| Danny Ings - Why not? 01:03 - Feb 9 with 3969 views | MorSwan |
It may seem a little silly to suggest but... why don't we go for him? I know Liverpool and Sociedad are interested but realistically he wouldn't go in ahead of Sturridge at Liverpool and I doubt he'd want to move away from the Premier League.
His wages won't be high at Burnley, probably no more than £15k considering he hasn't signed a new contact since they've been in the Prem so if we offered £40-50k a week given he'd sign on a bosman so we could risk it? Did that for Gomis and even paid him £3m to join and look how bad he is? Monk has literally been pressured in to playing him because of the guys ego and he isn't repaying the favour.
Who agrees? |  |
| |  |
| Danny Ings - Why not? on 01:59 - Feb 9 with 3945 views | JethroJack |
Ings isn't a bad shout.
But to say GM has been pressured into playing Gomis is bollox. |  | | |
| Danny Ings - Why not? on 02:10 - Feb 9 with 3940 views | MorSwan |
| Danny Ings - Why not? on 01:59 - Feb 9 by JethroJack |
Ings isn't a bad shout.
But to say GM has been pressured into playing Gomis is bollox. |
We'll see at West Brom because if he's in ahead of Oliveira then he's definitely not in there on form. I would love to see Oliveira in ahead of him. | |
| |
| Danny Ings - Why not? on 02:47 - Feb 9 with 3916 views | JethroJack |
| Danny Ings - Why not? on 02:10 - Feb 9 by MorSwan |
We'll see at West Brom because if he's in ahead of Oliveira then he's definitely not in there on form. I would love to see Oliveira in ahead of him. |
GM gets accused of picking his "mates" & now of being pressured into picking Gomis. Maybe that's why "mate" Leon finds himself down the DM pecking order now we have Ki back & signed Cork & also have Carrol & Fulton ahead of him. In Bafe's case, Oliveira is the only other option, so its hardly a case that GM is being pressured to play him because of his ego, as was suggested above. [Post edited 9 Feb 2015 2:49]
| | | |
| Danny Ings - Why not? on 02:49 - Feb 9 with 3907 views | Parlay |
| Danny Ings - Why not? on 02:10 - Feb 9 by MorSwan |
We'll see at West Brom because if he's in ahead of Oliveira then he's definitely not in there on form. I would love to see Oliveira in ahead of him. |
But Oliviera isn't ours. Id much prefer bed someone in than play somebody else's player. Bony didn't hit the ground running either and Bafe has far much mire proven pedigree than Oliviera.
If Bafe is in Garry's long terms plans then the smart move is to keep playing him, ive been frustrated with Monk over the last few weeks and months but we cant lay that at his door. To play Bafe is the right call. |  |
| |
| Danny Ings - Why not? on 02:55 - Feb 9 with 3905 views | MorSwan |
| Danny Ings - Why not? on 02:49 - Feb 9 by Parlay |
But Oliviera isn't ours. Id much prefer bed someone in than play somebody else's player. Bony didn't hit the ground running either and Bafe has far much mire proven pedigree than Oliviera.
If Bafe is in Garry's long terms plans then the smart move is to keep playing him, ive been frustrated with Monk over the last few weeks and months but we cant lay that at his door. To play Bafe is the right call. |
Yeah I agree, but I just can't stand him. I'd be really worried if Gomis is leading our line for years to come. | |
| |
| Danny Ings - Why not? on 07:06 - Feb 9 with 3822 views | karnataka |
| Danny Ings - Why not? on 02:55 - Feb 9 by MorSwan |
Yeah I agree, but I just can't stand him. I'd be really worried if Gomis is leading our line for years to come. |
If Gomis is leading our line for years to come it'll only be because he's been consistently banging the goals in surely? [Post edited 9 Feb 2015 7:08]
|  | | |
| Danny Ings - Why not? on 07:24 - Feb 9 with 3794 views | ApeShit |
We won't have a change of signing Danny Ings. |  | | |
| Danny Ings - Why not? on 09:27 - Feb 9 with 3650 views | tomdickharry |
| Danny Ings - Why not? on 07:24 - Feb 9 by ApeShit |
We won't have a change of signing Danny Ings. |
100% correct,spot them before they become so called stars,I suggested some time ago that we sign Callum Wilson of then Coventry as one for the future, still a bit raw at Bournemouth but has scored 17 this season,just watch if they get promoted he will turn out to be a very very good striker. | | | |
Login to get fewer ads
| Danny Ings - Why not? on 09:31 - Feb 9 with 3640 views | Oldjack |
If Burnley sell him they go down ,it's not gonna happen any time soon |  |
| Prosser the Tosser dwells on Phil's bum hole like a rusty old hemorrhoid ,fact
You Greedy Bastards Get Out Of OUR Club!
|
| |
| Danny Ings - Why not? on 09:50 - Feb 9 with 3612 views | QuakerJack |
| Danny Ings - Why not? on 02:49 - Feb 9 by Parlay |
But Oliviera isn't ours. Id much prefer bed someone in than play somebody else's player. Bony didn't hit the ground running either and Bafe has far much mire proven pedigree than Oliviera.
If Bafe is in Garry's long terms plans then the smart move is to keep playing him, ive been frustrated with Monk over the last few weeks and months but we cant lay that at his door. To play Bafe is the right call. |
I understand the concept Parlay but I don't see Gomis as a long term fixture for us. He's pushing 30 as it is, he's not playing well, not scoring goals and after everything that's been said the last few months I don't give a damn about developing him because if he hits any kind of form we all know he'll start again pushing for a big move.
