies Darran
I never mentioned win or lose (as you have now changed it to)
There are certainly no winners in that sorry debacle
Move on from Laudrup Darran, why do you keep bringing him up?
Tiny obsession maybe? | | | |
| Posts Being Deleted Again on 11:42 - Jun 6 with 1551 views | Darran |
| Posts Being Deleted Again on 11:28 - Jun 6 by Spratty |
Dear me still can not get what I said right (even after editing what I was supposed to have said in the other thread).
Why did you say I did not say "I hope fairness prevails" (when I did and provided the post) - such lies Darran
I never mentioned win or lose (as you have now changed it to)
There are certainly no winners in that sorry debacle
Move on from Laudrup Darran, why do you keep bringing him up?
Tiny obsession maybe? |
You stated on this site that if Laudrup had been shafted you'd be supporting him in a court case.
Uxbridge then told you that no true Swans fan would want that regardless of what had happened. |  |
| |
| Posts Being Deleted Again on 11:52 - Jun 6 with 1546 views | JackSomething |
Why don't both Spratty and Darran make a vow never to mention Laudrup again on this site?
We can then see who breaks first and who is really obsessed. [Post edited 6 Jun 2014 11:52]
|  |
| You know, Hobbes, some days even my lucky rocket ship underpants don't help. |
| |
| Posts Being Deleted Again on 11:55 - Jun 6 with 1535 views | Darran |
| Posts Being Deleted Again on 11:52 - Jun 6 by JackSomething |
Why don't both Spratty and Darran make a vow never to mention Laudrup again on this site?
We can then see who breaks first and who is really obsessed. [Post edited 6 Jun 2014 11:52]
|
Good idea or any reference to it. | |
| |
| Posts Being Deleted Again on 12:16 - Jun 6 with 1523 views | Spratty |
| Posts Being Deleted Again on 11:42 - Jun 6 by Darran |
You stated on this site that if Laudrup had been shafted you'd be supporting him in a court case.
Uxbridge then told you that no true Swans fan would want that regardless of what had happened. |
"court case" - still wrong
Also in answer to your original divisive question, I covered 2 scenarios - the club shafting him and him shafting the club
In fact covered the second scenario in more lurid detail
Tell you what Darran why don't you pick out each letter of the alphabet I use and rearrange them in any order - Oops too late you already did
Now where is that post you deleted? | | | |
| Posts Being Deleted Again on 12:26 - Jun 6 with 1517 views | Darran |
| Posts Being Deleted Again on 12:16 - Jun 6 by Spratty |
"court case" - still wrong
Also in answer to your original divisive question, I covered 2 scenarios - the club shafting him and him shafting the club
In fact covered the second scenario in more lurid detail
Tell you what Darran why don't you pick out each letter of the alphabet I use and rearrange them in any order - Oops too late you already did
Now where is that post you deleted? |
You did cover 2 scenarios and one of them stated if Laudrup had been wronged you wanted the club,our club to lose. | |
| |
Login to get fewer ads
| Posts Being Deleted Again on 13:18 - Jun 6 with 1489 views | pansypants |
Best thread ever....8 pager!! |  |
| |
| Posts Being Deleted Again on 13:29 - Jun 6 with 1482 views | Spratty |
| Posts Being Deleted Again on 12:26 - Jun 6 by Darran |
You did cover 2 scenarios and one of them stated if Laudrup had been wronged you wanted the club,our club to lose. |
No I did not mention our club losing - but please feel free to prove me wrong with the non existent evidence. Our club has already lost by the nature of the sacking.
I would have thought saying "I sincerely hope fairness prevails" as being clear enough.
I am happy with that and you have avoided my question - do you think fairness a bad thing or is it fair enough.
If you think it OK for the club representatives to cheat someone, or someone to cheat the club that is your opinion - however I would suggest not a very ethical one, and one that would quickly change if for e.g. it was say your child being cheated by our club.
If representatives of our club behave in an unethical manner, not supporting such behaviour I would posit is actually supporting our club as per a decade or so ago
Now where is my post that has been removed from the forum. | | | |
| Posts Being Deleted Again on 13:34 - Jun 6 with 1476 views | JackSomething |
| Posts Being Deleted Again on 13:29 - Jun 6 by Spratty |
No I did not mention our club losing - but please feel free to prove me wrong with the non existent evidence. Our club has already lost by the nature of the sacking.
I would have thought saying "I sincerely hope fairness prevails" as being clear enough.
I am happy with that and you have avoided my question - do you think fairness a bad thing or is it fair enough.
If you think it OK for the club representatives to cheat someone, or someone to cheat the club that is your opinion - however I would suggest not a very ethical one, and one that would quickly change if for e.g. it was say your child being cheated by our club.
If representatives of our club behave in an unethical manner, not supporting such behaviour I would posit is actually supporting our club as per a decade or so ago
Now where is my post that has been removed from the forum. |
It's happened. I knew it was only a matter of time.
