Please log in or register. Registered visitors get fewer ads.
Forum index | Previous Thread | Next thread
Fabianski red card-Seen the replays 15:13 - Dec 7 with 36440 viewsPlazex

Actually looks as if Sakho took fabianski down. Hope we have the card rescinded. And bloody hell 3-1 crap.

Poll: Where will we finish?

1
Fabianski red card-Seen the replays on 15:20 - Dec 7 with 8599 viewslidojack

Can a red card be rescinded for a foul in the build up? If the fa feel like the foul was worthy of a red card can they rescind it for the handball?
0
Fabianski red card-Seen the replays on 15:20 - Dec 7 with 8595 viewsParlay

There is no way that will be rescinded.

Forum celebrity
Poll: Is £45 a match ticket too high?

-4
Fabianski red card-Seen the replays on 15:21 - Dec 7 with 8591 viewsjack247

Can't even see us appealing that to be honest
-3
Fabianski red card-Seen the replays on 15:26 - Dec 7 with 8521 viewsApeShit

Ref missed the handball before Fabianski even touched him!

[Post edited 7 Dec 2014 15:26]
2
Fabianski red card-Seen the replays on 15:28 - Dec 7 with 8463 viewsParlay

Fabianski red card-Seen the replays on 15:26 - Dec 7 by ApeShit

Ref missed the handball before Fabianski even touched him!

[Post edited 7 Dec 2014 15:26]


It wont matter in terms of an appeal, separate incidents.
[Post edited 7 Dec 2014 15:28]

Forum celebrity
Poll: Is £45 a match ticket too high?

-2
Fabianski red card-Seen the replays on 15:28 - Dec 7 with 8448 viewsmonmouth

I would be astonished if that were appealed and rescinded. It may have been flawed with a swans bias, and given by a massive homer, but no one will overrule the match ref on that decision.

Poll: TRUST MEMBERS: What DID you vote in the, um, vote

-1
Fabianski red card-Seen the replays on 15:32 - Dec 7 with 8399 viewslidojack

Fabianski red card-Seen the replays on 15:28 - Dec 7 by Parlay

It wont matter in terms of an appeal, separate incidents.
[Post edited 7 Dec 2014 15:28]


If common sense prevails they will be considered the same incident though.
If the ref gives the handball there's no red card.
If the striker doesn't handball it he doesn't get it around Fabianski and there's no goal scoring opportunity to deny and therefore no red card.
1
Fabianski red card-Seen the replays on 15:33 - Dec 7 with 8374 viewsBLAZE

Im just annoyed a very cynical and deliberate handball paid off for him. Dont know if the ref was in a position to see it but it was very obviously done to take the ball around Fab and it sealed the game for them essentially. Fkin annoying. And they had a hissy over Chicos dramatics - well this is worse imo. Cheating plain and simple.

West Ham really are media darlings eh
[Post edited 7 Dec 2014 15:34]
3
Login to get fewer ads

Fabianski red card-Seen the replays on 15:34 - Dec 7 with 8349 viewscanhecatchit

ref sent him off for stopping a goal scorring attampt. When in fact the ref stopped sxcko from attempting to score by blowing up early when he wanted to carry on and score, this card should be rescinded every time

Swansea City, my one and only love , oh and then there's the Wife

1
Fabianski red card-Seen the replays on 15:35 - Dec 7 with 8343 viewsunion_jack

Fabianski red card-Seen the replays on 15:20 - Dec 7 by Parlay

There is no way that will be rescinded.


Not what Smith and York are saying?!

Are Sperm Whales the reason the sea is so salty?
Poll: Bony - Would You Want Him Back?

0
Fabianski red card-Seen the replays (n/t) on 15:35 - Dec 7 with 8339 viewscanhecatchit

[Post edited 7 Dec 2014 15:36]

Swansea City, my one and only love , oh and then there's the Wife

0
Fabianski red card-Seen the replays (n/t) on 15:35 - Dec 7 with 8337 viewscanhecatchit

[Post edited 7 Dec 2014 15:36]

Swansea City, my one and only love , oh and then there's the Wife

0
Fabianski red card-Seen the replays on 15:40 - Dec 7 with 8249 viewsParlay

Fabianski red card-Seen the replays on 15:32 - Dec 7 by lidojack

If common sense prevails they will be considered the same incident though.
If the ref gives the handball there's no red card.
If the striker doesn't handball it he doesn't get it around Fabianski and there's no goal scoring opportunity to deny and therefore no red card.


Nowt to do with common sense. They would be reviewing Fabianskis impeding of Sakho not Sakhos handball.

If you could give handballs after the match on reviews then France wouldnt have knocked Ireland out with Henrys famous hand.

Forum celebrity
Poll: Is £45 a match ticket too high?

-1
Fabianski red card-Seen the replays on 15:42 - Dec 7 with 8227 viewsscottishjack

I might be wrong here, but if it is a red card incident, shouldn't the ref stop lay immediately? You can play advantage on a yellow card, but not a red? Any refs on here?
0
Fabianski red card-Seen the replays on 15:43 - Dec 7 with 8207 viewsParlay

Fabianski red card-Seen the replays on 15:35 - Dec 7 by union_jack

Not what Smith and York are saying?!


Dont care what they are saying, you cannot review a not given handball afterwards. What will be reviewed is if Fabiański impeded Sakho - which he did.

Review panels are to overturn obvious mistakes, sending iff Fabianski handball aside is not a clear cut error on the refs part, in fact id have sent him off too if i didnt see the handball.

Forum celebrity
Poll: Is £45 a match ticket too high?

