| [Cricket] South Africa v England 22:46 - Dec 11 with 5040 views | Deano19766 |
Anyone else heading out for the Test series? Or any SA based R's attending any of the Tests? 3 of us (R's) heading out over the course of next week and the following week. Normally see a few Rangers shirts on tour. Sure this one will be no different. Come on England [Post edited 11 Dec 2015 22:49]
|  | | |  |
| [Cricket] South Africa v England on 09:38 - Jan 3 with 1297 views | BlackCrowe |
Take a bow Stokesy. A star is born. |  |
| |
| [Cricket] South Africa v England on 10:54 - Jan 3 with 1240 views | barabajagal |
| [Cricket] South Africa v England on 09:38 - Jan 3 by BlackCrowe |
Take a bow Stokesy. A star is born. |
The greatest of innings. Style, grace and absolute butchery... |  | | |
| [Cricket] South Africa v England on 11:48 - Jan 3 with 1184 views | DWQPR |
| [Cricket] South Africa v England on 10:54 - Jan 3 by barabajagal |
The greatest of innings. Style, grace and absolute butchery... |
And not a chance given. There is was this morning saying to myself after he hit ten off the first over of the day that he was a walking wicket playing like that and it was likely that he would get out before his hundred and with another quick wicket we would be 350-7 and struggling! And as I type there goes another huge six! What do I know about cricket!
And so pleased for Jonny Bairstow, first test hundred meant so much to him especially after losing his Dad in such awful circumstances when he was only eight. [Post edited 3 Jan 2016 11:50]
| |
| |
| [Cricket] South Africa v England on 10:38 - Jan 6 with 943 views | CamberleyR |
Throwing the game away? 87-4 at lunch on the final day. If the Saffas can get another wicket or two for the addition of not much more early in the afternoon session they are really going to fancy their chances of bowling us out and winning this.
Surely a first to score 600+ in the first innings and lose? |  |
| |
| [Cricket] South Africa v England on 10:46 - Jan 6 with 931 views | ElHoop |
England will go down swinging though so it's unlikely that we'll be out for much less than 200 which would be interesting if South Africa needed 200 off say 30 overs under test rules. They'd go for it so we could still win the game. 3 results still possible here. |  | | |
| [Cricket] South Africa v England on 11:42 - Jan 6 with 896 views | daveB |
If England can bat till tea they can still win this but would be shocked if it's not a draw |  | | |
| [Cricket] South Africa v England on 11:57 - Jan 6 with 879 views | CamberleyR |
Five down now. If another goes quickly it's squeaky bum time. | |
| |
Login to get fewer ads
| [Cricket] South Africa v England on 12:00 - Jan 6 with 875 views | ElHoop |
Amla batted out time when that was what he needed to do - Stokes couldn't do that and for all the hype he only averages around 30 in tests. Will be interesting to see whether Amla can biff it later on if the need arises. | | | |
| [Cricket] South Africa v England on 12:04 - Jan 6 with 869 views | CamberleyR |
586 the current highest score by a side batting first and losing (Australia 1894-95). That game was the first instance of a team following on and winning until Headingley 1981. England won that 1894-95 game by 10 runs. | |
| |
| [Cricket] South Africa v England on 12:05 - Jan 6 with 864 views | CamberleyR |
6 down now. DEFINITELY squeaky bum time  | |
| |
| [Cricket] South Africa v England on 12:09 - Jan 6 with 853 views | ElHoop |
Even 150 will be tough on this pitch today with Broad and Finn banging them down against a desire to chase runs. | | | |
| |
By continuing to use the site, you agree to our use of cookies and to abide by our Terms and Conditions.