Spratty has taken the step of comparing the board's decision to sack Laudrup to Petty's handling of the club.
Bravo. | |
| You know, Hobbes, some days even my lucky rocket ship underpants don't help. |
| |
| Posts Being Deleted Again on 13:40 - Jun 6 with 1468 views | Darran |
| Posts Being Deleted Again on 13:29 - Jun 6 by Spratty |
No I did not mention our club losing - but please feel free to prove me wrong with the non existent evidence. Our club has already lost by the nature of the sacking.
I would have thought saying "I sincerely hope fairness prevails" as being clear enough.
I am happy with that and you have avoided my question - do you think fairness a bad thing or is it fair enough.
If you think it OK for the club representatives to cheat someone, or someone to cheat the club that is your opinion - however I would suggest not a very ethical one, and one that would quickly change if for e.g. it was say your child being cheated by our club.
If representatives of our club behave in an unethical manner, not supporting such behaviour I would posit is actually supporting our club as per a decade or so ago
Now where is my post that has been removed from the forum. |
You stated that your support would be going to Laudrup if he'd been wronged. FACT | |
| |
| Posts Being Deleted Again on 14:22 - Jun 6 with 1438 views | Spratty |
| Posts Being Deleted Again on 13:34 - Jun 6 by JackSomething |
It's happened. I knew it was only a matter of time.
Spratty has taken the step of comparing the board's decision to sack Laudrup to Petty's handling of the club.
Bravo. |
Actually raised this long ago when people (many ironically involved in the Petty situation) got very prissy at others (not me) even questioning the Board.
Secondly the decision to sack Laudrup is a matter of opinion - of more concern is the timing, what lead to it, the involvement of others and very importantly they way in which it was done. Then there is the question of the recruitment of the best possible replacement for our club by fair and open competition.
Thirdly the only comparison I am making is that any potential unethical behaviour by our Board should be subject to question. This is a priniciple not a comparison of situation, intent or degree. I see our club as a larger entity than the sum of its employees or shareholders. This does not negate the praise for their considerable achievements but neither are these protection against proper accountability. | | | |
| Posts Being Deleted Again on 14:30 - Jun 6 with 1424 views | JackSomething |
| Posts Being Deleted Again on 14:22 - Jun 6 by Spratty |
Actually raised this long ago when people (many ironically involved in the Petty situation) got very prissy at others (not me) even questioning the Board.
Secondly the decision to sack Laudrup is a matter of opinion - of more concern is the timing, what lead to it, the involvement of others and very importantly they way in which it was done. Then there is the question of the recruitment of the best possible replacement for our club by fair and open competition.
Thirdly the only comparison I am making is that any potential unethical behaviour by our Board should be subject to question. This is a priniciple not a comparison of situation, intent or degree. I see our club as a larger entity than the sum of its employees or shareholders. This does not negate the praise for their considerable achievements but neither are these protection against proper accountability. |
To be fair, if I ignore your many other posts on this subject and take this post solely on it's own merits, it deserves a 'Good Post' from me. Whatever that is worth.
Well done on managing to link Petty and the current board without sounding like a complete pr*ck. I'd have thought that would be quite difficult to achieve. | |
| You know, Hobbes, some days even my lucky rocket ship underpants don't help. |
| |
| Posts Being Deleted Again on 14:31 - Jun 6 with 1423 views | Spratty |
| Posts Being Deleted Again on 13:40 - Jun 6 by Darran |
You stated that your support would be going to Laudrup if he'd been wronged. FACT |
Almost Darran - actually shafted was the word when you seemed to have difficulty interpreting my comment "I sincerely hope fairness prevails" which you said meant I supported Laudrup.
Just as I said in the reverse situation I would applaud Huw for having the guts to kick his famous ass up the road.
Fairness seems to be an issue you have difficulty with, just as answering questions related to it as posed in my previous post and studiously ignored by you. Lets be clear if the Board behave unethically they will not have my support for such behaviour (which brings our club into disrepute). I understand ethics may be a difficult concept for you.
Now where is my post that has been removed from the website? | | | |
| Posts Being Deleted Again on 14:37 - Jun 6 with 1340 views | Darran |
| Posts Being Deleted Again on 14:31 - Jun 6 by Spratty |
Almost Darran - actually shafted was the word when you seemed to have difficulty interpreting my comment "I sincerely hope fairness prevails" which you said meant I supported Laudrup.
Just as I said in the reverse situation I would applaud Huw for having the guts to kick his famous ass up the road.
Fairness seems to be an issue you have difficulty with, just as answering questions related to it as posed in my previous post and studiously ignored by you. Lets be clear if the Board behave unethically they will not have my support for such behaviour (which brings our club into disrepute). I understand ethics may be a difficult concept for you.
Now where is my post that has been removed from the website? |
Yes and I'm sure you stated that if Laudrup was shafted you were supporting him and not the club. | |
| |
| Posts Being Deleted Again on 14:41 - Jun 6 with 1327 views | Darran |
| Posts Being Deleted Again on 14:37 - Jun 6 by Darran |
Yes and I'm sure you stated that if Laudrup was shafted you were supporting him and not the club. |
Oh and if you didn't say it I'll have to concede and offer an apology.
