| Supporters action group 17:37 - Dec 6 with 19027 views | Murph75 |
A few of us have mentioned meeting up to discuss getting some action going in terms of us showing how unhappy we are with the current situation of the club both on the field and off it.
From conversations I've had with various other fans who don't visit this forum they're clueless to what's going and need waking up.
The initial meeting is open to suggestion, I'm thinking we meet and discuss next steps to starting a marketing campaign etc.
Meeting date is set for 7pm on 19th of December at the Landore social club.
If you'd like to attend can you please PM me confirming your attendance. [Post edited 8 Dec 2016 19:57]
|  | | |  |
| Supporters action group on 18:00 - Dec 7 with 2406 views | Swanjaxs |
| Supporters action group on 17:58 - Dec 7 by Darran |
Really? They support Jenkins? |
Not all but quite a few still loyal to cocknose |  |
| |
| Supporters action group on 18:07 - Dec 7 with 2372 views | Jackfath |
That's a shame. |  |
| |
| Supporters action group on 18:35 - Dec 7 with 2313 views | Murph75 |
| Supporters action group on 17:41 - Dec 7 by Landore_Jack |
What about inviting fans from other forums? E.g. SCFC2 and thejack.army etc
It would be great to spread the word on the Swansea City Supporters Trust Facebook page. |
I posted a link to this thread on scfc2 yesterday. | | | |
| Supporters action group on 18:37 - Dec 7 with 2305 views | Landore_Jack |
| Supporters action group on 18:35 - Dec 7 by Murph75 |
I posted a link to this thread on scfc2 yesterday. |
Excellent. |  |
| |
| Supporters action group on 18:38 - Dec 7 with 2289 views | DwightYorkeSuperstar |
Maybe they should have reconsidered their policy of banning the posters being verbally abused for no reason whilst doing nothing about the people conducting the verbal abuse. More might have joined if it didn't appear to be a forum full of hot headed cry babies. |  |
| |
| Supporters action group on 22:59 - Dec 7 with 2092 views | Darran |
| Supporters action group on 18:38 - Dec 7 by DwightYorkeSuperstar |
Maybe they should have reconsidered their policy of banning the posters being verbally abused for no reason whilst doing nothing about the people conducting the verbal abuse. More might have joined if it didn't appear to be a forum full of hot headed cry babies. |
Well if the fella that started the thread over there about it closing down is the same admin as before you don't want to be mentioning cry babies.
Seriously I'm amazed that people haven't heard the rumours though saying that some of those embarrassing c*nts would probably still post on there if they had. |  |
| |
| Supporters action group on 23:13 - Dec 7 with 2058 views | Uxbridge |
| Supporters action group on 19:24 - Dec 6 by DwightYorkeSuperstar |
The fan base isn't split. A supporters group that isn't The Trust may be able to implement strategies that The Trust feels uncomfortable undertaking due to the risk of having a negative impact on their working relationship. For example, the proposed leaflet/poster campaign to aware the rest of the fan base, something The Trust admitted was a big problem. [Post edited 6 Dec 2016 19:27]
|
In a nutshell. Think back to Petty, that was a multi pronged effort.
This is something I think gets missed. The Trust cant be poacher and gamekeeper. A loose alliance of fans wouldn't have to consider the sorts of things the Trust has to. Far easier to be reactionary. |  |
| |
Login to get fewer ads
| Supporters action group on 23:22 - Dec 7 with 2031 views | Darran |
SAG should work with the Trust. | |
| |
| Supporters action group on 23:47 - Dec 7 with 1992 views | ItchySphincter |
Has someone been arrested again? |  |
| |
| Supporters action group on 23:55 - Dec 7 with 1976 views | Darran |
| Supporters action group on 23:47 - Dec 7 by ItchySphincter |
Has someone been arrested again? |
lol.
Strangely I've just been over there and you have to admit there's some bizarre c*nts on there,I'm being accused of deleteing posts on here now too.
Funny thing is there's a mod currently posting on here and I'm being blamed for things that are nothing to do with me.
Anyone want to own up? | |
| |
| Supporters action group on 09:30 - Dec 8 with 1804 views | max936 |
| Supporters action group on 23:55 - Dec 7 by Darran |
lol.
Strangely I've just been over there and you have to admit there's some bizarre c*nts on there,I'm being accused of deleteing posts on here now too.
Funny thing is there's a mod currently posting on here and I'm being blamed for things that are nothing to do with me.
