| F.A.O SCSA 22:05 - Jan 30 with 6913 views | Landore_Jack |
Leave all the negativity until the end of the season. Get behind the team. |  |
| |  |
| F.A.O SCSA on 08:43 - Jan 31 with 1247 views | TheResurrection |
| F.A.O SCSA on 08:12 - Jan 31 by 34dfgdf54 |
What's best for SCFC, was not being sold to the individuals we were sold too. Jenkins even said so himself:
"I think we are unique the way we run our club. I think with Cardiff, they found an investor to come in and that, at the time, was right for them. I think we've all learned as football supporters, when you've got more often than not one owner, or a group of owners, that have very little attachment or affinity to the club, now and again you are going to have problems. But I think it's up to the supporters to stand as one and they hold the key to sorting it all out. |
Yes. We all agree with that Blaine, that point has more than been made.
But that's not a solution to the main problem is it, that's done now and isn't going to be change.
We need to accept that and deal with what we can. |  |
| |
| F.A.O SCSA on 08:45 - Jan 31 with 1242 views | TheResurrection |
| F.A.O SCSA on 08:41 - Jan 31 by Smellyplumz |
Divide and conquer, job done. |
You just regurgitate everything you hear from elsewhere don't you.
Got to be one of the worst posters on here. | |
| |
| F.A.O SCSA on 09:10 - Jan 31 with 1214 views | 34dfgdf54 |
| F.A.O SCSA on 08:45 - Jan 31 by TheResurrection |
You just regurgitate everything you hear from elsewhere don't you.
Got to be one of the worst posters on here. |
That we do agree on, the guy is an absolute pleb. |  | | |
| F.A.O SCSA on 09:17 - Jan 31 with 1196 views | pencoedjack |
| F.A.O SCSA on 08:04 - Jan 31 by Neath_Jack |
Honest question now, do you think by singing Jenkins out, that's going to make him resign before the end of the season?
I know you've got respect for those in the SCSA and anyone that's doing anything, but answer the question please. |
Honestly Jay probably not (but I will continue on the 27th minute) ...... My opinion is that to many of our fans couldn't give a flying fuk we sold to a US hedge fund .
Id imagine the majority of those fans (there are exceptions) will not be around to pick up the pieces.
My hope is we stay up & the US fund realize its best to move us on (they have sold our biggest assets) & we are sold to someone who spends money wisely (so that removes Jenkins) to retain our position in the top flight.
Probably unrealistic but what I hope for. |  | | |
| F.A.O SCSA on 09:19 - Jan 31 with 1193 views | Darran |
| F.A.O SCSA on 00:15 - Jan 31 by TheResurrection |
Be careful what you wish for mate.
7 years for SCFC in this league is nothing short of a miracle. |
So The Res hates Jenkins with a passion and wants him out of the club.
To wanting Jenkins to stay for the transfer window.
To wanting Jenkins to untill the end of the season.
To wanting Jenkins to stay on at the end of the season.
Anyone that doesn’t think this is a tad odd is clearly lying.
Very very strange. |  |
| |
| F.A.O SCSA on 10:31 - Jan 31 with 1136 views | Neath_Jack |
| F.A.O SCSA on 09:17 - Jan 31 by pencoedjack |
Honestly Jay probably not (but I will continue on the 27th minute) ...... My opinion is that to many of our fans couldn't give a flying fuk we sold to a US hedge fund .
Id imagine the majority of those fans (there are exceptions) will not be around to pick up the pieces.
My hope is we stay up & the US fund realize its best to move us on (they have sold our biggest assets) & we are sold to someone who spends money wisely (so that removes Jenkins) to retain our position in the top flight.
Probably unrealistic but what I hope for. |
I wouldn't say many fans, but there obviously will be an element of our fan base who are only along for the Premier League, i couldn't give a toss about them.
We have been sold, there is nothing we can do about that now, other than voice our displeasure, but that should be done in the boardroom, where it counts. Singing songs during a match about them or Jenkins isn't going to make them go away. They will probably sell us to another bunch of slimey crooks when they've had their fill, and i don't see it getting any better for a long time either
Look at the Newcastle fans, they've sung songs about Mike Ashley for season after season, he's still there.
The atmosphere last night was superb, and that's what we need every game, positivity. Protest before the game outside the main entrance, same after the game. Get in the media, social media or whatever, but support the team during the 90.
Jenkins is a massive c*nt and i hope he f*cks off in the summer, i'm not against him going today either mind.
Anyway, i'm still buzzing from last nights performance so i'm dipping out of these threads now.