I might even have to resign as a mod. | |
| |
| Posts Being Deleted Again on 15:05 - Jun 6 with 1306 views | Neath_Jack |
| Posts Being Deleted Again on 11:19 - Jun 6 by Spratty |
Thanks JB for sending me your drawing, you look very nice in it
normally save the tin foil for wrapping the tangerines at Christmas myself - but this is very imaginative - well done
how is nursery school btw |
I'm sure JB was being ironic as he's nuttier than squirrel sh1t. I think he'd give Lord Bony a run for his money lately. [Post edited 6 Jun 2014 15:31]
|  |
| |
| Posts Being Deleted Again on 19:03 - Jun 6 with 1251 views | Spratty |
| Posts Being Deleted Again on 14:41 - Jun 6 by Darran |
Oh and if you didn't say it I'll have to concede and offer an apology.
I might even have to resign as a mod. |
Whoopy do - still not correct 
Seriously Darran offer an apology - you ok pet lamb
On another matter thanks for the tip off for the Eagles Concert some time back - it was excellent - Joe Walsh was Brilliant | | | |
| Posts Being Deleted Again on 19:07 - Jun 6 with 1245 views | JackoBoostardo |
| Posts Being Deleted Again on 11:19 - Jun 6 by Spratty |
Thanks JB for sending me your drawing, you look very nice in it
normally save the tin foil for wrapping the tangerines at Christmas myself - but this is very imaginative - well done
how is nursery school btw |
Taken from your collection - it was taken before you were abducted by aliens, probed anally and had your memory wiped - so you're welcome.
Thanks also for the compliments on my imagination. Nursery school is freaking awesome by the way.
XXX |  |
| |
| Posts Being Deleted Again on 19:12 - Jun 6 with 1240 views | Spratty |
| Posts Being Deleted Again on 19:07 - Jun 6 by JackoBoostardo |
Taken from your collection - it was taken before you were abducted by aliens, probed anally and had your memory wiped - so you're welcome.
Thanks also for the compliments on my imagination. Nursery school is freaking awesome by the way.
XXX |
 and I thought the pain in my arse was you
Yep I loved nursery school too especially those little brown wooden logs in the sandpit - very tastey | | | |
| Posts Being Deleted Again on 19:12 - Jun 6 with 1240 views | Darran |
| Posts Being Deleted Again on 19:03 - Jun 6 by Spratty |
Whoopy do - still not correct
Seriously Darran offer an apology - you ok pet lamb
On another matter thanks for the tip off for the Eagles Concert some time back - it was excellent - Joe Walsh was Brilliant |
So you did say it then or is my memory playing tricks? | |
| |
| Posts Being Deleted Again on 19:14 - Jun 6 with 1239 views | Spratty |
| Posts Being Deleted Again on 19:12 - Jun 6 by Darran |
So you did say it then or is my memory playing tricks? |
The full Paul Daniels | | | |
| Posts Being Deleted Again on 19:18 - Jun 6 with 1237 views | exiledclaseboy |
| Posts Being Deleted Again on 11:13 - Jun 6 by Spratty |
Bump - Phil could you respond please?
I submitted a light hearted homage to those sympathetic and tolerant posters who have never taken their eyes off their children for 1 second until they were 18. (“Madeline macan” thread).
It asked if Huw should be prosecuted if he let Wenger take Bony (it did mention whilst his attention was drawn gazing doe eyed at his new bootroom prospect — perhaps that is what enraged “the computer”)
It was made approx 17:17 I would say and appeared in the position where Baker’s subsequent post now resides.
I immediately realised I had put AV for Wenger so changed it to AW and saw it with the edit (1 minute later than the post) and noticed that 2 people had already viewed it (so quickly that the omnipresent Daily Huw had not got round to down arrowing it yet).
A couple of hours later I noticed it had gone. Given it was stored on the database and displayed, edited, redisplayed and also viewed by at least 1 other; then it has either been deleted, moved or put into a non-display status. All of which equate to deleting my post from the form (yet again).
Please explain. Also interested that the OP in this thread has been edited by an admin. |
I can answer at least one of your questions. The OP on this thread says "edited by administrator" because I moved it from the football forum to this, the non-football one. Hope that dampens at least some of the conspiracy ardour.
I have no idea if or why your post on the Maddie thread was binned. Sounds like a stupid post though, to be honest. Not that posting something dumb is a reason for being moderated of course.
Hope this helps. |  |
| |
| Posts Being Deleted Again on 19:19 - Jun 6 with 1235 views | Darran |
| Posts Being Deleted Again on 19:14 - Jun 6 by Spratty |
The full Paul Daniels |
It must be me then because I could have sworn you'd said it,strange one. | |
| |
| |
By continuing to use the site, you agree to our use of cookies and to abide by our Terms and Conditions.
