| Today's Board Meeting 09:21 - Dec 13 with 1153 views | Darran |
I wonder if there'll be anything interesting? |  |
| |  |
| Today's Board Meeting on 09:49 - Dec 13 with 1106 views | Loyal |
In the biscuit department ? |  |
| Nolan sympathiser, clout expert, personal friend of Leigh Dineen, advocate and enforcer of porridge swallows.
The official inventor of the tit w@nk. | | Poll: | Who should be Swansea number 1 |
| |
| Today's Board Meeting on 10:16 - Dec 13 with 1044 views | legoman |
| Today's Board Meeting on 09:49 - Dec 13 by Loyal |
In the biscuit department ? |
A meeting is not a meeting without Bourbons |  |
| "M'sieur, you said your dog did not bite!"
"That's not my dog" |
| |
| Today's Board Meeting on 10:19 - Dec 13 with 1030 views | monmouth |
Marks and Sparks custard creams and Leigh Dineen back on the Board to eat them.
(It's not really a fattist comment Starsk, honest). |  |
| |
| Today's Board Meeting on 10:26 - Dec 13 with 1011 views | jackonicko |
Reminds me that there are nowhere near enough biscuit vending machines at the Lib. Another commercial opportunity missed. |  | | |
| Today's Board Meeting on 10:35 - Dec 13 with 971 views | NeathJack |
Well if Dineen gets voted back on the board today then that would be pretty much a case of Jenkins, Kaplan, Levein et al pushing the Trust metaphorically into the toilet pan, flushing it and laughing in their face, as opposed to "working together".
Let's see.... |  | | |
| Today's Board Meeting on 10:38 - Dec 13 with 960 views | 1983 |
Digestive caramel chocolate biscuit!!
Now that does take the biscuit |  |
| |
| Today's Board Meeting on 10:45 - Dec 13 with 944 views | CarregGlas |
| Today's Board Meeting on 10:38 - Dec 13 by 1983 |
Digestive caramel chocolate biscuit!!
Now that does take the biscuit |
Nothing can beat a dark chocolate hobnob! |  | | |
| Today's Board Meeting on 10:55 - Dec 13 with 907 views | monmouth |
| Today's Board Meeting on 10:35 - Dec 13 by NeathJack |
Well if Dineen gets voted back on the board today then that would be pretty much a case of Jenkins, Kaplan, Levein et al pushing the Trust metaphorically into the toilet pan, flushing it and laughing in their face, as opposed to "working together".
Let's see.... |
Indeed. Plus blocking him takes us no further forward in material terms, as it would be a classic ploy to create a non existent bogey man and then slay it to show good faith.
Better than having him back mind. | |
| |
| |
By continuing to use the site, you agree to our use of cookies and to abide by our Terms and Conditions.