UppaF*cking Jacks! |  |
| |
| F.A.O SCSA on 10:35 - Jan 31 with 1130 views | Darran |
| F.A.O SCSA on 10:31 - Jan 31 by Neath_Jack |
I wouldn't say many fans, but there obviously will be an element of our fan base who are only along for the Premier League, i couldn't give a toss about them.
We have been sold, there is nothing we can do about that now, other than voice our displeasure, but that should be done in the boardroom, where it counts. Singing songs during a match about them or Jenkins isn't going to make them go away. They will probably sell us to another bunch of slimey crooks when they've had their fill, and i don't see it getting any better for a long time either
Look at the Newcastle fans, they've sung songs about Mike Ashley for season after season, he's still there.
The atmosphere last night was superb, and that's what we need every game, positivity. Protest before the game outside the main entrance, same after the game. Get in the media, social media or whatever, but support the team during the 90.
Jenkins is a massive c*nt and i hope he f*cks off in the summer, i'm not against him going today either mind.
Anyway, i'm still buzzing from last nights performance so i'm dipping out of these threads now.
UppaF*cking Jacks! |
“Jenkins is a massive c*nt and i hope he f*cks off in the summer, i'm not against him going today either mind”
Ooh your chum The Box Office won’t like that. | |
| |
| F.A.O SCSA on 10:55 - Jan 31 with 1097 views | JACKMANANDBOY |
| F.A.O SCSA on 23:04 - Jan 30 by Darran |
You’re right that nothings going to change. This sale of the club to the Americans will get worse. How people can’t see that that’s the issue is beyond me. |
Spot on Sir!
 |  |
| |
Login to get fewer ads
| F.A.O SCSA on 12:31 - Jan 31 with 1051 views | TheResurrection |
| F.A.O SCSA on 09:17 - Jan 31 by pencoedjack |
Honestly Jay probably not (but I will continue on the 27th minute) ...... My opinion is that to many of our fans couldn't give a flying fuk we sold to a US hedge fund .
Id imagine the majority of those fans (there are exceptions) will not be around to pick up the pieces.
My hope is we stay up & the US fund realize its best to move us on (they have sold our biggest assets) & we are sold to someone who spends money wisely (so that removes Jenkins) to retain our position in the top flight.
Probably unrealistic but what I hope for. |
Course it's unrealistic and uniformed.
What de you know about a hedge fund, I mean you love using that term, you use it like its an insult or something.
Whoever is bought into Swansea have bought into us to make money. They're not going to make money from selling assets as you call it as there's no long term gain in that. What they are striving for is to run us more efficiently, bring in more streams of revenue, make us stronger commercially and stay in the Premier League. Then, they will no doubt at some point look to sell us on, for profit. But to do that, we need to be successful in the main and in this league.
Our assets as you describe them weren't necessarily that two years ago so it's just flimsy Bullshit to regurgitate shit you read on the internet and think hey presto I've worked something out here, as you haven't. Firstly Siggy was always likely to be worth a few Bob to us but 45m ??? No chance, so that's an "asset" out of the blue. Llorente, well the majority of fans were moaning like fack when we signed him, so he was hardly a planned asset was he.
Football moves on with supply and demand and this season alone, you could also make a strong case for Mawson and Ayew now being worth more than 50m combined.
Football moves on mate, it's always been the same and we've had owners in the past who have always been on the lookout to profit, in fact every single one of them has.
Start to think a bit more.... | |
| |
| F.A.O SCSA on 12:36 - Jan 31 with 1045 views | TheResurrection |
| F.A.O SCSA on 10:35 - Jan 31 by Darran |
“Jenkins is a massive c*nt and i hope he f*cks off in the summer, i'm not against him going today either mind”
Ooh your chum The Box Office won’t like that. |
You can try and come between posters if you so wish.
I also think Jenkins was an absolute kunt for what he did.
You've always tried to misinterpret that though. | |
| |
| F.A.O SCSA on 12:58 - Jan 31 with 1020 views | Darran |
| F.A.O SCSA on 12:36 - Jan 31 by TheResurrection |
You can try and come between posters if you so wish.
I also think Jenkins was an absolute kunt for what he did.
You've always tried to misinterpret that though. |
Nobody’s misinterpreting anything. You’re a fuçking oddball that changes his mind whenever he feels like.
Obviously when you wanted Jenkins sacked the summer before we got promoted that was for the good of the club too.
Anyway where’s your abusive reply to Jay like there’d be to anyone else that said what he said? Aren’t you going to offer him out? lol | |
| |
| F.A.O SCSA on 13:12 - Jan 31 with 984 views | Neath_Jack |
| F.A.O SCSA on 12:58 - Jan 31 by Darran |
Nobody’s misinterpreting anything. You’re a fuçking oddball that changes his mind whenever he feels like.