Oliveira is 23... if he comes in and starts scoring then that's good for the team, it also means we could look at a permanent move if we think he's that good or at least a year's loan.... we had De Guzman in the team regularly remember.
If not him then Gorre.... or my 1 year old niece.... anyone but that mercenary. |  |
| |
| Danny Ings - Why not? (n/t) on 09:53 - Feb 9 with 3607 views | Amy |
| Danny Ings - Why not? on 09:31 - Feb 9 by Oldjack |
If Burnley sell him they go down ,it's not gonna happen any time soon |
[Post edited 9 Feb 2015 9:57]
| | | |
| Danny Ings - Why not? on 09:55 - Feb 9 with 3601 views | jackonicko |
| Danny Ings - Why not? on 02:55 - Feb 9 by MorSwan |
Yeah I agree, but I just can't stand him. I'd be really worried if Gomis is leading our line for years to come. |
If he knocks a few goals in, you'll soon forget all about it.
Didn't take us long to get over Leon leaving for more money. |  | | |
| Danny Ings - Why not? on 10:35 - Feb 9 with 3519 views | eddie71 |
Ings will go to Liverpool. | | | |
| Danny Ings - Why not? on 10:39 - Feb 9 with 3515 views | ScoobyWho |
| Danny Ings - Why not? on 02:49 - Feb 9 by Parlay |
But Oliviera isn't ours. Id much prefer bed someone in than play somebody else's player. Bony didn't hit the ground running either and Bafe has far much mire proven pedigree than Oliviera.
If Bafe is in Garry's long terms plans then the smart move is to keep playing him, ive been frustrated with Monk over the last few weeks and months but we cant lay that at his door. To play Bafe is the right call. |
Gomis shouldn't be in the clubs long term plans, he is trouble.
He was trouble in France and he is trouble here.
Fck him off. |  |
| |
| Danny Ings - Why not? on 10:50 - Feb 9 with 3500 views | monmouth |
I wondered when Leon would be mentioned, unless I've missed a thread, but yeah, anyone who thinks Monk picks his mates needs to have a little look at that situation. It's surprised me to be honest, but something's gone sour there maybe. Monk said very clearly in the press conference when asked, 'Leon is fit'. But he's not in the team and he's not on the bench - Fulton is cover for Cork. Thanks for the memories Leon? |  |
| |
| Danny Ings - Why not? on 11:41 - Feb 9 with 3458 views | LeonisGod |
| Danny Ings - Why not? on 10:35 - Feb 9 by eddie71 |
Ings will go to Liverpool. |
Hasn't he already signed a pre-contract arrangement with them? There was paper talk about it, although I don't know whether it was ever confirmed.
We've a snowball in hell's chance of signing him if teams like that are interested. |  | | |
| Danny Ings - Why not? on 16:54 - Feb 9 with 3311 views | Huw57 |
You do realize even if/when Ings signs for someone on a bosman Burnley could claim around 5Mish in compensation. |  |
| |
| Danny Ings - Why not? on 17:45 - Feb 9 with 3246 views | ItchySphincter |
| Danny Ings - Why not? on 07:24 - Feb 9 by ApeShit |
We won't have a change of signing Danny Ings. |
You are right.
He's average and overpriced and someone like Liverpool will buy him, chew him up and spit him out. |  |
| |
| Danny Ings - Why not? on 18:22 - Feb 9 with 3215 views | hobo |
| Danny Ings - Why not? on 16:54 - Feb 9 by Huw57 |
You do realize even if/when Ings signs for someone on a bosman Burnley could claim around 5Mish in compensation. |
Bargain. Let's snap him up on a pre-contract now |  | | |
| Danny Ings - Why not? on 18:42 - Feb 9 with 3177 views | max936 |
| Danny Ings - Why not? on 09:31 - Feb 9 by Oldjack |
If Burnley sell him they go down ,it's not gonna happen any time soon |
Well nobody can sign him now Alan the windows closed mun.
Would be a great signing for us in the summer though, but I think we'd be out priced for him, think we'll have to look elsewhere, Im still hoping Gomis will step up though, think he still needs a few more games, the effort is there though, so the signs are good. [Post edited 9 Feb 2015 18:44]
|  |
| |
| Danny Ings - Why not? on 19:44 - Feb 9 with 3114 views | AJ101 |
| Danny Ings - Why not? on 11:41 - Feb 9 by LeonisGod |
Hasn't he already signed a pre-contract arrangement with them? There was paper talk about it, although I don't know whether it was ever confirmed.
We've a snowball in hell's chance of signing him if teams like that are interested. |
They would have to agree a fee with Burnley before agreeing a pre-contract which seems unlikely as I imagine Burnley will want Ings focussed on their games not contract talks with Liverpool. Only foreign clubs can bypass Burnley and talk to him now and no that doesn't mean Swansea!
Compensation will probably be ~£4m (including plenty of add-ons) or so based on previous cases but it's a bit of a guess as there's no set formula but as he's only played one season in the PL I don't think there's any way Burnley are going to get the £5.5m they say they'd want, if I was the "buying" club I'd let it go to a tribunal before stumping up over £4m.
I can see quite a few clubs going. Liverpool, Spurs, Southampton, Everton and even Man City(considering their need for home grown players) from what I've heard from he's a pretty mature level headed guy so I'd expect him to go somewhere he's going to get plenty of game time. |  | | |
| |
By continuing to use the site, you agree to our use of cookies and to abide by our Terms and Conditions.