Anyone want to own up? |
Its me, I'm Spartacus
 |  |
| |
| Supporters action group on 10:17 - Dec 8 with 1761 views | Murph75 |
If this is to take off maybe now is the time to put difference aside. The end of the day we don't have to like each other. We do have one love in common which should be enough x | | | |
| Supporters action group on 10:20 - Dec 8 with 1752 views | 1983 |
| Supporters action group on 10:17 - Dec 8 by Murph75 |
If this is to take off maybe now is the time to put difference aside. The end of the day we don't have to like each other. We do have one love in common which should be enough x |
Well said Murph |  |
| |
| Supporters action group on 17:44 - Dec 8 with 1657 views | A_Fans_Dad |
Why the hell isn't this a pinned post? |  | | |
| Supporters action group on 17:55 - Dec 8 with 1630 views | Landore_Jack |
| Supporters action group on 17:44 - Dec 8 by A_Fans_Dad |
Why the hell isn't this a pinned post? |
Good question. | |
| |
| Supporters action group on 18:01 - Dec 8 with 1619 views | morningstar |
| Supporters action group on 17:55 - Dec 8 by Landore_Jack |
Good question. |
The answer to that is simple. What we are trying to achieve will be set out at the meeting on the 19th, and it will be independent from this website and I'm sure against the approval of the trust. So it's quite obvious why it isn't a sticky if you think about it! In fact once we hold the initial meeting, We are hoping that it will be kept away from the site to avoid having threads removed. |  |
| |
| Supporters action group on 18:11 - Dec 8 with 1602 views | Murph75 |
| Supporters action group on 18:01 - Dec 8 by morningstar |
The answer to that is simple. What we are trying to achieve will be set out at the meeting on the 19th, and it will be independent from this website and I'm sure against the approval of the trust. So it's quite obvious why it isn't a sticky if you think about it! In fact once we hold the initial meeting, We are hoping that it will be kept away from the site to avoid having threads removed. |
Completely agree with what Gary has just said. I have my own views on the trust which I wont go in to on here as I don't want to create a divide between the fan base on here. | | | |
| Supporters action group on 18:14 - Dec 8 with 1595 views | Landore_Jack |
| Supporters action group on 18:01 - Dec 8 by morningstar |
The answer to that is simple. What we are trying to achieve will be set out at the meeting on the 19th, and it will be independent from this website and I'm sure against the approval of the trust. So it's quite obvious why it isn't a sticky if you think about it! In fact once we hold the initial meeting, We are hoping that it will be kept away from the site to avoid having threads removed. |
Ah, thanks for the reply. | |
| |
| Supporters action group on 18:17 - Dec 8 with 1591 views | A_Fans_Dad |
| Supporters action group on 18:11 - Dec 8 by Murph75 |
Completely agree with what Gary has just said. I have my own views on the trust which I wont go in to on here as I don't want to create a divide between the fan base on here. |
The problem is that there is still quite a while before the meeting takes place and some fans might not get to see about it on here.
So it looks like it will need bumping until then. | | | |
| Supporters action group on 18:22 - Dec 8 with 1583 views | morningstar |
| Supporters action group on 18:11 - Dec 8 by Murph75 |
Completely agree with what Gary has just said. I have my own views on the trust which I wont go in to on here as I don't want to create a divide between the fan base on here. |
Thank you Murph, though I will say that i would not get involved if i did not believe we could make a difference. We will set out a clear mandate, and the goals we wish to achieve. And they will not include people breaking the law in any shape or form. As you know, we have some great ideas on how to move this forward, but if anyone thinks we are planning on storming the directors box mob handed, then maybe this is not for you. | |
| |
| Supporters action group on 18:28 - Dec 8 with 1570 views | Jackfath |
Is my personal safety guaranteed if I come along to this meeting? | |
| |
| Supporters action group on 18:36 - Dec 8 with 1552 views | Darran |
| Supporters action group on 18:28 - Dec 8 by Jackfath |
Is my personal safety guaranteed if I come along to this meeting? |
I don't think so after you deleted Blobby from the other sites post last night. | |
| |
| Supporters action group on 18:36 - Dec 8 with 1549 views | Loyal |
| Supporters action group on 18:28 - Dec 8 by Jackfath |
Is my personal safety guaranteed if I come along to this meeting? |
I would be careful if someone drops a pound coin on the floor.
I may well slip you one. |  |
| Nolan sympathiser, clout expert, personal friend of Leigh Dineen, advocate and enforcer of porridge swallows.
The official inventor of the tit w@nk. | | Poll: | Who should be Swansea number 1 |
| |
| |
By continuing to use the site, you agree to our use of cookies and to abide by our Terms and Conditions.