Obviously when you wanted Jenkins sacked the summer before we got promoted that was for the good of the club too.
Anyway where’s your abusive reply to Jay like there’d be to anyone else that said what he said? Aren’t you going to offer him out? lol |
Why do you think he's my mate? Last time i spoke to him in person would probably have been 20 years ago. Just because people agree with some things on here doesn't equate to them being mates.
Have look at ARQS superb posts in the other thread and tell me you don't agree with what he's saying, that's pretty much what quite a few of us are saying. | |
| |
| F.A.O SCSA on 13:12 - Jan 31 with 982 views | pencoedjack |
| F.A.O SCSA on 12:31 - Jan 31 by TheResurrection |
Course it's unrealistic and uniformed.
What de you know about a hedge fund, I mean you love using that term, you use it like its an insult or something.
Whoever is bought into Swansea have bought into us to make money. They're not going to make money from selling assets as you call it as there's no long term gain in that. What they are striving for is to run us more efficiently, bring in more streams of revenue, make us stronger commercially and stay in the Premier League. Then, they will no doubt at some point look to sell us on, for profit. But to do that, we need to be successful in the main and in this league.
Our assets as you describe them weren't necessarily that two years ago so it's just flimsy Bullshit to regurgitate shit you read on the internet and think hey presto I've worked something out here, as you haven't. Firstly Siggy was always likely to be worth a few Bob to us but 45m ??? No chance, so that's an "asset" out of the blue. Llorente, well the majority of fans were moaning like fack when we signed him, so he was hardly a planned asset was he.
Football moves on with supply and demand and this season alone, you could also make a strong case for Mawson and Ayew now being worth more than 50m combined.
Football moves on mate, it's always been the same and we've had owners in the past who have always been on the lookout to profit, in fact every single one of them has.
Start to think a bit more.... |
Chris as I have told you several times when its comes to football (& the running of the club) I disagree with about 95% (of the parts that I read ) of what you post.
So maybe its best as I try ignore replying to your posts you do the same with me ..... Its saves the 'showing some respect' messages back & for to each other.
Anyway back to integrating 2 companies merged with the help of a US hedge fund.
 | | | |
| F.A.O SCSA on 13:21 - Jan 31 with 964 views | TheResurrection |
| F.A.O SCSA on 12:58 - Jan 31 by Darran |
Nobody’s misinterpreting anything. You’re a fuçking oddball that changes his mind whenever he feels like.
Obviously when you wanted Jenkins sacked the summer before we got promoted that was for the good of the club too.
Anyway where’s your abusive reply to Jay like there’d be to anyone else that said what he said? Aren’t you going to offer him out? lol |
Oh just fack off and bother someone else you bag of piss.
I agree with Jay, and mostly with everything he says. | |
| |
| F.A.O SCSA on 13:22 - Jan 31 with 960 views | TheResurrection |
| F.A.O SCSA on 13:12 - Jan 31 by Neath_Jack |
Why do you think he's my mate? Last time i spoke to him in person would probably have been 20 years ago. Just because people agree with some things on here doesn't equate to them being mates.
Have look at ARQS superb posts in the other thread and tell me you don't agree with what he's saying, that's pretty much what quite a few of us are saying. |
Hey. I thought we were mates?? | |
| |
| F.A.O SCSA on 13:25 - Jan 31 with 947 views | jacktheripper |
| F.A.O SCSA on 23:03 - Jan 30 by swanseacityx |
He will at the end of season. |
Can you get that in writing? |  | | |
| F.A.O SCSA on 13:25 - Jan 31 with 945 views | Neath_Jack |
| F.A.O SCSA on 13:22 - Jan 31 by TheResurrection |
Hey. I thought we were mates?? |
Are we still on for lunch on Friday? | |
| |
| F.A.O SCSA on 13:28 - Jan 31 with 941 views | TheResurrection |
| F.A.O SCSA on 13:25 - Jan 31 by Neath_Jack |
Are we still on for lunch on Friday? |
Certainly are 😉 | |
| |
| F.A.O SCSA on 13:31 - Jan 31 with 935 views | swancity |
| F.A.O SCSA on 12:31 - Jan 31 by TheResurrection |
Course it's unrealistic and uniformed.
What de you know about a hedge fund, I mean you love using that term, you use it like its an insult or something.
Whoever is bought into Swansea have bought into us to make money. They're not going to make money from selling assets as you call it as there's no long term gain in that. What they are striving for is to run us more efficiently, bring in more streams of revenue, make us stronger commercially and stay in the Premier League. Then, they will no doubt at some point look to sell us on, for profit. But to do that, we need to be successful in the main and in this league.
