| Today’s court case on 22:42 - Dec 22 with 2766 views | max936 |
| Today’s court case on 17:54 - Dec 22 by Whiterockin |
Anyone know the outcome of this case. Was it settled, adjourned or just a news blackout? |
Probably an out of court settlement and a signed gagging order. I just keeping hoping that all the truth will come out, don't think its gonna happen though.  |  |
|  |
| Today’s court case on 09:37 - Dec 23 with 2625 views | Whiterockin |
| Today’s court case on 22:42 - Dec 22 by max936 |
Probably an out of court settlement and a signed gagging order. I just keeping hoping that all the truth will come out, don't think its gonna happen though. |
The trust should have been informed through, as the club has been in court and they are 21% shareholders, shouldn't they? |  | | |
| Today’s court case on 09:50 - Dec 23 with 2592 views | Private_Partz |
| Today’s court case on 09:37 - Dec 23 by Whiterockin |
The trust should have been informed through, as the club has been in court and they are 21% shareholders, shouldn't they? |
The worry for me is the Trust (or the inner cabal) have been informed.
That Jenkins, realising he was on a sticky wicket, has shelled out to prevent further damage to his reputation becoming public.
The Trust hierarchy , hoping to continue building bridges, are keeping schtum.
I have no proof of this whatsoever but their previous actions suggest this could indeed be a possibility....... |  |
| You have mission in life to hold out your hand,
To help the other guy out,
Help your fellow man.
Stan Ridgway
|
| |
| Today’s court case on 09:52 - Dec 23 with 2589 views | Whiterockin |
| Today’s court case on 09:50 - Dec 23 by Private_Partz |
The worry for me is the Trust (or the inner cabal) have been informed.
That Jenkins, realising he was on a sticky wicket, has shelled out to prevent further damage to his reputation becoming public.
The Trust hierarchy , hoping to continue building bridges, are keeping schtum.
I have no proof of this whatsoever but their previous actions suggest this could indeed be a possibility....... |
"The Trust hierarchy , hoping to continue building bridges, are keeping schtum".
Building bridges or just enjoying the directors hospitality? | | | |
| Today’s court case on 11:06 - Dec 23 with 2508 views | Private_Partz |
| Today’s court case on 09:52 - Dec 23 by Whiterockin |
"The Trust hierarchy , hoping to continue building bridges, are keeping schtum".
Building bridges or just enjoying the directors hospitality? |
I was being purposefully polite lol. Lisa and Clasey may get some insight in the future. Depends on if, or how much, the ranks are closed. | |
| You have mission in life to hold out your hand,
To help the other guy out,
Help your fellow man.
Stan Ridgway
|
| |
| Today’s court case on 15:27 - Jan 6 with 2353 views | Neath_Jack |
What was the outcome of this? |  |
| |
| Today’s court case on 15:59 - Jan 6 with 2279 views | Whiterockin |
| Today’s court case on 15:27 - Jan 6 by Neath_Jack |
What was the outcome of this? |
I have been trying to get an update for weeks. Is there a total press blackout, has it been settled or is it adjourned if so until when. Surely the trust know as they are 21% shareholders of a business who are in court. | | | |
| Today’s court case on 16:01 - Jan 6 with 2272 views | Neath_Jack |
| Today’s court case on 15:59 - Jan 6 by Whiterockin |
I have been trying to get an update for weeks. Is there a total press blackout, has it been settled or is it adjourned if so until when. Surely the trust know as they are 21% shareholders of a business who are in court. |
Someone on here will definitely know. | |
| |
Login to get fewer ads
| Today’s court case on 16:02 - Jan 6 with 2266 views | Whiterockin |
| Today’s court case on 16:01 - Jan 6 by Neath_Jack |
Someone on here will definitely know. |
But will they tell us. | | | |
| Today’s court case on 17:23 - Jan 6 with 2159 views | AguycalledJack |
