| Hmm 17:50 - Aug 6 with 2514 views | MedwayR |
Seems to be a lack of threads this week questioning the role of Les Ferdinand, lack of signings, Lyndon Dykes etc etc etc
Wonder why that might be... |  |
| |  |
| Hmm on 17:53 - Aug 6 with 2453 views | ParkRoyalR |
Maybe one about all Dykes's flick-on's just hitting him in the face....or my personal favourite, Ilias not passing because he doesn't rate Dykes + co... |  | | |
| Hmm on 18:34 - Aug 6 with 2339 views | essextaxiboy |
A game of two halves for Dykes IMO . First half more like it please carry on . 2nd Half same old although to be fair he was knackered |  | | |
| Hmm on 18:55 - Aug 6 with 2265 views | traininvain |
| Hmm on 17:53 - Aug 6 by ParkRoyalR |
Maybe one about all Dykes's flick-on's just hitting him in the face....or my personal favourite, Ilias not passing because he doesn't rate Dykes + co... |
Funny how we all see things differently as I thought Dykes was excellent today. But every silver lining and all that. |  | | |
| Hmm on 19:19 - Aug 6 with 2195 views | DejR_vu |
Hmmm, maybe that’s because, in the case of the LF thread, as I pointed out until I was blue in the face, it was about the last 7.5 years, not the last result, but, of course, you choose to ignore that because it doesn’t fit with your narrative.
Given this thread, you’re clearly miffed that some posters posted comments after the defeat at Blackburn that you deemed negative. And yet, here you are, within an hour of the final whistle of a cracking game, when most people are still travelling home, having a snide dig. So let me get this right, not okay to post anything you consider negative after a defeat, but okay for you to be negative, digging people out after a win? What an absolute weapon.  | |
| |
| Hmm on 19:23 - Aug 6 with 2169 views | BlackCrowe |
| Hmm on 18:34 - Aug 6 by essextaxiboy |
A game of two halves for Dykes IMO . First half more like it please carry on . 2nd Half same old although to be fair he was knackered |
He ran his socks off. Whole team were blowing hard in the second half. |  |
| |
| Hmm on 19:29 - Aug 6 with 2149 views | MedwayR |
| Hmm on 19:19 - Aug 6 by DejR_vu |
Hmmm, maybe that’s because, in the case of the LF thread, as I pointed out until I was blue in the face, it was about the last 7.5 years, not the last result, but, of course, you choose to ignore that because it doesn’t fit with your narrative.
Given this thread, you’re clearly miffed that some posters posted comments after the defeat at Blackburn that you deemed negative. And yet, here you are, within an hour of the final whistle of a cracking game, when most people are still travelling home, having a snide dig. So let me get this right, not okay to post anything you consider negative after a defeat, but okay for you to be negative, digging people out after a win? What an absolute weapon. |
I presume this is directed at me?
First off, I don't have a narrative, but clearly you do as you showed last week. As I said last week, the fact you posted straight after a defeat made it look like jumping on a bandwagon. You explained that wasn't the case and I accepted that. I haven't dug anyone out, just made a point about the lack of negative threads unlike last week. The fact that you are getting so defensive and name calling shows that you're conscious of the fact that you were guilty of reacting to a defeat with a negative thread about LF. No snidey dig, just a blindingly obvious point being made. | |
| |
| Hmm on 19:37 - Aug 6 with 2121 views | eastside_r |
Was so tempted to revive the thread from last week where I had a spat with a poster on here, but I prefer to take the high moral ground. (But we’ll see after a couple more drinks!)
Let’s just enjoy the win together. We are all QPR after all. |  | | |
| Hmm on 19:38 - Aug 6 with 2110 views | DejR_vu |
| Hmm on 19:29 - Aug 6 by MedwayR |
I presume this is directed at me?
First off, I don't have a narrative, but clearly you do as you showed last week. As I said last week, the fact you posted straight after a defeat made it look like jumping on a bandwagon. You explained that wasn't the case and I accepted that. I haven't dug anyone out, just made a point about the lack of negative threads unlike last week. The fact that you are getting so defensive and name calling shows that you're conscious of the fact that you were guilty of reacting to a defeat with a negative thread about LF. No snidey dig, just a blindingly obvious point being made. |
It was, indeed, directed at you.
Not getting defensive, just pointing out the contradiction.
“Straight after a defeat”; 🤣 you’re having a dig within an hour of a WIN.
I’m certainly not “conscious of the fact that I was reacting to a defeat ” because that wasn’t the case, as I’ve pointed out, several times, including on this thread.
We’ve all had enough Sh1t to get down about over the last 6 months. This evening, I’ll be enjoying the win. | |
| |
Login to get fewer ads
| Hmm on 19:51 - Aug 6 with 2074 views | Boston |
| Hmm on 19:19 - Aug 6 by DejR_vu |
Hmmm, maybe that’s because, in the case of the LF thread, as I pointed out until I was blue in the face, it was about the last 7.5 years, not the last result, but, of course, you choose to ignore that because it doesn’t fit with your narrative.
Given this thread, you’re clearly miffed that some posters posted comments after the defeat at Blackburn that you deemed negative. And yet, here you are, within an hour of the final whistle of a cracking game, when most people are still travelling home, having a snide dig. So let me get this right, not okay to post anything you consider negative after a defeat, but okay for you to be negative, digging people out after a win? What an absolute weapon. |
I know, you've seen this all before. | |
| |
| |
By continuing to use the site, you agree to our use of cookies and to abide by our Terms and Conditions.