Our assets as you describe them weren't necessarily that two years ago so it's just flimsy Bullshit to regurgitate shit you read on the internet and think hey presto I've worked something out here, as you haven't. Firstly Siggy was always likely to be worth a few Bob to us but 45m ??? No chance, so that's an "asset" out of the blue. Llorente, well the majority of fans were moaning like fack when we signed him, so he was hardly a planned asset was he.
Football moves on with supply and demand and this season alone, you could also make a strong case for Mawson and Ayew now being worth more than 50m combined.
Football moves on mate, it's always been the same and we've had owners in the past who have always been on the lookout to profit, in fact every single one of them has.
Start to think a bit more.... |
I'm not sure that the owners of say Manchester City or Chelsea for example will be expecting to make a profit from their investment. Ploughing hundreds of millions into the Clubs to buy new players with salaries of £300,000 a week and huge squads means that it's almost impossible to be profitable from normal revenue streams i.e. Commercial, tv money, transfer policy.
Our owners aren't in that League. And in their case it's different, they will be hoping to be profitable, all 27 of them. It's purely a financial investment in their case and they view it that way. At least with Chelseas owner he enjoys attending games and shows emotion when they're doing well. |  |
| Only an idiot would eat a turkey curry on Christmas day |
| |
| F.A.O SCSA on 13:31 - Jan 31 with 934 views | Darran |
| F.A.O SCSA on 13:12 - Jan 31 by Neath_Jack |
Why do you think he's my mate? Last time i spoke to him in person would probably have been 20 years ago. Just because people agree with some things on here doesn't equate to them being mates.
Have look at ARQS superb posts in the other thread and tell me you don't agree with what he's saying, that's pretty much what quite a few of us are saying. |
Internet mate ini?
Well ARQS doesn’t change his mind every other month like Chrissy does he? Chrissys a bit of a laughing stock really,there’s just no consistency there at all.
I’ll tell you one thing though if people think that Huw Jenkins is the only person on the planet that could run this football club they need to drop everything,pick up the phone and make an appointment to see the doctor.
For instance what happens if Huw’s nipping over Rossi’s for his lunch and gets flattened by a bus (I sincerely hope that doesn’t happen) does the club the fold because there’s nobody in the world that could run it for £500k a year. | |
| |
| F.A.O SCSA on 13:33 - Jan 31 with 923 views | TheResurrection |
| F.A.O SCSA on 13:31 - Jan 31 by swancity |
I'm not sure that the owners of say Manchester City or Chelsea for example will be expecting to make a profit from their investment. Ploughing hundreds of millions into the Clubs to buy new players with salaries of £300,000 a week and huge squads means that it's almost impossible to be profitable from normal revenue streams i.e. Commercial, tv money, transfer policy.
Our owners aren't in that League. And in their case it's different, they will be hoping to be profitable, all 27 of them. It's purely a financial investment in their case and they view it that way. At least with Chelseas owner he enjoys attending games and shows emotion when they're doing well. |
The sheer fact you've even compared those 2 club's shows how weak an argument one would have against football owners looking to make a buck.
I'm not saying they're not out there but similarly they're hardly two a penny.
And if one of the 27 makes money they all do. That was a complete moot point. | |
| |
| F.A.O SCSA on 19:10 - Jan 31 with 817 views | MoscowJack |
I genuinely believe our owners' plan was to buy the club cheap (about 60% bought but have controlling rights and at a valuation roughly 60% below what I think we could have got at the top of the market!) and sell once the new TV deal's announced.
IF (as expected) the tv rights go up again, the club's revenues shoot up and we become even more valuable. Add the stadium lease and the added bottom line boost of stadium naming rights in place (note that Audi pay DC United something mad like $10m a year for stadium rights!) and we're worth at least double what the Yanks bought the club for.
For all that to happen, we need to be in the Premier League! They were never going to add additional money for transfers (but would have put more focus and attention onto the commercial side, which was abysmal) and would have done what the previous owners did to balance the books (sell high, buy low).
I'm pretty sure they thought we were a safe bet but I doubt they would buy the club again if they had the choice. They underestimated how bad things can go wrong so quickly and didn't realise how hard it really is to keep afloat.
One thing is certain though....the last thing the Yanks want is relegation as that means telling their investors that their stock has plummeted, possibly for good.
That's the reality....or at least how I see it ;) | |
| |
| |
By continuing to use the site, you agree to our use of cookies and to abide by our Terms and Conditions.