If the trust board do know then surely they have a duty to report back to trust members on this? |  | | |
| Today’s court case on 17:25 - Jan 6 with 2146 views | exiledclaseboy |
| Today’s court case on 17:23 - Jan 6 by AguycalledJack |
If the trust board do know then surely they have a duty to report back to trust members on this? |
I have no idea what the outcome was or indeed if the case has concluded yet. Can’t speak for anyone else though. |  |
| |
| Today’s court case on 17:41 - Jan 6 with 2086 views | Uxbridge |
| Today’s court case on 17:25 - Jan 6 by exiledclaseboy |
I have no idea what the outcome was or indeed if the case has concluded yet. Can’t speak for anyone else though. |
Judgement is in the coming weeks, all I know. The Trust isn't going to have this earlier than the public though, and even if it did it can't publicise legal proceedings. |  |
| |
| Today’s court case on 17:44 - Jan 6 with 2067 views | AguycalledJack |
| Today’s court case on 17:41 - Jan 6 by Uxbridge |
Judgement is in the coming weeks, all I know. The Trust isn't going to have this earlier than the public though, and even if it did it can't publicise legal proceedings. |
No, but the trust can feedback on the outcome and what it means for the club. | | | |
| Today’s court case on 17:49 - Jan 6 with 2048 views | Uxbridge |
| Today’s court case on 17:44 - Jan 6 by AguycalledJack |
No, but the trust can feedback on the outcome and what it means for the club. |
That's an option. Depends on the judgement. Point was that the Trust isn't going to be able to preempt the conclusion though. | |
| |
| Today’s court case on 17:58 - Jan 6 with 2011 views | AguycalledJack |
| Today’s court case on 17:49 - Jan 6 by Uxbridge |
That's an option. Depends on the judgement. Point was that the Trust isn't going to be able to preempt the conclusion though. |
As it shouldn’t. However a trust feedback or comment on the judgement would be appropriate given the Trust’s standing as a shareholder. | | | |
| Today’s court case on 18:14 - Jan 6 with 1980 views | Uxbridge |
| Today’s court case on 17:58 - Jan 6 by AguycalledJack |
As it shouldn’t. However a trust feedback or comment on the judgement would be appropriate given the Trust’s standing as a shareholder. |
I'd tend to agree. We'll see I guess, on both counts. [Post edited 6 Jan 2018 18:15]
| |
| |
| Today’s court case on 18:29 - Jan 6 with 1933 views | PozuelosSideys |
If a settlement is agreed out of court, chances are nothing will be allowed to be disclosed anyway |  |
| "Michu, Britton and Williams could have won 3-0 on their own. They wouldn't have required a keeper." | | Poll: | Hattricks |
| |
| Today’s court case on 18:50 - Jan 6 with 1900 views | QJumpingJack |
The fact that it has reached court level may suggest that the Americans and Huw J are confident of winning? | | | |
| Today’s court case on 18:55 - Jan 6 with 1894 views | Whiterockin |
| Today’s court case on 18:50 - Jan 6 by QJumpingJack |
The fact that it has reached court level may suggest that the Americans and Huw J are confident of winning? |
I think what has come out in this court case has strengthened the trusts case if they went to court over the share sale. | | | |
| Today’s court case on 19:04 - Jan 6 with 1862 views | Swanzay |
| Today’s court case on 18:50 - Jan 6 by QJumpingJack |
The fact that it has reached court level may suggest that the Americans and Huw J are confident of winning? |
Opposite way around... |  | | |
| Today’s court case on 19:16 - Jan 6 with 1846 views | thornabyswan |
| Today’s court case on 19:04 - Jan 6 by Swanzay |
Opposite way around... |
I am a bit surprised the owners have done this are they confident of winning the case Can t see that myself.
Do they have a buyer lined up and are they passing the problem on.
It just doesn't make any sense but I smell a rat. | |
| |
| |
By continuing to use the site, you agree to our use of cookies and to abide by our Terms and Conditions.