-2
Fabianski red card-Seen the replays on 15:44 - Dec 7 with 8187 viewsParlay

Fabianski red card-Seen the replays on 15:34 - Dec 7 by canhecatchit

ref sent him off for stopping a goal scorring attampt. When in fact the ref stopped sxcko from attempting to score by blowing up early when he wanted to carry on and score, this card should be rescinded every time


He did, Sakho played on. But he is well within his rights to send off after seeing if a goal would be scored anyway. Refs are told to try and keep the game 11 v 11 if possible in those situations. But in this case he blew a second after the contact as replays showed.
[Post edited 7 Dec 2014 15:45]

Forum celebrity
Poll: Is £45 a match ticket too high?

-1
Fabianski red card-Seen the replays on 15:46 - Dec 7 with 8142 viewsJackfath

Fabianski red card-Seen the replays on 15:44 - Dec 7 by Parlay

He did, Sakho played on. But he is well within his rights to send off after seeing if a goal would be scored anyway. Refs are told to try and keep the game 11 v 11 if possible in those situations. But in this case he blew a second after the contact as replays showed.
[Post edited 7 Dec 2014 15:45]


If he had scored, would the ref allowed it or pulled play back?

POSTER OF THE YEAR 2013. PROUD RECIPIENT OF THE SECOND PLANET SWANS LIFETIME ACHIEVEMENT AWARD.
Poll: Should Darran's ban be lifted?

-1
Fabianski red card-Seen the replays on 15:47 - Dec 7 with 8136 viewsLeonisGod

Fabianski red card-Seen the replays on 15:28 - Dec 7 by Parlay

It wont matter in terms of an appeal, separate incidents.
[Post edited 7 Dec 2014 15:28]


Disagree. He knocked the ball past him with his hand. Without that Fab looked like he was getting the ball. But we'll see.
1
Fabianski red card-Seen the replays on 15:48 - Dec 7 with 8116 viewsunion_jack

Fabianski red card-Seen the replays on 15:46 - Dec 7 by Jackfath

If he had scored, would the ref allowed it or pulled play back?


Whistle went before he kicked it so would not have counted.

Are Sperm Whales the reason the sea is so salty?
Poll: Bony - Would You Want Him Back?

0
Fabianski red card-Seen the replays on 15:51 - Dec 7 with 8093 viewsQuakerJack

Fabianski red card-Seen the replays on 15:48 - Dec 7 by union_jack

Whistle went before he kicked it so would not have counted.


Do you honestly think that? He had a look to see if he scored. He'd have given it and sent him off.

Poll: Some scummer on the anus board reckons 80% of us want them to go down. so... do

0
Fabianski red card-Seen the replays on 15:53 - Dec 7 with 8053 viewsParlay

Fabianski red card-Seen the replays on 15:46 - Dec 7 by Jackfath

If he had scored, would the ref allowed it or pulled play back?


Now it appears he had blown for the foul initially then it wouldnt have mattered whether he scored or not.

Forum celebrity
Poll: Is £45 a match ticket too high?

-1
Fabianski red card-Seen the replays on 15:53 - Dec 7 with 8053 viewsBLAZE

Im sure Sky Sports enchanced the audio which showed the ref blew up before the shot, so even if the ball went in it wouldn't have stood. He chose to show the red not play advantage.

Unfortunately I don't think the hand ball would be taken into account in a review.... But arguably play should have been dead the instant he handballed it, meaning no red card. But that's just tough luck on our part. Cheating prospered on this occasion
0
Fabianski red card-Seen the replays on 15:55 - Dec 7 with 8020 viewsParlay

Fabianski red card-Seen the replays on 15:47 - Dec 7 by LeonisGod

Disagree. He knocked the ball past him with his hand. Without that Fab looked like he was getting the ball. But we'll see.


Nothing to disagree with, they are separate fouls and only one can be reviewed. That's just fact.

The foul that will be reviewed if appealed (we wont appeal) will be fabianskis on Sakho regardless of handball. And that was a foul and he did stop a clear goalscoring opportunity.

Forum celebrity
Poll: Is £45 a match ticket too high?

-1
Fabianski red card-Seen the replays on 16:01 - Dec 7 with 7964 viewslondonlisa2001

Fabianski red card-Seen the replays on 15:43 - Dec 7 by Parlay

Dont care what they are saying, you cannot review a not given handball afterwards. What will be reviewed is if Fabiański impeded Sakho - which he did.

Review panels are to overturn obvious mistakes, sending iff Fabianski handball aside is not a clear cut error on the refs part, in fact id have sent him off too if i didnt see the handball.


on what basis would you have sent him off?

Irrespective of the obvious handball, there is no obligation whatsoever on a player to get out of the way if a player just runs into him which is what happened.

Fabianski didn't put his hands out, he didn't jump into him - he went out and blocked the angle which he is perfectly entitled to do. Sakho ran into him (actually with a slight push from Williams). The only reason it looked like a foul was the handball. The only possible foul was against Ash for the push - possible yellow card. The decision was incorrect.

We'll appeal that and it will get overturned, again! And we'll still have lost a chance at a point because of it.

Dear God - that was up there with the most biased commentary and match build up I have ever seen (including the BT coverage of the Man Utd match) and even they thought it wasn't a sending off, and yet we have so called Swans fans falling over themselves to justify another shocking decision because it fits with some sort of warped agenda.
1
Fabianski red card-Seen the replays on 16:02 - Dec 7 with 7953 viewsjack247

He was being sent off whether the shot went in or not. I'm not sure how the ref can play advantage and then bring them back for the free kick. No doubt it would have counted if he had scored and I can't see how a shot at an unguarded net, albeit from a tight angle, isn't classed as an advantage
0
About Us Contact Us Terms & Conditions Privacy Cookies Advertising
© FansNetwork 2024